Www.energy.gov/EM 1 Waste Management David Nickless Environmental Management Los Alamos Field Office March 3, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_1 Preferred Alternative Recommended by Core Team Environmental Impact Statement.
Advertisements

Federal Energy and Environmental Regulation Agencies and Laws
1 Transuranic Waste Processing Center Karen Deacon, Deputy Federal Project Director Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management.
1 Status of DOE Cleanup in Idaho Presentation to the “LINE Commission” By Rick Provencher Manager, DOE Idaho Operations Office April 7, 2012 Idaho Falls,
1 Best Practices for Risk-Informed Remedy Selection, Closure, and Post-closure Control for DOE’s Contaminated Sites October 30, 2013.
1 EM Update and Perspective David Huizenga Senior Advisor for Environmental Management 2012 DOE Project Management Workshop April 3, 2012.
1 Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Office of Environmental Management REMAINING CLEANUP OVERVIEW David S. Rhodes Acquisition Integrated.
Disposal of Non-hazardous, Hazardous and Nuclear Waste.
1 Decontamination, Deactivation, and Demolition David S. Rhodes Acquisition Integrated Project Team Chair Environmental Management Los.
National Spent Nuclear Fuel Program Meeting April 14, 2009 Stephen O’Connor, Director Office of Packaging and Transportation.
TRU Waste Processing Center Culture and Successful Implementation of an ISO Certified Environmental Management System Presented at the DOE ISM Conference.
Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation,
1 Hanford Transportation and Packing Overview Presented by: Jim Portsmouth and Marshall Myrick July 2015 CHPRC
Federal Energy and Environmental Regulation Agencies and Laws
Remote-Handled Transuranic Waste Disposition Discussion Meeting of the National Governors’ Association April 12, 2001 U. S. Department of Energy.
Pollution Prevention and Minimization. Pollution Prevention Though an obvious concept, this has been one of the most difficult concepts to implement Congress.
RCRA 101 Michael Gage New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection County Environmental and Waste Enforcement Special Investigations and Oversight.
Scott Surovchak Rocky Flats Site Manager U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) Cleanup and Remedy Implementation at the Rocky.
1 Material Disposal Areas David S. Rhodes Acquisition Integrated Project Team Chair Environmental Management Los Alamos Field Office.
1 presented to National Governors Association Federal Facilities Task Force National Transportation Program: A Policy Perspective J. Kent Hancock, Director.
1 Project Management, Support Functions, and Integration David S. Rhodes Acquisition Integrated Project Team Chair Environmental Management.
Performance Assessment Issues in Waste Management and Environmental Protection Annual Meeting of the Baltimore-Washington Chapter of the Health Physics.
Waste Management Working Group CTMA Point Clear, AL W. T. (Sonny) Goldston EnergySolutions Working Group Chair July 6 - 9, 2015.
Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Slide 1 Nick Salazar Operations Support.
May Hazard Classification of the Remote Handled Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Boyd D. Christensen Battelle Energy Alliance, Idaho National Laboratory.
1 U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office TRU Sites and Transportation Division James Mason Institutional Affairs Manager Carlsbad.
1 Idaho Cleanup Project Extension Work Transportation Accomplishments M. Shawn Tigue July 2015.
1 Resuming Operations at WIPP Frank Marcinowski Acting Associate Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for The Office of Environmental.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” SAFETY ASSESSMENT DURING DECOMMISSIONING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP ,
Source Control Phases I-II: Source Control Phases I-II: Main findings  Facility: drinking water and sewage treatment utility in Apatity, Murmansk region,
U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Management Los Alamos Field Office Legacy Cleanup Completion Project DOE National Cleanup Workshop September 29,
Using ISMS Principles and Functions in Developing an ARRA Readiness Review Process Presented by Linda K. Rogers Assessments & Readiness Programs Manager.
Retrieval and Treatment of Problematic MLLW Streams Renee Echols Senior Vice President CTMA Partners in Progress, July 7, 2015.
1 Characterizing Mercury Waste at DOE’s Sites & Developing Management Strategies Breaking the Mercury Cycle Conference Boston MS May 1-3, 2002 Mike Morris,
MODULE “PREPARING AND MANAGEMENT OF DOCUMENTATION” SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo da Vinci”
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Program Status National Governors’ Association Meeting May 17, 2002 Alton D. Harris, III.
1 A Consultancy on management of large amounts of radioactive waste after an emergency situation ~ Experience on aftermath of Fukushima Daiichi NPS accident.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
Phase I Decommissioning Project Update West Valley Demonstration Project Presented by: Bryan Bower, Department of Energy November 14, 2012.
Function Specific Training
Frank Marcinowski Deputy Assistant Secretary for Regulatory Compliance Office of Environmental Management U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Management.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Dr. Abraham Gregorio de Rosa,Sp.Rad Radiologist in HNGV Dili, Timor Leste 2 Perspectives on regulatory models.
1 West Valley Demonstration Project FY 2014 Budget Briefing Bryan C. Bower May 22, 2013.
WIPP National TRU Program
1 EM Update Presented to the National Governors Association Federal Facilities Task Force Dr. Inés Triay Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environmental.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Draft Year: 1976 (drafted as an amendment to the Solid Waste Disposal Act.) Amendment years: 1984(HSWA, Hazardous.
Progress in EM’s Footprint Reduction for the Oakland Projects Office Projects Rich Schassburger November 16, 2010.
The Challenge of Getting What You Asked For Integrated Safety Management Summit Knoxville TN August 24-27, 2009 Presented By: Patrice McEahern HNF
Program Manager’s Review Joe Christy September 19, 2005.
The Resource Conservation Act and Recovery Act of 1976 and 1989 (RCRA) This act was enacted in This is a National Law. Matt Vedrani.
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 and 1989 (RCRA) Alex Chenault Period 4.
South Carolina Nuclear Advisory Council SRS Update and FY 2017 Budget Service ● Safety ● Security ● Stewardship ● SRNL ● Sustainability April 14, 2016.
Savannah River Site Watch Columbia, South Carolina
Status of national system for control of radioactive sources: TANZANIA
Transportation in Environmental Cleanup
Sustaining Cradle-to-Grave Control of Radioactive Sources (INT-9182) Workshop on implementation of a national cradle-to-grave control system for radioactive.
-EL ABBARI Younes, FADIL Najib (CNESTEN) -SADIQ Younes (AMSSNuR)
Remediated Nitrate Salt (RNS) Remediation and Other WIPP Activities
The Off-Site Source Recovery Program Capabilities in Recovering Sealed Sources – CTMA, May 23-26, 2017 James (Jim) Matzke.
Low Level Radioactive Waste Forum, Fall 2014 Meeting
Shipping to WIPP Travis R. Myers 5/24/17 GV ppt.
The Path Forward for WIPP: A State and Local Perspective
Overview of Waste Disposition Activities Fall 2017 LLW Forum Meeting
Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management Update
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act 1976,1989
West Valley Demonstration Project Status Update
Status of Disposal Capabilities for Greater-Than-Class C (GTCC) Low-Level Radioactive Waste Theresa J. Kliczewski GTCC EIS Document Manager Office of.
NRC Oversight on Storage of Special Nuclear Material
Northeast High-Level Radioactive Waste Transportation Task Force
U.S. Department of Energy Perspectives on Waste Classification
Presentation transcript:

1 Waste Management David Nickless Environmental Management Los Alamos Field Office March 3, 2015

2 LANL Transuranic Waste Program

3 Regulatory Framework  DOE Radiological Regulatory Authority Authority under Atomic Energy Act DOE Order Change 1, Radioactive Waste Management Low-Level Radioactive Wastes (LLW) and Transuranic (TRU) Wastes  New Mexico Environment Department Authority Hazardous waste regulations implement EPA Resource Conservation and recovery Act (RCRA) requirements Hazardous Waste Facility Permit addressing treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous wastes  Waste Disposal LLW disposal operations in Area-G is under DOE authority under the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) TRU wastes in Area G include newly-generated TRU from NNSA operating facilities and Legacy TRU (EM responsibility) DOE authority over TRU handling, processing, shipment, and disposal NMED authority over treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials under permits

4 Facilities  3 Hazard Category II Nuclear Facilities  TA-54 Area G – used for storage, certification, venting, and processing  TA-54 Radioassay and Nondestructive Testing (RANT) – used for staging and shipping  TA-50 Waste Characterization Reduction and Repackaging Facility (WCRRF) – used for drum repackaging

5 TA 54 Area G  63 Acre Site  10 Large Storage Domes  Central Characterization Project (CCP), Assay, Real-Time Radiography (RTR), Gas Analysis, In-Situ Object Counting System (ISOCS)  Drum Venting  3 Repackaging Lines (412, 375, 231)

6 TA-54 RANT  10,000 square foot facility  TRUPACT II Loading Facility  Second 5 Ton Crane Added in 2013 to eliminate single point failure  Capability for average of 5 shipments a week, with surge to 12  Department of Transportation (DOT) compliant shipping using DOE's national treatment and disposal contracts

7 TA-50 WCRRF  Hazard Category II Nuclear Facility  Operation consists of outside transportainer storage and one operating glovebox  Facility maintains cascading ventilation though two ventilation systems  High Material at Risk (MAR) Drums

8 Current Above Grade Transuranic Inventory

9 Below Grade Inventory Waste CategoryDescriptionLegacy Containers Volume (m 3 ) MAR (PE-Ci) Trenches A-D720 Drums at 30 Gallons Each ,870 Pit 93,881 Drums and 197 Boxes4,0781,5606,019 Corrugated Metal Pipes (CMPs)158 CMPs at 30" in Diameter by 20' Long , Lined Shafts 32 Shafts w/ RH hot cell debris; 1 shaft contains reactor vessel Hot Cell Liners 5 shafts with RH hot cell lines TRU with Tritium Packages4 Tritium Torpedoes and 1 Tritium Tank56.78 RH Canisters1 Canister TOTAL5,0002,400110,751

10 Issues  Processing of Legacy TRU Waste Operations have been paused  Nitrate Salts stored under continuous surveillance and protection per Nitrate Salt Container Isolation Plan  Corrective Actions, internal and external programmatic evaluations / reviews, and regulatory discussions are ongoing and will impact future operations  Nitrate Salts require treatment prior to disposal  RANT Seismic Potential Inadequacy in the Safety Analysis (PISA) has RANT operations curtailed  Continued integration of Legacy TRU and Newly-Generated TRU processing  Future integration with RCRA permitted unit closures and demolition activities expected in phases at facility’s end-of-life

11 Questions Questions?