Comparison between TOR of IG-ITS/AD and SAE Levels*1

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
“Automated driving – What comes first: cars or standards?”
Advertisements

The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 Japan September / 2012 Informal document GRRF (73rd GRRF, September 2012,
lesson 1.2 YOUR DRIVING TASK
AUTOMOBILES Dimitris Milakis, Transport Institute, Delft University of Technology Envisioning Automated Vehicles within the Built Environment: 2020, 2035,
Evaluation of ACSF during periodic technical inspection Informal group ACSF # / 17 in Tokyo Informal Document ACSF
Proposal of Automated Driving from Ad- hoc group on LKAS/RCP Submitted by the Chair of the Special Interest Group on Lane Keeping Assist Systems (LKAS)
Autonomous Vehicles in California Stephanie Dougherty California DMV
Automatically Commanded Steering Function
ACSF Informal Group Industry proposals 1 st Meeting of ACSF informal group April 29 and 30, 2015 in Bonn 1 Informal Document ACSF
Autonomous Vehicles in California Bernard Soriano and Stephanie Dougherty.
Submitted by the experts from Sweden and Japan Presentation in conjunction with GRRF Amendment proposals to UN R79 to introduce the requirements.
Definition for Levels of Automation
REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND TRANSPORT Status report Informal Working Group on the Electronic Vehicle Stability Control Dr. Laszlo Palkovics.
United States Rulemaking on Electronic Stability Control (ESC) for Light Vehicles 138 WP.29 March, 2006 Informal document No. WP (138th WP.29,
Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.
Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.
Cars - the better drivers ?
ECE Regulation No.79 Informal Document No. GRRF (61 st GRRF, 5-9 February 2007 agenda item 5.) Proposal for Amendments Presented by the Expert from.
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Possible Example of Split of Regulation ~ Split of R79 and The New Regulation of Driving Assistance.
Difference for "Automatically commanded steering function", "Corrective steering function" and " Autonomous Steering System " Informal Document: ACSF
Vehicle Safety - (R)Evolution of Driving Assist Systems Jochen Schäfer Heiner Hunold Submitted by the experts from Informal document GRRF th GRRF,
IHRA-ITS UN-ECE WP.29 ITS Informal Group Geneva, March, 2011 Design Principles for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: Keeping Drivers In-the-Loop Transmitted.
Remote Control Parking (RCP)
Document No. ITS/AD (6th ITS/AD, 03 November 2015, agenda item 3-2) INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MOTOR VEHICLE MANUFACTURERS Automated Driving Submitted.
ANTILOCK BRAKING SYSTEM
5 th ACSF meeting French views Bonn January 2016 Informal Document - ACSF Submitted by the expert of France.
CLEPA Position Special GRRF Session on Automatic Emergency Braking and Lane Departure Warning Systems Brainstorming Meeting 9 Dec UN Palais des.
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles Excerpts from the relevant sections of the ToR: II. Working items to be covered (details.
Engineering College, Tuwa. Design Engineering 1 - B  Guided by, SUBMITTED BY, PRAGNESH PATEL SHAH HETAXI ( ) RAJPUT VIVEK ( ) SOLANKI.
#ENRTECH The Infrastructure Impact of Future Autonomous Connected Car Roger Melen, Toyota InfoTechnology Center U.S.A., Mountain View, California.
SENSOTRONIC BRAKE CONTROL (the brakes of the future)
Transmitted by the Experts of TRL (EC)
The challenges facing an autonomous car’s risk assessment Nick Durston, Senior Consultant.
OICA „Certification of automated Vehicles“
generic approach electronic braking ECE-R 13
Informal document GRRF-84-32
Autonomous Vehicles in California
Autonomous Vehicles in Canada
7th ACSF meeting London, June 28-30, 2016
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles
Informal Working Group on ACSF
Submitted by the expert form Japan Document No. ITS/AD-09-12
Initial project results: Annex 6 – 20 Sept 2016
Submitted by UNECE Document No. ITS/AD-07-07
CYBERSECURITY FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Communication technologies for autonomous vehicles
The Audi A8 The Most Advanced Self-Driving Technology The technological revolution has started with Audi’s autonomous driving technology. This is the first.
Automated vehicles Horizontal regulation Preliminary considerations
Functional Safety Automation in road transportation and its implications on user safety and cyber-security Dr Ireri Ibarra Chief Engineer, Functional.
SAE J3016 Revisions & SAE Ads/adas Standards
Accelerating the Introduction of
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
NHTSA Research Overview: Automation, ADAS, and Human Factors
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
ACSF – Automated Driving Systems Taxonomy and Definitions - SAE J3016 Jean-Michel Roy Transport Canada.
Communication technologies for autonomous vehicles
Emergency Steering Function
Informal document GRRF-78-41
ACSF-17 – Industry Preparation
ACSF B2 SAE Level 2 and/or Level 3
New Hampshire Department of Motor Vehicles
ACSF B2 and C2 Industry expectations from ACSF IG Tokyo meeting
6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Automated Lane Keeping Systems
Presentation transcript:

Comparison between TOR of IG-ITS/AD and SAE Levels*1 Document No. ITS/AD-01-05 (1st ITS/AD, 19 December 2014, agenda item 5) Comparison between TOR of IG-ITS/AD and SAE Levels*1 Highly Automated Driving in TOR Fully Autonomous Driving (include Semi-Autonomous) in TOR Level 5 Full Automation Advanced Driver Assistance Steering in existing R79 (§2.3.4.)*2 Autonomous Steering out of scope in existing R79 Level 4 High Automation Corrective Steering Automatically Commanded Steering (§2.3.4.1.)*3 Monitoring by the Driver Monitoring by the System (The second task by the driver may be permitted?) :Scope to be discussed in GRRF for the time being Level 3 Conditional Automation Level 2 Partial Automation Level 1 Driver Assistance Level 0 No Automation SAE Levels*1 Conforming to the Vienna Convention ? Not conforming to the Vienna Convention *1: WP29 definition of Automated Driving Technology will be discussed by IG-AD from the point of view of the vehicle regulation. *2: existing R79 2.3.4. "Advanced Driver Assistance Steering System" means a system, additional to the main steering system, that provides assistance to the driver in steering the vehicle but in which the driver remains at all times in primary control of the vehicle. *3: existing R79 2.3.4.1. "Automatically commanded steering function" means the function within a complex electronic control system where actuation of the steering system can result from automatic evaluation of signals initiated on-board the vehicle, possibly in conjunction with passive infrastructure features, to generate continuous control action in order to assist the driver in following a particular path, in low speed manoeuvring or parking operations.

SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) International (reference) SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) International Levels of Driving Automation Level Name Narrative definition Execution of steering and acceleration/ deceleration Monitoring of driving environment Fallback performance of dynamic driving task System capability (driving modes) BASt NHTSA level Human driver monitors the driving environment No Automation the full-time performance by the human driver of all aspects of the dynamic driving task, even when enhanced by warning of intervention system Human driver n/a Driver Only 1 Driver Assistance the driving mode-specific execution by a driver assistance system of either steering or acceleration/ deceleration using information about the driving environment and with expectation that the human driver perform all remaining aspects of the dynamic driving task Human driver and system Some driving modes Assisted 2 Partial Automation the driving mode-specific execution by one or more driver assistance systems of both steering and acceleration/ deceleration using information about the driving environment and with the expectation that the human driver perform all remaining aspects of the dynamic driving task System Partially automated Automated driving system( “system”) monitors the driving environment 3 Conditional Automation the driving mode-specific performance by an automated driving system of all aspects of the dynamic driving task with the expectation that the human driver will respond appropriately to a request to intervene Highly 4 High Automation the driving mode-specific performance by an automated driving system of all aspects of the dynamic driving task, even if a human driver does not respond appropriately to a request to intervene Fully 3/4 5 Full Automation the full-time performance by an automated driving system of all aspects of the dynamic driving task under all roadway and environmental conditions that can be managed by a human driver All driving modes -