1 Teaching for Learning: Using Active Learning Strategies & Cooperative Student Groups to Promote Learning in Lecture Classes – Session 4 Karl Smith Civil.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ackward esign. Teachers are designers. The effectiveness of their designs corresponds to whether they have accomplished their goals for the end users.
Advertisements

Formal Cooperative Learning: Text Comprehension/Interpretation Karl A. Smith Laura Apol.
Engaging Faculty and Students in Talking about Teaching and Learning (Informed by Assessment Data) Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University.
Cooperative/Collaborative Learning An Instructional technique in which learning activities are specifically designed for small interactive groups Collaborative.
Engaging Faculty and Students in Talking about Teaching and Learning (Informed by Assessment Data) Karl A. Smith Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota.
Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota University.
Formal Cooperative Learning: Text Comprehension/Interpretation Karl A. Smith Laura Apol.
Identifying, Formulating And Solving Problems
University of Missouri – Rolla Center for Educational Research & Teaching Innovation January 5, 2006 Karl Smith University of Minnesota Civil Engineering.
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
1 The Innovation Journey VandeVen, Polley, Garud & Venkataraman, The innovation journey is a nonlinear cycle of divergent and convergent activities.
An Approach to Creating and Facilitating Workshops Library Instructor College Fall 2010 Charles Dershimer Erping Zhu Center For Research on Learning and.
1 Problem-Based Cooperative Learning Karl Smith Civil Engineering Estimation Exercise.
1 Problem-Based Cooperative Learning Karl Smith Civil Engineering Estimation Exercise.
Introduction to teaching and assessing so students will learn more using learner-centered teaching Phyllis Blumberg Warm-up activity How can instructor’s.
Formal Cooperative Learning: Text Comprehension/Interpretation Karl A. Smith Laura Apol.
Cooperative Learning Students work together in small groups and learn through interaction with each other while the teacher coaches the process.
Design Down Curriculum Planning & Cooperative Learning Douglas Gosse, PhD Nipissing University, Office H120 TEL: ,
1 Active Learning Organizing Effective Groups in Class.
Engaging Faculty and Students in Talking about Teaching and Learning (Informed by Assessment Data) Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University.
1 Teaching for Learning: Using Active Learning Strategies & Cooperative Student Groups to Promote Learning in Lecture Classes – Session 3 Karl Smith Civil.
Design & Implementation of Problem-Based Cooperative Learning Karl Smith University of Minnesota Civil Engineering.
Effective Team Work and Group Process Human Relations Chapter 11: Cooperative Learning in the Classroom By Jacqueline Malcolm, Grace Corda, Zaeem Minan,
1 Straightforward Backward Course Design Karl A. Smith Civil Engineering University of Minnesota Science and.
Designing a Training Program RATIONALE OF THE TRAINING Background or introduction of what the training is all about –Developments in the field/discipline/area.
Structuring Cooperative Learning: Examples from Small group learning in higher education (SGLHE) Karl A. Smith University of Minnesota Cooperative.
Design Down Curriculum Planning & Cooperative Learning Douglas Gosse, PhD Assistant Professor, Faculty of Education Office A145 Nipissing University 100.
Designing Cooperative Learning Applications Karl A. Smith University of Minnesota  Felder & Brent B Course Design  Wiggins & McTighe B Understanding.
Formal Cooperative Learning: Text Comprehension/Interpretation Karl A. Smith Laura Apol.
Assessment Power! Pamela Cantrell, Ph.D. Director, Raggio Research Center for STEM Education College of Education University of Nevada, Reno.
Problem-based Learning Cherdsak Iramaneerat Department of Surgery Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital 1PBL.
Design and Implementation of Active and Cooperative Learning in Large Classes Michigan State University 12th Annual Spring Institute Karl Smith University.
Engaging Faculty and Students in Talking about Teaching and Learning (Informed by Assessment Data) Karl A. Smith Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota.
Guidance for Graduate Students and Early Career Faculty Karl A. Smith University of Minnesota Cooperative Jigsaw Nanyang Business School.
Design & Implementation of Problem-Based Cooperative Learning Karl Smith University of Minnesota May 2004.
21st Centruy Approaches to Teaching Physics
Problem-Based Cooperative Learning
D2L Refresher Upload content into the Content section in a D2L course
Three Ways to Structure Cooperative Learning: Formal-Informal-Base
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
University of Minnesota – Duluth
Virginia Tech CEUT Teaching Enhancement Workshop November 2006
Drake University Designing Courses that Help Students Learn
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Coaching.
Karl A. Smith Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota
Design & Implementation of Cooperative Learning
University of Wisconsin - Platteville
Design & Implementation of Cooperative Learning
Design & Implementation of Cooperative Learning
Utah State University Designing Courses that Help Students Learn
Three Ways to Structure Cooperative Learning: Informal-Formal-Base
Project-Based Cooperative Learning
Three Ways to Structure Cooperative Learning: Informal-Formal-Base
Formal Cooperative Learning: Jigsaw
Designing Courses that Help Students Learn Louisiana State University
Design & Implementation of Cooperative Learning
Cooperative Learning Students work together in small groups and learn through interaction with each other while the teacher coaches the process.
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Cooperative Learning Concepts
Brigham Young University
Design & Implementation of Problem-Based Cooperative Learning
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Designing Courses that Help Students Learn Michigan State University
Formal Cooperative Learning: Reading Comprehension/Interpretation
Three Ways to Structure Cooperative Learning: Formal-Informal-Base
Structuring Cooperative Learning:
Presentation transcript:

1 Teaching for Learning: Using Active Learning Strategies & Cooperative Student Groups to Promote Learning in Lecture Classes – Session 4 Karl Smith Civil Engineering University of Minnesota Kathleen O’Donovan Connie Tzenis Center for Teaching and Learning University of Minnesota Agricultural Exports and Rural Income (AERI) Midwest University Consortium for International Activities Faculty Workshop – July 2004

2 Backward Design Stage 1. Identify Desired Results/Goals Stage 2. Determine Acceptable Evidence/ Assessment Stage 3. Plan Learning Activities and Instruction

3 Backward Design Stage 3. Plan Learning Activities & Instruction What enabling knowledge (facts, concepts, and principles) and skills (procedures) will students need to perform effectively and achieve desired results? What activities will equip students with the needed knowledge and skills? What will need to be taught and coached, and how should it be taught, in light of performance goals? What materials and resources are best suited to accomplish these goals? Is the overall design coherent and effective?

4 Session Design - Cooperative Learning Format TASK: Complete the session design project. INDIVIDUAL: Everyone contributes. COOPERATIVE: One plan from the group, strive for agreement, make sure everyone is able to explain or demonstrate the learning activity. EXPECTED CRITERIA FOR SUCCESS: Everyone must be able to explain. EVALUATION: Does the learning strategy fit the selected goal? INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTABILITY: One member from your group may be randomly chosen to explain or demonstrate the activity. EXPECTED BEHAVIORS: Active participating, checking, encouraging, and elaborating by all members. INTERGROUP COOPERATION: Each group will describe or demonstrate their activity to one other group.

5 Team Member Roles Task Recorder Checker – check to make sure each member understands and can explain Timekeeper

6 Design I: Session for Colleagues Plan a session featuring the highlights of this workshop What are 2-3 goals you have for your colleagues? Select one of these goals and design an activity that would help your colleagues meet this goal? How will you assess their achievement of the goal? What materials and resources do you need?

7 Design 2: Course/Lesson Stage 3. Plan Learning Activities & Instruction What enabling knowledge (facts, concepts, and principles) and skills (procedures) will students need to perform effectively and achieve desired results? What activities will equip students with the needed knowledge and skills? What will need to be taught and coached, and how should it be taught, in light of performance goals? What materials and resources are best suited to accomplish these goals? Is the overall design coherent and effective?

8 Worksheet 1 Worksheet for Designing a Course Ways of Assessing Actual Teaching-Learning Helpful Resources: Learning Goals for Course: This Kind of Learning: Activities: (e.g., people, things)

9 Professor's Role in Formal Cooperative Learning -- Planning Form Overview -- 1.Specifying Objectives 2.Making Decisions 3.Explaining Task, Positive Interdependence, and Individual Accountability 4.Monitoring and Intervening to Teach Skills 5.Evaluating Students' Achievement and Group Effectiveness

10

11

12 Effective Course Design Students Goals and Objectives Assessment EC 2000 Bloom’s Taxonomy Course-specific goals & objectives Cooperative learning Lectures Labs Other experiences Classroom assessment techniques Tests Instruction Other measures Technology (Felder & Brent, 1999)

13 It could well be that faculty members of the twenty-first century college or university will find it necessary to set aside their roles as teachers and instead become designers of learning experiences, processes, and environments James Duderstadt, 1999

14 Identifying, Formulating And Solving Problems

15 Problem Identification What are the problems, challenges, and barriers interfering with our progress? Develop a List of Problems 1.Individually B Jot down as many problems, etc that come to mind in about 2 minutes 2.Cooperatively B Share individual lists and create a joint list in about 5 minutes Do Not Solve (yet) Be Realistic and Specific

16 Addressing Problems -Iteration One 1.Select One Problem 2.Clarify the Problem 3. BRAINSTORMING B Create at least Three Possible Actions that will Solve, Resolve or Eliminate the Problem 4. PLANNING B Prioritize the Possible Solutions: Plan A, Plan B...Develop a Plan 5.Establish Specifications, Constraints, Criteria for Workable Solutions

17 Implement a Process (such as this) to Identify, Formulate, and Solve Problems Expect Some Problems, Challenges, and Barriers 1.Recognize problems when they appear (or before they appear) 2.With one or more colleagues, develop three or more solutions 3.Implement one, evaluate, replan, and retry

18 The biggest and most long-lasting reforms of undergraduate education will come when individual faculty or small groups of instructors adopt the view of themselves as reformers within their immediate sphere of influence, the classes they teach every day. K. Patricia Cross

19 Workshop Evaluation Please complete and submit the workshop evaluation Thank you for your hard work and cooperation!