SHRM Survey Findings: Job Analysis Activities In collaboration with and commissioned by ACT December 11, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Financial Stress In collaboration with and commissioned by June 25, 2014.
Advertisements

SHRM Survey Findings: 2014 Strategic Benefits— Flexible Work Arrangements January 22, 2015.
SHRM Survey Findings: HR Professionals’ Perceptions About Performance Management Effectiveness In collaboration with and commissioned by the National Center.
SHRM Survey Findings: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—Professional Services Industry September 25, 2013.
June 23, 2011 SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Recognition Programs In collaboration with and commissioned by Globoforce.
SHRM Survey Findings: 2015 Holiday Schedules November 10, 2014.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Flexible Work Arrangements December 18, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: Vacation’s Impact on the Workplace In collaboration with and commissioned by November 12, 2013.
SHRM/Globoforce Survey: Employee Recognition Programs, Fall ©SHRM 2012 SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Recognition Programs, Fall 2012 In collaboration.
SHRM Survey Findings: Social Networking Websites and Recruiting/Selection April 11, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: Paid Leave in the Workplace
The Use of Criminal Background Checks in Hiring Decisions ©SHRM 2012 July 19, 2012 SHRM Survey Findings: Background Checking—The Use of Criminal Background.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Communicating Benefits January 10, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Communicating Benefits December 18, 2013.
June 13, 2011 SHRM Poll: Relief Efforts for Victims of the Japan Earthquake and Tsunami.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Benefits in California—Communicating Benefits April 23, 2014.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Benefits in California— Flexible Work Arrangements April 23, 2014.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employing People With Disabilities: Practices and Policies Related to Recruiting and Hiring Employees With Disabilities. In collaboration.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employing People with Disabilities - Practices and Policies Related to Retention and Advancement for Employees With Disabilities.
April 12, 2012 SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Recognition Programs, Winter 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Globoforce.
July 12, 2012 SHRM Survey Findings: Work/Life Balance Policies.
July 12, 2012 SHRM Survey Findings: Technology and Its Impact on Employees During Nonworking Hours.
SHRM Survey Findings: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—High-Tech Industry September 25, 2013.
February 2012 SHRM Poll: Smoking Policies in the Workplace.
SHRM Survey Findings: Virtual Teams July 13, 2012.
May 9, 2011 SHRM Poll: Staff Levels and the Use of Contingent and Part-time Workers.
August 31, 2011 SHRM Poll: Disaster Planning in Organizations 10 Years After the Sept. 11 Terrorist Attacks.
SHRM Survey Findings: 2014 Older Workers Survey In collaboration with and commissioned by the Sloan Foundation September xx, 2014.
SHRM Survey Findings: The Use of Office Pools April 25, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employing People with Disabilities - Practices and Policies Related to Accessibility and Accommodation for Employees With Disabilities.
© 2005 SHRM SHRM Weekly Online Survey: March 15, 2005 Hiring Decisions Sample comprised of 282 randomly selected HR professionals. Analyzing 282 response.
SHRM Survey Findings: An Examination of How Social Media is Embedded in Business Strategy and Operations ©SHRM 2011 January 2012 SHRM Survey Findings:
Sponsored by AETNA June 29, 2011 SHRM Poll: The State of Consumer-Directed Health Plans in the Workplace.
SHRM Survey Findings: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—Manufacturing Industry September 25, 2013.
SHRM Poll: Employee Discount Programs February 15, 2012.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Benefits in California—Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees April 23, 2014.
SHRM Survey Findings: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—State and Local Government September 25, 2013.
August 16, 2011 SHRM Poll: Managing Employee Absences.
Social Networking Websites and Identifying Potential Job Candidates ©SHRM 2011 June 20, 2011 SHRM Poll: Social Networking Websites for Identifying and.
SHRM Survey Findings: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—Construction, Mining, Oil and Gas Industry September 25, 2013.
SHRM/DATIA Poll: Drug Testing Efficacy ©SHRM 2011 September 7, 2011 SHRM Poll: Drug Testing Efficacy In collaboration with and commissioned by the Drug.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees January 10, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: 2014 Holiday Schedules October 15, 2013.
June 6, 2011 SHRM Poll: Succession Planning. Succession Planning ©SHRM 2011 Key Findings 2  What percentage of organizations currently have succession.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees January 10, 2013.
October 15, 2015 SHRM Survey Findings: 2015 Strategic Benefits— Wellness Initiatives.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Benefits in California—Health Care April
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Wellness Initiatives December 18, 2013.
December 1, 2011 SHRM Poll: 2011Holiday Parties Holiday Parties ©SHRM 2011 Key Findings 2  Do organizations plan to have a 2011 end-of-year or.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Benefits in California— Wellness Initiatives April 23, 2014.
SHRM Survey Findings: Virtual Teams
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Recognition Programs, Fall 2012
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees December 18, 2013.
SHRM Poll: Performance Management and Other Workplace Practices
SHRM Poll: Personality Tests for the Hiring and Promotion of Employees
SHRM Poll: Managing Employee Absences
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Holiday/Year-End Activities
SHRM Survey Findings: 2012 Holiday/Year-End Activities
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Communicating Benefits January 10, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Recognition Programs, Winter 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Globoforce April 12, 2012.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Benefits in California—Health Care
SHRM Poll: Smoking Policies in the Workplace
SHRM Survey Findings: Background Checking—The Use of Criminal Background Checks in Hiring Decisions July 19, 2012.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Wellness Initiatives December 18, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: Technology and Its Impact on Employees During Nonworking Hours July 16, 2012.
SHRM Survey Findings: The Hiring of 2012 University/College Undergraduates and Postgraduates July xx, 2012.
SHRM Survey Findings: The Hiring of 2012 University/College Undergraduates and Postgraduates July 12, 2012.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees December 18, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Benefits in California—Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees April 23, 2014.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Recognition Programs, Fall 2012
Presentation transcript:

SHRM Survey Findings: Job Analysis Activities In collaboration with and commissioned by ACT December 11, 2014

In this research, respondents were asked about activities related to the processes that occur to examine and analyze the activities of a particular job or role within an organization. The analysis can result in information that includes the tasks or competencies of the job/role; the knowledge, skills and abilities required for successful performance in the job/role; and the conditions under which the responsibilities are performed. These types of activities are often referred to as a job analysis. Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Definitions

What methods and tools did organizations use to conduct job analysis activities? The leading methods to conduct job analysis were interview (50%), observation (33%) and structured questionnaires (27%). Organizations with 25,000 or more employees were more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to use structured questionnaires to conduct job analysis activities. Over two-fifths (44%) of organizations used tools that were specifically designed for their organization, and one-quarter (26%) used online job analysis tools. What types of information did organizations collect when conducting job analysis activities? The most common types of information organizations collected when conducting job analysis activities were knowledge (96%), skills (95%), abilities (92%) and task statements (90%). How did organizations use information collected through job analysis activities? Nearly three-quarters of organizations used the information collected through job analysis activities for recruitment (73%) and performance standards (72%). Other purposes included compensation (69%) and training (61%). For what job levels did organizations conduct job analysis activities? The majority of organizations conducted job analysis activities for management (87%), nonexempt (84%) and professional nonmanagement (80%) job levels. Furthermore, 60% of organizations conducted job analysis activities for executive-level positions. Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Key Findings

What experience did HR professionals have with job analysis? Roughly one-half (51%) of HR professionals have participated in at least one formal or informal job analysis-related activity, and 45% of HR professionals have used information from job analyses for purposes beyond identifying what was required for a job/role, such as developing interview questions and performance appraisal systems. Approximately two out of five HR professionals have conducted job analyses at their current organization. Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Key Findings (continued)

Considering that many HR professionals say they are having trouble finding qualified candidates for open positions at the moment, an accurate job description becomes even more important as an element of the recruiting process. Nearly three-fourths of respondents to this survey said they used information collected through job analysis activities for recruiting. With proper analysis of jobs at all levels of organizations, HR professionals will also have a more effective performance management process. Clearly knowing the responsibilities that come with certain jobs allows for ease of measurement on annual evaluations, periodic reviews, goal attainment and other forms of performance management. HR professionals need a comprehensive understanding of how jobs are performed at all levels of their organizations to perform their own duties. The tasks of managing personnel, developing training guidelines and fulfilling other responsibilities could be much more difficult for HR professionals without an effective job analysis system. Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Implications for the HR Profession

Methods to Conduct Job Analysis Activities Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Note: n = 459. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. Respondents who answered "don't know" were excluded from this analysis.

Methods to Conduct Job Analysis Activities Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Existing sources of information Government (42%)>Publicly owned for-profit (17%) Comparisons by organization sector Government organizations were more likely than publicly owned for-profit organizations to report existing sources of information as a method for identifying the knowledge, skills, abilities and competencies required for a job/role.

Methods to Conduct Job Analysis Activities Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Checklists 25,000 or more employees (42%)>500 to 2,499 employees (18%) Comparisons by organization staff size Larger organizations were more likely than smaller organizations to report checklists, structured questionnaires and technical conference/focus groups as methods for identifying the knowledge, skills, abilities and competencies required for a job/role. Structured questionnaires 25,000 or more employees (38%)>1 to 99 employees (13%) Technical conference/focus groups 25,000 or more employees (36%)>1 to 99 employees (13%)

Tools for Conducting Job Analysis Activities Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Note: n = 388. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. Respondents whose organizations do not use or were unsure about methods associated with job analysis activities were not asked this question. Respondents who answered "don't know" were excluded from this analysis.

Tools for Conducting Job Analysis Activities Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Survey software 500 to 2,499 employees (23%)>1 to 99 employees (2%) Comparisons by organization staff size Larger organizations were more likely than smaller organizations to use survey software and tools designed specifically for their organization when identifying the knowledge, skills, abilities and competencies required for a job/role. Tools designed specifically for my organization 25,000 or more employees (69%)>100 to 499 employees (40%)

Information Collected in Job Analysis Activities Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Note: n = Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple responses. Respondents whose organizations do not use or were unsure about methods associated with job analysis activities were not asked this question. Responses for this question were as follows: yes, no and don’t know. Respondents who answered "don't know" were excluded from this analysis. Only respondents who answered “yes” are shown. Percentage Knowledge (i.e., specific types of information people need to perform a job such as an understanding HIPAA regulations) 96% Skills (i.e., practiced acts such as writing clearly or operating a crane) 95% Abilities (i.e., stable capacity to engage in a specific behavior such as lifting objects weighing up to 50 pounds or climbing ladders up to 25 feet) 92% Task statements (i.e., list of activities performed on the job) 90% The types of tools and technology that are used in the job89% Requirement/qualification of knowledge, skills and abilities at time of appointment 86% Competencies (i.e., set of defined behaviors that are used to identify, evaluate and develop employees) 84% Job context (e.g., purpose of job within the organization or work environment) 80% Ratings for knowledge, skills, abilities (e.g., importance, criticality, frequency) 64% Performance criteria (e.g., standards for each performance level) 64%

Information Collected in Job Analysis Activities (continued) Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Note: n = Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple responses. Respondents whose organizations do not use or were unsure about methods associated with job analysis activities were not asked this question. Responses for this question were as follows: yes, no and don’t know. Respondents who answered "don't know" were excluded from this analysis. Only respondents who answered “yes” are shown. Percentage Ratings for tasks (e.g., importance, criticality, frequency, difficulty) 61% Ratings for competencies (e.g., importance, criticality, frequency) 58% Other characteristics (e.g., personality, interests, work styles, values) 55% Consequences of error36%

Information Collected in Job Analysis Activities Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Ratings for tasks Publicly owned for-profit (75%)>Privately owned for-profit (52%) Comparisons by organization sector Publicly owned for-profit organizations were more likely than privately owned for- profit organizations to collect ratings for tasks and ratings for competencies when identifying the knowledge, skills, abilities and competencies required for a job/role. Ratings for competencies Publicly owned for-profit (74%)>Privately owned for-profit (50%)

Information Collected in Job Analysis Activities Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Ratings for tasks 2,500 to 24,999 employees (75%)>100 to 499 employees (48%) Comparisons by organization staff size Organizations with 2,500 to 24,999 employees were more likely than organizations with 100 to 499 employees to collect ratings for tasks when identifying the knowledge, skills, abilities and competencies required for a job/role.

Purposes for Job Analysis Activities Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Note: n = 344. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple responses. Respondents whose organizations do not use or were unsure about methods associated with job analysis activities were not asked this question. Respondents who answered "don't know" were excluded from this analysis. Percentage Recruitment73% Performance standards/appraisals72% Compensation (e.g., classification and pay)69% Training61% Employee development58% Selection54% Workforce planning/organizational design45% Succession planning43% Disability or return-to-work accommodation38% Legal support (e.g., ADA compliance, termination, workers’ compensation) 33% High-potential identification and development27% Test identification, test development and/or test validation15% Other1%

Purposes for Job Analysis Activities Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workforce planning Publicly owned for-profit (62%)>Privately owned for-profit (36%) Comparisons by organization sector Publicly owned for-profit organizations were more likely than privately owned for- profit organizations to use information identifying the knowledge, skills, abilities and competencies required for a job/role for workforce planning. Succession planning Publicly owned for-profit (64%)> Privately owned for-profit (39%) Nonprofit (31%) Publicly owned for-profit organizations were more likely than privately owned for- profit and nonprofit organizations to use information identifying the knowledge, skills, abilities and competencies required for a job/role for succession planning.

Purposes for Job Analysis Activities Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Compensation Nonprofit (80%)>Privately owned for-profit (60%) Comparisons by organization sector Nonprofit organizations were more likely than privately owned for-profit organizations to use information identifying the knowledge, skills, abilities and competencies required for a job/role for compensation.

Job Levels Used for Job Analysis Activities Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Note: n = 344. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple responses. Respondents whose organizations do not use or were unsure about methods associated with job analysis activities were not asked this question. Respondents who answered "don't know" were excluded from this analysis.

Job Levels Used for Job Analysis Activities Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Executive level Nonprofit (78%)>Privately owned for-profit (51%) Comparisons by organization sector Nonprofit organizations were more likely than privately owned for-profit organizations to identify the knowledge, skills, abilities and competencies required for a job/role for executives and nonexempt job levels. Professional nonmanagement level Nonprofit (94%)> Publicly owned for-profit (74%) Privately owned for-profit (71%) Nonexempt level Nonprofit (95%)>Privately owned for-profit (80%) Nonprofit organizations were more likely than publicly owned for-profit and privately owned for-profit organizations to identify the knowledge, skills, abilities and competencies required for a job/role for professional nonmanagement job levels.

Job Levels Used for Job Analysis Activities Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Executive level 2,500 to 24,999 employees (70%)>100 to 499 employees (47%) Comparisons by organization staff size Organizations with 2,500 to 24,999 employees were more likely than organizations with 100 to 499 employees to identify the knowledge, skills, abilities and competencies required for a job/role for the executive job level.

Job Candidate Evaluation Methods Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Note: n = 344. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple responses. Respondents whose organizations do not use or were unsure about methods associated with job analysis activities were not asked this question. Respondents who answered "don't know" were excluded from this analysis. Percentage Behavioral interviews: job specific and prepared in advance.62% Online, minimum qualifications screening questionnaires: questions that may eliminate/disqualify candidates from the recruiting process. 41% Skills testing: assessing the level of a practiced activity such as writing, blueprint reading and computer programming. 38% Interviews with behaviorally anchored rating scales: answer keys used to evaluate candidate responses and rating methods that produce a numeric score. 26% Situational judgment questionnaires: choosing a response when given a scenario. 23% Organizational fit questionnaires: questions that evaluate organization-relevant factors such as team based, entrepreneurial and traditional. 23% Personality testing: assessing personality traits such as persuasiveness, detail orientation, conscientiousness, rule following, optimism, goal orientation, data rational and boredom proneness. 22% Aptitude testing: assessing the level of abilities in areas such as problem-solving and critical reasoning. 18% Scorable job applications: numeric values placed on experience, skills, etc. 16%

Job Candidate Evaluation Methods (continued) Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Note: n = 344. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple responses. Respondents whose organizations do not use or were unsure about methods associated with job analysis activities were not asked this question. Respondents who answered "don't know" were excluded from this analysis. Percentage Cognitive skills testing: assessing the level of abilities in areas such as reading and mathematics. 16% Online, realistic job preview (RJP): an overview of the job demands with questions to confirm interest in continuing the application process. 12% Biodata questionnaires: standardized questions on verifiable school/work history, reported in scales such as reliability, dependability and safety. 7% Simulations: interactive experience that models job demands.7% Assessment centers: formal observation under controlled conditions. 6% Virtual job tryouts: completing online work samples.2% Other2%

Job Candidate Evaluation Methods Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Interviews with behaviorally anchored rating scales Publicly owned for-profit (39%)>Privately owned for-profit (18%) Comparisons by organization sector Publicly owned for-profit organizations were more likely than privately owned for- profit organizations to use or plan to use interview with behaviorally anchored rating scales, online minimum qualification screening questionnaires and biodata questionnaires within the next 12 months to evaluate job candidates for hiring. Online, minimum qualifications screening questionnaires Publicly owned for-profit (58%)>Privately owned for-profit (30%) Biodata questionnaires Publicly owned for-profit (14%)>Privately owned for-profit (3%)

Job Candidate Evaluation Methods Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Online, realistic job previews Publicly owned for-profit (24%)> Privately owned for-profit (8%) Nonprofit (3%) Comparisons by organization sector Publicly owned for-profit organizations were more likely than privately owned for- profit and nonprofit organizations to use or plan to use online, realistic job previews within the next 12 months to evaluate job candidates for hiring. Personality testing Publicly owned for-profit (27%) Privately owned for-profit (26%) >Government (4%) Publicly owned for-profit and privately owned for-profit organizations were more likely than government organizations to use or plan to use personality testing within the next 12 months to evaluate job candidates for hiring.

Job Candidate Evaluation Methods Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Online minimum qualification screening questionnaires 2,500 to 24,999 employees (53%)>100 to 499 employees (27%) Comparisons by organization staff size Organizations with 2,500 to 24,999 employees were more likely than organizations with 100 to 499 employees to use or plan to use online minimum qualification screening questionnaires within the next 12 months to evaluate job candidates for hiring.

HR Professionals’ Experience with Job Analysis Activities Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Note: n = 339. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple responses. Respondents whose organizations do not use or were unsure about methods associated with job analysis activities were not asked this question. Percentage I have conducted job analyses at my current organization.41% I have conducted job analyses at a previous organization.39% I have used information from job analyses for purposes beyond identifying what was required for a job/role such as developing interview questions and performance appraisal systems. 45% I have taken one or more courses that covered job analysis. 30% I have a certification that covers job analysis.15% I have participated in at least one formal or informal activity associated with job analysis. 51% I have no experience with any formal or informal activities associated with job analysis. 15% Other1%

Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Demographics

Demographics: Organization Industry Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Note: n = 392. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. Percentage Professional, scientific and technical services18% Health care and social assistance15% Manufacturing15% Government agencies11% Finance and insurance9% Educational services8% Transportation and warehousing7% Accommodation and food services6% Retail trade6% Administrative and support and waste management and remediation services 5% Construction5%

Demographics: Organization Industry (continued) Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Note: n = 392. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. Percentage Utilities5% Information4% Wholesale trade4% Arts, entertainment, and recreation3% Real estate and rental and leasing3% Religious, grant-making, civic, professional and similar organizations 3% Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting2% Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction2% Repair and maintenance2% Personal and laundry services1% Other2%

Demographics: Organization Sector Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM n = 385

Demographics: Organization Staff Size Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Note: n = 387. Percentages do not equal 100% due to rounding.

n = 394 Demographics: Other Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM U.S.-based operations only 70% Multinational operations 30% Single-unit organization: An organization in which the location and the organization are one and the same. 26% Multi-unit organization: An organization that has more than one location. 74% Multi-unit headquarters determines HR policies and practices 47% Each work location determines HR policies and practices 4% A combination of both the work location and the multi-unit headquarters determines HR policies and practices 50% Is your organization a single-unit organization or a multi-unit organization? For multi-unit organizations, are HR policies and practices determined by the multi-unit headquarters, by each work location or by both? Does your organization have U.S.-based operations (business units) only, or does it operate multinationally? n = 397 Note: n = 305. Percentages do not equal 100% due to rounding. Corporate (companywide) 69% Business unit/division16% Facility/location14% Note: n = 304. Percentages do not equal 100% due to rounding. What is the HR department/function for which you responded throughout this survey?

33 SHRM Survey Findings: Job Analysis Activities Response rate = 16% 459 HR professionals from a randomly selected sample of SHRM’s membership participated in this survey Margin of error +/-5% Survey fielded September 11-October 15, 2014 In collaboration with and commissioned by ACT Survey Methodology Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM 2014

Job Analysis Resource Page Performing Job Analysis Toolkit Job Analysis: Desk Audit Review Sample Form Resources for HR Educators: Job Analysis-Based Performance Appraisal Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM Additional SHRM Resources

For more survey/poll findings, visit shrm.org/surveysshrm.org/surveys For more information about SHRM’s Customized Research Services, visit shrm.org/customizedresearchshrm.org/customizedresearch Follow us on Twitter Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM About SHRM Research

Founded in 1948, the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) is the world’s largest HR membership organization devoted to human resource management. Representing more than 275,000 members in over 160 countries, the Society is the leading provider of resources to serve the needs of HR professionals and advance the professional practice of human resource management. SHRM has more than 575 affiliated chapters within the United States and subsidiary offices in China, India and United Arab Emirates. Visit us at shrm.org.shrm.org Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM About SHRM

ACT is a mission-driven, nonprofit organization dedicated to helping people achieve education and workplace success. Headquartered in Iowa City, Iowa, ACT is trusted as the nation’s leader in college and career readiness, providing high-quality achievement assessments grounded in more than 50 years of research and experience. ACT offers a uniquely integrated set of solutions that help people succeed from elementary school through career, providing insights that unlock potential. To learn more about ACT, go to Job Analysis Activities ©SHRM About ACT