Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0 Submission July 2014 W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)Slide 1 DSC and Legacy Coexistence Date: 14/07/2014 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0868r0 July 2014 Johan Söder, Ericsson ABSlide 1 UL & DL DSC and TPC MAC simulations Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission Proposed Changes to Simulation Scenario Date: 2015/01/12 Takeshi Itagaki, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Authors: January.
Dynamic Sensitivity Control V2
Doc.: IEEE /1012r0 Submission Sept 2013 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Improvement to area throughput Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/1426r1 November 2014 Gustav Wikström et al., EricssonSlide 1 DSC and legacy coexistence Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1225r1 Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax Date: Slide 1Huawei Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0045r0 Submission January 2015 Takeshi Itagaki, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Performance Analysis of BSS Color and DSC Date: 2015/01/12.
Discussion on The Receiver Behavior for DSC/CCAC with BSS Color
Submission doc.: IEEE /0374r0 Mar 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Further Considerations on Legacy Fairness with Enhanced CCA Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/613r0 May 2015 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 1 Box 5 Calibration Result Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0551r1 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 OBSS Preamble Detection Evaluation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0319r1 Submission March 2015 Takeshi Itagaki, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Impact of TPC coupled to DSC for legacy unfairness issue Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/1148r1 Consideration of asynchronous interference in OBSS environment Date: Authors: September 2014 Slide 1Koichi.
Doc.: IEEE /0861r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury Impact of CCA adaptation on spatial reuse in dense residential scenario Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0085r1 Jan 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Legacy Fairness Issues of Enhanced CCA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1443r0 SubmissionEsa Tuomaala Adapting CCA and Receiver Sensitivity Date: Authors: Slide 1 November 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1404r0 Submission November 2014 Eisuke Sakai, Sony CorporationSlide 1 11aa GCR-BA Performance in OBSS Date: 2014/11/2 Authors:
Discussion on OFDMA in IEEE ax
Doc.: IEEE /0046r0 Submission January 2015 Eisuke Sakai, Sony CorporationSlide 1 11aa GCR-BA Performance in OBSS Date: 2015/01/12 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0623r1 May 2015 Guido R. Hiertz, Ericsson et al.Slide 1 TGax simulation scenario “Box 5” – calibration results Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0374r1 Mar 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Further Considerations on Legacy Fairness with Enhanced CCA Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1153r0 Submission September 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Simulation scenario proposal Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0320r1 Submission March 2015 Yusuke Tanaka, Sony CorporationSlide 1 GCR-BA Performance with Measurement Report in OBSS Date: 2015/03/09.
Doc.: IEEE /1044r4 Submission September 2015 Yusuke Tanaka, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Further Study of 11ax Multicast Date: 2015/09/14 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0868r0 July 2015 Hakan Persson, Ericsson ABSlide 1 Impact of Frequency Selective Scheduling Feedback for OFDMA Date:
Dynamic CCA control and TPC Simulation Results with SS1~SS3
Doc.: IEEE /1290r0 Submission Nov 2013 Dynamic Sensitivity Control for HEW SG Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0801r1 Akira Kishida, NTT Issues of Low-Rate Transmission Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1039r0 Chuck Lukaszewski et al. Aruba Networks, an HP Company Spatial Reuse Measurements September, 2015 Slide 1 Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0648r0 Submission May 2014 Chinghwa Yu et. al., MediaTekSlide 1 Performance Observation of a Dense Campus Network Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0804r0 Submission July 2015 TG ax Outdoor Enterprise Scenario and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
Doc.: ax Submission July 2014 Slide 1 Proposed Calibration For MAC simulator Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0523r0 Submission April 2014 Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 MAC simulation results for Dynamic sensitivity control (DSC - CCA adaptation)
Doc.: IEEE /610r1 Submission Vida Ferdowsi, Newracom May 2015 Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Vida Ferdowsi Daewon Lee Reza Hedayat.
Doc.: IEEE /0680r1 SubmissionJiyong Pang, Huawei TechnologiesSlide 1 Reference Box5 Calibration Assumptions and Parameters Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0779r2 Submission June 2014 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Practical Usage Date: 2014-July Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Performance Analysis of BSS Color and DSC
Doc.: IEEE /0814r0 Submission July 2015 Simulation Results for Box5 Calibration Ke Yao, et, al. (ZTE) Slide 1 Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /1172r2 Submission September 2014 Eisuke Sakai, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Multicast Performance in OBSS Date: 2014/9/15 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1349r0 November 2013 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D Labs.Slide 1 Access Control Enhancement Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE /0294r1 Submission Dynamic Sensitivity Control Channel Selection and Legacy Sharing Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1373r1 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Updated Box 5 Calibration Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1044r2 Submission September 2015 Yusuke Tanaka, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Further Study of 11ax Multicast Date: 2015/09/14 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission Feb 2016 TG ax Enterprise Scenario, Color and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1392r5 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Simulation results for Box 5 calibration Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Month Year doc: IEEE /xxxxr0
Simulation results for spatial reuse in 11ax
Performance Evaluation of OBSS Densification
TPC combined with channel allocation method for OBSS environment
Simulation results for
Simulation Results for Box5
Simulation Analysis of ED Threshold Levels
Updated Simulation Results for Box5
Simulation Results for Box 5 Calibration
Simulation Results for Box5
Joint submission for Box 5 calibration
Simulation results for
Simulation Results for Box5
Box5 Calibration Results
Box5 Results of 11ac SS6 Date: Authors: Jan 2015 Sept 2014
Box 5 Calibration Result
Potential of Modified Signal Detection Thresholds
Simulation results for
Simulation results for
System Level Simulator Evaluation with/without Capture Effect
DSC Calibration Result
Consideration on System Level Simulation
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /854r0 Submission July 2014 W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)Slide 1 DSC and Legacy Coexistence Date: 14/07/2014 Authors:

doc.: IEEE /854r0 Submission Abstract Dynamic Sensitivity Control (DSC) techniques as discussed to date in TGax have shown promise to improve TGax STA performance. However, TGax STA improvements using DSC should not adversely affect performance of legacy STAs. Effects of DSC in mixed networks therefore needs careful study and proper mitigation methods should be considered. July 2014 Slide 2W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)

doc.: IEEE /854r0 Submission Introduction DSPG’s presentation ( ax-dsc-practical- usage) says, –Legacy STA in the same network as a DSC STA is completely unaffected by the DSC STAs. –The legacy STA may be held off from transmitting by STA in OBSS, but will compete equally with DSC STAs in same BSS As other DSC STAs will ignore OBSS STAs their traffic is often occurring during a time when the legacy STA cannot TX, and hence overall contention is lessened. This effect cannot be ignored in the evaluation of 11ax. July 2014 Slide 3W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)

doc.: IEEE /854r0 Submission DSPG’s Simulation Results July 2014 Slide 4 DSC Network with 2 DSC STAs 2 Legacy STAs OBSS Network 4 Legacy STAs DSC 100Mbps Legacy ~22Mbps Legacy STAs are not affected BUT look at the DSC STAs! Quoted from: ax-dsc- practical-usage Quoted from: ax-dsc- practical-usage W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)

doc.: IEEE /854r0 Submission Simulation Conditions Each STA sends uplink UDP traffic (Full-buffer condition). See backup slide for more detail. July 2014 Slide 5 50m 3m AP1AP2 Case 1 (2 STAs per BSS) Case 2 (24 STAs per BSS) DSC STA or Legacy STA Legacy STA 50m 3m AP1 AP2 Each STA is close enough to their AP so that each link satisfies the required SNR for used MCS, even if interference from OBSS is observed. Packets from OBSS can be detected by only Legacy STAs. (See next slide) Packets from OBSS can be detected by only Legacy STAs. W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)

doc.: IEEE /854r0 Submission Simulation Conditions (Relation between preamble detection threshold and distance from OBSS) July 2014 Slide 6 Receive level when Tx power is +15dBm DSC STA cannot detect packets from OBSS Legacy STA can detect packets from OBSS Preamble detection threshold for DSC STA set to -62 dBm Preamble detection threshold for Legacy STA set to -82 dBm (Note) Propagation loss model of TGn is used. Fluctuation by fading is not illustrated. W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)

doc.: IEEE /854r0 Submission Simulation Results (Case 1: 4 STAs) July 2014 Slide 7 50m 3m AP1AP2 If the number of STAs is few, there is less difference of Legacy STAs’ performance. But... If the number of STAs is few, there is less difference of Legacy STAs’ performance. But... STA4 STA1STA2 STA3 DSCLegacy STA1 (DSC STA or Legacy STA) STA2 (DSC STA or Legacy STA) STA3 (Legacy STA) STA4 (Legacy STA) W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)

doc.: IEEE /854r0 Submission Simulation Results (Case 2: 48 STAs) July 2014 Slide 8 As the number of STAs increases, there is noticeable performance degradation of Legacy STAs. As the number of STAs increases, there is noticeable performance degradation of Legacy STAs. DSC Legacy It is not negligible, especially in a dense scenario. 50m 3m AP1 AP2 STA1~12 (DSC STA or Legacy STA) STA13~24 (DSC STA or Legacy STA) STA25~36 (Legacy STA) STA37~48 (Legacy STA) W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)

doc.: IEEE /854r0 Submission Simulation Results (Throughput Summary) July 2014 Slide 9 Throughput [Mbps] All STAs are Legacy STA1 and 2 use DSC System Total DSC Total (per STA) (12.62) Legacy Total (per STA) (6.33) (5.18) Throughput [Mbps] All STAs are Legacy Half of STAs use DSC System Total DSC Total (per STA) (1.37) Legacy Total (per STA) (0.56) 5.50 (0.23) Case 1 (2 STAs per BSS) Case 2 (24 STAs per BSS) 40% Up42% Up 18% Down 59% Down Throughput degradation for Legacy STA depends on the number of STAs. W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)

doc.: IEEE /854r0 Submission Summary The impact of using DSC in TGax on other Legacy STA exists and is not negligible. As the number of STAs increases (e.g., dense scenarios), the degradation on performance of Legacy STAs also increases. Suggest to evaluate impact on fairness with legacy STAs when conducting DSC simulations. July 2014 Slide 10W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)

doc.: IEEE /854r0 Submission BACKUP July 2014 Slide 11W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)

doc.: IEEE /854r0 Submission Simulation Conditions July 2014 Slide 12 Node & TopologySee right figures Traffic Model & LoadUplink UDP 100Mbps (from all STA) Traffic Duration [sec]20 Access CategoryAC_BE (CWmin=15, CWmax=1023, AIFSN=3) Tx Power [dBm]+15dBm MCSMCS5 (52Mbps) Fixed Packet Length [byte](MPDU, MSDU, APP)=(1530, 1500, 1472) Fixed L2 Retry10 Ack RateMCS0 Fixed RTS/CTSDisabled AggregationDisabled Channel(Propagation, Shadow, Fading)= (TGn, Disabled, Flat Rayleigh) Preamble Detection Threshold. [dBm] -62 (on DSC STA, AP), -82 (on Legacy STA) Energy Detection Threshold [dBm] -62 Channel Setting [MHz](Center Freq, BW)=(2412, 20) Detection Cancel behavior on PLCP error Not emulated 50m 3m AP1AP2 Case 1 Case 2 50m 3m AP1 AP2 DSC STA or Legacy STA Legacy STA W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)

doc.: IEEE /854r0 Submission Confirmation of simulation conditions What is the behavior of each STA when PLCP header has an error ? –Is Rx canceled or does it continue to receive? Does AP also enable DSC ? July 2014 Slide 13W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)

doc.: IEEE /854r0 Submission Behavior of DSC and Rx cancel on PLCP error July 2014 Slide 14 Preamble Data STA AP Detect depend on preamble level SIG When CRC of SIG is error, Then Rx is cancelled. “Busy” or “Idle” depends on Energy-Detection result Rx Preamble Data STA AP SIG Not detect due to high threshold DSC Rx cancel on PLCP error W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)