1 Status of Power-Flux * Search for Continuous-Wave Sources Dave Chin, Vladimir Dergachev, Keith Riles (University of Michigan) LIGO Scientific Collaboration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Adaptive Hough transform for the search of periodic sources P. Astone, S. Frasca, C. Palomba Universita` di Roma “La Sapienza” and INFN Roma Talk outline.
Advertisements

Broadband Search for Continuous-Wave Gravitation Radiation with LIGO Vladimir Dergachev (University of Michigan) LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS meeting,
Burst detection efficiency  In order to interpret our observed detection rate (upper limit) we need to know our efficiency for detection by the IFO and.
1 Status of Unbiased Search for Continuous-Wave Sources Dave Chin, Vladimir Dergachev, Keith Riles (University of Michigan) LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G W Gregory Mendell and Mike Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory The StackSlide Search Summary: November 2003.
LIGO-G W Gregory Mendell, LIGO Hanford Observatory on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration StackSlide Summary LSC Meeting, August 2005.
Searching for pulsars using the Hough transform Badri Krishnan AEI, Golm (for the pulsar group) LSC meeting, Hanford November 2003 LIGO-G Z.
Systematic effects in gravitational-wave data analysis
One-Factor Experiments Andy Wang CIS 5930 Computer Systems Performance Analysis.
LIGO-G W Gregory Mendell, LIGO Hanford Observatory on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Stackslide search for continuous gravitational.
CW signals: plans for S2 June the group held a f2f meeting to discuss plans for analyses of S2 data (and beyond). Slides from the various presentations.
LIGO- XXX Bruce Allen, LSC Talk LIGO Scientific Collaboration - U. Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 Effects of Timing Errors and Timing Offsets in Pulsar.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 21, 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida.
GWDAW /12/161 Activities of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration’s Continuous Wave Group Xavier Siemens for the LSC University of Wisconsin -- Milwaukee.
The Continuous Waves UL Group: status report. LSC Meeting LIGO Hanford Observatory August 2002 M.Alessandra Papa LIGO-G Z.
Searching for gravitational radiation from Scorpius X-1: Limits from the second LIGO science run Alberto Vecchio on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting April 25, 2006 Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in Data from the.
6. Results The accompanying histograms show the empirical PDF of z for each interferometer (H1, H2 at Hanford, WA; L1 at Livingston, LA). The green areas.
S.Klimenko, December 2003, GWDAW Performance of the WaveBurst algorithm on LIGO S2 playground data S.Klimenko (UF), I.Yakushin (LLO), G.Mitselmakher (UF),
LIGO-G Z April 2006 APS meeting Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech) Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO’s S5 run Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech)
LIGO-G D Status of Stochastic Search with LIGO Vuk Mandic on behalf of LIGO Scientific Collaboration Caltech GWDAW-10, 12/15/05.
Yousuke Itoh GWDAW8 UW Milwaukee USA December 2003 A large value of the detection statistic indicates a candidate signal at the frequency and.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Software Tools K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Status Report on CW Discriminator Work Keith.
Attenuation measurement with all 4 frozen-in SPATS strings Justin Vandenbroucke Freija Descamps IceCube Collaboration Meeting, Utrecht, Netherlands September.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G Z Instrum. Lines and Blind CW Search K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Status Report on Instrumental Line Catalog and Blind.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida for.
Non-Parametric Distributional Tests for Gravitational Wave Transient Event Detection Yeming Shi 1, Erik Katsavounidis 1, Michele Zanolin 2 1 Massachusetts.
This material is based upon work supported in part by National Science Foundation Award PHY May 30-31, 2003, LIGO G Z APS NW Section Meeting.
APPLICATION OF A WAVELET-BASED RECEIVER FOR THE COHERENT DETECTION OF FSK SIGNALS Dr. Robert Barsanti, Charles Lehman SSST March 2008, University of New.
LIGO-G v2 The Search For Continuous Gravitational Waves Gregory Mendell, LIGO Hanford Observatory on behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration The.
S.Klimenko, LSC, August 2004, G Z BurstMon S.Klimenko, A.Sazonov University of Florida l motivation & documentation l description & results l.
LIGO-G Z Confidence Test for Waveform Consistency of LIGO Burst Candidate Events Laura Cadonati LIGO Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Optimized hierarchical continuous-wave searches Badri Krishnan Curt Cutler, Iraj Gholami AEI, Golm G Z LSC meeting, March 2004 ASIS session.
LIGO-G Z GWDAW9 December 17, Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO Science Run 2 Data John G. Zweizig LIGO / Caltech for the LIGO.
1 Unbiased All-Sky Search (Michigan) [as of August 17, 2003] [ D. Chin, V. Dergachev, K. Riles ] Analysis Strategy: (Quick review) Measure power in selected.
15-18 December 2004 GWDAW-9 Annecy 1 All-Sky broad band search for continuous waves using LIGO S2 data Yousuke Itoh 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Peter Shawhan The University of Maryland & The LIGO Scientific Collaboration Penn State CGWP Seminar March 27, 2007 LIGO-G Z Reaching for Gravitational.
LIGO-G Z TFClusters Tuning for the LIGO-TAMA Search Patrick Sutton LIGO-Caltech.
1 Work of the LSC Pulsar Upper Limits Group (PULG) Graham Woan, University of Glasgow on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration GWDAW 2003.
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan (University of Maryland) for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Special thanks to Michael Landry and Bruce Allen Eastern.
Igor Yakushin, December 2004, GWDAW-9 LIGO-G Z Status of the untriggered burst search in S3 LIGO data Igor Yakushin (LIGO Livingston Observatory)
LIGO- G Z 11/13/2003LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 BlockNormal Performance Studies John McNabb & Keith Thorne, for the Penn State University.
CW Search Group Status Summary: August 2005 M.Alessandra Papa for the CW group G05yyxx-00-Z.
All-sky LIGO Search for Periodic Gravitational Waves in the Fourth Science Run (S4) Keith Riles University of Michigan For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Broadband Search for Continuous-Wave Gravitation Radiation with LIGO Vladimir Dergachev (University of Michigan) for the LIGO/Virgo scientific collaboration.
Broadband Search for Continuous-Wave Gravitational Radiation with LIGO Vladimir Dergachev (University of Michigan) for the LIGO scientific collaboration.
Review production of 30min calibrated SFTs well under way (see talks by V.Dergachev., X. Siemens in ASIS/DetChar). Also expect calibrated h(t) in the next.
Xavier Siemens for the LSC University of Wisconsin -- Milwaukee
A 2 veto for Continuous Wave Searches
P.Astone, S.D’Antonio, S.Frasca, C.Palomba
S4 Pulsar Search Results from PowerFlux
Searching for pulsars using the Hough transform
S4 Pulsar Search Results from PowerFlux
The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO
Coherent wide parameter space searches for gravitational waves from neutron stars using LIGO S2 data Xavier Siemens, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Two Interpretations of What it Means to Normalize the Low Energy Monte Carlo Events to the Low Energy Data Atms MC Atms MC Data Data Signal Signal Apply.
Igor Yakushin, LIGO Livingston Observatory
(Y. Itoh, M.A.Papa,B.Krishnan-AEI, X. Siemens –UWM
A.M. Sintes for the pulgroup
TwoSpect Scorpius X-1 mock data challenge, September 2013 Evan Goetz (AEI—Hannover), Grant David Meadors, Keith Riles (University of Michigan) TwoSpect.
TwoSpect Scorpius X-1 mock data challenge, September 2013 Evan Goetz (AEI—Hannover), Grant David Meadors, Keith Riles (University of Michigan) TwoSpect.
Bounding the strength of a Stochastic GW Background in LIGO’s S3 Data
Broad-band CW searches in LIGO and GEO S2 and S3 data
LIGO Scientific Collaboration, UW - Milwaukee
Hough search for continuous gravitational waves using LIGO S4 data
Deanna Emery Mentor: Dick Gustafson
CW Search Group Efforts – overview Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory on behalf of the CW Search Group LSC Meeting June 6, 2004 Tufts University,
Status and Plans for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Data Analysis
Gravitational radiation from known radio pulsars using LIGO data
Presentation transcript:

1 Status of Power-Flux * Search for Continuous-Wave Sources Dave Chin, Vladimir Dergachev, Keith Riles (University of Michigan) LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory March 15-18, 2004 *The analysis formerly known as “unbiased” G Z

2 Analysis Procedure Compute raw powers for intervals over entire data run (30-minute SFT’s  0.5 mHz binning) Define sky/polarization bins [RA,  For each sky/polarization bin and each 0.5 Hz band, define log 10 (power) matrix (900 freq bins  ~2000 SFT’s) where: –Each power corrected for antenna-pattern: 1 / |F +/× | 2 –Power weighted by inverse noise: 1/ σ 2 where σ ~  Option to avoid discarding high-noise SFT’s –Alternatives: unweighted mean or median with SFT vetoing (results shown here)

3 Analysis Procedure (cont.) Decompose matrix into sum of SFT and frequency vectors plus residuals with zero median per row & column  Diagnostic of anomalous bins & SFT’s  Remove large-outlying SFTs (option)  Flag but do not remove large-outlying frequency bins  Flag bins with poor K-S statistic for residual Order SFT’s in ascending corrected power Stack bins of corrected power with 1/noise weighting until last SFT added increases expected standard deviation of median over band of cumulative stacks Recompute matrix from retained SFT’s, including Doppler frequency shifts (“sliding”)

4 Analysis Procedure (cont.) Use Monte Carlo simulations (software injections) to estimate biases and errors on upper limits (to do) Recent Changes from Previous Baseline Analysis Added “sliding”  Improves performance, negligible additional computing cost Included antenna pattern correction in power estimation (instead of post-computation efficiency correction)  Better handles non-stationary noise Tried inverse-noise weighting of power contributions  Option for non-stationary noise, but less effective than expected  Computational cost of extra SFT’s make truncation attractive

5 Snapshot of Analysis Most analysis elements in place – will present preliminary S2 limits for a selected 0.5 Hz band at selected sky point for “+” polarization

6 Sample frequency band: H Hz Matrix decomposition – SFT median vector (no antenna-pattern correction) Chronological orderSorted by median power

7 Sample frequency band: H Hz Matrix decomposition – Frequency median vector (no antenna-pattern correction) [log 10 (power) contribution]

8 Sample frequency band: H Hz Matrix decomposition – Residuals for all bins (no antenna-pattern correction) H1 data: Stationary noise simulation Non-stationary noise simulation

9 Sample frequency band: H Hz Matrix decomp.: Estimated error vs ordered SFT (no antenna-pattern correction) Stop here

10 Sample frequency band: H Hz Now bin the sky and include antenna pattern (arbitrary sampling of 264 sky locations) Stop here  Antenna pattern strongly affects sample of SFT’s retained (prefers low-noise SFT’s with favorable orientation)

11 Sample frequency band: H Hz Sample of SFT’s kept/discarded in the analysis KEEP DISCARD SFT index (time)

12 Sample frequency band: H Hz Median of SFT powers in the band with Doppler corrections: (similar to stack-slide) Edge effects due to Doppler shifts  Exclude left/right ~0.1 Hz One sky point (of 264):

13 Sample frequency band: H Hz Set limits on total power flux in each frequency bin (for now, define 90% CL as [measured σ band ], where “measured” is constrained to be non-negative; do it right later) Measured median powers: Mean-subtracted powers sigma: Min upper limit

14 Sample frequency band: H Hz Convert “power flux” limit to strain amplitude limit: (pile-up at left edge due to ultra-conservative truncation of excess power at zero) Reminder Limits apply to One sky location One polarization One band No Monte Carlo efficiency correction Preliminary Limits h + < 2-4 ×

15 Summary Have demonstrated a pipeline for obtaining limits in presence of non-stationary noise Implemented antenna pattern & Doppler modulations But much work to do: Signal injection tests – evaluate required sky binning Deal with strong instrumental lines Deal with colored noise (fit? Running median?) Logistics of full search over ~2kHz and polarization Multiple IFO’s