TAGUCHI’S CONTRIBUTIONS TO EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN & QUALITY ENGINEERING.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Common Methods to Determine the Parameters of Technical Standards Zhang Yue-yi China Ji Liang University.
Advertisements

Prof. Steven D.Eppinger MIT Sloan School of Management.
…We have a large reservoir of engineers (and scientists) with a vast background of engineering know-how. They need to learn statistical methods that can.
Robust Design – The Taguchi Philosophy
An approach to the SN ratios based on
Taguchi Design of Experiments
Why/When is Taguchi Method Appropriate? A new tip Every Friday Friday, 3rd August 2001.
Why/When is Taguchi Method Appropriate? Friday, 25 th May 2001 Tip #6 Using Orthogonal Arrays for Generating Balanced Combinations of NoIsE Factors.
Fractional Factorial Designs of Experiments
Robust Design and Two-Step Optimization Lihui Shi.
Stat 321 A Taguchi Case Study Experiments to Minimize Variance.
8.1 Chapter 8 Robust Designs. 8.2 Robust Designs CS RO R Focus: A Few Primary Factors Output: Best/Robust Settings.
Using process knowledge to identify uncontrolled variables and control variables as inputs for Process Improvement 1.
Robust Design (Taguchi Method)
IE 673Session 7 - Process Improvement (Continued) 1 Process Improvement (Continued)
Stat Today: Start Chapter 10. Additional Homework Question.
Chapter 12 Design for Six Sigma
Lecture 15 Today: Finish FFSP designs, Next day: Read !!!
IV.4.1 IV.4 Signal-to-Noise Ratios o Background o Example.
Chapter 12 Design for Six Sigma.
Lecture 16 Today: Next day:. Two-Step Optimization Procedures Nominal the best problem: –Select the levels of the dispersion factors to minimize.
Design and Analysis of Engineering Experiments
Chapter 1Based on Design & Analysis of Experiments 7E 2009 Montgomery 1 Design and Analysis of Engineering Experiments Ali Ahmad, PhD.
I.5 Taguchi’s Philosophy  Some Important Aspects  Loss Functions  Exploiting Nonlinearities  Examples  Taguchi - Comments and Criticisms.
Introduction to Robust Design and Use of the Taguchi Method.
Design of Experiments Hongyan Zhang Dept. of MIME The University of Toledo Fall 2011.
1 Design and Analysis of Engineering Experiments Chapter 1: Introduction.
Why/When is Taguchi Method Appropriate? Friday, 1 st June 2001 Tip #7 Taguchi Method : When to Select a ‘larger’ OA to perform “Factorial Experiments”
Taguchi Methods Genichi Taguchi has been identified with the advent of what has come to be termed quality engineering. The goal of quality engineering.
 (Worse) It is a fact that engineers select an appropriate variable and the transformed observations are treated as though they are normally distributed.
MSE-415: B. Hawrylo Chapter 13 – Robust Design What is robust design/process/product?: A robust product (process) is one that performs as intended even.
MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 1 Chapter 12 Design for Six Sigma.
Friday, 13 th July 2001 Of Course It is tip # 13 as well as It is Friday the 13th Why/When is Taguchi Method Appropriate?NOT.
Why/When is Taguchi Method Appropriate? Friday, 18 th May 2001 Tip #5 Taguchi Method Appropriate Signal-to-Noise Ratio Appropriate Signal-to-Noise Ratio.
Design/Manufacturing Interface/Production Planning Control MSE508/L Week 12 W, 04/09/08.
Design and Analysis of Experiments Dr. Tai-Yue Wang Department of Industrial and Information Management National Cheng Kung University Tainan, TAIWAN,
Why/When is Taguchi Method Appropriate? A new tip Every Friday Friday, 29 th June 2001.
Why/When is Taguchi Method Appropriate? Friday, 11 th May 2001 Tip #4 design stage Robust design improves “QUALITY ” at all the life stages at the design.
Why/When is Taguchi Method Appropriate? Friday, 4 th May 2001 Tip #3 Taguchi Method Appropriate for Concurrent Engineering.
Why/When is Taguchi Method Appropriate? Tip #2 Taguchi Method Can Study Interaction between NoIsE Factors and Control Factors Friday, 27 April 2001.
X. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN FOR QUALITY
Slide 1 Loss Function Losses begin to accrue as soon as a quality characteristic of a product or service deviates from the nominal value Under the Taguchi.
THE MANAGEMENT & CONTROL OF QUALITY, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 1 Chapter 12 Design for Six Sigma The Management & Control of Quality,
TAUCHI PHILOSOPHY SUBMITTED BY: RAKESH KUMAR ME
TAGUCHI PHILOSOPHY-- CONCEPT OF PARAMETER DESIGN &ROBUST DESIGN THREE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT STAGES:- PRODUCT DESIGN PROCESS DESIGN PRODUCTION SOURCES OF.
M EASUREMENT AND OPTIMIZATION OF DRILLING PROCESS PARAMETERS Presented by:  Rahul Bhat  Hardik Thummar  Maunik.
Taguchi Quality Loss Function
2015 JMP Discovery Summit, San Diego
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Dr. S. Poornachandra Dean – BME & EIE SNS College of Technology
Why/When is Taguchi Method Appropriate?
Chapter 14 Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 7th Edition by Douglas C. Montgomery. Copyright (c) 2012  John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Why/When is Taguchi Method Appropriate?
Why/When is Taguchi Method Appropriate?
Why/When is Taguchi Method Appropriate?
Why/When is Taguchi Method Appropriate?
Why/When is Taguchi Method Appropriate?
Diseño de Experimentos
Why/When is Taguchi Method Appropriate?
Why/When is Taguchi Method Appropriate?
Why/When is Taguchi Method Appropriate?
Why/When is Taguchi Method Appropriate?
I.5 Taguchi’s Philosophy
Why/When is Taguchi Method Appropriate?
Why/When is Taguchi Method Appropriate?
Why/When is Taguchi Method Appropriate?
Design and Analysis of Experiments
Why/When is Taguchi Method Appropriate?
Presentation transcript:

TAGUCHI’S CONTRIBUTIONS TO EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN & QUALITY ENGINEERING

Taguchi’s Contribution  In the early 1980s, Prof. Genechi Taguchi introduced his approach to using experimental design for 1)Designing products or processes so that they are robust to environmental conditions. 2)Designing/developing products so that they are robust to component variation. 3)Minimizing variation around a target value.

Taguchi’s Contribution  By robust, we mean that the product or process performs consistently on target and is relatively insensitive to factors that are difficult to control.

Taguchi Philosophy  3 stages in a product’s (or process’s) development: 1)System design: uses scientific and engineering principles to determine the basic configuration. 2)Parameter design: specific values for the system parameters are determined. 3)Tolerance design: determine the best tolerances for the parameters.

Taguchi Philosophy  Recommends: statistical experimental design methods have to be used for quality improvement, particularly during parameter and tolerance design phases.  Key component: reduce the variability around the target (nominal) value.  Imposes a quadratic loss function of the form: L(y) = k(y – T) 2

Taguchi Philosophy  Involves 3 central ideas: 1)Products and processes should be designed so that they are robust to external sources of variability. 2)Experimental design methods are an engineering tool to help accomplish this objective. 3)Operation on target value is more important than conformance to specifications.

Taguchi Approach to Parameter Design  There are controllable factors and uncontrollable noise factors that affect the system.  Aim: to find the levels of the controllable factors that are least influenced by the noise factors and yield the maximum (or minimum) response.

Taguchi Approach to Parameter Design  Select one experimental design for the controllable factors and another design for the noise factors.  Thus defines orthogonal arrays.  Inner array: array containing the controllable factors  Outer array: array containing the noise factors  Test each run from the inner array across the runs from the outer array called a crossed array design.

Taguchi Approach to Parameter Design  Then analyze the mean response for each run in the inner array.  Also analyze the variation by the use of appropriate signal-to-noise (SN) ratio derived from the loss function.

Taguchi Approach to Parameter Design  Widely used SN ratios are: 1)Nominal the best: used to reduce variability used to reduce variability around a target value around a target value 2)Larger the better: used to max. response used to max. response 3)Smaller the better: used to min. Response. used to min. Response.

Critiques  Ignores interactions  It leads to a very large experiment while interactions cannot be estimated.  In general: crossed array approach is often unnecessary. Better strategy: use a combined design that incorporates both controllable and noise factors.  Also there are critiques about the use of SN ratios (see Montgomery)