LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO: Progress and Prospects Barry Barish 18 July 2000 COSPAR 2000 Fundamental Physics in Space.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
Advertisements

Advanced Gravitational-wave Detectors and LIGO-India
The 2000 Buhl Lecture Einstein’s Unfinished Symphony: “Listening” for Gravitational Waves Barry C. Barish.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Research and Development David Shoemaker LHO LSC 11 November 2003.
LIGO-G M First Generation Interferometers Barry Barish 30 Oct 2000 Workshop on Astrophysical Sources for Ground-Based Gravitational Wave Detectors.
Gravitational Waves Laser Interferometric Detectors
1 Science Opportunities for Australia Advanced LIGO Barry Barish Director, LIGO Canberra, Australia 16-Sept-03 LIGO-G M.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G W Is there a future for LIGO underground? Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO Status and Plans Barry Barish / Gary Sanders 13-May-02
LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Status and Plans Barry Barish 5 June 2000 Gravitational Waves: A Challenge to Theoretical Astrophysics Trieste, 5-9 June 2000.
Status of the LIGO Project
Barry Barish AIP Conference, Sydney Australia 11-July-02
LIGO Gravitational Waves Barry Barish Feb 23, 2000 Lake Louise Winter Institute.
LIGO Present and Future
G M LIGO “First Lock” Barry Barish 21 October 2000.
LIGO-G M LIGO and Detection of Gravitational Waves Barry Barish 13 October 2000.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory LIGO
1 Observing the Most Violent Events in the Universe Virgo Barry Barish Director, LIGO Virgo Inauguration 23-July-03 Cascina 2003.
Listening to Gravitational Waves: Einstein’s Songlines from the Universe Barry C. Barish.
LIGO-G M LIGO and Prospects for Detection of Gravitational Waves Barry Barish 1 November 2000.
Sir Isaac Newton Universal Gravitation
LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Status and Plans Barry Barish March 13, 2000.
Overview Ground-based Interferometers Barry Barish Caltech Amaldi-6 20-June-05.
LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO and Detection of Gravitational Waves Barry Barish 14 September 2000.
LIGO -- Studying the Fabric of the Universe LIGO-GOxxxx Barry C. Barish National Science Board LIGO Livingston, LA 4-Feb-04.
Gravitational Wave Detectors: new eyes for physics and astronomy Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University.
David Shoemaker 30 August 05
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G v1 The LIGO Vacuum System and plans for LIGO-Australia Stan Whitcomb IndIGO - ACIGA meeting on LIGO-Australia 9 February 2011.
LIGO-G D Installation and Commissioning Status Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 14 June 2001 Caltech.
The GEO 600 Detector Andreas Freise for the GEO 600 Team Max-Planck-Institute for Gravitational Physics University of Hannover May 20, 2002.
LIGO- G M Status of LIGO David Shoemaker LISA Symposium 13 July 2004.
LIGO G M Introduction to LIGO Stan Whitcomb LIGO Hanford Observatory 24 August 2004.
LIGO-G M Management of the LIGO Project Gary Sanders California Institute of Technology Presented to the Committee on Programs and Plans of the.
14 July LNGSSearch for Gravitational Waves with Interferometers 1 The search for gravitational waves with the new generation of interferometers Peter.
G M 1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC/Virgo MIT July 2007.
LIGO-G D Enhanced LIGO Kate Dooley University of Florida On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SESAPS Nov. 1, 2008.
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v1.
LIGO-G D The LIGO-I Gravitational-wave Detectors Stan Whitcomb CaJAGWR Seminar February 16, 2001.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
Gravitational Wave Detection Using Precision Interferometry Gregory Harry Massachusetts Institute of Technology - On Behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration.
LIGO Commissioning Status
Initial and Advanced LIGO Detectors
LIGO-G D Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory) Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech National.
The status of VIRGO Edwige Tournefier (LAPP-Annecy ) for the VIRGO Collaboration HEP2005, 21st- 27th July 2005 The VIRGO experiment and detection of.
LIGO-G W LIGO Detector Commissioning Reported on behalf of LIGO colleagues by Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G M The Curtain Rises on LIGO: Listening to Einstein's Gravitational Symphony Gary Sanders Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory.
Initial and Advanced LIGO Status Gregory Harry LIGO/MIT March 24, 2006 March 24, th Eastern Gravity Meeting G R.
LIGO-G D Commissioning at Hanford Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 12 December 2000 LIGO Livingston Observatory.
LIGO-G M Scientific Operation of LIGO Gary H Sanders LIGO Laboratory California Institute of Technology APS Meeting APR03, Philadelphia Gravitational-Wave.
LIGO-G M Catching the Waves with LIGO Barry Barish 26 Sept 01.
LIGO G M Intro to LIGO Seismic Isolation Pre-bid meeting Gary Sanders LIGO/Caltech Stanford, April 29, 2003.
G Z The LIGO gravitational wave detector consists of two observatories »LIGO Hanford Observatory – 2 interferometers (4 km long arms and 2 km.
LIGO-G M Press Conference Scientific Operation of LIGO Gary H Sanders Caltech (on behalf of a large team) APS April Meeting Philadelphia 6-April-03.
LIGO-G Z LIGO’s Thermal Noise Interferometer Progress and Status Eric D. Black, Kenneth G. Libbrecht, and Shanti Rao (Caltech) Seiji Kawamura.
1 The status of VIRGO E. Tournefier LAPP(Annecy)-IN2P3-CNRS Journées SF2A, Strasbourg 27 juin – 1er juillet 2005 The VIRGO experiment The commissioning.
Searches for Gravitational Waves Barry Barish Caltech IPA London – Aug 2014 “Merging Neutron Stars“ (Price & Rosswog)
Current and future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors
Status of Interferometers and Data Analysis
Is there a future for LIGO underground?
Installation and Commissioning Status Stan Whitcomb
Nergis Mavalvala MIT IAU214, August 2002
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
Gravity -- Studying the Fabric of the Universe Barry C
Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning
Albert Lazzarini California Institute of Technology
LIGO Interferometry CLEO/QELS Joint Symposium on Gravitational Wave Detection, Baltimore, May 24, 2005 Daniel Sigg.
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO: Progress and Prospects Barry Barish 18 July 2000 COSPAR 2000 Fundamental Physics in Space

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Suspended mass Michelson-type interferometers on earth’s surface detect distant astrophysical sources International network (LIGO, Virgo, GEO, TAMA) enable locating sources and decomposing polarization of gravitational waves. Interferometers terrestrial

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Interferomers international network LIGO Simultaneously detect signal (within msec) detection confidence locate the sources decompose the polarization of gravitational waves GEO Virgo TAMA AIGO

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Interferometers space and terrestrial  EM waves are studied over ~20 orders of magnitude »(ULF radio  HE  rays)  Gravitational Waves over ~10 orders of magnitude » (terrestrial + space) Audio band

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO I the noise floor  Interferometry is limited by three fundamental noise sources  seismic noise at the lowest frequencies  thermal noise at intermediate frequencies  shot noise at high frequencies  Many other noise sources lurk underneath and must be controlled as the instrument is improved

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO I interferometer LIGO I configuration Science run begins in 2002

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Sites Hanford Observatory Livingston Observatory

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Plans schedule 1996Construction Underway (mostly civil) 1997Facility Construction (vacuum system) 1998Interferometer Construction (complete facilities) 1999Construction Complete (interferometers in vacuum) 2000Detector Installation (commissioning subsystems) 2001 Commission Interferometers (first coincidences) 2002Sensitivity studies (initiate LIGOI Science Run) LIGO I data run (one year integrated data at h ~ ) 2005Begin LIGO II installation

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Livingston Observatory

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Hanford Observatory

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Facilities Beam Tube Enclosure minimal enclosure reinforced concrete no services

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Beam Tube  LIGO beam tube under construction in January 1998  65 ft spiral welded sections  girth welded in portable clean room in the field

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO vacuum equipment

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Vacuum Chambers HAM Chambers BSC Chambers

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Seismic Isolation constrained layer damped springs

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Seismic Isolation Systems Progress »production and delivery of components almost complete »early quality problems have mostly disappeared »the coarse actuation system for the BSC seismic isolation systems has been installed and tested successfully in the LVEA at both Observatories »Hanford 2km & Livingston seismic isolation system installation has been completed, with the exception of the tidal compensation (fine actuation) system »Hanford 4km seismic isolation installation is complete HAM Door Removal (Hanford 4km)

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Laser  Nd:YAG   m  Output power > 8W in TEM00 mode

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Laser Prestabilization  intensity noise:   I(f)/I <10 -6 /Hz 1/2, 40 Hz<f<10 KHz  frequency noise:   (f) < Hz/Hz 1/2 40Hz<f<10KHz

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Optics mirrors, coating and polishing  All optics polished & coated »Microroughness within spec. (<10 ppm scatter) »Radius of curvature within spec.  R/R  5%) »Coating defects within spec. (pt. defects < 2 ppm, 10 optics tested) »Coating absorption within spec. (<1 ppm, 40 optics tested)

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO metrology  Caltech  CSIRO

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Input Optics installation & commissioning  The 2km Input Optics subsystem installation has been completed »The Mode Cleaner routinely holds length servo-control lock for days »Mode cleaner parameters are close to design specs, including the length, cavity linewidth and visibility »Further characterization is underway

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Commissioning Configurations  Mode cleaner and Pre-Stabilized Laser  Michelson interferometer  2km one-arm cavity  At present, activity focussed on Hanford Observatory  Mode cleaner locking imminent at Livingston

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Schematic of system

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Commissioning Pre-Stabilized Laser-Mode Cleaner  Suspension characterization »actuation / diagonalization »sensitivity of local controls to stray Nd:YAG light »Qs of elements measured,  Laser - Mode Cleaner control system shakedown  Laser frequency noise measurement

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Wavefront sensing mode cleaner cavity  Alignment system function verified

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Michelson Interferometer  Interference quality of recombined beams ( >0.99)  Measurements of Qs of Test Masses

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M 2km Fabry-Perot cavity  Includes all interferometer subsystems »many in definitive form; analog servo on cavity length for test configuration  confirmation of initial alignment »~100 microrad errors; beams easily found in both arms  ability to lock cavity improves with understanding » 0 sec 12/1 flashes of light » 0.2 sec 12/9 » 2 min 1/14 » 60 sec 1/19 » 5 min 1/21 (and on a different arm) » 18 min 2/12 » 1.5 hrs 3/4 (temperature stabilize pre modecleaner)

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M 2km Fabry-Perot cavity  models of environment » temperature changes on laser frequency » tidal forces changing baselines » seismometer/tilt correlations with microseismic peak  mirror characterization » losses: ~6% dip, excess probably due to poor centering » scatter: appears to be better than requirements » figure 12/03 beam profile

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M 2km Fabry-Perot cavity 15 minute locked stretch

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Significant Events

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO astrophysical sources LIGO I ( ) LIGO II (2007- ) Advanced LIGO

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Phase Noise splitting the fringe spectral sensitivity of MIT phase noise interferometer above 500 Hz shot noise limited near LIGO I goal additional features are from 60 Hz powerline harmonics, wire resonances (600 Hz), mount resonances, etc

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Noise Floor 40 m prototype d isplacement sensitivity in 40 m prototype. comparison to predicted contributions from various noise sources

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Detection Strategy Coincidences Two Sites - Three Interferometers »Single Interferometernon-gaussian level~50/hr »Hanford (Doubles) correlated rate (x1000)~1/day »Hanford + Livingston uncorrelated (x5000)<0.1/yr  Data Recording (time series) »gravitational wave signal (0.2 MB/sec) »total data (16 MB/s) »on-line filters, diagnostics, data compression »off line data analysis, archive etc  Signal Extraction »signal from noise (vetoes, noise analysis) »templates, wavelets, etc

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Sites Hanford Observatory Livingston Observatory

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Interferometer Data 40 m Real interferometer data is UGLY!!! (Gliches - known and unknown) LOCKING RINGING NORMAL ROCKING

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M The Problem How much does real data degrade complicate the data analysis and degrade the sensitivity ?? Test with real data by setting an upper limit on galactic neutron star inspiral rate using 40 m data

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M “Clean up” data stream Effect of removing sinusoidal artifacts using multi-taper methods Non stationary noise Non gaussian tails

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Inspiral ‘Chirp’ Signal Template Waveforms “matched filtering” 687 filters 44.8 hrs of data 39.9 hrs arms locked 25.0 hrs good data sensitivity to our galaxy h ~ mHz -1/2 expected rate ~10 -6 /yr

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Detection Efficiency Simulated inspiral events provide end to end test of analysis and simulation code for reconstruction efficiency Errors in distance measurements from presence of noise are consistent with SNR fluctuations

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Setting a limit Upper limit on event rate can be determined from SNR of ‘loudest’ event Limit on rate: R < 0.5/hour with 90% CL  = 0.33 = detection efficiency An ideal detector would set a limit: R < 0.16/hour

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO II incremental improvements

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO astrophysical sources Compact binary mergers

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO astrophysical sources  Pulsars in our galaxy »non axisymmetric: 10-4 <  < 10-6 »science: neutron star precession; interiors »narrow band searches best

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Conclusions  LIGO I construction complete  LIGO I commissioning and testing ‘on track’  Interferometer characterization underway  Data analysis schemes are being developed, including tests with 40 m data  First Science Run will begin in 2002  Significant improvements in sensitivity anticipated to begin about 2006