Sensor research and algorithm development for corn in ND L.K. Sharma, D.W. Franzen, H. Bu, R. Ashley, G. Endres and J. Teboh North Dakota State University,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
Advertisements

Determine seeding rate and hybrid effects on: Phenotypical and physiological plant measurements Canopy and leaf sensor measurements A goal in precision.
Morteza Mozaffari Soil Testing and Research Laboratory, Marianna Efforts to Improve N Use Efficiency of Corn in Arkansas Highlights of Research in Progress.
INTRODUCTION Figure 1: Seedling germination success by planting technique plus rainfall amount and date at the Poolesville location during fall BC.
Sensor Orientation to maize canopy row and estimating biomass and Nitrogen Status Paul Hodgen, Fernando Solari, Jim Schepers, John Shanahan, Dennis Francis.
N Reflections on Years of Sensor Research Algorithm Development and Jim Schepers.
Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) is estimated to be 33% throughout the world, and can be lower in single, pre-plant applications compared with split nitrogen.
Use of Active Optical Sensor in North Dakota Dave Franzen and Lakesh Sharma, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND.
Relationships Between NDVI and Plant Physical Measurements Beltwide Cotton Conference January 6-10, 2003 Tim Sharp.
Corn and Soybean Production as Affected by Rotational Tillage Systems Jeffrey A. Vetsch* and Gyles W. Randall, Univ. of Minnesota, Southern Research and.
Comparison of Active Optical Sensors
1 CANOPY REFLECTANCE (HRWW AND HRSW) IN SOUTH DAKOTA ECONOMIC OPTIMUM NITROGEN RATE FOR HRSW IN SOUTH DAKOTA Nitrogen Use Efficiency Meeting Cheryl Reese*,
GreenSeekerTM Variable Rate Applicator Equipment and Applications
Comparison of Commercial Crop Canopy Sensors Ken Sudduth Newell Kitchen Scott Drummond USDA-ARS, Columbia, Missouri.
NUE Workshop: Improving NUE using Crop Sensing, Waseca, MN
Sensor Technology in India R.K. Gupta, B. Singh, P. Chandna, R.K. Sharma, M.L. Jat.
Nitrogen Use Efficiency Workshop Canopy Reflectance Signatures: Developing a Crop Need-Based Indicator for Sidedress Application of N Fertilizer to Canola.
Differences b etween Red and Green NDVI, What do they predict and what they don’t predict Shambel Maru.
Preview of Summer 2014 Revision of Corn N Recommendations and N Issues Dave Franzen, PhD Extension Soil Specialist North Dakota State University, Fargo,
New Technology and Strategies for Nitrogen Management.
Determining the Most Effective Growth Stage in Corn Production for Spectral Prediction of Grain Yield and Nitrogen Response Department of Plant and Soil.
Eric C. Miller Jeremiah L. Mullock, Jacob T. Bushong, and William R. Raun NUE Conference Sioux Falls, SD August 5 th, 2014.
Reverse N lookup, sensor based N rates using Weather improved INSEY Nicole Remondet Rationale Weather is an aspect of agricultural sciences that cannot.
AJ Foster Soils 4213 Spring AJ Foster, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University.
Remote sensing of canopy reflectance on a field scale has been proposed as a useful tool for diagnosing nitrogen (N) deficiency of corn plants. Differences.
Optimizing Nitrogen and Irrigation Timing for Corn Fertigation Applications Using Remote Sensing Ray Asebedo, David Mengel, and Randall Nelson Kansas State.
UTILIZATION OF CROP SENSORS TO DETECT COTTON GROWTH AND N NUTRITION
2013 NUE Conference Des Moines, Iowa August 5-7 Jacob T. Bushong.
Active-Crop Sensor Calibration Using the Virtual-Reference Concept K. H. Holland (Holland Scientific) J. S. Schepers (USDA-ARS, retired) 8 th ECPA Conference.
GreenSeeker Sensor Brian Arnall Precision Nutrient Management Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State University.
Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Wade Thomason,
Development of Vegetation Indices as Economic Thresholds for Control of Defoliating Insects of Soybean James BoardVijay MakaRandy PriceDina KnightMatthew.
Effect of micronutrient fertilizer on winter wheat yield
State of Engineering in Precision Agriculture, Boundaries and Limits for Agronomy.
Moving Beyond NDVI for Active Sensing in Cotton
LATE SEASON N APPLICATIONS FOR IRRIGATED HARD RED WHEAT PROTEIN ENHANCEMENT. S.E. Petrie*, Oregon State Univ, B.D. Brown, Univ. of Idaho. Introduction.
N Fertilization in Colorado Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19 th & 20 th Oklahoma State University Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19.
Sensor Based Technologies in Mexico CIMMYT (Dr. Ivan Ortiz-Monasterio ) Oklahoma State University (Yumiko Kanke)
Three Alternative Nitrogen Management Strategies for Cereal Grain Production Brian Arnall Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State.
On-farm Evaluation of Optical Sensor Technology for Variable Rate N Application to Corn in Ontario and Quebec Bao-Luo Ma, and Nicolas Tremblay Eastern.
Generalized Algorithm for Variable Rate Nitrogen Application on Cereal Grains John B. Solie, Regents Professor Biosystems and Agri. Engineering Dept. William.
NFOA for Wheat and Corn. Yield Potential Definitions INSEYIn Season Estimated Yield = NDVI (Feekes 4 to 6)/days from planting to sensing (days.
Weekly NDVI Relationships to Height, Nodes and Productivity Index for Low, Medium, and High Cotton Productivity Zones T. Sharp, G. Evans and A. Salvador.
REAL-TIME CALIBRATION OF ACTIVE CROP SENSOR SYSTEM FOR MAKING IN-SEASON N APPLICATIONS K.H. Holland and J.S. Schepers Holland Scientific and USDA-ARS,
Oklahoma State University Precision Agriculture / Soil Fertility / Soil Nutrient Management Why should Nitrogen Use Efficiencies be improved? What technologies.
Dave Franzen – North Dakota State University Newell Kitchen – USDA-ARS, Columbia, MO Laura Stevens, Richard Ferguson – University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Technology for Crop Production John Nowatzki Extension Ag Machine Systems Specialist.
Theory of Predicting Crop Response to Non-Limiting Nitrogen.
IRRIGATED CORN RESPONSE TO NITROGEN FERTILIZATION IN THE COLORADO ARKANSAS VALLEY Ardell Halvorson 1, Frank Schweissing 2, Michael Bartolo 2, and Curtis.
Drew Tucker and Dave Mengel KSU Agronomy An update on Kansas sensor based N recommendations.
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Laboratory for Agriculture and Environmental Studies Sensor Based Variable Rate N Management in Mid-Atlantic.
Hero Gollany USDA-ARS Pendleton, OR NUE Conference - August 8-10, 2016.
Exploratory Research in Corn
To Side-Dress or Not to Side-Dress (apologies to the Bard of Avon)
Developing Sidedress N Recommendations for Corn in Central PA
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
Evolution of OSU Optical Sensor Based Variable Rate Applicator
Crop-based Approach for In-season N Application
Nutrient rates applied annually in the six treatments
How High Should NUE Be, and Can Knowing Soil N Help Us Get There
EVOLUTION OF NITROGEN REFERENCE STRIPS
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Dave Franzen – North Dakota State University
Contact: Effect of Sulfur Fertilization on Nitrogen Use Efficiency for Spring Wheat and Corn in Minnesota and North Dakota "But if.
REVIEW.
Late-Season Prediction of Wheat Grain Yield and Protein
Gyles Randall and Jeff Vetsch University of Minnesota
Tastes Great. Less Filling
Variability in Corn Response to N Fertilizer along a 1000-ft Hillslope
Reflectance and Sensor Basics
Presentation transcript:

Sensor research and algorithm development for corn in ND L.K. Sharma, D.W. Franzen, H. Bu, R. Ashley, G. Endres and J. Teboh North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND

 Area and production million acre and 5.5 MT million acre and 8.5 MT Corn acreage in North Dakota is increasing at a very high rate in the last 10 years. INTRODUCTION

Day 1 Day 45 Day 80 Day 120 Corn N timeline Application Period of greatest uptake

The first 6 weeks of growth, little N is needed Source: Dr. Jim Schepers, NUE conference presentation, Fargo-

In high clay soils Leaching is not an issue. Downward movement of water in a high clay soil (Fargo soil series) is about inches per hour, or about 1/3 inch per day.

Image taken June 28, 3 days after area was covered by 6 inches of water

Active optical sensors have been identified as a tool to increase nitrogen-use efficiency GreenSeeker™ (Trimble) Holland Crop Circle Sensor™ (Holland Scientific)

Holland Crop Circle-470 LED Red TARGET SENSOR Red Edge User Selected Filters ACS-470 NIR Source: Dr. Jim Schepers, NUE conference presenattion, Fargo-

 Greenseeker emits two bands visible and near infrared: NDVI= (NIR – Red)/(NIR+Red) (774nm reading – 656nm reading)/(774nm + 656nm) Or (774nm reading – 710nm reading)/(774nm + 710nm) (New GreenSeeker)  Crop Circle-470 emit three bands visible, red edge, and near infrared: NDVI= (NIR – Red/(NIR+Red) (760nm reading – 670nm reading)/ ( ) Or NDVI= (NIR – Red Edge/NIR+Red Edge) (760nm reading – 730nm reading)/ ( )

Materials and Methods Locations and Treatments  51 sites were selected in  Six nitrogen treatments: 0, 40, 80, 120, 160, and 200 lb/acre.  Experimental design: Randomized complete block design with four replications.  Plot size: 20 feet long by 10 feet wide  Soil was sampled to 2-feet in depth for residual nitrate- N preplant.  P and K applied, if found deficient and cooperator application not practical

Crop History & Soil Texture  Previous crop  Tillage history  Surface-subsurface soil texture Sensor readings  Approximately 45 samples/row  The NDVI values were averaged for each plot as well as for each treatment.  Both sensors Crop Circle and Greenseeker were used 8 and 12 leaf stage over the top

Location segregation All research Sites No till Sites East High Clay Sites Medium Textured Sites Conventional till Higher yields/lower yields Western sites

SensorWavelength for NDVI G-SBasic Yield Prediction FormulaMinimum INSEY for N rate GSRedV6Yield = ( X INSEY) GSRed EdgeV6Yield = ( X INSEY) CCRedV6Yield = ( X INSEY) CCRed EdgeV6Yield = ( X INSEY) GSRedV12Yield = (71686 X INSEY) GSRed EdgeV12Yield = ( X INSEY) CCRedV12Yield = ( X INSEY) CCRed EdgeV12Yield = ( X INSEY) West River No-Till

SensorWavelength for NDVI G-SBasic Yield Prediction FormulaMinimum INSEY for N rate GSRedV6Yield = (85506 X INSEY) GSRed EdgeV6Yield = ( X INSEY) CCRedV6Yield = (94286 X INSEY) CCRed EdgeV6Yield = ( X INSEY) GSRedV12Yield = ( X INSEY) GSRed EdgeV12Yield = (89991 X INSEY) CCRedV12Yield = ( X INSEY) CCRed EdgeV12Yield = ( X INSEY) High Clay Soils Eastern North Dakota

SensorWavelength for NDVI G-SBasic Yield Prediction FormulaMinimum INSEY for N rate GSRedV6Yield = (59103 X INSEY) GSRed EdgeV6Not established CCRedV6Yield = (91892 X INSEY) CCRed EdgeV6Yield = (55652 X INSEY) GSRedV12Yield = (89116 X INSEY) GSRed EdgeV12Not established CCRedV12Yield = (88306 X INSEY) CCRed EdgeV12Yield = ( X INSEY) Medium Texture Soils Eastern North Dakota

SensorWavelength for NDVI G-SBasic Yield Prediction FormulaMinimum INSEY for N rate GSRedV6Yield = ( X INSEY) GSRed EdgeV6Not established CCRedV6Yield = ( X INSEY) CCRed EdgeV6Not established GSRedV12Not established GSRed EdgeV12Not established CCRedV12Not established CCRed EdgeV12Yield = ( X INSEY) Long-term No-Till Eastern North Dakota

Procedure to use algorithm

INSEY Yield Reference INSEY Reference Yield INSEY in field Field Yield estimate Corn yield difference in kg/ha. X 1.25 % N in corn grain divided by efficiency factor 0.6 = N rate in kg/ha

Example- Reference yield predicted- 120 bushels In-field yield estimated- 60 bushels difference = 60 bushels X 56 lb N/bushel = 3360 pounds X = 42 lb N 42 /0.6 efficiency factor = 70 lb N at that location.

Wavelength evaluation of two ground based active optical sensors to detect sulfur deficiency in corn using N rich within field areas

Locations Tillage System GPS Coordinated Soil Type Planting Dates First Sensing (V6 stage) Second Sensing (V12 stage) Arthur Convention al-tillage 47 o 06’ ” N, 97 o 57’ ” W Coarse-silty, mixed, superactive, frigid Pachic Hapludolls 05/15/1306/20/1307/10/13 OakesNo-till ’38.066’’ N ’55.219’’ Coarse-silty, mixed, superactive, frigid Aeric Calciaquolls 05/11/1306/18/1307/09/13 Tillage system, soil type, planting date and date of the first and second sensing of experimental sites.

Relationship between N rate and Crop circle red edge INSEY (Crop circle red edge wavelength reading/growing degree-days), V6 at Arthur Relationship between N rate and Crop circle red edge INSEY (Crop circle red edge wavelength reading/growing degree-days), V12 at Arthur

Relationship of Crop Circle red edge INSEY (sensor red edge NDVI/growing degree-days from planting to sensing) and N rate, V6 stage at Arthur Relationship of Crop Circle red edge INSEY (sensor red edge NDVI/growing degree-days from planting to sensing) and N rate, V12 stage at Arthur

Overall Conclusion  Multiplying INSEY by the corn height improve the relationship between INSEYS and Yield.  Red edge NDVI is better at 2 nd stage than Red NDVI.  Crop circle red edge was found better as compared to Greenseeker 2 nd stage.  V12 leaf stage was found better in predicting yield as compared to V8.  Inseason N rate algorithm was successfully build with help of sensors.

This algorithms is a starting point for growers. NDSU Computer Science (Anne Denton- a ICPA presenter) are developing a ‘machine learning’ tool, which will help growers to add their data into the existing algorithm to make the algorithm their ‘own’.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Special Thanks Dr. Dave Franzen (PhD Advisor) Dr. Tom DeSutter (PhD Committee member) Dr. R. J. Goos (PhD Committee member) Dr. Joel Ransom (PhD Committee member) Thanks to the North Dakota Corn Council, IPNI and Pioneer Hi-Bred International for their support of this project. Also to Dr. Anne Denton, NDSU Computer Science Department and the National Science Foundation. Also to Honggang Bu, Brad Schmidt and Eric Schultz.