Building Your Workforce Using One Tool at a Time Presented by: Mary Berg, MSW.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Resources for Improving Outcomes for Children and Families Through Caseload/Workload Reductions Webinar Presentation to State Liaison Officers July 17,
Advertisements

Partnership Working The evidence base. Partnership working What is partnership working? Principles of partnership working Benefits? Success factors? Challenges?
Nancy S. Dickinson, MSSW, PhD The Use of Evidence in Child Welfare Practice and Policy: An International Perspective on Future Directions Jerusalem, May.
Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.
Implementing System Change in Child Welfare Presented to National Resource Center for Organizational Improvement Practice Model Peer Network Conference.
1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
Child Welfare Workforce Development: Shared Success & Future Directions Kansas Council for Social Work Education April 5, 2013.
Initiating & Sustaining a Mentoring Program Dr. Virginia Strand- Fordham University Jodi Hill-Lilly, MSW & Tracy Davis, MSW Connecticut Department of Children.
Turnover and Retention 13 th Annual Tile IV-E Federal Region VI Conference May 28, 2009 Jane Burstain, PhD, Senior Policy Analyst Unless otherwise noted,
Kansas Kansas Workforce Initiative The Importance of Supervisors Michelle Levy and Roxanne Emmert-Davis September 15, 2010.
1 Introduction to Workforce Planning and Development in State of Alaska Executive Branch Departments.
The Kansas Child Welfare Workforce Profile SSWR 2011 Annual Conference January 14, 2010 Alice Lieberman, Ph.D. and Michelle Levy, A.M.
Organizational Innovation in Child Welfare Systems Social Work Education Consortium in Partnership with New York State Office of Children and Family Services.
NRCOI March 5th Conference Call
Strategic Thinking to Align Initiatives and Integrate Management, Supervision, and Practice Heidi D. McIntosh, MSW Deputy Commissioner Fernando J. Muñiz,
Recruitment & Retention of a Qualified Workforce The Foundation of Success.
ASU Involvement in Child Welfare Workforce Development and Research: Experiences, Challenges, and Opportunities Testimony to the Arizona Child Safety Task.
Implementing and Sustaining Practice Models Presented to National Resource Center for Organizational Improvement Conference Call/ Webinar November 29,
1 Do Work Life Balance Policies Work? An Evaluation of the Work Life Balance (WLB) Challenge Fund, UK Adrian Nelson and Kathryn Nemec The Tavistock Institute.
OS 352 4/24/08 I. Exam III is on Monday, 4/28, 11:45- 2:45pm, in Science Center /28 Office Hours: 9am-11am, my office. II. HR Scorecard, continued.
Center for Health Care Quality Licensing & Certification Program Evaluation 1 August 2014 rev.
1 Strengthening Child Welfare Supervision as a Key Practice Change Strategy Unit I: Helping Child Welfare Leaders Re-conceptualize Supervision.
The View from the Agency Perspective. Jefferson County State supervised, county administered child welfare system 180 employees in the Division Serving.
450 PRESENTATION NURSING TURNOVER.
May 18, MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that.
Proposed Conceptual Model to Guide Workforce Development Efforts in Child Welfare Feb 2014.
Kansas Relating Supervision to Workforce Outcomes Justin Thaw, MSW Excellence in Supervision Conference September 22, 2011.
1 Council of the Great City Schools October 27, 2012 Succession Planning and Leadership Development.
The Future of Flexibility BC Center for Work & Family Executive Briefing Series Boston College Center for Work and Family.
Evidence-based Strategies for Improving Child Welfare Performance, Staff Retention and Client Outcomes XIX ISPCAN International Congress on Child Abuse.
The New Mexico Experience Practice Model Peer Network Webinar September 10, 2012.
CSWE Child Welfare Symposium Child Welfare Workforce Retention Research in New York State New York State Social Work Education Consortium.
Improving Recruitment & Retention in Public Child Welfare – Some Lessons Learned University of Iowa and Iowa Department of Human Services December 4, 2008.
1 Virtual Office Government Technology Conference May 29, 2008 Presented by Jim Wang, AHCCCS CIO Linda Skinner, AHCCCS Asst Dir DMS.
Blandin Foundation Broadband Initiatives. Why Broadband? Communities must be connected to maintain vitality and economic competiveness People must be.
Proposed Conceptual Model to Guide Workforce Development Efforts in Child Welfare Feb 2014.
1 Keeping Competent and Committed Staff Keeping Competent and Qualified Staff: Promising Strategies By Freda Bernotavicz and Nancy Dickinson Spring 2008,
Agency Health and the State of the Service Report 2006–07.
The effects of an organizational intervention on child welfare agency atmosphere and workforce stability Jessica Strolin, PhD Jim Caringi, LiCSW Thank.
2013 AIM Hospital Marketing Conference How to Build Physician Leaders AIM Annual Conference April 13, :00 – 1:45 p.m. BUILDING PHYSICIAN LEADERSHIP:
Mark Miller, Director of Training Maryam Fatemi; Regional Administrator Tedji Dessalegn Regional Administrator A Los Angeles “Regional Update” Fairness.
Today’s Presenter - Jim Bergman © 2009 Commitment Management, Inc. All Rights Reserved Best Practices in Contracting Skills Development Welcome.
1 Virtual Office APHSA ISM Conference August 26, 2008 Presented by Jim Wang, AHCCCS CIO
Julie R. Morales Butler Institute for Families University of Denver.
Employee Recognition and Wellness Benchmarking Project Healthy Workplace Champions June 29, 2009.
Your Presenters Melissa Connelly, Director, Regional Training Academy Coordination Project, CalSWEC Sylvia Deporto, Deputy Director, Family & Children’s.
NIATx Project  BIG AIM: Reduce (re-) hospitalization due to gaps in service delivery when consumers’ needs are immediate, multiple and/or exceed.
COUNTY PARTNERSHIP TO MEET SKILL NEEDS & ENHANCE TRANSFER CLIMATE The Ohio Child Welfare Training Program.
State of Delaware: The Department of Services for Children, Youth and Their Families DELAWARE CHILDREN’S DEPARTMENT ‘Think of the Child First’ CWLA NATIONAL.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
The Esteemed Agency: Managing Human Services Teams Week Fifteen.
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
What the NCWWI Evaluators have been up to… A love story Changing... Leading... Learning...
Picking the Right One Human Resource Experts: Mary Mallory, Wilson County HR Director Tondra Talley, Wilson County HR Facilitators: Christy Nash and Darrell.
THE TRAINING STRATEGY MODEL BUSINESS GOALS Establish the priorities BUSINESS PROCESSES Tasks or business model for achieving the goals JOB ROLES Identify.
Employee Socialization and Orientation
Overview of the 5 Zones Maryland Health Improvement and Disparities Reduction Act of 2012 funded the HEZ program with $4 million per year for four years.
Strategic Workforce Interventions Andrew L. Reitz Barbara Schmitt Child Welfare League of America.
1 Copyright © 2009, 2006, 2003, 2000, 1997, 1994 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 15 The Health Care Organization and Patterns of Nursing.
Improving Patient Experience within Primary Care in East & North Hertfordshire Clare Hawkins Deborah Kearns Heather Moulder Nicky Williams.
Organizational Factors Impacting Evaluation NHSTES May 25, 2016 University of California, Berkeley Janice Saturday and Deidre Carmichael.
Cybersecurity Workforce Initiatives Maureen B. Higgins Assistant Director Agency Support and Technical Assistance February 25, 2010.
Performance Management - Principals
Selection & Deployment - Principals
No Place Like HOME Texas Kick Off Meeting
Transforming The Way We Think and Work
Building a Quality Pool - Principals
703: Leading Orientation Efforts
Lincoln County Social Services Organizational Effectiveness
Presentation transcript:

Building Your Workforce Using One Tool at a Time Presented by: Mary Berg, MSW

What do you know? Take A Stand!

In one study, the average cost of turnover was $10,000. Take a Stand!

Recent research has shown that staff turnover has no effect on maltreatment recurrence rates. Take a Stand!

In one study, factors that led to lower turnover were increased salaries, a policy of no on-call work, and a strong effort to complete and approve case plans. Take a Stand!

There is a 30% chance of a child achieving permanency in 12 months when she has had two workers. Take a Stand!

Turnover results in all of these issues: * Unrealistic workloads/caseloads * Unpredictable hours * Too much paperwork * Lack of quality supervision Take a Stand!

The Western Regional Recruitment & Retention Project (WRRRP) University of Denver was one of eight federal child welfare training grants focusing on staff recruitment and retention Five sites in the greater Rocky Mountain region: Colorado, Arizona, and Wyoming Urban and rural child welfare settings Jefferson County

The Western Regional Recruitment & Retention Project (WRRRP) Strong focus on developing and implementing a team model for organizational change. Technical assistance to provide assessment and strategic planning. Technical support for implementing site specific organizational intervention. Development and delivery of specific training to meet site needs. Project tools, resources and trainings.

Jefferson County Getting Started Commitment from top leadership Broad representation of all levels on steering committee Organizational assessment Surveys and focus groups Listen and accept reality Organizational culture change necessary OD is a slow, steady process

 Recruitment  Selection  Training  Retention Strategic Planning

Supervision (Yankeelov, Barbee, Sullivan, & Antle, 2009; Strand & Bosco-Ruggiero, 2008; WRRRP, 2007; Scanapieco & Connell-Carrick, 2007; Strolin-Goltzman, Auerbach, McGowan, & McCarthy, 2008) Work-life fit (Strolin-Goltzman, 2008; SUNY, 2006; Strolin- Goltzman et al., 2008) Organizational culture (Ellett, 2009, Strand & Bosco- Ruggiero, 2008; Weaver, Chang, Clark, & Rhee, 2007) Job Stress (Kim & Stoner, 2008; Hopkins & Cohen- Callow, 2007) Factors most influencing Retention

Job Satisfaction (WRRRP, 2007; Weaver et al, 2007; SUNY, 2006; Strolin-Goltzman, 2008) Training (Strand & Bosco-Ruggiero, 2008; Scanapieco & Connell-Carrick, 2007, SUNY, 2006) Caseloads (Scanpieco & Connell-Carrick, 2007; Weaver et al, 2007) Clarity & Coherence (Strolin-Goltzman, 2008; WRRRP, 2007; SUNY, 2006) Factors most influencing Retention

Identify the issue Develop solutions using multiple strategies IssueSolution Implementation Approach

Recruitment Issue / Solution Issue: Caseworkers surprised about the challenges of the position and resign within months after being hired Solution: Inform applicants about position with a Realistic Job Preview video

Recruitment Issue / Solution Issue: Staff applicant pools do not meet the cultural/language needs of clients. Solution: Partner with bilingual radio station for recruitment efforts.

Issue: Random approach to interviewing and screening of new applicants Solution: Develop standard questions and best practice answers. Role play and interactive case scenarios. Selection Issue/Solution

Training Issues / Solutions Issue: Ill-prepared workforce Solution: Provide standard On the Job Training with competency standards, structured practice and evaluation. Develop continuous training opportunities and tracks.

Retention Issues / Solutions Issue: Fear based organizational culture Solution: Leadership training and organizational culture and practice change

Retention Issues / Solutions Issue: Work/life balance Solution: Flexible/ Alternative work schedules Issue: Vacant positions from turnover (workload distribution) Solution: Pre-vacancy positions

Impact on Practice CFSR Outcomes Re-entry into out of home care SFY % SFY % SFY %

Re-involvement SFY – 11.2% SFY – 9.4% SFY – 7.7%

Questions