March 17, 2011Mike Hildreth – SLAC ESA Testbeam Workshop Energy Spectrometer Tests at End Station A Mike Hildreth University of Notre Dame SLAC, March.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LCABD WP 4.2 Review, 24 th September Mark Slater Motivation Final Results from 2006 Upgrades for 2007 Conclusions The Collaboration LCABD WP 4.2.
Advertisements

Energy spectrometer cavity BPM Royal Holloway, University of London S. Boogert, G. Boorman University of Cambridge M. Slater, M. Thomson & D. Ward University.
BPM Energy spectrometry, status & future plans at ESA in SLAC Bino Maiheu University College London Yerevan Collaboration Meeting October 2006 Yerevan.
Progress report for the energy spectrometer test experiment at ESA at SLAC Bino Maiheu on behalf of the T474/T491 collaboration LCWS 2007, DESY Hamburg.
Fast and Precise Beam Energy Measurement at the International Linear Collider Michele Viti.
Friday 28 th April Review of the aims and recommendations from the workshop L. Rinolfi.
Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
March 22, 2011Mike Hildreth – ALCPG 2011, Beam Instrumentation Energy Spectrometer R&D; Plans for End Station A Test Beams Mike Hildreth University of.
ILC RF phase stability requirements and how can we demonstrate them Sergei Nagaitsev Oct 24, 2007.
October 1, 2009Mike Hildreth – ALCPG09 Energy Spectrometer R&D Progress and Plans Mike Hildreth University of Notre Dame representing SLAC T-474/491 &
Beam position monitors LCABD Plenary meeting Bristol, 24th March 2009 A. Aryshev, S. T. Boogert, G. Boorman, S. Molloy, N. Joshi JAI at Royal Holloway.
WP 4.2 review meeting Status of the ESA work... Wednesday, 13 September 2006, UCL,
Discussion and Conclusions C. Hast and M. Pivi ESTB Workshop.
Radiation Physics Beam Tests J. Bauer, J. Liu, L. Nicolas, S. Rokni, M. Santana ESTB Workshop 2011 March 17, 2011.
Paul Emma LCLS FAC April 16, Initial Experience with Injector Commissioning P. Emma, et al. Facilities Advisory Committee.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Beam Energy Measurement: SLC-style Energy Spectrometer Stan Hertzbach University of Massachusetts LCWS 2000, Fermilab.
P. Emma, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P. Emma LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
M. Woods (SLAC) BI Tests for the Linear Collider Turning the LOI into a Proposal SLAC ALCPG Meeting Jan. 9, 2004 M. Woods, SLAC LC-LEP Beam Tests at SLAC.
1 June 7, 2006M. Woods, SLAC Collimator design, wakefields (T-480) BPM energy spectrometer.
K. Moffeit 6 Jan 2005 WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at the International Linear Collider SLAC January 6-8, 2005 Polarimetry at the ILC Design issues.
20 March 2005Ken Moffeit LCWS1 Highlights from the MDI workshop Spin Rotation System for 2 IR’s Downstream polarimetry Ken Moffeit.
IPBPM piezo-mover system and plans for in situ monitoring of calibration and stability Current status and plan for ATF2 Philip Bambade Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur.
M. Woods (SLAC) Beam Diagnostics for test facilities of i)  ii) polarized e+ source January 9 –11, 2002.
Ground Motion + Vibration Transfer Function for Final QD0/SD0 Cryomodule System at ILC Glen White, SLAC ALCPG11, Eugene March 21, 2011.
1 July 19, 2006M. Woods, SLAC (S. Boogert, RHUL) Collimator design, wakefields (T-480) BPM.
12/12/04 1 Stewart Boogert (UCL) Second Mini-workshop Nano project at ATF UK plans for Energy spectrometer studies University College London Stewart Boogert.
___________________ Jürgen Schreiber, ECFA/DESY LC workshop, Amsterdam, April 1-4, 2003 BEAM ENERGY SPECTROMETER DESY – Dubna – TU Berlin Machine physicists,
BPMs and HOM-BPMs for the XFEL Linac N. Baboi for the BPM and the HOM teams (DESY, CEA-Saclay, SLAC, FNAL, Cockroft/Daresbury) XFEL Linac Review Meeting,
UK/EU Plans for ATF2 G.A. Blair ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-0ff meeting, Annecy, 8 th October 2006 Overview EUROTeV UK.
March 7, 2007 LET Issues (Cai/Kubo/Zisman) Global Design Effort 1 Low-Emittance Tuning Issues and Plans Yunhai Cai, Kiyoshi Kubo and Michael S. Zisman.
WP9 : Cavity BPM spectrometry Royal Holloway S. Boogert & G. Boorman University College London D. Attree, A. Lyapin, B. Maiheu & M. Wing Cambridge University.
January 8, 2005Mike Hildreth – ILC-MDI Workshop A BPM-Based Energy Spectrometer Technical Considerations & Plans for the End Station A Test Beam Mike Hildreth.
ILC BCD Crossing Angle Issues G. A. Blair Royal Holloway Univ. London ECFA ILC Workshop, Vienna 14 th November 2005 Introduction BCD Crossing Angle Rankings.
BPM-Based Energy Spectrometer Contributors: A. Lyapin, B. Maiheu, F. Gournaris, D. Attree, M. Wing, D. Miller University College London (UCL) M. Slater,
Global Design Effort Beam Delivery System => EDR LCWS07 June 2, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi Yamamoto.
Energy Spectrometer for the ILC Alexey Lyapin University College London.
ILC BDS Static Beam-Based Alignment and Tuning Glen White SLAC 1.Aims. 2.Error parameters and other assumptions. 3.Overview of alignment and tuning procedure.
Development of a Low-latency, High-precision, Intra-train Beam Feedback System Based on Cavity Beam Position Monitors N. Blaskovic Kraljevic, D. R. Bett,
ILC Beam Delivery System / MDI Issues for LCC-phase (~
1 Plan and Opportunities for Migration and Integration of the Photoinjector into New Muon Lab Mike Church AAC Review - 12/5/06.
1 FONT R&D status Philip Burrows Douglas Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
DR 3.2 km Lattice Requirements Webex meeting 10 January 2011.
A Short History of Nearly Everything Michele Viti.
1 Franz-Josef Decker 1 Multi-Bunch Operation for LCLS Franz-Josef Decker March 17, Definitions and goals multi-bunch within.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
SABER, “maybe” a new facility in the South Arc (South Arc Beam Experimental Region) End Station A (ESA) in 2007 ILC Test Beams in 2008 Test Beams beyond.
Cesr-TA Simulations: Overview and Status G. Dugan, Cornell University LCWS-08.
SLAC ESA T-474 ILC BPM energy spectrometer prototype Bino Maiheu University College London on behalf of T-474 Vancouver Linear Collider.
Simulations - Beam dynamics in low emittance transport (LET: From the exit of Damping Ring) K. Kubo
ATF status M. Ross October 15, 2004 The ATF is the largest test facility built exclusively for linear collider RD –Utility not reduced by the selection.
May 31, 2005Mike Hildreth – ATF 2005 Energy Spectrometry and ATF Components of the nano-BPM Test Program and Plans for Future Tests Mike Hildreth University.
1 SLAC EPAC Meeting, Jan M. Woods, SLAC SLAC EPAC Meeting January 24, 2006 CCLRCLLNLQMULU.
Beam Instrumentation Tests for the Linear Collider SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14, 2003 M. Woods, SLAC Luminosity, Energy and Polarization measurements at the.
DRAFT: What have been done and what to do in ILC-LET beam dynamics Beam dynamics/Simulations Group Beijing.
1 Experiments with pulse supplies and strip-lines at ATF, Plans for fast extraction kicker for ATF2 1. Fast Kicker R&D at ATF 2. Instrumentation at ATF.
IoP HEPP/APP annual meeting 2010 Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales: maintaining luminosity at future linear colliders Ben Constance John Adams Institute,
Instrumentation at ATF / TTF Accelerator Test Facility (KEK) Tesla Test Facility – FLASH (DESY) ESA / LCLS (SLAC) Marc Ross, SLAC.
Characterization of the Fast Ion Instability at CesrTA David Rubin Cornell University.
1 June 7, 2006M. Woods, SLAC Collimator design, wakefields (T-480) BPM energy spectrometer.
TBL experimental program, evolution to RF power testing in TBL ACE 2011, February 2-3Steffen Döbert, BE-RF  Current status of TBL  Experimental program.
The Engineering Test Facility for nLC
LCABD WP 4.2 – Spectrometer and BPM Studies
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
IP Beam Instrumentation R&D and Testbeams for the ILC
Testbeam plans for LEP instrumentation
Analysis of 14/20 mrad Extraction Line Energy Chicane
Beam Optics Set-Up at SLAC End Station A
SLAC - End Station A ILC testrun – April '06 ...
ILC Beam Tests in End Station A
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
Presentation transcript:

March 17, 2011Mike Hildreth – SLAC ESA Testbeam Workshop Energy Spectrometer Tests at End Station A Mike Hildreth University of Notre Dame SLAC, March 17, 2011

March 17, 2011Mike Hildreth – SLAC ESA Testbeam Workshop Precision Beam Measurements Precision Physics Measurements require precise determination of beam parameters – How well do we have to do? Luminosity, Differential Luminosity Spectrum: –Total cross sections:  L/L ~ 0.1% –Lineshape scans (Giga-Z)  L/L ~ 0.02% –Threshold scans (e.g., m top )  L/L ~ 1%, but additional constraints: dL/dE core to 0.1%, tails to ~1% Energy: –top, higgs masses<100 ppm –W mass with threshold scan50 ppm (4 MeV) –A LR with Giga-Z200 ppm (comparable to 0.25% Pol) 50 ppm (if  P/P ~ 0.1%) Polarization: –Standard Model Asymmetries  P/P < 0.25% –A LR with Giga-Z  P/P < 0.1%

March 17, 2011Mike Hildreth – SLAC ESA Testbeam Workshop Energy Measurements A few words of Motivation... –Energy Calibration needs for Physics at a future Linear Collider will be similar to what we had at LEPII: Threshold Scans : Kinematic Fits:

March 17, 2011Mike Hildreth – SLAC ESA Testbeam Workshop Prototypical Energy Spectrometers “LEP-Type”: BPM based, bend angle measurement “SLC-Type”: SR stripe based, bend angle measurement BPMs p  “upstream”  “downstream” Aim for Energy Measurement

March 17, 2011Mike Hildreth – SLAC ESA Testbeam Workshop “ILC” Upstream Energy Spectrometer Pure “Displacement” Strategy: Prototype Design –total length 54.4 m –dispersion at center = 5mm (~equal to beam displacement) so, 0.5  m BPM resolution gives 1x10 -4 measurement (per pulse) –Design incorporated into Accelerator Lattice Incoming Beam Central BPMs measure offset, offset difference between ±B (cancel some systematic errors) Outer BPMs required to constrain beam trajectory all magnets run to ±B 5 mm better resolution would allow intra-train bunch energy measurements M. Hildreth (Notre Dame), SLAC

March 17, 2011Mike Hildreth – SLAC ESA Testbeam Workshop Mechanical Stability Stability requirements determined by overall BPM resolution needed Mechanical support structure must be designed to limit vibration, and with minimal thermal expansion properties –Custom temperature regulation needed... Stability must be monitored: Developing Interferometry-based system Zygo 4004 Measurement System –Design Specs: 0.3 nm single-bit resolution at up to 5 m/s velocity BPM Local motion measurement Interferometer heads Long Baseline Monitoring

March 17, 2011Mike Hildreth – SLAC ESA Testbeam Workshop Synchrotron Stripe Spectrometer Measure and Energy Spectrum of Disrupted Beam 4mrad kick over 75 meters: need ~30  m position resolution –instrument with 100  m quartz fibers read out with multianode PMT Wide-aperture bends needed to extract SR fans (and Compton Endpoint) from Stayclear: Design incorporated into RDR Radiation hard and robust, simple detectors, fast & simple readout, very little cross talk Design Considerations: IP Image E. Torrence (Oregon), SLAC

March 17, 2011Mike Hildreth – SLAC ESA Testbeam Workshop History: ESA Test Beam Experiments 1.BPM Energy Spectrometer (T-474/491) PIs: M. Hildreth, Notre Dame, S. Boogert, Royal Holloway, Y. Kolomensky, Berkeley/LBNL Institutions: Cambridge, DESY, Dubna, Royal Holloway, Notre Dame, UCL, Berkeley, SLAC –Goals: Demonstrate mechanical and electrical stability at 100-nm level Perform energy measurement in 4-magnet chicane Develop calibration techniques, operational procedures –multiple BPM triplets to test overall stability, new BPM designs 2.Synchrotron stripe diagnostics (T-475) PI: E. Torrence, Oregon Institutions: Oregon, SLAC –Goals: test chicane scheme with wiggler magnet characterize detector (quartz fiber / other) performance and capabilities Overall Goal: perform cross-check of two energy measurements at the ~10 -4 level

March 17, 2011Mike Hildreth – SLAC ESA Testbeam Workshop T474 (T491), T475: Energy Spectrometers BPM-based and Synchrotron-Stripe Spectrometers can be evaluated in a common four-magnet chicane Dipole BPMs Wiggler Synchrotron Stripe Detector

March 17, 2011Mike Hildreth – SLAC ESA Testbeam Workshop FY07 Configuration Ran in 2006 with no dipole chicane Runs in March, July 2007 with chicane Simultaneous test of BPM and Synchrotron Stripe Spectrometers –first beam tests for Synchrotron Detector –compare measured energy, energy jitter at ppm level –tests of BPM movers –more elaborate mechanical stability monitoring Dipoles Wiggler BPMs Interf. Station Straightness Monitor

March 17, 2011Mike Hildreth – SLAC ESA Testbeam Workshop Energy Measurement with chicane (2007) Beam energy computed from spectrometer  Bdl and BPM offset measurement vs. time –energy variation from linac energy scan –large pulse-to-pulse jitter Cross-calibration with beam displacement at high- dispersion BPM in A-line gives  E ~16 MeV (  E/E ~ 5.5×10 -4 ) need higher-precision test

March 17, 2011Mike Hildreth – SLAC ESA Testbeam Workshop New SR Stripe Detector Next-generation prototype for Energy Measurement test –schedule advanced in anticipation of ESA closure/hiatus due to LCLS optical survey E. Torrence (Oregon), SLAC

March 17, 2011Mike Hildreth – SLAC ESA Testbeam Workshop Support Stand/Photon Exit window in ESA New installation downstream of dipole chicane Beam PMT stand window support E. Torrence (Oregon), SLAC

March 17, 2011Mike Hildreth – SLAC ESA Testbeam Workshop Next Steps for ESA Dipoles Wiggler BPMs Interf. Station Straightness Monitor Cross check of spectrometer energy measurements –Commission SR-Stripe setup –Previous chicane measurements limited by BPM resolution LCLS2 BPMs? (under negotiation) –more new hardware/electronics for better resolution/stability –aim for 1×10 -4 relative measurement, cross-calibration –Finish what we started!

Parameters required for Beam Tests Beam parametersValueComments Particle Typeelectrons Energymax available Rep Rate1 Hz? Charge per pulsemax available Energy Spreadmin available Bunch length rms Beam spot size, x-y Others (emittance, …)Full current LCLS pulse LogisticsRequirements Space requirements (H x W x L)Requires chicane, wiggler, SR monitor, etc. Duration of Test and Shift Utilization 8-10 shifts. Will require beam setup for optimal transport parameters Desired Calendar Dates? vibration remediation?

March 17, 2011Mike Hildreth – SLAC ESA Testbeam Workshop Interferometer Data from End Station Vibrations with amplitudes close to or exceeding expected BPM resolution seen on support girder Synchronous data acquisition allows interferometer measurement of BPM position to be subtracted in later data analysis Resolution of central BPM improved by ~700nm (added in quadrature) after vibration subtraction BPM support girder clearly needs to be redesigned if we want to do any sort of stability testing nm condense

March 17, 2011Mike Hildreth – SLAC ESA Testbeam Workshop Spectrometer Program Large and Active R&D program End Station A program complementary to ATF2, other beam tests –high energy, “ILC”-like beam very useful –Essentially, all world players in this game are at KEK and ESA working on both beamlines Robustness tests of measurement techniques are critical –exposure of components to beam tails, halo, etc. –“Trust, but Verify” –Have to make sure these things work! not a huge number of other ideas for many of these measurements Forces re-design of serious accelerator real estate if we fail Milestones: Spectrometer cross-check in 2008(?) –Running will be needed beyond this Needs: Schedule limited by $$, People –availability of ESA beam in the LCLS era is a serious concern –have secured joint postdoc (R&D supplement) to drive this effort

March 17, 2011Mike Hildreth – SLAC ESA Testbeam Workshop Upstream Energy Spectrometer Design Details: –Constrained by allowed emittance growth from Synchrotron Radiation hard bending at points of large dispersion gives large emittance growth  Any bend magnets inside chicane need to be “soft” –Constrained by available real estate in Beam Delivery Syst, overall size Relative positions of components need to be monitored –limits total size to ~50 m These constraints determine needed BPM resolution/stability –overall design for BPM resolution of ~0.5  m –can always average over many pulses if things are stable –if we do much better, bunch-by-bunch diagnostics possible –Other issues drive systematic errors, diagnostics  Complicated dependence on design parameters, options –Must be robust, invisible to luminosity M. Hildreth (Notre Dame), SLAC, Cambridge, UCL, Royal Holloway, LBNL/Berkeley, DESY-Zeuthen, Dubna

March 17, 2011Mike Hildreth – SLAC ESA Testbeam Workshop Synchrotron Stripe Hardware (pre-2007) 8 x 100  m quartz fibers 8 x 600  m fibers 1mm pitch (one cut at entry for background monitoring) Some indications that it is seeing light: Up until now, the quartz fiber box has been buried upstream in the beam switchyard. (No access during test beam running!) Now moved to the endstation proper for the dual spectrometer tests E. Torrence (Oregon), SLAC

March 17, 2011Mike Hildreth – SLAC ESA Testbeam Workshop Interferometer Installation July 2006 March 2007

March 17, 2011Mike Hildreth – SLAC ESA Testbeam Workshop BPM Performance and Stability (2006)  ~ 350nm  ~ 700nm Stability of predicted position 100nm Residual  m

March 17, 2011Mike Hildreth – SLAC ESA Testbeam Workshop BPMs and Electronics Linac rf cavity BPM ILC Linac BPM SLAC Linac BPMs form main component of instrumentation –new electronics developed by Y. Kolomensky (Berkeley/LBNL)(LCRD Accelerator R&D) Also testing prototype ILC Linac BPMs developed at SLAC (C. Adolphsen) New BPMs, optimized for energy spectrometer, designed at University College London in collaboration with BPM experts at SLAC and KEK –custom electronics –mover system –July 2007

March 17, 2011Mike Hildreth – SLAC ESA Testbeam Workshop Beamline Components Dipoles: Measured in SLAC Magnet Lab prior to installation (SLAC/Dubna/Zeuthen) –RMS Reproducity of field integral: 60ppm –RMS Agreement across working points: 100ppm –Temperature coefficient: 5.7x10 -5 /°C –Excellent agreement between measured and simulated magnet properties –Also: measurements made of residual magnetic fields along entire beamline (  Bdl ~ 3 Gm) Wiggler refurbished – now installed

March 17, 2011Mike Hildreth – SLAC ESA Testbeam Workshop Interferometer Installations July 2006 March 2007 single BPM stationlink two BPM stations