The Effects of Jitter on the Perceptual Quality of Video Mark Claypool and Jonathan Tanner Computer Science Department Worcester Polytechnic Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Empirical Study of RealVideo Performance Across the Internet Yubing Wang, Mark Claypool and Zheng Zuo
Advertisements

Measuring Perceived Quality of Speech and Video in Multimedia Conferencing Applications Anna Watson and M. Angela Sasse Dept. of CS University College.
QoS Impact on User Perception and Understanding of Multimedia Video Clips G. Ghinea and J.P. Thomas Department of Computer Science University of Reading,
Performance Analysis of Home Streaming Video Using Orb Rabin Karki, Thangam Seenivasan, Mark Claypool and Robert Kinicki Worcester Polytechnic Institute.
Multimedia Systems As Presented by: Craig Tomastik.
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 Chapter 28 Real-Time Traffic over the Internet.
Chapter 20: Multimedia Systems Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts Chapter 20: Multimedia Systems What is Multimedia.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009 Operating System Concepts – 8 th Edition Chapter 20: Multimedia Systems.
The Good, the Bad and the Muffled: the Impact of Different Degradations on Internet Speech Anna Watson and M. Angela Sasse Department of CS University.
1 ARMOR-Adjusting Repair and Media Scaling with Operations Research for Streaming Video PhD Candidate: Huahui Wu - Computer Science, Worcester Poly. Inst.
1 Measurements of the Congestion Responsiveness of Windows Streaming Media James Nichols, Mark Claypool, Robert Kinicki and Mingzhe Li Computer Science.
Application, Network and Link Layer Measurements of Streaming Video over a Wireless Campus Network Passive & Active Measurement Workshop 05 Boston, MA,
The Good, the Bad and the Muffled: the Impact of Different Degradations on Internet Speech Anna Watson and M. Angela Sasse Dept. of CS University College.
EE442—Multimedia Networking Jane Dong California State University, Los Angeles.
An Empirical Study of RealVideo Performance Across the Internet Yubing Wang, Mark Claypool and Zheng Zuo
1 Sangeun Han, Athina Markopoulou Transmitting Scalable Video over a DiffServ network EE368C Project Proposal Sangeun Han, Athina Markopoulou 1/30/01.
A New Adaptive FEC Loss Control Algorithm for Voice Over IP Applications Chinmay Padhye, Kenneth Christensen and Wilfirdo Moreno Department of Computer.
MediaPlayer ™ vs. RealPlayer ™ A Comparison of Network Turbulence Mingzhe Li, Mark Claypool, Robert Kinicki CS Department Worcester Polytechnic Institute.
CS 360 – Spring 2007 Pacific University Multimedia Content (Streaming Media) Session “Layer” section Feb 2007.
Impact of Reference Distance for Motion Compensation Prediction on Video Quality ACM/SPIE Multimedia Computing and Networking (MMCN) San Jose, California,
Successful Multiparty Audio Communication over the Internet Vicky Hardman, M. Angela Sasse and Isidor Kouvelas Department of Computer Science University.
Prefix Caching assisted Periodic Broadcast for Streaming Popular Videos Yang Guo, Subhabrata Sen, and Don Towsley.
1 PV'2003, Nantes France, April 2003 Measurement of the Congestion Responsiveness of RealPlayer Streaming Video Over UDP Jae Chung, Mark Claypool, Yali.
An Empirical Study of Delay Jitter Management Policies D. Stone and K. Jeffay Computer Science Department University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill ACM.
Adaptive Content-Aware Scaling for Improved Video Streaming. Avanish Tripathi Mark Claypool Presented by: Huahui Wu Worcester Polytechnic Institute
The Effectiveness of a QoE - Based Video Output Scheme for Audio- Video IP Transmission Shuji Tasaka, Hikaru Yoshimi, Akifumi Hirashima, Toshiro Nunome.
On Combining Temporal Scaling and Quality Scaling for Streaming MPEG Huahui Wu, Mark Claypool, Robert Kinicki Computer Science, Worcester Polytechnic Institute.
Rate-Based Active Queue Management with Priority Classes for Better Video Transmission Jae Chung and Mark Claypool Computer Science Department Worcester.
A Model for MPEG with Forward Error Correction (FEC) and TCP-Friendly Bandwidth Huahui Wu, Mark Claypool & Robert Kinicki Computer Science Department Worcester.
Dynamic-CBT and ChIPS – Router Support for Improved Multimedia Performance on the Internet Jae Chung and Mark Claypool Computer Science Department Worcester.
CSc 461/561 CSc 461/561 Multimedia Systems 0. Introduction.
Dynamic-CBT and ChIPS - Router Support for Improved Multimedia Performance on the Internet Jae Chung and Mark Claypool Department of Computer Science WPI.
Better-Behaved Better- Performing Multimedia Networking Jae Chung and Mark Claypool (Avanish Tripathi) Computer Science Department Worcester Polytechnic.
Measurement of the Congestion Responsiveness of RealPlayer Streaming Video Over UDP Jae Chung, Mark Claypool, Yali Zhu Proceedings of the International.
Using Redundancy and Interleaving to Ameliorate the Effects of Packet Loss in a Video Stream Yali Zhu, Mark Claypool and Yanlin Liu Department of Computer.
Successful Multiparty Audio Communication over the Internet Vicky Hardman, M. Angela Sasse and Isidor Kouvelas Department of Computer Science University.
Better Behaved, Better Performing Multimedia Networking Jae Chung and Mark Claypool Computer Science Department Worcester Polytechnic Institute Proceedings.
Streaming Video Over Variable Bit-Rate Wireless Channels IEEE Trans. on Multimedia, April 2004 Thomas Stockhammer, Hrvoje Jenka ˇ c, and Gabriel Kuhn.
Using Interleaving to Ameliorate the Effects of Packet Loss in a Video Stream Mark Claypool and Yali Zhu Computer Science Department Worcester Polytechnic.
A Selective Retransmission Protocol for Multimedia on the Internet Mike Piecuch, Ken French, George Oprica and Mark Claypool Computer Science Department.
Guidelines for Selecting Practical MPEG Group of Pictures The IASTED International Conference on Internet and Multimedia Systems and Applications (EuroIMSA.
The Effects of Latency on Player Performance in Cloud-based Games Mark Claypool and David Finkel Computer Science and Interactive.
Computer Networks Laboratory Utility-Based Adaptive Video Streaming Mechanisms Paolo V. Encomienda Nestor Michael C. Tiglao University of the Philippines.
XE33OSA Chapter 20: Multimedia Systems. 20.2XE33OSA Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Chapter 20: Multimedia Systems What is Multimedia Compression.
CS Spring 2012 CS 414 – Multimedia Systems Design Lecture 29 – Buffer Management (Part 2) Klara Nahrstedt Spring 2012.
Quality of Service in the Internet The slides of part 1-3 are adapted from the slides of chapter 7 published at the companion website of the book: Computer.
EFFECTS OF LOCALITY, CONTENT AND JAVA RUNTIME ON VIDEO PERFORMANCE Vikram Chhabra, Akshay Kothare, Mark Claypool Computer Science Department Worcester.
Content Clustering Based Video Quality Prediction Model for MPEG4 Video Streaming over Wireless Networks Asiya Khan, Lingfen Sun & Emmanuel Ifeachor 16.
1 CP586 © Peter Lo 2003 Multimedia Communication Video Terminology.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009 Operating System Concepts – 8 th Edition, Multimedia Systems.
Effects of P2P Streaming on Video Quality Csaba Kiraly, Luca Abeni, Renato Lo Cigno DISI – University of Trento, Italy
August 23, 2001ITCom2001 Proxy Caching Mechanisms with Video Quality Adjustment Masahiro Sasabe Graduate School of Engineering Science Osaka University.
Real-time Content Filtering for Mobile Devices Philip West Greg Foster and Peter Clayton Department of Computer Science Rhodes University.
Adaptive Content-Aware Scaling for Improved Video Streaming. Avanish Tripathi Advisor: Mark Claypool Reader: Bob Kinicki.
Saving Bitrate vs. Users: Where is the Break-Even Point in Mobile Video Quality? ACM MM’11 Presenter: Piggy Date:
On the Interactions Between Layered Quality Adaptation and Congestion Control for Streaming Video 11 th International Packet Video Workshop Nick Feamster.
Chapter 20: Multimedia Systems
Multimedia Systems Operating System Presentation On
Chapter 20: Multimedia Systems
Chapter 20: Multimedia Systems
Overview What is Multimedia? Characteristics of multimedia
Mark Claypool and Jonathan Tanner Computer Science Department
An Analytic Comparison of RPS Video Repair
Chapter 20: Multimedia Systems
Chapter 20: Multimedia Systems
Chapter 20: Multimedia Systems
Digital Video Faraz Khan.
Adjusting Forward Error Correction for TCP- Friendly Streaming MPEG
Presentation transcript:

The Effects of Jitter on the Perceptual Quality of Video Mark Claypool and Jonathan Tanner Computer Science Department Worcester Polytechnic Institute Proceedings of ACM Multimedia Conference November 1999

Motivation Computers are powerful Networks have high bandwidth  Video across the Internet to the desktop is possible But … the Internet is not optimized for video playback –bandwidth limitations (loss) –delivery limitations (loss) –timing guarantee limitations (delay and jitter)

Loss and Jitter in a Video Stream

Effects on Perceptual Quality Effects of delay is well-studied –(Roy, 1994) ATM recommendations –(Dimolitsas+, 1993) Teleconf Effects of loss is well-studied –(Massimino and Sheridan, 1994) Teleoperators –(Gringeri +, 1998) MPEG-2 over lossy ATM –(Perkins, Hodson and Hardman, 1998) SuperJ Reducing jitter is well-studied –(Ramjee ) Buffering –(Stone and Jeffay, 1995) Buffering But, … effects of jitter on PQ are not studied

Experiments Induce Loss and Jitter in Video –levels: none (“perfect”), low and high –based on Internet traces ([GBC98]) –Same “amount” of loss and jitter Users give perceptual quality rating –Slider (reading is ), labeled best-worst –over 40 users –most students, years, CS majors Video clips –1 minute clips, sampled from television –Temporal vs. Spatial redundancy

Sample Clip: News

Sample Clip: Sports

Sample Clip: Home Shopping

Sample Clip: Animation

Sample Clip: Sitcom

Video Playout Reduce effects of order of quality First picture was “perfect” to prime users equally

Effect of Jitter

Effect of Movie Content (Confidence Intervals overlapped!)

Conclusions Jitter can degrade perceptual quality as much as loss Low amount of jitter or loss severely degrade quality Video content determines effects of jitter or loss only slightly

Future Work Refinement of perceptual quality curve –Where is the “knee”? –Forced choice comparison Comparison on effects on perceptual quality of: –jitter –loss –delay Exploration of combination effects Exploration of amounts of delay, loss, jitter and what network conditions cause them

Evaluation of Science? Category of Paper Science Evaluation (1-10)? Space devoted to Experiments?