1 Technology Transfer Seminar Series Patent Licensing : A Pathway to Commercialization Karen Hersey Senior Counsel for Intellectual Property, MIT. Ret.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Business Legal Checklist for Purchasing A Digital Media Company Using Videogame Developers & Publishers As Case Studies.
Advertisements

The Federal Technology Transfer Process: Licenses and Cooperative Research and Development Agreements ADVANCED LICENSING INSTITUTE AT.
17 th Annual Advanced Licensing Institute January 7, 2009 University Licensing: Turning Academic Innovation into Useful Products Karen Hersey Visiting.
Negotiating Technology License Agreements Tamara Nanayakkara.
Fashion Law: Apparel Licensing for Licensing Professionals Presented to the California State Bar Association Intellectual Property Section/Licensing Division.
Welcome to class of Licensing by Dr. Satyendra Singh
Patents and Intellectual Property by Kari Barnes
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
1 The Use of Intellectual Property in Business Introduction to Intellectual Property Strategies –The intellectual property systems throughout the world.
CHAPTER Section 22.1 Franchising & Licensing Section 22.2 Exit Strategies Franchising & Exit Strategies.
© 2012 Cooley LLP, Five Palo Alto Square, 3000 El Camino Real, Palo Alto, CA The content of this packet is an introduction to Cooley LLP’s capabilities.
LICENSING “One Way of Putting Your I.P. to Work for Your Organization” Inventing and Patenting Seminar May 16, 2001.
Air Force Materiel Command I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Developing, Fielding, and Sustaining America’s Aerospace Force INTELLECTUAL.
Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer Ron Huss, Ph.D., Associate Vice President of Research and Technology Transfer Michael Brignati, Ph.D., J.D.,
Welcome and Introduction: Market Timing and Licensing Options
Intellectual Property
Successful Technology Licensing Chapter III: Key Terms Cluster 3: Forms of Payment and other Financial Terms Arnaud Michel Gide Loyrette Nouel, Paris (Bogota,
Chapter 6 – Legal Issues for the Entrepreneurs Vishnu Parmar, IBA University of Sindh, Jamshoro.
Patents and trade secrets 6 6 Chapter. Patents  Grant of property rights to inventors  Issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)  Permits.
Technology Transfer Commercial Opportunities in Research J. Heidjer Staecker Partner.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LICENSING Advantages to Transferring Intellectual Property Rights Abroad Avoid Costs of Exporting Goods Avoid Problems with Host.
Vilnius Lithuania BSc.: Biochemistry Neuropsychology J.D.: University of Oregon LL.M.:University College London Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
By, Henry “Hank” Abromson, Esq.. Introduction  Henry “Hank” Abromson  Attorney with Miles & Stockbridge P.C. (Frederick)  Intellectual Property, Corporate,
Iowa State University Technology Protection and Licensing.
A business law firm serving entrepreneurs, emerging growth companies and investors Licensing and Corporate Partnering An Overview of Licensing Agreements.
What is Commercialization of IP Josiah Hernandez.
LICENSING & FRANCHISING Silvia Aguilar Eduard Morales Mateo Villa.
B284 ENTREPRENEURSHIP Unit 2 Notes. Entrepreneurship Today  Knowledge of economics contributes to an understanding of how entrepreneurs and customers.
Intro to Intellectual Property 05/13/2015. Exponential Inventor Intro to Intellectual Property 05/13/2015 Why is IP Important? Everyone makes a big deal.
WIPO Dispute Resolution in International Science & Technology April 25, 2005 Ann M. Hammersla Senior Counsel, Intellectual Property Massachusetts Institute.
Constructing the “Price” of the Technology in IP Licensing Negotiations Sub Regional Training Program on IP Valuation Maribor November 5 to 7, 2012.
Characteristics of a Market Economy
Innovation Network Protecting Your Business for Future Success [Trademarks. Patents. Brands]
A Basic Primer on Intellectual Property Kathryn Atchison, DDS, MPH Vice Provost, Intellectual Property and Industry Relations Associate Vice Chancellor.
Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.
SUCCESSFUL TECHNOLOGY LICENSING (STL) Key Terms of a Licensing Agreement Cluster I an II : Subject Matter and Scope ________________ INAPI – WIPO Santiago.
1 Knowledge | Innovation | Technology Overview of Risk Management in University Technology Transfer David N. Allen, Ph.D. Associate Vice President for.
Jay A. Lefton Senior Partner Common Mistakes That Cause Turmoil in Licensing, Financing and M&A Transactions Common.
Zheng Liu January 18, 2015 Intellectual Property Law For Startups.
Custom Software Development Intellectual Property and Other Key Issues © 2006 Jeffrey W. Nelson and Iowa Department of Justice (Attach G)
“Win-Win” LicensingAgreement: Negotiating and Drafting Strategies “Win-Win” Licensing Agreement: Negotiating and Drafting Strategies August 12 – 14, 2008.
All Rights Reserved. GTRC. Atlanta, Georgia Georgia Tech Integrated Program for Startups Inventing the Future 2012 Technology Commercialization:
How Commercial Firms Protect Intellectual Property In Transactions Daniel J. Mazella Celera Genomics Group, An Applera Corporation Business.
Elements of a Workable Intellectual Property Policy OPIC IP Roundtable Noel Courage Bereskin & Parr November 21, 2007.
Life of a Stanford Invention. Functional Antibodies FM Sound Synthesis Recombinant DNA Google Notable Stanford Inventions.
Maximizing Intangible Benefits from IPRs protection to Exploitation of IPRs: Business Strategies based on Franchising and /or Merchandising Avv. Fabrizio.
Commercializing Scientific Research and development Legislation, Contracts, Royalty rates Anne K. S. Jensen Senior Examiner, M. Sc. EE Danish Patent and.
1 Valuation of Intellectual Property in the Commercial Environment April 22, 2002 “How the Other Half Lives...”
Technology Licensing at Stanford University
Intellectual Property Basics: What Rules Apply to Faculty, Staff, and Student Work Product? Dave Broome Vice Chancellor and General Counsel October 15,
Moscow, Russia, 10 September 2012 HSE Intellectual Property Policy Aliya Ermakova, Head of IP Department, Innovation and Enterprise Office, HSE
Market Oriented Economic Systems. Basic Principles Individuals should have freedom of choice  Elect people to represent us in government  Where we work.
1 The Political, Legal, and Regulatory Environments of Global Marketing Global Marketing Chapter 5.
UNECE April 2009 Commercialization of IPR A Business Perspective Jason Bucha, Compliance Counsel April 2, 2009.
1 28 June 2006 © ip21 Limited 2006 Intellectual Property Issues for the Consultant Matthew Dixon, Chartered Patent Attorney, ip21 Limited
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 101 CHASE KASPER, DIRECTOR OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
Top 10 Legal Minefields A University Perspective October 8, 2009 Catherine Shea Associate University Counsel University of Colorado.
An Overview of Intellectual Property by John Slaughter September 26, 2009 © John Slaughter All Rights Reserved.
Bygrave & Zacharakis, Entrepreneurship, New York: Wiley. © Chapter 13 Intellectual Property.
Review of Research-Related Agreements Between Academic Institutions and Other Entities. Manoja Ratnayake Lecamwasam, PhD Intellectual Property and Innovation.
ip4inno Module 4C IP Licensing Name of SpeakerVenue & Date.
Bygrave & Zacharakis, Entrepreneurship, New York: Wiley. © Chapter 13 Intellectual Property.
1 Successful Technology Licensing: A Practical Guide.
Intellectual Property - Patents, Copyrights, and Other Protectionist Barriers CEPR Basic Economics Seminar Dean Baker November 17, 2005.
Lecture 28 Intellectual Property(Cont’d)
SOCIAL,ETHICAL AND LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
Capturing Creativity: Intellectual Asset Management and IP Strategy.
Welcome to class of International Licensing Dr
Patents and Standards Benoît Müller Director, Software Policy (Europe)
Presentation transcript:

1 Technology Transfer Seminar Series Patent Licensing : A Pathway to Commercialization Karen Hersey Senior Counsel for Intellectual Property, MIT. Ret. Adjunct Professor of Law, Franklin Pierce Law Center

2 Commercializing University Assets 4 Success in university technology transfer occurs through establishing commercial value for university “assets” 4 University technology products or “assets” find commercial value in what they are worth – what someone will pay for the product because there is incentive to productize (incentive = profit) –If everyone can use it, money value = 0 –If only one/few can use it, money value = + 4 Value + user/consumer demand = $

3 Commercializing University Assets 4 Two ways to “create” or force value –Limit the number of people who know it Probably not reasonable in an educational environment –Limit the number of people who can use it By asserting legally enforceable ownership rights to it and deciding who can use it, under what circumstances and at what price

4 Commercializing University Assets 4 Asserting legal rights of ownership – the choices –As personal property.... Limited methods of commercial exploitation available: bailment, lease, sale –As intellectual property... Lawfully applied “intangible rights” provide greater promise for the success in the commercial marketplace Ownership of intangible rights do not transfer with “use” rights

5 Sorting Out Legal Protection Options for “Technology-related” Candidates 4 Knowledge/ideas – often not protected by federal statutory IP rights are commonly known as “know-how” = trade secrets (state protection) 4 Innovation in research/discoveries = patents 4 Computer software programs = copyrights and sometimes patents 4 Biological materials = tangible property and sometimes patents

6 Why Do Universities Commercialize Through Licensing? 4 Licensing: the preferential transactional choice for university-owned intellectual property rights –Benefits Confers legal monopoly transferable to licensee but licensor sets the conditions Multiple licensing alternatives allow the licensor to “hedge bets” Due diligence requirements with penalties, loss of license if not met Time, geographical, field of use limitations permitting best development of licensed asset by most competent licensees Royalties matched to licensee’s capabilities, expectations Flexibility

7 Why Don’t Universities Just “Sell” 4 The Downside of a patent “Sale” –Advance payment (selling price) may not reflect true market value –No rights to compel use (avoiding the filing cabinet/circular file end-game) –No opportunity for “best/highest use” alternatives –No retained rights to use by seller –No rights of attribution for seller’s inventors 4 Statutory Limitations –Bayh-Dole (no assignment to commercial company) –UBIT likely

8 Negotiating Patent Licenses: A Complicated Matter 4 Most important: Patent licenses are contracts! 4 Terms to sort out through negotiation –What is being licensed Mere disclosure Patent application Issued patent Foreign filed patents –To whom Who is the licensee?

9 Negotiating Patent Licenses: A Complicated Matter 4 Terms to sort out –With what rights Exclusive, non-exclusive All fields of use or only some All geographic areas (world-wide or not) With right to sublicense others or not –For how long Life of the patent or shorter –For what price The royalty structure

10 Negotiating Patent Licenses: A Complicated Matter 4 More Terms to sort out –Under what conditions Due diligence requirements and penalties if not met –Who pays patent costs? –What happens if the patent is infringed by others – who can sue? –What happens if the licensee infringes rights of others while commercializing? Can the university be sued? –What happens if the licensee’s product using the patent causes injury to others (product liability)? Can the university be sued?

11 Negotiating Patent Licenses: A Complicated Matter 4 And, even more terms to sort out –Can the licensee assign its rights to others Should the licensor have the right to approve? –What if the inventors make an improvement to the patent Does the licensee have rights? –What if the licensor has background patents needed by the licensee?