Preamble Structure in ax

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beamformed HE PPDU Date: Authors: May 2015 Month Year
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /569r0 Submission Performance of 1x, 2x, and 4x HE-LTF May 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Kome Oteri (InterDigital)
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/0550r0 May 2015 K. Yunoki and B. Zhao, KDDI R&D Labs.Slide 1 L-Preamble Issues for UL-OFDMA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0358r3 Submission March 2015 Daewon Lee, NEWRACOM Numerology for 11ax Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission Daewon Lee, NewracomSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /0577r1May 2015 Pilot Design for 11ax Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0621r2 May 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Design Principles for HE Preamble Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0068r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, NEWRACOM January 2015 Support of Outdoor Environments Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0099 Submission Payload Symbol Size for 11ax January 2015 Ron Porat, BroadcomSlide 1 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 11-14/1432r1 Submission Nov Minho Cheong, ETRISlide 1 Proposed ax Specification Framework - Background Date: Authors:
Preamble structure for 11ax system
Protocol and signaling framework for OFDMA
Doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission Preamble structure for 11ax system January 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Jiayin Zhang, et al. (Huawei Technologies)
Doc.: IEEE /0587r0 Submission May 2015 Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Reza.
Doc.: IEEE /0099 Submission Payload Symbol Size for 11ax January 2015 Ron Porat, BroadcomSlide 1 Date: Authors:
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Submission doc.: IEEE /0823r1 July 2015 Sungho Moon, NewracomSlide 1 Preamble Design and Auto-Detection for 11ax Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0823r3 September 2015 Sungho Moon, NewracomSlide 1 Preamble Design and Auto-Detection for 11ax Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0824r0 July 2015 Slide 1 Pilot Design for 11ax Downlink Transmissions Date: Authors: Yujin Noh, Newracom.
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1091r0 September 2015 Considerations on Range Extension with SIG-A Repetition Date: Authors:
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1328r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 1 Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1097r1 September 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Reducing Channel Sounding Protocol Overhead for 11ax Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0843r1 July 2015 Submission(ZTE) UL MU Random Access Analysis Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress Yonggang.
Submission Sungho Moon, NewracomSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /0584r1May 2015 Considerations on LTF Sequence Design Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 11-14/1432r0 Submission Nov Minho Cheong, ETRISlide 1 Proposed ax Specification Framework - Background Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0819r1 Submission July 2010 Ravi Mahadevappa, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Stream Partition Index for MU-MIMO Transmissions Date:
Reza Hedayat, Newracom doc.: IEEE /829r0 Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Reza Hedayat Young.
May 2015 doc.: IEEE /0586r1 Slide 1 Frequency Diversity Options in OFDMA Date: Authors: Reza Hedayat, Newracom NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 1 Diversity Mode in OFDMA Date: Authors:
1x/2x/4x OFDM Symbol in HE SU PPDU with BCC
Doc.: IEEE /1243r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Preamble for 120MHz Date: Authors: Sun Bo, ZTE Corporation Nov, 2010.
Doc.: IEEE /0066r0 Submission January 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Downlink OFDMA Protocol Design Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0079r2 January 2016 Kentaro Taniguchi, ToshibaSlide 1 Allocation sizes for BCC in OFDMA Date: Authors:
HE Trigger Frame Format
Submission doc.: IEEE /0674r0 May 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 EIFS excess problem of Acknowledgement for UL MU procedure Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0127r0 July 2016 Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei Technologies)Slide 1 IEEE ax Overview Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0043r0 Jan 2016 John Son et al., WILUSSlide 1 Clarification of SFD Texts Date: Authors:
1x/2x/4x OFDM Symbol in HE SU PPDU with BCC
Inefficiency of 256-FFT per 20MHz
Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing
LTF Sequence Designs Date: Authors: November 2015
Supported Resource Allocations in SIG-B
Signalling Support for Full Bandwidth MU-MIMO Compressed SIG-B Mode
Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement
Flexible Wider Bandwidth Transmission
Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing
Discussions on HE SIG-A Structure
Discussions on HE SIG-A Structure
Regarding HE NDPA frame for DL Sounding Sequence
Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
802.11ac Preamble Discussions
MU-MIMO support for Heterogeneous Devices
Considerations on PAPR of Wake Up Packet
SIG-B Structure Date: Authors: September 2015 Month Year
PHY designs for NGV Date: Authors:
SIG-B Structure Date: Authors: September 2015 Month Year
UL MU Random Access Analysis
Bits Consideration for SIGNAL fields
Fix the Issue on Number Of HE-SIG-B Symbols
Bits Consideration for SIGNAL fields
Numerology for 11ax Date: Authors: March 2015 Month Year
F3-6A, Huawei Base, Bantian, Shenzhen
20 MHz transmission in NGV
HE NDP Frame for Sounding
11bd Frame Format Date: Authors: March 2019
20 MHz transmission in NGV
NGV PPDU Format Date: Authors: doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
Further discussion for 11be preamble
F3-6A, Huawei Base, Bantian, Shenzhen
Further discussion for 11be preamble
Presentation transcript:

Preamble Structure in 802.11ax Date: 2015-05-xx Authors:

Background Structure of legacy preamble and HE-SIG-A has been decided The legacy preamble (L-STF, L-LTF and L-SIG) duplicated on each 20MHz for backward compatibility and coexistence with legacy devices operating in the same band HE-SIG-A duplicated as well on each 20MHz after the legacy preamble for common control information Variable size of HE-SIG-B added in SFD [1] 3.y.z Downlink HE MU PPDU shall include HE-SIG-B field, and the number of OFDM symbols of HE-SIG-B field is variable (Note: HE-SIG-B field includes information required to interpret HE MU PPDU, and detail is TBD) In this contribution, several options on HE-SIG-B structure are proposed

Preamble Structure for 11ac L-STF L-LTF L-SIG VHT- SIG-A VHT- SIG-B VHT-STF VHT-LTF Data 4µs per VHT-LTF symbol VHT-SIG-A xxx VHT-SIG-B

HE-SIG-A Preamble structure for HE-SIG-A 3.2µs DFT duration, duplicated on each 20MHz Fixed number of OFDM symbols Number of available bits for new features of 11ax Assumption: required control information that is common for all STAs approx. 24 bits are taken away from total number of available bit in SIG-A Common control information: bandwidth, GI, 2x or 4xLTF, BCC tail bits, CRC, etc Approx. 24 ~ 48 bits additionally available depending on the number of OFDM symbols Legacy Preamble HE- SIG-A … 4µs per OFDM Symbol time freq.

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 HE-SIG-B Option 1 HE-SIG-B is defined for 20MHz and duplicated on each 20MHz … HE- SIG-A HE- SIG-B 4µs per OFDM Symbol time frequency 20MHz Duplicated information Pros Cons Robust to interference - Robust reception of SIG-A, and SIG-B even in case of interference/collision in non-primary channels MRC gain - MRC combining gain of duplicated signals is possible (Relatively) Larger Overhead - Payload Size per OFDM symbol is limited to 24 bits. May require many OFDM symbols for large per-STA information. John Doe, Some Company

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 HE-SIG-B Option 2 HE-SIG-B is jointly encoded across the entire OFDMA operation bandwidth HE- SIG-A HE- SIG-B 4µs per OFDM Symbol … time frequency 40MHz Pros Cons (Relatively) Less Overhead - More payload bits are available for wider bandwidths, where large per-STA information is more likely. Additional HE-STF and HE-LTF overhead - Certain implementation/design may require additional STF/LTF symbols because channel estimation only from the primary channel exist.[*] Additional interleaver design - Depending on the number of tones for HE-SIG-B, new BCC interleaver may need to be defined John Doe, Some Company

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 HE-SIG-B Option 3 HE-SIG-B is separately encoded for each assigned subband or STA HE- SIG-A HE-SIG-B 4µs per OFDM Symbol 16µs per OFDM Symbol … time frequency 10MHz 20MHz Pros Cons Small variation in preamble (SIG-B) length - Number of required bits per subband or STA is likely to be fixed and do not vary as a function of bandwidth or assigned number of STAs. Large Overhead for small number of assigned STAs - SIG-B OFDM symbol duration is 4x time longer. And this long overhead may exist regardless of number of assigned STAs in OFDMA John Doe, Some Company

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 HE-SIG-B (cont.) DL MU overhead of HE-SIG-B for 20MHz channel bandwidth Assumption : OFDMA and MU-MIMO are exclusive of each other : HE-SIG-B consists of user specific information (20 bits) per STA and CRC/Tail Opt.1 and Opt.2 has the same overhead Opt.3 has fixed duration because HE-SIG-B is separately encoded for each assigned subband or STA 2 OFDM symbols with 32 µs if there may be not enough room within 1 OFDM symbol on small subband Opt 1 duplicated on each20MHz Opt 2 encoded on entire band Opt 3 encoded on assigned subband Note: the length of HE-SIG-A and HE-SIG-B can be changed depending on contents in it John Doe, Some Company

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 HE-SIG-B (cont.) DL MU overhead of HE-SIG-B for 80MHz channel bandwidth Assumption : OFDMA and MU-MIMO are exclusive of each other : HE-SIG-B consists of user specific information (20bits) and CRC/Tail Opt.2 is good if 11ax optimizes for small number of STAs Opt.3 is good if 11ax optimizes for large number of STAs Opt 1 duplicated on each20MHz Opt 2 encoded on entire band Opt 3 encoded on assigned subband Note: the length of HE-SIG-A and HE-SIG-B can be changed depending on contents in it John Doe, Some Company

SP 1 Do you agree to add the following sentence to the TG SFD: 3.y.x. HE-SIG-A field in HE PPDU shall be fixed number of OFDM symbols, the number of OFDM symbols is TBD. YES NO ABS

SP 2 Do you agree to add the following sentence to the TG SFD: 3.y.x. HE-SIG-B field in DL HE PPDU is a single encoded information mapped to the entire bandwidth. YES NO ABS

SP 3 Do you agree to add the following sentence to the TG SFD: 3.y.x. HE shall support only two types of HE-SIG, such as HE-SIG-A and HE-SIG-B. YES NO ABS

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 References [1] Robert Stacey, Specification Framework for Tgax, 11-15/0132r4, Mar 2015 John Doe, Some Company

Appendix – Additional STF/LTF for Option 2 Depending on the implementation or design, additional STF/LTF before SIG-B may be needed Some implementation may choose to only buffer samples in the primary 20 MHz channel, and adapt its receiver once bandwidth information is available (typically in first OFDM symbol of SIG-A). May require additional STF, if receive bandwidth is also changed during the process SIG-B may have more subcarriers than L-LTF subcarriers, in which case channel estimation for the additional subcarriers requires additional LTF. HE- SIG-A HE- SIG-B HE-LTF HE-STF … May or may not be required

HE-SIG-B (cont.) More Example for DL MU overhead of HE-SIG-B Assumption : OFDMA and MU-MIMO are exclusive of each other : HE-SIG-B consists of user specific information (10 bits) per STA and CRC/Tail Similar trends are shown Opt 1 duplicated on each20MHz Opt 2 encoded on entire band Opt 3 encoded on assigned subband