Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing the BTeV Collaboration 05/17/2002, FPCP Conference, Philadelphia, PA The BTeV Experiment Outline Physics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BTeV Physics, The Staged Detector & Some Physics Reach Comparisons with LHCb S. Stone July, 2004.
Advertisements

LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics.
(what are all those B factory talks really about ?)
BTeV forever1 BTeV The final aim of BTeV experiment is to search for New Physics in the Heavy Flavor sector, b and c We could either discover it or contribute.
PHENIX Decadal Plan o Midterm upgrades until 2015 o Long term evolution after 2015 Dynamical origins of spin- dependent interactions New probes of longitudinal.
Prospect for  s measurement at LHC Alessia Satta on behalf of the LHCb collaboration + some Atlas and CMS results Physics at LHC, 3 rd october 2008.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
Study of B  D S ( * )  D*  *   and D ( * ) (4  )   at CLEO Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing The CLEO Collaboration DPF 2000 Aug 9.
ICFP 2005, Taiwan Colin Gay, Yale University B Mixing and Lifetimes from CDF Colin Gay, Yale University for the CDF II Collaboration.
Search for B s oscillations at D  Constraining the CKM matrix Large uncertainty Precise measurement of V td  properly constrain the CKM matrix yield.
1 Measurement of f D + via D +   + Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K- K+K+ “I charm you, by my once-commended.
MC Study of B°  S Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 06/27/01.
1 B s  J/  update Lifetime Difference & Mixing phase Avdhesh Chandra for the CDF and DØ collaborations Beauty 2006 University of Oxford, UK.
The new Silicon detector at RunIIb Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96.
Description of BTeV detector Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing The BTeV Collaboration DPF 2000 Aug , 2000 Columbus, Ohio.
October 18, 2003B. Cox 1 The Physics Reach of BTeV B. Cox University of Virginia October 18, 2003 “potentially the best quark flavor physics experiment.
Peter Fauland (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity for the B S - mixing phase  S at LHCb.
MC Study on B°  J/  ° With J/      °     Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 03/04/01.
The BaBarians are coming Neil Geddes Standard Model CP violation BaBar Sin2  The future.
Ulrich Uwer University of Heidelberg On behalf of the LHCb collaboration Beauty 2003, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Physics Performance.
Analysis work by: Rachid Ayad Sheldon Stone Jianchun Wang CBX note available: /homes/cleo/sls/ds4pi.ps Status of B  D  (4  )   analysis Jianchun.
Donatella Lucchesi1 B Physics Review: Part II Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova RTN Workshop The 3 rd generation as a probe for new physics.
The BTeV Tracking Systems David Christian Fermilab f January 11, 2001.
FPCP 2003 K. Honscheid Ohio State The BTeV Experiment: Physics and Detector FPCP 2003 K. Honscheid Ohio State University More details can be found at www-physics.mps.ohio-state.edu/~klaus/research/cipanp.pdf.
SuperKEKB to search for new sources of flavor mixing and CP violation - Introduction - Introduction - Motivation for L= Motivation for L=
BTeV – A Dedicated B Physics Experiment at the Tevatron Collider Klaus Honscheid The Ohio State University July 13, 2001.
Nick Hadley Run II Physics (I) Nick Hadley The University of Maryland New Perspectives 2000 Fermilab - June 28, 2000.
Physics Performance of LHC-B Neville Harnew University of Oxford Beauty-97, Los Angeles October Outline Introduction The LHC-B Experiment New.
CIPANP2003 K. Honscheid Ohio State The Future of Flavor Physics at Hadron Colliders CIPANP 2003 K. Honscheid Ohio State University.
QCD 与强子物理研讨会, 2010 年 8 月 4 - 10 日,威海 Prospects of Flavor Physics at the LHC 高原宁 清华大学高能物理研究中心 2010/8/61Y. Gao, Prospects of flavor physics at the LHC.
1 BTeV Status  Collaboration Status New Groups  University of Iowa - C. Newsom (Pixels)  Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP - Protvino) - A. Derevschikov,
Higgs Properties Measurement based on HZZ*4l with ATLAS
CP Violation: Recent Measurements and Perspectives for Dedicated Experiments LAFEX/CBPF March, 2001 Outline Introduction CP violation in the B sector BaBar.
NA48-2 new results on Charged Semileptonic decays Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Kaon 2005 Workshop 14 June 2005.
RICH 2002, Pylos, Greece1 Steven Blusk for the BTeV Collaboration Design of the BTeV RICH and its Expected Performance.
S.B. - Status of - Physics at LHC, June 15 th 2004, Vienna 1 Status of BTeV experiment at the Fermilab Tevatron Stefano Bianco Laboratori.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
B c mass, lifetime and BR’s at CDF Masato Aoki University of Tsukuba For the CDF Collaboration International Workshop on Heavy Quarkonium BNL.
1 Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment Marcel Merk NIKHEF Representing the LHCb collaboration 19 th.
DIS 2004, Strbske Pleso,April LHCb experiment sensitivity to CKM phases and New Physics from mixing and CP violation measurements in B decays LHCb.
CP violation measurements with the ATLAS detector E. Kneringer – University of Innsbruck on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration BEACH2012, Wichita, USA “Determination.
The BTeV Project at Fermilab Talk to DOE/Fermi Group Jan. 11, 2001 Introduction – Joel Butler Tracking detectors – David Christian Particle Identification.
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
Ю.Г. Куденко 1 Редкие распады каонов Дубна, 12 мая 2004 Вторые Марковские чтения Дубна-Москва, мая 2004 г. Институт ядерных исследований РАН CKM.
1 Highlights from Belle Jolanta Brodzicka (NO1, Department of Leptonic Interactions) SAB 2009.
Radiative penguins at hadron machines Kevin Stenson University of Colorado.
High precision and new CP violation measurements with LHCb Michael Koratzinos, CERN EPS HEP 99 Tampere,15 July 1999.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
ATLAS B-Physics Reach M.Smizanska, Lancaster University, UK
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
Sergey Burdin FNAL DØ Collaboration 8/12/2005 Chicago Flavor New Bs Mixing Result from DØ.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
Clara MatteuzziFPCP, Paris 2-6 june 2003 The LHCb experiment: status and physics program Clara Matteuzzi On behalf of the LHCb collaboration Università.
Jeroen van Hunen (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity to  s and  Γ s at LHCb.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
P Spring 2002 L16Richard Kass B mesons and CP violation CP violation has recently ( ) been observed in the decay of mesons containing a b-quark.
The BTeV Pixel Detector and Trigger System Simon Kwan Fermilab P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510, USA BEACH2002, June 29, 2002 Vancouver, Canada.
BTeV Beam Test Results Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing J.A. Appel, J.N. Butler, G. Cardoso, H. Cheung, G. Chiodini, D.C. Christian, E.E.
Open and Hidden Beauty Production in 920 GeV p-N interactions Presented by Mauro Villa for the Hera-B collaboration 2002/3 data taking:
Klaus Honscheid 1 Ohio State University BTeV – A Dedicated B Physics Experiment at the Tevatron Collider Klaus Honscheid The Ohio State University DPF.
1 outline ● Part I: some issues in experimental b physics ● why study b quarks? ● what does it take? ● Part II: LHCb experiment ● Part III: LHCb first.
The New CHOD detector for the NA62 experiment at CERN S
Measurement of the phase of Bs mixing with Bs ϕϕ
Overview of LHCb Poland Ukraine Brazil UK Switzerland France Spain
LHCb Particle Identification and Performance
8th International Conference on Advanced Technology and
B Physics at the LHC Neville Harnew University of Oxford.
The Large Hadron Collider beauty Experiment & Physics
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
Presentation transcript:

Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing the BTeV Collaboration 05/17/2002, FPCP Conference, Philadelphia, PA The BTeV Experiment Outline Physics Goal The one-arm spectrometer Physics sensitivities Status

2 BTeV—as of March 2002 Belarussian State- D.Drobychev, A. Lobko, A. Lopatrik, R. Zouversky UC Davis - P. Yager Univ. of Colorado- J. Cumalat Fermi National Lab J. Appel, E. Barsotti, C. N. Brown, J. Butler, H. Cheung, G. Chiodini, D. Christian, S. Cihangir, R. Coluucia, I. Gaines, P. Garbincius, L. Garren, E. Gottschalk, A. Hahn, P. Kasper, P. Kasper, R. Kutschke, S. Kwan, P. Lebrun, P. McBride, M. Votava, M. Wang, J. Yarba Univ. of Florida at Gainesville P. Avery University of Houston M. Bukhari, K. Lau, B. W. Mayes, V. Rodriguez, S. Subramania Illinois Institute of Technology R. A. Burnstein, D. M. Kaplan, L. M. Lederman, H. A. Rubin, C. White Univ. of Illinois- M. Haney, D. Kim, M. Selen, J. Wiss Univ. of Insubria in Como- P. Ratcliffe, M. Rovere INFN - Frascati- M. Bertani, L. Benussi, S. Bianco, M. Caponero, F. Fabbri, F. Felli, M. Giardoni, A. La Monaca, E. Pace, M. Pallotta, A. Paolozzi INFN - Milano - G. Alimonti, P. D’Angelo, L. Edera, S. Magni, D. Menasce, L. Moroni, D. Pedrini, S.Sala, L. Uplegger INFN - Pavia - G. Boca, G. Liguori, & P. Torre INFN - Torino – R. Arcidiacono, S. Argiro, S. Bagnasco, N. Cartiglia, R. Cester, F. Marchetto, E. Menichetti, R. Mussa, N. Pastrone IHEP Protvino, Russia A. Derevschikov, Y. Goncharenko, V. Khodyrev, V. Kravtsov, A. Meschanin, V. Mochalov, D. Morozov, L. Nogach, K. Shestermanov, L. Soloviev, A. Uzunian, A. Vasiliev University of Iowa C. Newsom, & R. Braunger University of Minnesota V. V. Frolov, Y. Kubota, R. Poling, & A. Smith Nanjing Univ. (China) T. Y. Chen, D. Gao, S. Du, M. Qi, B. P. Zhang, Z. Xi Zhang, J. W. Zhao Ohio State University K. Honscheid, & H. Kagan Univ. of Pennsylvania W. Selove Univ. of Puerto Rico A. Lopez, & W. Xiong Univ. of Science & Tech. of China - G. Datao, L. Hao, Ge Jin, T. Yang, & X. Q. Yu Shandong Univ. (China) - C. F. Feng, Yu Fu, Mao He, J. Y. Li, L. Xue, N. Zhang, & X. Y. Zhang Southern Methodist University - T. Coan SUNY Albany - M. Alam Syracuse University M. Artuso, S. Blusk, C. Boulahouache, O. Dorjkhaidav, K. Khroustalev, R.Mountain, N. Raja, T. Skwarnicki, S. Stone, J. C. Wang Univ. of Tennessee T. Handler, R. Mitchell Vanderbilt University W. Johns, P. Sheldon, K. Stenson, E. Vaandering, & M. Webster Univ. of Virginia: M. Arenton, S. Conetti, B. Cox, A. Ledovskoy Wayne State University G. Bonvicini, & D. Cinabro, A. Shreiner University of Wisconsin M. Sheaff York University S. Menary

3 Physics Goals  BTeV is designed to search for physics beyond Standard Model and make precise measurements of SM parameters.  The important measurements to make involve mixing, CP violation and rare decays of hadrons containing b or c quarks, especially:  CP violation in B o, B s and D o mesons.  B s mixing and  s.  Rare b decays. A window to new physics

4 The CKM Matrix and Phases  The CP violation in the SM originates from quark mixing.  The Unitarity of the CKM matrix allows us to construct 6 triangles, the most common beauty triangle is the bd triangle.  The primary goal is to measure CKM phases:   It is also important to measure the lengths of the sides (magnitudes).  It is important to remove the 4- fold ambiguity generated by sin( .      Constraint: 

5 Required Measurements for CKM Tests The BTeV detector is unique that satisfies all these requirements.

6 A Forward Detector at pp Collider b production angle b production peaks at large angles with large bb correlation The higher momentum b are at larger   Pseudo-rapidity  Forward region, 10  300 mrad, 1.5 <|  <3.5 BTeV

7 The Tevatron as b & c Source

8 The BTeV Spectrometer

9 The BTeV Pixel Detector  Provides extremely high quality precision space points for vertex reconstruction, which are also used in the detached vertex trigger.  Reasons for pixel detector:  Superior signal to noise.  Excellent spatial resolution (5-10  m).  Very low occupancy.  Radiation hard.  Very fast.  Special features:  Directly used in the level 1 trigger.  Pulse height is measured on every channel with a 3-bit FADC.  It is inside a dipole and gives a standalone momentum. 0.5 cm 30 2-plane pixel stations Pixels size: 50  m  400  m

10 Performance of the Pixel Detector B       /  L =36 at p B =30GeV Spatial Resolution from Beam Test 1999 Large L decay /  L is critical for b experiment p B (GeV) P B distribution Decay length error  L (cm)

11 Ring Imaging Cherenkov Detector Cherenkov angle vs P Liquid C 5 F 12 (n=1.24) Gas C 4 F 10 (n= ) The RICH provides identification of kaons and pions. It is essential to CP violation study

12 Lepton Identification Using RICH  While the full detector aperture is 300 mr, the acceptance of the electromagnetic calorimeter and muon detector is only ~200 mr.  The RICH, however, has both e/  and  discrimination at low momentum. The wide angle particles are mostly at low momentum! 44 B  J/  X

13 Electromagnetic Calorimeter  EM calorimeter for  reconstruction and electron ID.  10,000 PbWO 4 crystal (rad hard) with PMT readout  Lateral size: 27.2  27.2mm 2 (front), 28  28mm 2 (back), Length 22cm (25 X 0 )  Resolution:  E /E = 0.8% for  in B  K* ,  M = 2.6 MeV for 10 GeV .  Sample crystals tested in a beam at Protvino.

14 Detached Vertex Trigger State efficiency(%) State efficiency(%) B   +  - 63 B o  K +  - 63 B s  D s K 71 B o  J/  K s 50 B -  D o K - 70 B s  J/  K * 68 B -  K s  - 27 B o    o  o   Idea: finds the primary vertex, selects events that have additional tracks miss it  Requirement: at least 2 tracks detached by more than 6   1% minimum bias at level 1 trigger.  Refined reconstruction at level 2 and 3.  With 3-level trigger scheme, the event rate:  Efficiency: (after the other analyses cuts) 7.6 MHz  3 kHz

15 Physics Reach (CKM) in 10 7 s J/  l + l - Reaction B (B)(x10 -6 ) # of EventsS/B Parameter Error or (Value) Bo+-Bo+ ,600 3 Asymmetry B s  D s K  8 o B o  J/  K S J/  l + l  , sin(2  ) B s  D s  ,000 3 x s (75) B -  D o (K +  - ) K B -  D o (K + K - ) K ,000>10  13 o B-KS -B-KS  ,600 1 <4 o + B o  K +  ,  theory errors Bo+-Bo+- 28 5, BoooBooo  ~4 o B s  J/  330 2, B s  J/  670 9, sin(2  Critical check to the SM

16 Critical Checks Using   Silva & Wolfenstein (hep-ph/ ), (Aleksan, Kayser & London), propose a test of the SM, that can reveal new physics; it relies on measuring the angle .  BTeV can use CP eigenstates in B s decay to measure  for example B s  J/       Can also use J/  but need a complicated angular analysis  The critical check is  Very sensitive since  ±  Since  ~ 0.03, need lots of data

17 Rare b Decays  Sensitive to high mass gauge bosons and fermions. It is a good place to find new physics.  Exclusive Rare Decays such as B  B  K* +  : Dalitz plot & polarization  Inclusive Rare Decays such as inclusive b  s , b  d , b  s +   + - Reaction B (10 -6 ) Signal /Year S/BPhysics B o  K* o  +  polarization & rate B-K-+-B-K-+ rate bs+-bs+ rate: Wilson coefficents

18 MSSM Measurements (from Hinchcliff & Kersting hep-ph/ )  Contributions to B s mixing  Contributions to direct CP violating decay Asym=(M W /m squark ) 2 sin(   ), ~0 in SM B-K-B-K- CP asymmetry  0.1sin   cos   sin(  m s t), ~10 x SM B s  J 

19 Reconstructed Events in New Physics Modes: Comparison of BTeV with B-factories Mode BTeV (10 7 s) B-fact (500 fb -1 ) YieldTaggedS/BYieldTaggedS/B B s  J/   > B-K-B-K > BoKsBoKs B o  K*  +  ~50 3 Bs +-Bs + >15 0 Bo+-Bo+ >10 0 D *+   + D o, D o  K  + ~10 8 large 8x10 5 large

20 Specific Comparisons with LHC-b Yields in two final states Mode BR Yield S/B Yield S/B B s  D s K - 3.0x Bo+-Bo+- 2.8x BoooBooo 0.5x not known BTeVLHC-b

21 Status  BTeV received a second unanimous approval by the Fermilab PAC (4/2002).  Detector costs have been reduced from ~180 M$ to ~110 M$ (includes G&A and 30% contingency). Full “Temple” review in 9/2002.  P5 or equivalent review for DOE in Fall PAC Recommendation “ … BTeV has designed and prototyped an ambitious trigger that will use B decay displaced vertices as its primary criterion. This capability, together with BTeV’s excellent electromagnetic calorimetry and particle ID and enormous yields, will allow this experiment to study a broad array of B and B s decays. BTeV has a broader physics reach than LHCb and should provide definitive measurements of CKM parameters and the most sensitive tests for new physics in the flavor sector.”