Performance Evaluation and the Balanced Scorecard

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2002 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Rewarding Business Performance Chapter 24.
Advertisements

Measuring Up: Performance Reporting and Measuring
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2002 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Decision Making is pushed down. Delegation of Decision Making (Decentralization) Decentralization.
Management Control Systems
Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 18 Organizational Design, Responsibility Accounting, and Evaluation.
Evaluation of Investment Centers Managerial Accounting Prepared by Diane Tanner University of North Florida Chapter 24.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 McGraw-Hill/Irwin 25-1 REWARDING BUSINESS PERFORMANCE Chapter 25.
Chapter 12 Decentralization and Performance Evaluation
Performance Management and Evaluation – Chapter 21 Financial & Managerial Accounting, 8 th Edition by Needles, Powers, Crosson.
CHAPTER 11 Performance Measurement, Compensation,
CHAPTER 23 Performance Measurement, Compensation,
Chapter 15 Chapter 15 Performance Evaluation and Compensation Key Topics: –Agency theory –Knowledge and assigning decision-making authority –Performance.
Performance Measurement, Compensation, and Multinational Considerations Chapter 23.
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
©2005 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 13/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton Management Control Systems and Responsibility.
ROI, Residual Income, and Economic Value Added
Performance Measurement in Decentralized Organizations
Performance Evaluation and the Balanced Scorecard
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Chapter 24 1.
Based on Chapter 13, Cost Accounting, 12th ed. Horngren et al., Edited and Modified by C. Bailey 1.
Performance Measurement Chapter 23. Financial and Nonfinancial Performance Measures Some organizations present financial and nonfinancial performance.
PowerPoint Authors: Susan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPA Charles W. Caldwell, D.B.A., CMA Jon A. Booker, Ph.D., CPA, CIA Cynthia J. Rooney, Ph.D., CPA Copyright.
©2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publically accessible website, in whole or in part.
Decentralized Performance Evaluation
Copyright © by Houghton Miffin Company. All rights reserved.1 Financial & Managerial Accounting 2002e Belverd E. Needles, Jr. Marian Powers Susan Crosson.
RESPONSIBILITY ACCOUNTING. Responsibility Center Types  Underlying the accounting classifications of responsibility centers is the concept of controllability:
9 - 1 ©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton Chapter 9 Management Control Systems.
Copyright © 2008 Prentice Hall All rights reserved 12-1 Performance Evaluation and the Balanced Scorecard Chapter 12.
Performance Evaluation and the Balanced Scorecard
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Performance Measurement, Compensation, and Multinational Considerations.
Prepared by: Rasha El Hagrassy Creating Cause-and-Effect Linkages 1. Develop objectives and measures for each of the four perspectives.  The business.
AC239 Unit 8 Chapter 24 Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2008 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Financial & Managerial Accounting The Basis for Business Decisions FOURTEENTH EDITION Williams.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
©2004 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Introduction to Management Accounting, 2/e Werner/Jones Chapter 09 Decentralization: Segmented Reporting.
Evaluation and Control
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Performance Evaluation Chapter 10 1.
Accounting 3020 Chapter 12 – Segment Reporting, Decentralization, and Balanced Scorecard.
Chapter 24 Responsibility Accounting and Performance Evaluation
ACCT 2302 Fundamentals of Accounting II Spring 2011 Lecture 15 Professor Jeff Yu.
Chapter 23. Explain why and how companies decentralize.
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Performance Measurement, Compensation, and Multinational Considerations.
PowerPoint Authors: Susan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPA Charles W. Caldwell, D.B.A., CMA Jon A. Booker, Ph.D., CPA, CIA Cynthia J. Rooney, Ph.D., CPA Copyright.
Organizational Design, Responsibility Accounting and Evaluation of Divisional Performance Chapter 18.
PowerPoint Authors: Susan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPA Charles W. Caldwell, D.B.A., CMA Jon A. Booker, Ph.D., CPA, CIA Cynthia J. Rooney, Ph.D., CPA Copyright.
1 PowerPointPresentation by PowerPoint Presentation by Gail B. Wright Professor Emeritus of Accounting Bryant University MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING 10 TH EDITION.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
©2005 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 13/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton ©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,
Introduction The dilemma for companies is to find tools that allow the evaluation of managers at all levels in the organization. How would the evaluation.
Investment Centers and Transfer Pricing CHAPTER 13 Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without.
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved 1 Performance Evaluation and the Balanced Scorecard Chapter 12.
Performance Evaluation Chapter 15 Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
PowerPoint Authors: Susan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPA Charles W. Caldwell, D.B.A., CMA Jon A. Booker, Ph.D., CPA, CIA Cynthia J. Rooney, Ph.D., CPA Copyright.
Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations
Performance Measurement. 2 Performance measures recently introduced or being considered for introduction Balanced Scorecard Approach Economic Value Added.
CORNERSTONES of Managerial Accounting, 5e. © 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part,
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in any manner.
Performance Management and Evaluation 8. Performance Measurement OBJECTIVE 1: Define a performance management and evaluation system, and describe how.
9 - 1 Chapter 9 Management Control Systems and Responsibility Accounting.
Chapter 13 Financial performance measures for investment centres and reward systems.
Responsibility Accounting and Performance Evaluation
Performance Measurement in Decentralized Organizations
CHAPTER 23 Performance Measurement, Compensation,
Performance Measurement in Decentralized Organizations
Decentralization and Performance Evaluation
Performance Measurement
Responsibility Accounting
Performance Measurement in Decentralized Organizations
The Balanced Scorecard
Presentation transcript:

Performance Evaluation and the Balanced Scorecard Chapter 23

Explain why and how companies decentralize Learning Objective 1 Explain why and how companies decentralize

Decentralized Operations Companies decentralize as they grow Split operations into different divisions or operating units Top management delegates decision-making to unit managers Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Decentralization Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Advantages Outweigh Disadvantages Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Responsibility Centers Manager is responsible for: Cost center ? Revenue center Profit center Investment center Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Explain why companies use performance evaluation systems Learning Objective 2 Explain why companies use performance evaluation systems

Performance Measurement When companies decentralize, top management needs a system to communicate goals to subunit managers Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Limitations of Financial Performance Measures Financial measures tend to be lag indicators Management also needs lead indicators Tendency to focus on short-term achievements Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Learning Objective 3 Describe the balanced scorecard and identify key performance indicators for each perspective

Balanced Scorecard Management must consider both financial and operational performance measures Measures should be linked with company goals and strategy Financial measures are only one measure among many Uses key performance indicators Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Examples of critical factors and corresponding KPIs COMPANY GOALS Examples of critical factors and corresponding KPIs CRITICAL FACTORS Customer satisfaction Operational efficiency Employee excellence Financial profitability KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Market share Yield rate Training hours Revenue growth Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Four Perspectives Financial Customer Internal Business Learning and Growth Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Financial Perspective How do we look to shareholders? KPIs: Sales revenue growth Gross margin growth Return on investment Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Customer Perspective How do customers see us? Customer concerns: KPIs: Customer satisfaction Market share Number of customers and repeat customers Rate of on time deliveries Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Internal Business Perspective At what business processes must we excel? Three factors: Innovation Operations Post-sales service Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Learning and Growth Perspective How can we continue to improve and create value? Three factors: Employee capabilities System capabilities Company’s climate for action Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Exercise 23-15, letters a thru k Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Exercise 23-15, letters l thru w Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Use performance reports to evaluate cost, revenue, and profit centers Learning Objective 4 Use performance reports to evaluate cost, revenue, and profit centers

Performance Reports Report financial performance of responsibility centers Cost center Revenue center Profit center Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Performance Reports Management by exception Should focus on information, not blame Some variances are uncontrollable Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Use ROI, RI, and EVA to evaluate investment centers Learning Objective 5 Use ROI, RI, and EVA to evaluate investment centers

Investment Centers Performance measures: Return on investment (ROI) Residual income (RI) Economic value added (EVA) Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Return On Investment (ROI) ? ROI ? ? ? ROI Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

ROI ? Profit margin ? ? Capital turnover ? Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Exercise 23-18 ? % ? % Operating income ROI Total assets Residential ? % $63,700 $196,000 Professional $162,400 ? % $406,000 Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Exercise 23-18 (continued) Operating income Profit margin Sales Residential $63,700 ? % $580,000 Professional $162,400 ? % $1,100,000 Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Exercise 23-18 (continued) Capital turnover Sales Total assets Residential $580,000 ? $196,000 Professional $1,100,000 ? $406,000 Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Exercise 23-18 (continued) Profit margin Capital turnover ROI Residential ? % 2.96 10.98% Professional 2.71 ? % 14.76% Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Residual Income (RI) Compares division’s operating income with minimum operating income expected given the size of the division’s assets Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Residual Income RI ? Minimum acceptable income minus Minimum acceptable income Minimum acceptable income ? Total assets Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Residual Income Advantages Promotes goal congruence better than ROI Incorporates management’s minimum required rate of return Can use different target rates of return for divisions with different levels of risk Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Economic Value Added (EVA) Special type of RI calculation Considerations: Income available to stakeholders Assets used to generate income for stakeholders Minimum rate of return required by stakeholders Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Economic Value Added EVA ? Total assets Current liabilities ? % minus Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Advantages of Performance Measures Return on investments Residual income Economic value added Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

Limitations of Performance Measures Measurement issues Short-term focus Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

End of Chapter 23