Property Law Rule Against Perpetuities Boston College Law School October 29, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RULE AGAINST PERPETUITIES
Advertisements

COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2002 CLASS 17 March 22, 2002.
 In favor of a transferee (not the grantor), and  Does not qualify as a remainder.
Chapter 2 Land Interests: Present and Future
 Holds equitable title.  Enforces fiduciary duties against trustee.  Capacity = ability to take and hold property.
 “Perpetuities * * * are contrary to the genius of a free government, and shall never be allowed * * *.”  Art. 1, § 26.
1.  1. Future interest held by someone other than grantor ▪ Warning: Not all future interests held by a non- grantor qualify as remainders; they could.
Property I Professor Donald J. Kochan Classes 16,
(F) Reggie “to Veronica for life, then to Betty and her heirs if Betty attains the age of 21.” Veronica: Life Estate Betty: Contingent Remainder in Fee.
 An interest is not good* unless it must vest**, if at all, not later than 21 years after some life in being*** at the time of the creation of the interest,
Rule Against Perpetuities. No interest is good unless it must vest or fail within some life in being at the creation of the interest plus 21 years.
LOGISTICS No Office Hours Today Test Grades & Answers/Comments Handout Available by Early Next Week Fall Schedule Available Later in the Week –I’ll Talk.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School April 25, 2008 Preemption.
Copyright Law Boston College Law School February 6, 2003 Transfers and Termination.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School April 25, 2007 Preemption.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 16, 2007 Patent - Novelty.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved CHAPTER1CHAPTER1 CHAPTER1CHAPTER1 Introduction to Real Estate Finance and Investments.
Property Law Estates and Future Interests Boston College Law School November 1, 2006.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School April 22, 2009 Preemption.
Property Law Estates and Future Interests Boston College Law School October 29, 2004.
 Grant of land that is, in some manner, conditional [not “absolute”]  Grantee could lose the “bundle of sticks”  Conditions may be added to:  Fee.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 14, 2007 Patent - Utility.
 Trusts.  What is a Trust? o Trusts are a financial planning tool (legal documents) that Provide for ownership of assets Control of interests in assets.
DEFEASIBLE FEES Cont’d Fee Simple Determinable Fee Simple on Condition Subsequent Mahrenholz v. County Board Distinguishing Fee Simple Determinable from.
Slide Set Sixteen: Real Property: Interests in Land – Time, Possession, Future Interests and Title Limitation Rules 1.
Property I Professor Donald J. Kochan Class
Rule Against Perpetuities. Classic Statement of RAP An interest is not good unless it must vest, if at all, not later than 21 years after some life in.
1 Unit 10 The Nature of Real Property Real property distinguished from personal property…
COPYRIGHT LAW 2003 CLASS 15 Mar. 10, 2003 Welcome Back From Spring Break!
Must be married by midnight on Halloween to receive property under a will.
Mahrenholz P583: [A] grantor should give a FSD if he intends to give property for so long as it is needed for the purposes for which it is given and no.
Chapter 19 Trust Creation All the basic information on how to do it…
 A will which states that it is effective only if a stated event occurs (or does not occur).  “This will is effective only if I die in 2012.”  “This.
Stock Options Howard Godfrey, Ph.D., CPA Professor of Accounting ©Howard Godfrey-2015.
Weekend Schedule Class: Saturday 9:00 a.m.-10:20 a.m. Office Hours (Room 263) –Saturday 11-2 –Sunday 2-4:30 New on Course Page: Comments & Corrections.
An interest is not good unless it must vest, if at all, not later than 21 years after some life in being at the time of the creation of the interest,
Slide Set Fifteen: Real Property – Estates in Land
Executory Interests. Elements of Executory Interests In favor of a transferee (not the grantor) but, not a remainder.
Right to possess and use forever Right to transfer all present and future rights (inheritable/devisable) Right to liquidate assets Default estate today.
MUSIC: Alicia de Larrocha, Piano THE ART OF ALICIA DE LARROCHA Performances Disc 1: Music of Johann Sebastian Bach & Joseph Hadyn.
PROPERTY A SLIDES Tuesday March 17 Wynton Marsalis, Trumpet Classic Wynton (1998) Detailed Instructions on Course Page for Thursday: REDWOOD:
PLEASE PUT ASSIGNMENT #4 FACE DOWN IN BASKET ON CHAIR  MUSIC: Bach, Concertos for Two Harpsichords ( ) THE ENGLISH CONCERT Trevor Pinnock, Conductor,
Remaining Schedule Office Hours: 6:30-9 p.m. Deans’ Suite – Qs sent before 9 p.m. To be Posted Today –Slides from Today (Probs RSTU) –Suggested Analysis.
ESTATES & FUTURE INTERESTS THE SHADOW OF THE PAST:
Future Interest Chart. Remainders Held by a third person (not the grantor) Created by the same instrument (deed or will) as the possessory interest Becomes.
Copyright Law: Fall 2008 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS of October 22, 2008 Copyright Renewal, Termination.
Power of Appointment Chapter 10 Tools & Techniques of Estate Planning Copyright 2011, The National Underwriter Company1 What is a Power of Appointment?
PROPERTY E SLIDES YOSEMITE: Problem 4I HALF DOME.
Statutes and Ordinances An introduction to University processes.
PROBLEMS A-D Featuring the Mangos: Hutzler;GottLiebowitz;JMason; Sarinsky.
Review pRoblem R Renee conveys “to Stacy for life, then to my heirs, but should Stacy marry before she turns 35, to Marni.” AMBIGUITIES/QUESTIONS?
 In favor of a transferee (not the grantor), and  Does not qualify as a remainder.
PROPERTY E SLIDES DENALI: Problem 4M continued Denali Caribou.
Welcome to Unit 4 Wills and Trusts Ann Sanok Instructor.
PROPERTY D SLIDES National Sloppy Joe Day.
 Event must occur before beneficiary may claim the gift.  “I leave $10,000 to X if she is a law school graduate at the time of my death.”
Technology Transfer Office
(O): 1st QUESTION: RECAP
Introduction to Real Estate Finance and Investments
Stock Options Howard Godfrey, Ph. D
Rule Against Perpetuities Boston College Law School October 27, 2010
Agenda for 13th Class Admin stuff Name plates Lunch sign-up Handouts
Property Law Estates and Future Interests Boston College Law School
Agenda for 14th Class Admin stuff Name plates Handouts Slides Leases I
Real Property: Estates in Land Interests in Land – Time and Possession
Slide Set Twenty-Three: Modern Challenges in Property Law – Land Use 3
Slide Set Sixteen: Real Property: Estates in Land
Real Property: Estates in Land Interests in Land – Future Interests
Rule Against Perpetuities Compliance
Conditional Gifts.
Presentation transcript:

Property Law Rule Against Perpetuities Boston College Law School October 29, 2009

Rule Against Perpetuities Policy interests –Prevent “dead hand control” Restrictions on current use of property Ability to move property to more valued use –But enable some ability to control grants

Rule Against Perpetuities Rule –“No interest is good unless it must vest, if at all, no later than 21 years after the death of a life in being at the creation of the interest” Example –O to A, so long as used as a hospital, then to B –May vest more than 21 years after O, A & B dead

Rule Against Perpetuities Applies to: – Contingent third-party interests Executory interests (“O to A, so long as used for hospital, then to B”) Contingent remainders (“O to A for life, then to B if B graduates”) Vested remainders subject to open (“O to A for life, then to A’s children”) Options Does not apply to: –Vested interests Reversions (“O to A for life”) Vested remainders (“O to A for life, then to B”) Vested remainders subject to divestment (“O to A for life, then to B, but if...” –Contingent interests in the grantor Possibility of Reverter (“O to A, so long as used for a hospital”) Right of Re-entry (“O to A for use as hospital, but if not, then B has right …”

Rule Against Perpetuities Elements of rule –“must vest if at all” Invalid if any possibility that might vest outside time Does not matter if actually vests within time –“within 21 years of death of life in being at time of grant” Look to lives mentioned in the grant Corporations have no “life”

Rule Against Perpetuities Examples –“O to A, so long as used for hospital” –“O to A, so long as used for hospital, then B” –“O to A for life, then to B if B graduates” –“O to A for life, then to B, but if B marries C, then the property reverts back to O” –“O to A for life, then to the children of B” –“O to A for life, remainder to the first daughter of A to become president of the U.S.”

Rule Against Perpetuities Consequence: strike offending language Potentially different consequences –“O to A so long as used for residential purposes, then to B” Becomes “O to A so long as used for residential purposes” –“O to A, but if for non-residential purposes, then to B” Becomes “O to A”

Rule Against Perpetuities Modifications –Wait and See Approach Wait to see if interest actually vests w/in time period E.g. “O to A for use as hospital, then B” –Uniform Statutory Rule Against Perpetuities Like wait and see approach Except use 90-year period from grant –Statutory Cut-offs for Grantor Rights Possibility of reverter Right of re-entry –Marketable Title Acts

Next Assignment Next assignment –IV.C.2 – Rule Against Perpetuities –Through p. 553 Make up class –Friday, 2-3:05 p.m., EW115B –Wednesday students on call Practice exam –Wednesday, 11/4