Using GOES Imagery as Pointing Truth for TEMPO Image Navigation and Registration Kerrie Allen 1, James L. Carr 1, Brad Pierce 2, Joseph Fox-Rabinovitz.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Digital Image Processing
Advertisements

Applications of one-class classification
Characterization of ATMS Bias Using GPSRO Observations Lin Lin 1,2, Fuzhong Weng 2 and Xiaolei Zou 3 1 Earth Resources Technology, Inc.
Predicting and mapping biomass using remote sensing and GIS techniques; a case of sugarcane in Mumias Kenya Odhiambo J.O, Wayumba G, Inima A, Omuto C.T,
Robert DeMaria.  Motivation  Objective  Data  Center-Fixing Method  Evaluation Method  Results  Conclusion.
Resolution Resolving power Measuring of the ability of a sensor to distinguish between signals that are spatially near or spectrally similar.
Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences Methodology to compare GERB- CERES filtered radiances.
GIS and Image Processing for Environmental Analysis with Outdoor Mobile Robots School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering Queen’s University Belfast.
Optical Navigation System Michael Paluszek, Joseph Mueller, Dr. Gary Pajer Princeton Satellite Systems EUCASS July 4-8, 2011 St. Petersburg, Russia.
Green Vegetation Fraction (GVF) derived from the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) sensor onboard the SNPP satellite Zhangyan Jiang 1,2,
CPI International UV/Vis Limb Workshop Bremen, April Development of Generalized Limb Scattering Retrieval Algorithms Jerry Lumpe & Ed Cólon.
An artificial neural networks system is used as model to estimate precipitation at 0.25° x 0.25° resolution. Two different networks are being developed,
Satellite Imagery Meteorology 101 Lab 9 December 1, 2009.
GOES-13 Science Team Report SST Images and Analyses Eileen Maturi, STAR/SOCD, Camp Springs, MD Andy Harris, CICS, University of Maryland, MD Chris Merchant,
Simultaneous Localization and Map Building System for Prototype Mars Rover CECS 398 Capstone Design I October 24, 2001.
Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Automatic Tie-Point and Wire-frame Generation From Oblique Aerial Imagery Seth Weith-Glushko Advisor: Carl.
Hyperspectral Satellite Imaging Planning a Mission Victor Gardner University of Maryland 2007 AIAA Region 1 Mid-Atlantic Student Conference National Institute.
Comparison of LIDAR Derived Data to Traditional Photogrammetric Mapping David Veneziano Dr. Reginald Souleyrette Dr. Shauna Hallmark GIS-T 2002 August.
Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring of Pollution (TEMPO) Kelly Chance & the TEMPO Team April 6, 2013.
Design & Operation of ABI for PCW 11GOESRJPSS J19.2, 8 January 2015 This document is not subject to the controls of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations.
World Renewable Energy Forum May 15-17, 2012 Dr. James Hall.
Proxy Data and VHF/Optical Comparisons Monte Bateman GLM Proxy Data Designer.
EVM-2 Notice of Partnership Questions and Answers January 23, 2015.
Mobile Mapping Systems (MMS) for infrastructural monitoring and mapping are becoming more prevalent as the availability and affordability of solutions.
“Community Benefits of Earth Science” SPECIAL WASTE COMMITTEE MEETING of the California Integrated Waste Management Board FEBRUARY 9, 2005 Presented by.
Introduction Belief propagation: known to produce accurate results for stereo processing/ motion estimation High storage requirements limit the use of.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are grateful to the MOPITT team, especially the groups at University of Toronto and the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR),
UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH EXPERIENCE Derek Morris Jr. (Elizabeth City State University), Shahee Jackson (Elizabeth City State University), Andrew.
Multi-Sensor Image Fusion (MSIF) Team Members: Phu Kieu, Keenan Knaur Faculty Advisor: Dr. Eun-Young (Elaine) Kang Northrop Grumman Liaison: Richard Gilmore.
Using spectral data to discriminate land cover types.
GOES-R ABI PROXY DATA SET GENERATION AT CIMSS Mathew M. Gunshor, Justin Sieglaff, Erik Olson, Thomas Greenwald, Jason Otkin, and Allen Huang Cooperative.
Thanks also to… Tom Wrublewski, NOAA Liaison Office Steve Kirkner, GOES Program Office Scott Bachmeier, CIMSS Ed Miller, NOAA Liaison Office Eric Chipman,
1 Requirements Gathering, Validation, and Concept Studies GOES Users’ Conference Boulder, CO October 1-3, 2002.
25 June 2009 Dawn Conway, AMSR-E TLSCF Lead Software Engineer AMSR-E Team Leader Science Computing Facility.
Future Satellite Capabilities for Air Quality Applications Future Satellite Capabilities for Air Quality Applications ARSET - AQ Applied Remote SEnsing.
Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) will be flown on the next generation of NOAA Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES)-R platform. The sensor.
Algorithm and Software Development of Atmospheric Motion Vector Products for the GOES-R ABI Jaime M. Daniels 1, Wayne Bresky 2, Chris Velden 3, Iliana.
, Key Components of a Successful Earth Science Subsetter Architecture ASDC Introduction The Atmospheric Science Data Center (ASDC) at NASA Langley Research.
Hurricane Intensity Estimation from GOES-R Hyperspectral Environmental Suite Eye Sounding Fourth GOES-R Users’ Conference Mark DeMaria NESDIS/ORA-STAR,
1 of 26 Characterization of Atmospheric Aerosols using Integrated Multi-Sensor Earth Observations Presented by Ratish Menon (Roll Number ) PhD.
Improved Geo-location Accuracy For POES Imagery 11 December 2002 NOAA/NESDIS Office of Satellite Operations Office of Systems Development Peter Phillips.
Survey of OSPO Efforts to Improve Operational GOES Imagery S. Hadesty*, K. Ludlum**, N. Sanders*, C. Thomas* * ASRC Federal Contractor – Engineering and.
Investigating the use of Deep Convective Clouds (DCCs) to monitor on-orbit performance of the Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) using Lightning Imaging.
On the Use of Geostationary Satellites for Remote Sensing in the High Latitudes Yinghui Liu 1, Jeffrey R. Key 2, Xuanji Wang 1, Tim Schmit 2, and Jun Li.
Globes- 3-D representation of the earth Pros: Accurate shape, landmasses correct size and shape Cons: Inconvienent, only able to see one side at a time.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Infrared Temperature and.
The Second TEMPO Science Team Meeting Physical Basis of the Near-UV Aerosol Algorithm Omar Torres NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Atmospheric Chemistry.
14 ARM Science Team Meeting, Albuquerque, NM, March 21-26, 2004 Canada Centre for Remote Sensing - Centre canadien de télédétection Geomatics Canada Natural.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 The GOES-14 Science Test Timothy Schmit (GOVERNMENT PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR)
VALIDATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF THE GOES-R RAINFALL RATE ALGORITHM Background Robert J. Kuligowski, Center for Satellite Applications and Research, NOAA/NESDIS,
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Using CALIPSO to Explore the Sensitivity to Cirrus Height in the Infrared.
As components of the GOES-R ABI Air Quality products, a multi-channel algorithm similar to MODIS/VIIRS for NOAA’s next generation geostationary satellite.
OMI validation workshop - 22 nd June 2006 Louisa. J. Kramer (1), Paul. S. Monks (2), Roland. J. Leigh (1) (1) Earth Observation Science, Space Research.
Introduction GOES-R ABI will be the first GOES imaging instrument providing observations in both the visible and the near infrared spectral bands. Therefore.
A Brief Overview of CO Satellite Products Originally Presented at NASA Remote Sensing Training California Air Resources Board December , 2011 ARSET.
May 15, 2002MURI Hyperspectral Workshop1 Cloud and Aerosol Products From GIFTS/IOMI Gary Jedlovec and Sundar Christopher NASA Global Hydrology and Climate.
BOWSER 1 COSGC Space Research Symposium 2010 BOWSER Balloon Observatory for Wavelength and Spectral Emission Readings.
Radiance Simulation System for OSSE  Objectives  To evaluate the impact of observing system data under the context of numerical weather analysis and.
© 2012 Anwendungszentrum GmbH Oberpfaffenhofen Idea by: Dr. Eng. Mohamed Zayan | 1.
Geometry of Aerial Photography
Fourth TEMPO Science Team Meeting
Paper under review for JGR-Atmospheres …
Simulated GOLD Observations of Atmospheric Waves
VIS/NIR reference instrument requirements
Paper – Stephen Se, David Lowe, Jim Little
Satellite Meteorology
Need for TEMPO-ABI Synergy
Update on Advancing Development of the ROLO Lunar Calibration System
Hyperspectral Wind Retrievals Dave Santek Chris Velden CIMSS Madison, Wisconsin 5th Workshop on Hyperspectral Science 8 June 2005.
Antonio Plaza University of Extremadura. Caceres, Spain
Presentation transcript:

Using GOES Imagery as Pointing Truth for TEMPO Image Navigation and Registration Kerrie Allen 1, James L. Carr 1, Brad Pierce 2, Joseph Fox-Rabinovitz 1, Norman Lo 1, David Zakar 1 The InstrumentThe Solution Acknowledgements The Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring of Pollution (TEMPO) instrument will observe tropospheric O 3, NO 2, and other trace gases as part of NASA’s Earth Venture Instrument (EV-I) program. TEMPO will be hosted onboard a geostationary communications satellite to allow for continuous observation of CONUS and parts of Canada and Mexico. As an EV-I hosted payload, TEMPO will not have the same Image Navigation and Registration (INR) capabilities available to it that an observatory-class mission such as GOES-R would have. 1.Carr Astronautics, Greenbelt, MD 2.NOAA/NESDIS Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR), Madison, WI The Approach Satellite observations are linked to specific locations on the earth through the process of Image Navigation and Registration (INR). Navigation involves determining the latitude and longitude of each pixel; registration maintains the pointing of each pixel to the same earth location and/or the registration between spectral channels. GOES-NOP implements INR using star senses and landmarks observed by the instrument to characterize their pointing. GOES-R will use instrument star sensing and rely on GPS. Another method is to use tie points– identify a point in the satellite imagery, and find the same point in another, well- navigated image to serve as “pointing truth.” The offset between the two images, which can be determined through image processing techniques like normalized cross correlation (NCC), can then be translated into satellite roll, pitch, and yaw misalignments and other geometric model parameters. A difficulty of using tie points is that, if two satellites at different longitudes are looking at an object at some unknown altitude above the earth, there will be a parallax error. Often, particularly when the pointing truth is generated from aerial photography, tie points are only selected in clear sky areas, so that the tie point will be located on the ground. However, for TEMPO, often there will be times when the image will be dominated by clouds. Next Steps The Prototype Feasibility of this concept has been shown through a Matlab validation prototype. In September of 2012, GOES-14 had been taken out of storage due to an anomaly with GOES-13. After GOES-13 returned to normal operations, GOES-14 continued to operate for increased coverage during Hurricane Sandy. The data from this time period– three satellites taking simultaneous imagery– provides an excellent proxy dataset, with GOES-14 at 89.5° W, binned to a lower resolution, acting as TEMPO, and GOES-13 and -15 providing pointing truth. TEMPO’s INR algorithm is currently being implemented in C++. It is designed to work with imagery from the GOES-NOP series, or the GOES- R series, or a combination thereof. There is a great deal of existing NOP imagery available for development and testing purposes, but this technique is intended to take advantage of the increased refresh rate of GOES-R imagery, and its increased navigation accuracy. The tie point offsets are used as inputs for TEMPO’s Kalman Filter, which continually provides and updates estimates of the instrument state. The state includes various sources of system error, from roll, pitch, and yaw to slit rotational misalignment in the grating spectrometer. These states can then be used to calculate the geographic position of each pixel. Once an entire scan’s worth of tie points are available, the filter calculates a smoothed state, refining the accuracy of the calculations. The state estimates will also be used to determine scan parameters that keep the imagery centered over the CONUS. Accurate geolocations are key to TEMPO’s performance, as they will allow researchers to link observations back to potential sources of pollution. TEMPO has been selected as an Earth Venture Instrument under NASA’s Earth System Science Pathfinder program. Its development team is led by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and includes Ball Aerospace, NASA Langley, and a number of other partners. Carr Astronautics is the INR lead. TEMPO is scheduled for delivery in The work described in this poster is the subject of Provisional Patent 61/933,574: “Image Navigation and Registration (INR) Transfer from Exquisite Systems to Hosted Space Payloads”, filed 30 January When available, TEMPO’s ground system will use near simultaneous imagery from GOES-East and West to enable binocular vision and compensate for the parallax of unknown objects. Each TEMPO data cube is associated with the most recent CONUS image from each GOES satellite. The data is collapsed with a spectral response function and resampled spatially to create an image that resembles one taken by GOES’ imager. Chips are extracted from this image, and compared to neighborhoods in the GOES imagery, and NCC is used to determine the offset that would make the two images line up most accurately. If near-simultaneous imagery is available from only one GOES satellite, we can still use the match, but need to compensate for parallax using a cloud-top height or appropriately de-weight the measurement in the direction of the parallax when the feature being matched is a cloud. Each tie-point measurement is used to update a Kalman Filter state, which includes roll, pitch, and yaw attitude states. Between updates, the attitude states are propagated using gyroscope telemetry. Imagery from the three satellites used in the prototype is nearly simultaneous, and comes from identical imagers. Offsets in the tie points should be determined by the relative pointing misalignments of the satellites. Therefore, the offset values should be closely clustered for all tie points, and relatively small after compensating for parallax. In fact, this is what we see: image matching without parallax mitigation finds offsets in the range of -8 to +25 GOES pixels. Binocular tie points reduce that range to -2 to +2 GOES pixels, which translates to a pixel or less at TEMPO’s coarser resolution. Calculated object altitudes were generally in the range of 0 to 7km, which are realistic cloud heights. The parallax-compensated tie points follow roughly Gaussian distributions in each axis. Chips from two images are compared using normalized cross correlation. Poster #2.54 TEMPO GOES Parallax Parallax can cause large errors when comparing images gathered by satellites at different longitudes. Tie point offsets, colored by NCC value. The scatter is much higher in the east-west direction, where parallax is more important than in the north-south direction. Offsets for binocular tie points show much lower variance. Tie points shown at their locations in images from GOES-15(left), 14(center) and 13(right). Histogram of tie point offsets show a roughly Gaussian distribution GOES East TEMPO GOES West Binocular tie points use two sources of imagery to solve for altitude and mitigate parallax error.