Working Group E: The Pre-CME Sun - Pre-eruption structure, evolution & energy release - Global issues: helicity, homologous CMEs - Inputs to CME initiation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Observational evidence of a magnetic flux rope eruption associated with the X3 flare on 2002 July 15 Liu Yu Solar Seminar, 2003 June 16.
Advertisements

Lecture 9 Prominences and Filaments Filaments are formed in magnetic loops that hold relatively cool, dense gas suspended above the surface of the Sun,"
The magnetic nature of solar flares Paper by E.R. Priest & T.G. Forbes Review presented by Hui Song.
The Relationship Between CMEs and Post-eruption Arcades Peter T. Gallagher, Chia-Hsien Lin, Claire Raftery, Ryan O. Milligan.
Estimating the magnetic energy in solar magnetic configurations Stéphane Régnier Reconnection seminar on Thursday 15 December 2005.
Hot Precursor Ejecta and Other Peculiarities of the 2012 May 17 Ground Level Enhancement Event N. Gopalswamy 2, H. Xie 1,2, N. V. Nitta 3, I. Usoskin 4,
Energy and Helicity Budget of Four Solar Flares and Associated Magnetic Clouds. Maria D. Kazachenko, Richard C. Canfield, Dana Longcope, Jiong Qiu Montana.
Lecture 4 The Formation and Evolution of CMEs. Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) Appear as loop like features that breakup helmet streamers in the corona.
Sarah Gibson October 2005 Twisted magnetic flux ropes: A breeding ground for CMEs? Sarah Gibson Collaborators: Yuhong Fan, Joan Burkepile, Giuliana de.
CME/Flare Mechanisms Solar “minimum” event this January For use to VSE must be able to predict CME/flare Spiro K. Antiochos Naval Research Laboratory.
Magnetic Reconnection Across the HCS Mark Moldwin UM and Megan Cartwright UC-Berkeley Isradynamics April 2010 With thanks to Mark Linton at NRL Linton.
Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures N. Gopalswamy, S. Yashiro, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, and P. Mäkelä IHY – ISWI Regional meeting.
Active Region Evolution and the Removal of Magnetic Helicity by CMEs Len Culhane Mullard Space Science Laboratory University College London.
A full view of EIT waves Chen, P.F., Fang, C. & Shibata, K. ApJ, 2005, 622, Solar seminar Shiota.
STEREO AND SPACE WEATHER Variable conditions in space that can have adverse effects on human life and society Space Weather: Variable conditions in space.
SHINE Campaign Event: 1-2 May 1998 Brian Welsch (& Yan Li) Space Sciences Laboratory, UC Berkeley Introduction: Data, Context, etc. Work: Completed & Ongoing.
Two energy release processes for CMEs: MHD catastrophe and magnetic reconnection Yao CHEN Department of Space Science and Applied Physics Shandong University.
Low-Coronal and Coronagraphic Images: Their Complementary Roles in Understanding Geo-Effective Eruptions N. V. Nitta, Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics.
MSU Team: R. C. Canfield, D. W. Longcope, P. C. H. Martens, S. Régnier Evolution on the photosphere: magnetic and velocity fields 3D coronal magnetic fields.
Tucson MURI SEP Workshop March 2003 Janet Luhmann and the Solar CISM Modeling Team Solar and Interplanetary Modeling.
Prediction of Central Axis Direction of Magnetic Clouds Xuepu Zhao and Yang Liu Stanford University The West Pacific Geophysics Meeting, Beijing, China.
Center for Space Environment Modeling Ward Manchester University of Michigan Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory SHINE July.
Coronal Mass Ejections: Models and Their Observational Basis (P.F. Chen Living Rev. Solar Phys.) 张英智 中国科学院空间科学与应用研究中心空间天气学国家重点实验室.
Ward Manchester University of Michigan Coupling of the Coronal and Subphotospheric Magnetic Field in Active Regions by Shear Flows Driven by The Lorentz.
The May 1,1998 and May 12, 1997 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
February 26, 2007 KIPAC Workshop on Magnetism Modeling/Inferring Coronal And Heliospheric Field From Photospheric Magnetic Field Yang Liu – Stanford University.
Study of magnetic helicity in solar active regions: For a better understanding of solar flares Sung-Hong Park Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New.
EUV vs. B-field Comparisons Yingna Su Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Coauthours: Leon Golub, Aad Van Ballegooijen, Maurice Gros. HMI/AIA Science.
Sung-Hong Park Space Weather Research Laboratory New Jersey Institute of Technology Study of Magnetic Helicity and Its Relationship with Solar Activities:
Coronal holes as seen in soft X-rays H. S. Hudson (UCB and SPRC) SOHO-11, Davos, March 13, 2002.
Elmau III, March 16, 2004 Coronal mass ejections A critical view of interpretations H.S. Hudson (UC Berkeley)
Solar Source and Magnetic Cloud Yang Liu – Stanford University
The May 1997 and May 1998 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Magnetic Structures of Active Regions and their Link to Coronal Mass Ejections Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Big Bear Solar Observatory, Big Bear City, CA 92314,
Twist & writhe of kink-unstable magnetic flux ropes I flux rope: helicity sum of twist and writhe: kink instability: twist  and writhe  (sum is constant)
CME Initiation: The Matrix Reloaded David Alexander, Rice University.
Locating the solar source of 13 April 2006 Magnetic Cloud K. Steed 1, C. J. Owen 1, L. K. Harra 1, L. M. Green 1, S. Dasso 2, A. P. Walsh 1, P. Démoulin.
1 THE RELATION BETWEEN CORONAL EIT WAVE AND MAGNETIC CONFIGURATION Speakers: Xin Chen
Three-dimensional MHD simulation of a flux rope driven CME Manchester IV, W.B., Gombosi, T.I., Roussev, I., De Zeeuw, D.L., Sokolov, I.V., Powell, K.G.,
Radio obsevation of rapid acceleration in a slow filament eruption/fast coronal mass ejection event Kundu et al ApJ, 607, 530.
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Long-term development of solar corona in build-up to the SEP events of 21 April 2002 and 24 August 2002 A. J. Coyner, D. Alexander,
A study of flare-associated X-ray plasma ejections. I. Association with coronal mass ejections Yeon-Han Kim, Y.-J. Moon, K.-S. Cho, Kap- Sung Kim, and.
Observations of Eruptive Events with Two Radioheliographs, SSRT and NoRH V.V. Grechnev, A.M. Uralov, V.G. Zandanov, N.Y. Baranov, S.V. Lesovoi Kiyosato,
Flare Energy Build-Up in a Decaying Active Region Near a Coronal Hole Yingna Su Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Collaborators: A. A. van Ballegooijen,
1 Introduction: Onset of solar flares and coronal mass ejections Yokoyama, T. Dept. Earth & Planetary Science, University of Tokyo Isobe, H. Univ. Tokyo.
Using the evolution of dimming regions to probe the global magnetic field topology A new interpretation of the 12 th May 1997 event G. Attrill 1, M. Nakwaki.
ISSI Jan 2009 Early Stages of Eruptions Alphonse C. Sterling 1 NASA/MSFC 1 Currently at JAXA/ISAS, Sagamihara, Japan.
A comparison of CME-associated atmospheric waves observed in coronal (Fe XII 195A) and chromospheric ( He I 10830A) lines Holly R. Gilbert, Thomas E. Holzer,
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Detailed comparison of active regions AR9906 and AR0069 in the build-up to the SEP events of 21 Apr 2002 and 24 Aug 2002 D.
KASI Low atmospheric reconnections associated with an eruptive flare Yong-Jae Moon(1), Jongchul Chae(2), Young-Deuk Park(1) 1: Korea Astronomy and.
Properties of CME Acceleration in the Low Corona Jie Zhang George Mason University SHINE June 28 – July 2, 2004 Big Sky - Montana Address.
White light coronagraph showing prominances and streamers The Coronal Magnetic Field.
Observations and nonlinear force-free field modeling of active region Y. Su, A. van Ballegooijen, B. W. Lites, E. E. DeLuca, L. Golub, P. C. Grigis,
IMAGING AND SPECTOROPIC INVESTIGATIONS OF A SOLAR CORONAL WAVE: PROPERTIES OF THE WAVE FRONT AND ASSOCIATED ERUPTING MATERIAL L OUISE K. HARRA AND A LPHONSE.
A Numerical Study of the Breakout Model for Coronal Mass Ejection Initiation P. MacNeice, S.K. Antiochos, A. Phillips, D.S. Spicer, C.R. DeVore, and K.
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs A. Asai 1 ( 浅井 歩 ), T.T. Ishii 2, K. Shibata 2, N. Gopalswamy 3 1: Nobeyama.
Observations –Morphology –Quantitative properties Underlying Physics –Aly-Sturrock limit Present Theories/Models Coronal Mass Ejections (CME) S. K. Antiochos,
Shine 2004, A. Sterling CME Eruption Onset Observations: Dimmings Alphonse C. Sterling NASA/MSFC/NSSTC.
Recent observations of rotating sunspots in TRACE white light images and their apparent association with soft X-ray sigmoids have led to the intriguing.
Analysis of 3 and 8 April 2010 Coronal Mass Ejections and their Influence on the Earth Magnetic Field Marilena Mierla and SECCHI teams at ROB, USO and.
17 th November, 2005STEREO/Solar-B Workshop 1 Related Solar Imaging and Near-Earth In-situ Observations of an ICME A. N. Fazakerley 1, L.K. Harra 1, J.L.
Multiwavelength Study of Solar Flares Chang Liu Big Bear Solar Observatory, NJIT Seminar Day November 2, 2007.
Anemone Structure and Geo-Effective Flares/CMEs
Corona Mass Ejection (CME) Solar Energetic Particle Events
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs
Solar and Heliospheric Physics
Preflare State Rust et al. (1994) 太陽雑誌会.
Correlation between halo coronal mass ejections
Ju Jing, Vasyl B. Yurchyshyn, Guo Yang, Yan Xu, and Haimin Wang
Ron Moore and Alphonse Sterling
Presentation transcript:

Working Group E: The Pre-CME Sun - Pre-eruption structure, evolution & energy release - Global issues: helicity, homologous CMEs - Inputs to CME initiation models N. Gopalswamy From First Elmau CME workshop

Presentations PresenterTopic/QuestionFuture Plans J.-L. BougeretGlobal SunHomolog. CMEs R. Canfield Separatrix surfaces,  sCDAW 1999 data for CME-  connection S. Antiochos Bipole  shear   Seehafer  -effect builds up helicity; released in CMEs Use SOHO/MDI data D. MaiaNonthermal brightening & Filament eruption Do statistics N. GopalswamyMicrowave filament &X-ray brightening Chen/ShibataFilament Eruption & Emerging Flux Simulation K. DereAR evolution & CMEsUse Lara et al. (2000) method N. GopalswamyPhotospheric B flux changeDo Statistics S.AntiochosInputs to CME models N. GopalswamyNonradial Motion of filaments

Structure of CMEs Frontal structure Cavity Prominence Core Post-eruption Arcade (Two-ribbon in H- alpha, arcades in X-ray, EUV) Note: Not all structures are present in all CMEs!

‘Cavity’ in Eclipse Pictures

Where do CMEs originate? CMEs originate from closed field regions -Active Regions -Filament regions -Combination of AR and Filament regions -Transequatorial interconnecting regions

Closed Field Regions: Where one should look for pre-CME signatures TIL Filament Active region SOHO/EIT image 195 A H-alpha picture

Structure (Sigmoids, Flux Ropes) Evolution (Flux Emergence, Flux cancellation, Shear, Twist) Energy Release (Small-scale Heating & Particle Acceleration) Aspects of Pre-eruption Phase

Three-part structure before eruption (Yohkoh/SXT) Frontal (but sheared) Cavity hidden? Filament core

Pre-Eruption Structure: Sigmoids S- and reverse S-shaped structures in X-ray images of Active Regions (Rust & Kumar 1996). Erupt more often than non-sigmoidal regions (Canfield et al. 1999); Beware of apparent “sigmoids” (Glover et al., 2000) Relation to white light CMEs being studied Coronal counterpart of photospheric shear? (Ambastha et al., 1993)

Pre-eruption Structure: Flux ropes Naturally support prominences (Linker et al., 2001) Often observed as dark cavity in eclipse pictures Formed before (Low, 2001) or during (Gosling et al., 1990) eruption? Interplanetary Magnetic Clouds are flux ropes (Burlaga et al.,1981) MC formed out of filament or cavity of the white light CME? (Bothmer & Schwenn, 1994; Gopalswamy et al., 1998)

Pre-eruption Structure: Guiding Streamers Non-radial motion of filaments Obvious during Solar Minimum Latitudinal distribution of CMEs peaks near the equator; associated solar sources peak near the active region belt  The solar dipole field has strong influence on CME propagation

CME CPAs equatorward of Prominence CPA during min Compared 186 microwave prominences with LASCO CMEs during

Pre-eruption Evolution Substantial Flux emergence near filament before eruption; polarity of new flux favorable for reconnection (Feynman & Martin, 1995) - Confirmed by numerical simulation studies (Chen & Shibata, 2000) Significant changes in photospheric flux in small areas in the eruption region (Lara et al., 2000) CMEs without flux emergence also observed (Subramanian & Dere, 2001; Wang & Sheeley, 1999) Reconnection-favoring flux emergence

Simulation supports preeruption Reconnection (Chen & Shibata 2000) Flux emergence under the filament Flux emergence from the side

A transequatorial Eruption EIT 195 A difference image showing dimming at 08:36 UT LASCO image at 08:56 UT

Weak Dimming Before Eruption AR-Active Region D-Dimming G- GOES X-ray Flux

Pre-eruption Evolution: Prolonged Dimming Weak, prolonged dimming for ~ 1 hr (Gopalswamy et al., 2001) Small-scale opening of field lines resulting in the eruption of underlying structure? (Antiochos et al., 1994)

Pre-eruption Energy Release Small-scale heating near filaments - consistent with reconnection scenario Particle Acceleration -Radio bursts (400 MHz) near filaments (Maia et al.) -Minutes before filament eruption -nonthermal energy release due to reconnection

Filament Eruption Onset

Models: Goal & Observational Inputs Goal of Models: - High velocity (> 1000 km/s) opening of field Inputs: - Slow photospheric driving: -- emergence/submergence of flux -- shear/twist -B-stressing concentrated near B z reversal line -- B-supports prominences/filaments

Summary of Numerical Models of CMEs Model Forbes et al., 1994 Linker, et al Chen and Shibata, 2000 Antiochos et al., 1994 Wu et al., 2000 Chen et al., 1997 Pre-Eruption Structure Flux rope in bipolar field: either emerges or forms in the corona Flux rope in multipolar field Sheared arcade in multipolar field Flux rope with overlying streamer in the solar wind Flux rope in equilibrium Pre-eruption Evolution Flux decrease/changes leading to loss of equilibrium Flux emerges consistent with reconnection Continued shearing Increase in the azimuthal flux or shear of the streamer field Increase in the azimuthal flux Pre-eruption Energy Release None Reconnection energization at the site of emergence Reconnection energization at coronal null/separator None Caution: This table is incomplete, mainly initiation

Homologous CMEs? Homologous flares are known: flares from the same region with same morphology and similar light curves. Are there homologous CMEs? -multiple CMEs from the same region Candidate events: transequatorial CMEs during April 27-May 8, 1998 (

CMEs and Helicity - Solar Dynamo builds up helicity - Released by CMEs Use full-disk MDI magnetograms to calculate global distribution of H (assuming B to be constant over certain time intervals & exploiting the fact that B is seen different directions). Compare global helicity distribution and evolution with appearance of CMEs. Use vector magnetograms to study helicity and CMEs in active regions in comparison with the helicity of the global B.

“Reconnection-favoring” Flux Emergence

2000/09/12 SXR & H-alpha Pre-eruption Post-eruption

Energy Release Near Filament

Filament Eruption in EUV SOHO/EIT (195 A) images presented as a movie. The NW-SE filament in the southern hemisphere erupts and becomes the core of the white light CME Arcade formation follows the eruption

H-alpha:Before and After Eruption

2000/09/12 CME on the Disk SOHO/LASCO C3 movie Partial halo event consistent with the southern location on the disk The bright core is the filament

2000/09/12 CME in LASCO/C2

CMEs and ICMEs: A tentative correspondence CMEs Near Sun Shock  Frontal  Cavity  Prominence Core  Arcade Formation ICMEs near Earth Shock Sheath Ejecta/MC Pressure Plug