Hein Stigum http://folk.uio.no/heins/ courses E8 DAGs intro 2h, Answers Hein Stigum http://folk.uio.no/heins/ courses 17. apr. H.S.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Statins for ischaemic heart disease: Excellence and equity Hackney, Newham & Tower Hamlets.
Advertisements

Presentation, data and programs at:
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK Mendelian randomization:
Coronary heart disease (CHD) event rates in secondary prevention and acute coronary syndrome trials A. Kumar, C.P. Cannon. Arch Med Sci 2007;3:S115-S125.
EPID Introduction to Analysis and Interpretation of HIV/STD Data Confounding Manya Magnus, Ph.D. Summer 2001 adapted from M. O’Brien and P. Kissinger.
Presentations in this series 1.Introduction 2.Self-matching 3.Proxies 4.Intermediates 5.Instruments 6.Equipoise Avoiding Bias Due to Unmeasured Covariates.
Chance, bias and confounding
Critical Appraisal for MRCGP Jim McMorran Coventry GP GP trainer Editor GPnotebook (
Cross-Sectional Studies. Features of C-S Studies Snapshot in time e.g. - cholesterol measurement and ECG measured at same time Determines prevalence at.
Modern Approach to Causal Inference
Covariate Selection for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Causal Graphs, epi forum
Oct-15H.S.1Oct-15H.S.1Oct-151 H.S.1Oct-15H.S.1Oct-15H.S.1 Causal Graphs, epi forum Hein Stigum
Oct-15H.S.1Oct-15H.S.1Oct-15H.S.1 Directed Acyclic Graphs DAGs Hein Stigum
Lecture 6 Objective 16. Describe the elements of design of observational studies: (current) cohort studies (longitudinal studies). Discuss the advantages.
October 15H.S.1 Causal inference Hein Stigum Presentation, data and programs at:
Confounding. Objectives To define and discuss confounding To discuss methods of diagnosing confounding To define positive, negative and qualitative confounding.
Lifecourse Epidemiology: Relevance for Studying Health Disparities in Cognitive Aging Maria Glymour Friday Harbor Psychometrics Workshop June 12, 2012.
Introduction to confounding and DAGs
1 Ch 11 Estimating Risk: Is There an Association? Table 11-1 A hypothetical investigation of a foodborne disease outbreak The suspect foods were identified.
Jun-16H.S.1 Confounding and DAGs (Directed Acyclic Graphs) Hein Stigum.
Selection Bias Concepts
Basics of Mediation David A. Kenny. 2 Interest in Mediation Mentions of “mediation” or “mediator” in psychology abstracts: –1980: 36 –1990: 122 –2000:
Risk Ratio for Coronary Heart Disease Mortality in 59 Randomized Controlled Trials of Cholesterol-Lowering Interventions Statins0.69 ( ) n=13 (16,228/11,279)
Case-Control Study Duanping Liao, MD, Ph.D
The association between serum CRP, total cholesterol, triglycerides and coronary artery disease Beata Virginas, Timea Gal.
Lipids Standardization and DAGs Enrique Schisterman, PhD Epidemiology Branch – DESPR – NICHD 1.
Matching. Objectives Discuss methods of matching Discuss advantages and disadvantages of matching Discuss applications of matching Confounding residual.
Motivation We wish to study the effect of genotype, measured at cohort baseline on incident disease during follow-up. Question: should we exclude cohort.
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study Increased risk of CHD death due to prior disease: Myocardial infarction or other coronary heart disease; Occlusive.
Confounding of indirect effects in the "real world" Danella Hafeman.
Figure 1. Illustrating confounders with a directed acyclic graph. A.A. Akinkugbe et al. J DENT RES 2016; Copyright © by International &
Date of download: 9/18/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Implications of Coronary Artery Calcium Testing.
Using Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) to assess confounding Glenys Webster & Anne Harris May 14, 2007 St Paul’s Hospital Statistical “Rounds”
Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Effect of Naturally Random Allocation to Lower Low-Density.
Matching methods for estimating causal effects Danilo Fusco Rome, October 15, 2012.
Ann Intern Med. 2000;133(6): doi: / Figure Legend:
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study
AIM HIGH Niacin plus Statin to prevent vascular events
Copyright © 2012 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Figure 7 Mendelian randomization of overlapping exposures
DAGs intro with exercises 3h DirectedAcyclicGraph
DAGs intro with exercises 6h
Presentation, data and programs at:
Figure 1 Mendelian randomization study
Presentation, data and programs at:
Hein Stigum courses DAGs intro, Answers Hein Stigum courses 28. nov. H.S.
Presenter: Wen-Ching Lan Date: 2018/03/28
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Scale, Causal Pies and Interaction 1h
APOC3, Coronary Disease, and Complexities of Mendelian Randomization
Description of studies for pooled analyses
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Challenges in Interpreting Multivariable Mendelian Randomization: Might “Good Cholesterol” Be Good After All?  Michael V. Holmes, George Davey Smith 
DAGs intro without exercises 1h Directed Acyclic Graph
Modeling the Causal Effects of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART)
Khurram Nasir et al. JACC 2015;66:
Kaplan–Meier estimates of the incidence of first heart failure hospitalization during follow-up according to the statin category among patients with type.
Cause of death Treatment-arm events, % (n=45 054)
Volume 383, Issue 9921, Pages (March 2014)
Baseline Demographic Characteristics of Adults With Diagnosed Heart Failure and Eligible to Receive Lipid-Lowering Therapy Alan S. Go, et al.
Statin Use and Risk of COPD Exacerbation Requiring Hospitalization
Counterfactual models Time dependent confounding
Summary of Measures and Design 3h
Baseline characteristics of the 1,842 men without coronary heart disease and the 230 men with a first coronary heart disease event during the 13-year.
Causal diagram showing assumed associations between baseline smoking status, ESRD, and baseline characteristics in the Study of Heart and Renal Protection.
Adjusted prevalence of CHD, atrial fibrillation, and stroke by sex and ethnic group. Numbers for sex are adjusted for age and clustering within practices.
Risk differences for incident stroke, coronary heart disease (CHD), and cardiovascular mortality (per 1000 person-years) by clinical risk factor in the.
Risk for cardiovascular disease and all-cause death according to RHR: (A) as categorical variable (HR≥75 bpm vs HR
Mendelian Randomization: Genes as Instrumental Variables
Presentation transcript:

Hein Stigum http://folk.uio.no/heins/ courses E8 DAGs intro 2h, Answers Hein Stigum http://folk.uio.no/heins/ courses 17. apr. H.S.

Exercise: Physical activity and Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) We want the total effect of Physical Activity on CHD. What would we adjust for? Unconditional   Path Type Status 1 E®D Causal Open 2 E¬C1®D Non-causal 3 E¬C2®D Bias Noncausal open=biasing path Conditioning on C1 and C2   Path Type Status 1 E®D Causal Open 2 E¬[C1]®D Non-causal Closed 3 E¬[C2]®D No bias Apr-17 Apr-17 Apr-17 H.S. H.S. 2 2

Tea and depression Total effect: adjust for O Direct effect: adjust for C (and O) Caffeine is both intermediate and part of a confounder path.   Path Type Status 1 E→D Causal Open 2 E→C→D 3 E←O→C→D Non-causal Tea and depression: Finnish study Caffeine reduces depression: Nurses Health Study direct total indirect Apr-17 H.S.

Statin and CHD We want the total effect of statin on CHD. What would you adjust for? Can we estimate the direct effect of statin on CHD (not mediated through cholesterol)? No adjustments gives the total effect Adjusting for C will close path 2 but will open path 3 and give bias! C is a collider on path 3 Apr-17 H.S.

Survival bias Conclusion: Have survival bias risk Paths: ED Causal Open E[S]RD Non-causal Open E early exposure D later disease E and R are unrelated causes for disease Conclusion: Have survival bias Must adjust for R to remove the bias 17. apr. H.S.

Exercise: causal pies Sufficient causes for Hospital: Selection bias: Causal pies for hospital Selection bias: Sufficient causes for Hospital: 1) or 2) and 3) both Selection bias: Negative bias Positive bias ? Apr-17 H.S.

Exercise: Collider stratification Hospital risk: Selection bias Collider stratification bias Apr-17 H.S.