Evolutionary Psychology, Workshop 11: Controllability of Mate Value.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sex Differences in human mate preferences
Advertisements

An evolutionary perspective on human mating: Strategies of self- promotion, competitor derogation, and mate poaching.
Evolutionary Psychology. Workshop 8: Jealousy.. Learning Outcomes. zAt the end of this session you should be able to: z1. Briefly review the evidence.
Sex and Mating Strategy Differences in Jealousy Sarah L. Strout, Sarah E. Bush, & James D. Laird: Clark University Abstract Previous research focused on.
AGE VARIATION IN MATING STRATEGIES AND MATE PREFERENCES AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS Danielle Ryan and April Bleske-Rechek, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire.
Male Long-Term Mating Strategies The Problems of Paternity.
Evolutionary Psychology,Workshop 7: Waist-Hip Ratio.
Introduction to Psychology Suzy Scherf Lecture 14: How Do We Interact? Human Mating Strategies.
Sexual Conflict The Coevolutionary Battle of the Sexes (Part I)
Women’s Long Term Mating Strategies
Evolutionary Psychology, Workshop 3: Altruism and Cooperation.
1 Psychology 320: Gender Psychology Lecture Romantic Relationships: 1. What factors determine relationship satisfaction for females and males? (continued)
Examining Differential Item Functioning of "Insensitive" Test Items Examining Differential Item Functioning of "Insensitive" Test Items Juliya Golubovich,
Brooke Bussone Dylan Antovich. The Evolutionary Theory of Romantic Jealousy Jealousy is an adapted function designed to increase fitness Two factors in.
The Biological Perspective
Genetic Factors Predisposing to Homosexuality May Increase Mating Success in Heterosexuals Written by Zietsch et. al By Michael Berman and Lindsay Tooley.
Evolutionary Psychology Workshop 9: Female Aggression.
Homework  Plan the following essay ready for timed essay after half term “Discuss two or more theories of the formation of romantic relationships” (8+16)
Evolutionary Psychology, Workshop 4 Mate Preferences.
Summary by Amber Kika, Nina Dangourian, and Esmeralda Huerta
© 2013 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. The Personality Puzzle Sixth Edition by David C. Funder Chapter 9: The Inheritance of Personality: Behavioral Genetics.
Examine the Biological, Psychological and Social Origins of Attraction
Romantic Red: Red Enhances Men’s Attraction to Women Andrew J. Elliot and Daniela Niesta University of Rochester Elliot, A., & Niesta, D. (2008 November).
A01 feedback Starting sentence before you go into the biology (23 pairs of chromosomes, males XY, females XX) Don’t just explain how genes affect your.
Origins of Attraction MATTHEW CORRINET. Biological: Fischer et al. (2003)  “... used an fMRI... to investigate blood flow in the brains of 20 men and.
WJEC Psychology Psy 2 Core Studies
An Evolutionary Psychology Perspective on Sex Differences in Exercise Behaviors and Motivations Peter K. Jonason Summary and presentation by: Redd Davis,
Evolution & mate choice Sexual selection suggests that men & women adopt different mating strategies Male – relatively indiscriminate, interested in fertility.
WHS AP Psychology Unit 3: Biological Psychology Essential Task 3-9: Explain key behaviors that evolutionary psychologists believe exist because of their.
Biosocial Approach Gender Development. Gender Characteristics, whether biological or socially influenced, by which people define male and female WomenMen.
1 Psychology 305A: Personality Psychology October 1 Lecture 7.
B USS I NTERNATIONAL P REFERENCES IN S ELECTING M ATES – A S TUDY OF 37 C ULTURES. BACKGROUND: Evolutionary psychologists suggest that men and women.
Psychology 3051 Psychology 305A: Theories of Personality Lecture 6 1.
Psychology 3051 Psychology 305A: Theories of Personality Lecture 6 1.
By: Deanna Duermit, Mikayla Mowzoon, Jenna Tioseco
Sexual Selection Psychology Introduction A species’ ecology should dictate what traits are optimal Natural selection Explain this then.
Evolutionary Psychology Chapter 4, Lecture 2 “The typical genetic difference between two Icelandic villagers or between two Kenyans is much greater than.
1 Psychology 305A: Personality Psychology September 30 Lecture 7.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences Lecture 40.
Introduction Disordered eating continues to be a significant health concern for college women. Recent research shows it is on the rise among men. Media.
Sex differences in romantic kissing among college students: An evolutionary perspective Summary by Amber Kika, Nina Dangourian, and Esmeralda Huerta For.
MOTIVATION Process Theories of Motivation. “Process theories attempt to identify the relationship among the dynamic variables which make up motivation.
Buss 1989 Sex differences in mate preferences. Objectives Lesson 1  To understand the context, aims and procedures of Buss’s evolutionary study  To.
Biological Approach PSYB1. Basic Assumptions of the Biological Approach Mind and behaviour have a biological basis e.g. the mind is a result of the way.
1 Psychology 320: Gender Psychology Lecture Mental Health: 1. Are there sex differences in: (a) depression, (b) eating disorders, (c) personality.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences Lecture 15.
Body Image Body image reflects how we see our own body, and how we think, feel, and act towards it. Thus, body image is generally defined in terms of four.
Addiction UNIT 4: PSYA4 Miss Bird (LCB)
A2 Psychology of Sport Self confidence Booklet 4 Skills Working as a team Complete green group tasks Working as an individual Complete yellow individual.
1 Psychology 320: Gender Psychology Lecture Invitational Office Hour Invitations, by Student Number for October 22 nd 11:30-12:30, 3:30-4:30 Kenny.
By: Jennifer Busico, Renee Egizi, Laura Jimenez Buss, D. M. (2008). Attractive Women Want It All: Good Genes, Economic Investment, Parenting Proclivities,
5 mins To look over notes and plan Timed essay- 30 mins DISCUSS THE BIOSOCIAL APPROACH TO GENDER DEVELOPMENT. (8 +16 MARKS) You can use your plan but this.
 What connects these two images..?  In many species, males have characteristics (e.g. brighter colouration, exaggerated tails) that serve to attract.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences October 15 Lecture 11.
Locus of Control Elenuel T. Genova Ph.D Student. Locus of control  Locus of Control defines the term as a theory in personality psychology referring.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences January 22 Lecture 39.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences Lecture 38.
Template provided by: “posters4research.com”   Ideals: mental constructs that represent an idea of traits we are attracted to in potential partners (Fletcher.
Scenario Your have been in a long-term relationship for 3 years. You have decided to move in together. Your best friend has just told you that when they.
Biological, Cognitive and Sociocultural Explanations to the origins of attraction The Origins of Attraction.
Sex Differences in Gender, Orientation, and Identity
Unit 3: Biological Psychology
Are masculine males attractive
‘Sex differences in human mate preferences’
Mate Preferences Evolutionary lens model.
‘Sex differences in human mate preferences’
Presentation transcript:

Evolutionary Psychology, Workshop 11: Controllability of Mate Value.

Learning Outcomes. zAt the end of this session you should be able to: z1. Carry out a small survey concerning controllability of mate value using the questionnaire derived from Hamida et al., (1998). z2. Collate the results from the group and discuss the findings. z3. Discuss the predictions generated by the Hamida et al., article.

Background. zRecall that males and females may show distinct preferences for certain traits in their potential romantic partners, and these mate preferences do appear to translate into actual mate choice (e.g. Buss, 1989). zNatural selection will have favoured those individuals who try to improve their mate value, and the success of the cosmetic, clothing and physical fitness industries bears witness to this. zHamida et al., (1998) argued that the traits valued by males (physical attraction) are less controllable than the status-relevant characteristics valued by women (hard work, industriousness etc). zImproving one’s mate value may therefore involve differential emotional consequences for males and females

Sex Differences in Control Over Mate Value zMales have greater control over their traits because they generally involve investing time and effort in their profession and/or education, which are voluntary and can be improved. zMales investing in improving their physical characteristics, and females investing in improving their control of resources will not make much difference to their mate status. zFemales however have much less control over the traits that males find attractive (biological factors such as youthful-looking skin, waist-hip ratio etc). zThe greater uncontrollability of mate value for women may lead to increased frustration, helplessness, low self-esteem, negative affect and depression.

Predictions. zWe may thus predict that women’s attempts to improve their mate value will often result in failure (or the results will not be as good as they hoped). zThis lack of control may have important emotional consequences. zFurthermore, a woman may perceive such an uncontrollable process as: zStable (here to stay), zGlobal (it affects many bodily processes as well as other aspects of one’s life) zInternal (it is something that only the individual can control). zSuch attributions that can lead to maladaptive responses (helplessness and depression).

Testing the Predictions. zHamida et al., (1998) examined whether women perceive traits that men value as less controllable, compared with men’s perceptions of the controllability of the traits than women find attractive. z74 males and 76 females filled in two self-report questionnaires. zThe first asked them to rate the importance of 64 items in a long-term partner. zThe second questionnaire presented the same items, but the participants had to rate their perceived degree of personal control over these traits. zThey found the following:

Results from Hamida et al., (1998).  Males placed more emphasis on traits concerned with physical attraction and youth.  Women placed more emphasis on traits associated with social status, ambition, good job prospects and physical strength.  Women also placed greater emphasis on personality traits such as ‘sincere’, ‘kind’, ‘sensitive’, ‘generous’, and ‘sympathetic’.  Women felt that they had considerably less control over the traits that men placed greater emphasis on than men did over traits favoured by women.

Other Predictions.  Females who are in the peak reproductive years should be more concerned about their attractiveness.  Teenage girls who experience larger fluctuations in their physical appearance may be more prone to negative affect and low self-esteem if they perceive they lack control over these changes.  The high prevalence of eating disorders in gay men may reflect the fact that they place great value on youth, and physical attraction in their partners.  Males should experience correspondingly greater negative affect if they lose control over their ability to acquire resources (i.e. they become unemployed). Suicide amongst the male unemployed is indeed high.

Problems With the Study.  The self-report nature of the questionnaire, particularly regarding the controllability measure, as it is not clear whether people can accurately judge their ability to control various traits. For example, some thought that they could control personality traits, and yet probably cannot.  The importance of individual differences within sex was ignored. For example, not all women are equally vulnerable to the effects of their perceived inability to control certain physical attributes.  They did not actually measure helplessness, negative affect, or changes in self-esteem following the evaluation of uncontrollable traits.

Task. zGather data from 2 males and 2 females concerning perceptions of the controllability of mate value using the questionnaire devised by Hamida et al., (1998). zWe will collate the data and discuss the findings in relation to predictions generated by these authors.

Results From This Session.

References. zBuss, D.M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioural & Brain Sciences, 12: zHamida, S.B., Mineka, S., & Bailey, J.M. (1998). Sex differences in perceived controllability of mate value: an evolutionary perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75: