Independent Study to Assess Future Savings from Mitigation Track B Progress Report Project Management Committee Meeting, Washington, D.C. April 2, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lesson 4 Minimizing Health Implications. For additional information or questions please contact Toledo-Lucas County Health Department APC:
Advertisements

Burton Reist Chief, 2020 Research and Planning Office U.S. Census Bureau 2014 SDC and CIC Steering Committee Meeting March 5, Census Updates.
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY: INDIVIDUALS & HOUSEHOLDS PROGRAM NAACP GULF COAST FINANCIAL BUILDING INITIATIVE.
Conducting Income Survey’s Indiana Office of Community and Rural Affairs “Serving Indiana’s rural communities through technical, financial and personal.
Using Mitigation Planning to Reduce Disaster Losses Karen Helbrecht and Kathleen W. Smith United States: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May.
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Program SSVF Grantee Uniform Monitoring.
Indianapolis-Carmel MSA
ESS Mixed mode experiment ESRA Conference, Ljubljana, July 2013 Alun 18 July 2013.
Update Training Meeting
Verification SY Objectives Identify the steps required for Verification. Calculate an accurate sample size and verify the correct number of applications.
Risk Analysis So how do we choose who gets monitored?  HQ gives each Field Office a monitoring goal they must meet.  Each year HUD reviews all of its.
Kevin Deardorff Assistant Division Chief, Decennial Management Division U.S. Census Bureau 2014 SDC / CIC Conference April 2, Census Updates.
Outreach Evaluation Series: Community Assessment Susan Barnes and Alan Carr National Network of Libraries of Medicine Outreach Evaluation Resource Center.
Introduction to the State-Level Mitigation 20/20 TM Software for Management of State-Level Hazard Mitigation Planning and Programming A software program.
Benefits and Costs of Mitigation Natural Hazards Workshop, 2004 Linda B. Bourque Southern California Injury Prevention Research Center, Center for Public.
Project Management Committee Meeting Washington, D.C. September 21, 2004 Independent Study to Assess Future Savings from Mitigation, Track B Telephone.
Project Management Committee Meeting Washington, D.C. September 21, 2004 Independent Study to Assess Future Savings from Mitigation, Track B Telephone.
Project Management Committee Meeting Washington, D.C. September 21, 2004 Independent Study to Assess Future Savings from Mitigation, Track B Telephone.
Acting Assistant City Manager REFUSED 2/3/04 Assistant Director of Public Works INTERVIEWED 1/27/04 1 City Manager, Originally agreed Then REFUSED 1/30/04.
Asthma Prevalence in the United States National Center for Environmental Health Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects June 2014.
Ending Family Homelessness The Basics National Alliance to End Homelessness Conference Seattle, Washington February 7, 2008 Sue Marshall The Community.
Regional Affordable Housing Study Summary Suk-Kyung Kim, Ph.D., Assistant Professor School of Planning, Design, & Construction Michigan State University.
Civil Rights Rhode Island Department of Education Child Nutrition Programs September 17, 2014.
The 2002 Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program’s on-line application process has been designed to lead fire departments through a series of screens.
The Elderly Population in Maryland Data from the 2000 Census and Projections MACo Summer Conference, August 14 th, 2003 Maryland Department of Planning.
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-1.
The Self-Sufficiency Standard and Calculator A Path to Economic Security.
Project Management Committee Meeting Washington, D.C. September 21, 2004 Independent Study to Assess Future Savings from Mitigation, Track B Telephone.
1 Utility Discount Program Update Energy Committee Briefing April 23, 2014.
The American Community Survey Texas Transportation Planning Conference Dallas, Texas July 19, 2012.
CACFP Internet Claim Procedures Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) At Risk After School Sites Emergency.
 As of June 1, SIS data was available for 277 adults (initial sample drawn was )  As of June 9, SIS data was available for 30 children and youth,
Multihazard Mitigation Council A public/private partnership designed to reduce the societal and economic costs of natural hazards MMC is a Council of the.
HAZARD MITIGATION 101 Sandusky County Initial Planning Meeting March 11, 2014.
Student versus Non-Student Data: (Census Special Tabulation #137) Selected Summary File 3 Data for Tompkins County, NY.
Oconee County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Kickoff Meeting Brian Laughlin Hazard Mitigation Planner Georgia Emergency.
NATIONAL CORE INDICATORS ADULT CONSUMER SURVEY
INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY NUTRITION DEBORAH THOMPSON.
Collecting and Using Cost Data in the Orange County System of Care AEA – October 17, 2013 Brad R. Watts, Senior Research Scientist, Center for Human Services.
Linkages Program Mark Twain Mark Twain.
Community and Health emergency Management Dr: Khawla Al-Hoti Family physician. Director of health services, Quriyat Willayt MRCGP,ARAB BOARD, Diploma in.
Citizens’ Survey Presentation of Results for Total Sample February 25, 2003 Prepared By: 831 E. Morehead Street, Suite 150 Charlotte, North Carolina
Action Plan Update July 8, Where We Are Community meetings Community Conditions Survey Results Invite Community Leaders Last Action Plan Define.
USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
CNPweb Claims Upload and Security. 1. Claim Upload File.
Civil Rights Training. Goals of Civil Rights  Equal treatment for all applicants and participants  Elimination of illegal barriers that prevent people.
Trends and Comparisons in Higher Education Economics: How has Kentucky Fared? William Hoyt, Acting Director Center for Business & Economic Research Policy.
WHAT’S NEW WITH SCHOOL NUTRITION Tuesday, June10.
Recruiting strategies: Enlisting tomorrow’s school psychologists  Many recognize the need for recruiting more school psychology candidates but the literature.
CA COUNTY PEER QUALITY CASE REVIEW (Insert Review Week Dates)
Skills for Success Program Savenia Falquist Youth Development Coordinator Jefferson County Juvenile Officer July 14, 2005.
1 Leadership Symposium on Evidence-Based Practice in Child Welfare Services June 28, 2007 Davis, CA Inter-Agency and University Research Collaboration:
Census 2000 Supplementary Survey: An Operational Feasibility Test Nancy M. Gordon Associate Director for Demographic Programs U.S. Census Bureau July 2001.
Verification SY Objectives Identify the steps required for Verification. Calculate an accurate sample size and verify the correct number of applications.
Data, Data, and More Data Alison M. Weir, Director of Policy, Research, and Analysis.
The Community Financial Center of Prince George’s Community College March 11, 2010 Betty Habershon, Director October 26, 2015 Asset Building In Prince.
TJ Goodsell, Direct Certification Grant Coordinator.
2010 PHC NATIONAL PUBLICITY COMMITTEE SENSITIZATION WORKSHOP SEPTEMBER BASIC CONCEPTS, COVERAGE.
What’s New with School Nutrition Tuesday, May 13.
State of California Department of Industrial Relations California Commission on Health and Safety and Workers’ Compensation The Commission on Health and.
U.S. Hispanic Population: Population Size and Composition.
The Spatial Patterns Of Earthquake Casualties (Damages) And Social Vulnerability Zahra Golshani Natural Resource & Environmental Science University of.
Oregon Department of Education Child Nutrition Programs Oregon Department of Education Child Nutrition Programs NSLP 2013 Equipment Assistance Grant Heidi.
Aging in Place in Newport Toward A Model Senior-Friendly Community In Newport County, Rhode Island Visiting Nurse Services of Newport and Bristol Counties.
International Association of Fire Fighters ® An Overview Of Labor Issues and Collective Bargaining Services.
Federal Schedule Webinar Presented in Conjunction with ODJFS January 11, 2012 Rhonda Kline, CPA Accounting & Auditing Division.
SECTION 503: Community of Practice Capacity Building & Sharing Operations Support Manager Ticket to Work program Pam Walker, CEO, Alliance Professional.
Redefining the Principal Supervisor’s Role School Operational Matters Office of Service Quality.
Serving All Branches of Military
2017 Community Health Assessment Fredericksburg City, Virginia
Presentation transcript:

Independent Study to Assess Future Savings from Mitigation Track B Progress Report Project Management Committee Meeting, Washington, D.C. April 2, 2004

Hayward was selected to represent: 1 of 56 medium-sized communities 1 of 56 medium-sized communities (50, ,999 population) (50, ,999 population) 1 of 10 communities that received awards only for earthquakes 1 of 10 communities that received awards only for earthquakes 1 of 30 communities at high risk of earthquakes 1 of 30 communities at high risk of earthquakes 1 of 9 communities located in Region IX 1 of 9 communities located in Region IX The other communities that meet all four criteria are Berkeley, Oakland, Orange and Costa Mesa. All located in California.

Demographic Characteristics of Hayward:CommunityPopulationNon-WhiteHousehold With Child < 18 yrs Household With Member > 64 years Female- Headed Household w/child <18 Median Age Berkeley102, Hayward140, Oakland399, Orange128, Costa Mesa 108, Source: Census 2000 Summary File, DP-1. Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: 2000.

Demographic Characteristics of Hayward: continuedCommunity Vacant Units Renter Occupied In Labor Force Median Family Income Per Capita Income Families Below Poverty Level, 1999 Berkeley ,43430, Hayward ,71219, Oakland ,38421, Orange ,57324, Costa Mesa ,45623, Source: Census 2000 Summary File, DP-3. Profile of Selected Economic Characteristics: 2000.

Protocol Followed in Setting Up Interviews Conference Call FEMA Letter Confirmation of Letter Regional Office Visit Contact Community Confirm FEMA Awards Coordination with Region Preliminary Research Telephone Interviews Community Visits and Economic Analyses Description of Spin-offs List of Participants and Interviews Data Files

Protocol Followed in Setting Up Interviews Confirmation that FEMA Letter Received, Given OK to Proceed Send Introduction Letter to Primary Contact ( , Fax, Mail) Telephone Primary Contact: Describe Study, Get Referrals, Schedule Interview Send Introduction Letter to Referrals ( , Fax, Mail) Telephone Referrals: Schedule Interviews, Get Referrals Conduct Interviews Send Thank You Letters to Participants

FEMA Acting Assistant City Manager 1/12/04 REFUSED 2/3/04 Assistant Director Of Public Works INTERVIEWED on 1/27 after 9 contacts over 16 days 1 City Manager, Originally agreed Then REFUSED on 1/30/04 Referred back to Assistant Director of Public Works INTERVIEWED on 1/9/04 after 6 Contacts and Intervention Chief Building Inspector REFUSED on 2/5/04 after 4 contacts Associate Civil Engineer INTERVIEWED On After 13 Contacts and intervention Senior Planner REFUSED On 2/5/04 After 2 contacts HAZMAT Program Coordinator INTERVIEWED on 2/18/04 After 9 contacts and intervention Fire Chief REFUSED On 2/5/04 After 4 contacts Emergency Operations REFUSED on 2/9/04 After 3 contacts Division Head of Water Facility INTERVIEWED on 2/1904 After 15 Contacts and intervention 1 Index Informant 2 Independent Network Director, Community & Economic Development INTERVIEWED on 3/12/04 2 Public Information Officer INTERVIEWED on 3/12/04 2 Flow Chart of Interview Network in Hayward

Summary of Hayward Interviews Agreed to Interview = 53.8% (7/13) Agreed to Interview = 53.8% (7/13) # NEMIS Awards Informants Asked about = 4 # NEMIS Awards Informants Asked about = 4 Informants (# NEMIS Awards Familiar with): Informants (# NEMIS Awards Familiar with):  Director of Public Works (2)  Assistant Director of Public Works (3)  Associate Civil Engineer (3)  Div. Head of Water Facility (1)  HAZMAT Program Coordinator (1)  Director of Community and Economic Development (0)  Public Information Officer (2) Average Length of Interview = 65.7 min. (35-160) Average Length of Interview = 65.7 min. (35-160)

“What is your assessment of the community’s overall natural hazard mitigation program?” “It’s good within funding limitations. We addressed this fairly well, but there's always a problem with cost.” -Assistant Director of Public Works “It’s good within funding limitations. We addressed this fairly well, but there's always a problem with cost.” -Assistant Director of Public Works “It’s good in that we've gotten a lot of state and federal grants, we’ve been proactive with the retrofit of public as well as emergency response buildings, and we’ve done a good job in trying to prepare for earthquakes.” “It’s good in that we've gotten a lot of state and federal grants, we’ve been proactive with the retrofit of public as well as emergency response buildings, and we’ve done a good job in trying to prepare for earthquakes.” ‑ Associate Civil Engineer “There’s not one, but a whole series of policies, it’s very appropriate for community.” ‑ Director of Public Works “There’s not one, but a whole series of policies, it’s very appropriate for community.” ‑ Director of Public Works “It’s pretty well thought out; we’ve spent a lot of time and effort preparing for a large earthquake.” –Division Head of Water Facility “It’s pretty well thought out; we’ve spent a lot of time and effort preparing for a large earthquake.” –Division Head of Water Facility “As a homeowner, it's middling.” –Public Information Officer “As a homeowner, it's middling.” –Public Information Officer “I think because we are in California, we pay more attention, and we have a good set of policies and procedures. Our Emergency Operation Center needs a little tuning up, and we're working on that. We're up there with some of the better.” –Director, Community & Economic Development “I think because we are in California, we pay more attention, and we have a good set of policies and procedures. Our Emergency Operation Center needs a little tuning up, and we're working on that. We're up there with some of the better.” –Director, Community & Economic Development

Perceived Benefits of HAZMAT Equipment Project 1 Hayward ( N = 4 of 7 respondents knew about this project ) 1 NEMIS Persons

Perceived Benefits of Relocation of Fire Station #1 1 Hayward ( N = 3 of 7 respondents knew about this project ) 1 NEMIS Persons

Perceived Benefits of Retrofit of Fire Buildings & Yard 1 Hayward ( N = 3 of 7 respondents knew about this project ) 1 NEMIS Persons

Perceived Benefits of Emergency Public Information 1 Hayward ( N = 1 of 7 respondents knew about this project ) 1 NEMIS (Process Award) Persons

Perceived Benefits of HAZMAT Release Prevention 1 Hayward ( N = 1 of 7 respondents knew about this project ) 1 Spin-off of NEMIS Persons

Perceived Benefits of FEMA Map-Floodplain Management 1 Hayward ( N = 1 of 7 respondents knew about this project ) 1 Informant considered this a spin-off but it does not flow from any NEMIS activity. Persons

Comparison of Community’s Ability to Meet This Objective With and Without this Activity 1 Hayward ( N = 1-4 of 7 respondents knew about these projects) 1 On a scale of 1 to 10 where 1 …. And 10 ….., how would you rate the community’s success in Meeting this objective with this activity? … without this activity? Respondent who knew about HAZMAT relief answered “don’t know” to both questions. Extremely High Extremely Low

Lessons Learned from Hayward Do not send questionnaires or a synopsis of the questionnaire in advance Do not send questionnaires or a synopsis of the questionnaire in advance Simultaneously contact all persons identified in the community Simultaneously contact all persons identified in the community A protocol was developed for handling “gatekeepers” A protocol was developed for handling “gatekeepers” Additional informants may be identified during the field visit Additional informants may be identified during the field visit

Status of Other 5 Communities: Interviews Jefferson County, AL Jefferson County, AL  10 Interviews, 1 Refusal, Tentatively Completed Horry County, SC Horry County, SC  6 Interviews, 1 Refusal, Tentatively Completed Village of Freeport, NY Village of Freeport, NY  4 Interviews, 0 Refusals, In progress Tuscola County, MI Tuscola County, MI  3 Interviews, 0 Refusals, In progress Jamestown, ND Jamestown, ND  Waiting for approval.

Status of Other 5 Communities: Contact Attempts CommunityInterviewsRefusersCalls sFaxesLetters Hayward Jefferson Co Horry Co Freeport Tuscola Interviewing still in process; pursuing 3 additional referrals. 2 Interviewing still in process; pursuing 4 additional referrals.