Wisconsin’s Integrated Approach to Phosphorus Indexing Laura Ward Good, Larry Bundy, and Paul Kaarakka University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing Nutrients through Precision Feed Management
Advertisements

Overview – Nutrient Fate and Transport Mark B. David University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Presented at Building Science Assessments for State-Level.
Nutrient Management: Planning and Trends
The Science Behind the Phosphorus Risk Index Wes Jarrell, Professor and Head Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, UIUC March 2, 2005.
Soil Erosion Estimation TSM 352 Land and Water Management Systems.
Phosphorus and Potassium CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Phosphorus Index for Oregon and Washington Steve Campbell USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service Portland, Oregon Dan Sullivan Oregon State University.
Phosphorus Indices: an Understanding of Upper Mississippi Strategies John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences University of Missouri.
Phosphorus Index Based Management Douglas Beegle Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences Penn State University
Manure 101: Nutrient Management and the Dairy Industry.
Project collaborators: Laura Ward Good, Katie Songer, Matt Diebel, John Panuska, Jeff Maxted, Pete Nowak, John Norman, K.G. Karthikeyan, Tom Cox, Water.
©2003 Institute of Water Research, all rights reserved Water Quality Modeling for Ecological Services under Cropping and Grazing Systems Da Ouyang Jon.
2013 KY NRCS (590) Nutrient Management Standard Highlights: NRCS 590 is now only required for producers applying to receive NRCS financial or technical.
Baraboo River Watershed RCPP
Kim Meyer UW-Nutrient and Pest Management Program.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
REMM: Riparian Ecosystem Management Model USDA-Agricultural Research Service University of Georgia California State University – Chico USDA-Natural Resources.
Nutrient Management Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Balancing Biomass for Bioenergy and Conserving the Soil Resource Jane Johnson USDA-ARS- North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory.
Conesus Lake – Upstream Changes Maxwell Farms Farm plan developed by Nathan Herendeen, Nancy Glazier, John Hanchar, and the Maxwell Brothers.
Defining Land Management in the Wisconsin River Basin Defining Land Management in the Wisconsin River Basin Adam Freihoefer Wisconsin Department of Natural.
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
S TATE T ECHNICAL M EETING February 14, AGENDA Ag Water Quality Plans Nutrient Management Plans – Options for producers.
How Management Effects Nutrient and Sediment Losses Dennis FrameFred Madison Directors UW Discovery Farms Program.
Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) Measuring the Environmental Benefits of Conservation Managing the Agricultural Landscape for Environmental.
Iowa P-Index Relationship to Feedlots Steve Brinkman CCA Nutrient Management Specialist USDA / NRCS
Additional Questions, Resources, and Moving Forward Science questions raised in the development of a science assessment Effect of Conservation Tillage.
Getting More NM Planning WI Dept. of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection Selling Nutrient Management Getting Conservation Compliance Reporting
NuGIS: a Nutrient Use Geographic Information System March 29-31, 2011 Denver, Colorado Paul Fixen Ryan Williams and Quentin Rund.
P Index Development and Implementation The Iowa Experience Antonio Mallarino Iowa State University.
Soil Tillage, Land Preparation and Conservation Topic 2061
Using the Missouri P index John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences Commercial Agriculture Program University of Missouri.
My Field has High Soil Test P. Now what? John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences Commercial Agriculture Program University of Missouri.
Soil Conservation: Soil Conservation: towards sustainable agriculture.
Nonpoint Source Pollution Reductions – Estimating a Tradable Commodity Allen R. Dedrick Associate Deputy Administrator Natural Resources & Sustainable.
 PowerPoint begins with teacher-led discussion (on next slide)  Necessary materials:  PowerPoint Guide Teacher Information!
Planning Process for CNMPs Vicki S. Anderson Resource Conservationist Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Predicting Sediment and Phosphorus Delivery with a Geographic Information System and a Computer Model M.S. Richardson and A. Roa-Espinosa; Dane County.
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Reduction Strategy Mark David, George Czapar, Greg McIsaac, Corey Mitchell March 11,
SOIL CONDITION INDEX – (SCI) AS AN INDICATOR OF THE SOIL ORGANIC MATTER DYNAMICS AT THE FARM BUTMIR NEAR SARAJEVO Prof. Dr. Hamid Čustović Tvica Mirza.
Clayton County Watershed Projects Update Turkey River Watershed Alliance January 31, 2013.
BMP CHALLENGE Experience: Cannon River Watershed Partnership Information provided by: Dave Legvold Executive Director Cannon River Watershed Partnership.
Cover crop economics: estimating a return on investment Liz Juchems and Jamie Benning.
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan Scott Sturgul Nutrient & Pest Management Program Soil & Water Management Farm & Industry Short Course Feb. 16,
LOWER L’ANGUILLE WATERSHED COST SHARE PATRICIA PERRY ST. FRANCIS COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT.
Sustainable Agriculture UNIT 1 – SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Field Specific Decisions: N vs P CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Agenda Item 2. A review of basic concepts and terminology related to phosphorus movement from cropland to streams and rivers. Great Lakes Protections Fund.
Step 1 – Based on the soil test shown on P. 5 describe a soil sampling strategy for each field that will result in the taking of the proper number of soil.
Lecture 2. Agricultural Pollution Control in the Baltic Sea with Special Emphasis on Manure Management Prepared by Assoc. Prof. Philip Chiverton, SLU and.
™ Nutrient Management Planning ¨ Will these be mandated in your state?  An emerging national issue is how to account for agricultural non-point source.
Farming methods  4.3. Farming Methods  All agriculture depends on soil.  Therefore, soil erosion is a major problem in agriculture.  Erosion happens.
The Effect of Compost Application and Plowing on Phosphorus Runoff Charles S. Wortmann Department of Agronomy and Horticulture Nutrient Management for.
Nutrient Issues Review of Nutrient Management Issues Addressed by EPA NODA for Proposed CAFO Regulations.
Buffer Width Tool In Table A select the reference line number that most closely resembles the field conditions and the type of pollutant the buffer will.
National Assessment for Cropland. Analytical Approach Sampling and modeling approach based on a subset of NRI sample points. Farmer survey conducted to.
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan The How, Where, When, and Why.
Whole Farm Simulation and Nutrient Management USDA, Agricultural Research Service University Park, Pennsylvania C. Alan Rotz USDA / ARS.
Precision Management beyond Fertilizer Application Hailin Zhang.
Agricultural pollution in Ukraine (Azov-Black Sea Region ) The World Bank.
P Index Fundamentals of Nutrient Management Training Course December 15, 2005 Isaac Wolford, West Virginia NRCS State Agronomist.
Slide 1 Achieving Effective Conservation in the Upper Mississippi River Basin CEAP —Conservation Effects Assessment Project.
 Decreasing Nutrient Runoff from Iowa Farms to Improve Water Quality Everywhere from Local Sources in Iowa to the Dead Zone in the Gulf of Mexico.
Yahara River Watershed RCPP
Soil Loss Estimation. USLE – Universal Soil Loss Equation SLEMSA – Soil Loss Estimation Model for Southern Africa.
Pastures keep soil in place data from Breneman Discovery Farms project
Soil Conservation.
Field Sites for Runoff, Sediment and P-Loss Measurements
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan
Presentation transcript:

Wisconsin’s Integrated Approach to Phosphorus Indexing Laura Ward Good, Larry Bundy, and Paul Kaarakka University of Wisconsin-Madison

For planning manure applications use: 1. Soil Test P: > 50 ppm – limit P applications to crop removal > 100 ppm – eliminate P applications if possible; cumulative P applications must be 25% less than crop removal 2. Wisconsin P Index Wisconsin’s Nutrient Management Standard

Field The P Index estimates total annual P delivery from a field to nearest surface water Wisconsin P Index Stream

Field P Index Edge of field P loss: Sediment-bound P + Dissolved P + Single-event P (surface appl.) Total P Delivery Ratio X = Stream P Index Components

Advantages to “Modeling” Approach Quantifying impacts allows better comparison of management practices and allows management flexibility in reaching goals It can be tested through watershed monitoring

Year-round Runoff Monitoring on Cropped Fields 18 fields 21 crop years Crops: Alfalfa, corn, corn silage Slopes: 4-13% Soils: silt loam, silty clay loam, loam Soil test P: 18 – 130 ppm Range of tillage practices, manure and fertilizer applications

Soil Test P and Runoff P

Row and Column P Index and Runoff P

P Index Values and Runoff P

The Implementation Problem Phosphorus planning requires Multi-year calculations Up-to-date assessment of soil loss But …. Statewide expectation of limited/declining local field staff

Solution Software integrating soil loss and P loss risk assessments with nutrient management planning

RUSLE2 P Index calculator SNAP-Plus Entry by field: County, Soil, Slope, Soil test, Crop rotation, Yields, Tillage, Manure, Fertilizer Output by field: Fertilizer and manure application plan, Rotation soil loss assessment, Rotation P Index Value, Rotation P and K balance Nutrient application calculator

Download from SNAP-Plus website:

How many years in a plan? Nutrient application plans - 1 year Soil loss – rotation (up to 8 years) P-based planning – 4 years (soil test frequency) or rotation Conceptual Hurdle

Wisconsin Solution Phosphorus planning is rotation-based

P Index Planning No manure can be applied to a field with a planned P Index value greater than 6 across the rotation

Current Program Status On-going field monitoring and research Equations will be refined Field testing on farms as nutrient management planning tool Program improvements based on user feedback, agency needs Field testing on farms as P and sediment delivery risk tool Planned features (near future): filter strips; incorporation of economic information for planning

Wisconsin Dairy Farms Preliminary Results If applying manure according N standards, not over-applying P to most fields Most farms have very few “problems”: Erosion (corn for silage) Unmanaged grazing on fragile lands Large winter manure applications High soil test P

“Most-Problems” Farm Daily Haul – Rotation 2 Corn silage – Oats – 3 Alfalfa – Spr. Chisel Plow

Same Farm as No-till

Summary Wisconsin is using a quasi-model-type P Index integrated with RUSLE2 in nutrient management planning software Will lead to: More planning flexibility for producers Greater reductions in P delivery to surface waters

Acknowledgements Wes Jarrell, U. of Illinois Kevin Erb, UW-Extension Dan Yoder and Jim Lyon, U. of Tennessee Kevin Beckard, Sue Porter, and Jim Vandenbrook; WI DATCP Judy Derricks, John Pingry, and Pat Murphy; WI NRCS Chris Baxter, Paul Kivlin, and Scott Sturgul; UW-Extension Peggy James and Mark Caine, WI DNR Jeff Topel Major funding contributors for SNAP-Plus or related research: UW College of Agricultural and Life Sciences (CALS), Department of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer Protection (DATCP), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), Wisconsin Fertilizer Research Program (WFRP), Wisconsin Buffer Initiative (WBI), UW Consortium for Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Researchers Conducting Runoff Monitoring: Dave Owens, Todd Stuntebeck, and Matt Komiskey, USGS; Carlos Bonilla, John M. Norman, and Christine Molling, UW- Madison Soil Science Department; John Panuska, Paul Miller, and K.G. Karthikeyan, UW-Madison Biological Systems Engineering Department; Randy Mentz, Chris Baxter, and Tom Hunt, UW-Platteville Pioneer Farm; Dennis Frame and Fred Madison, UW- Discovery Farms.