Boeing vs. Airbus Jaime Cuervo Kaushik Kumar Priyanshi Patel Sotonye Ogan Thais Gaspar.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Economics: Principles in Action
Advertisements

The GE/Honeywell merger and the issue of bundling.
office hours: 8:00AM – 8:50AM tuesdays LUMS C85
Mergers and Acquisitions (M&As): Running Afoul of Antitrust Laws Jennifer Sawayda Program Specialist Anderson School of Management University of New Mexico.
1 1 Concubhar Deisceoil Wajahat Laiq Raya Awad Benedikt Bingler July 6th, 2009 Airbus/Boeing.
Chapter 7 In Between the Extremes: Imperfect Competition.
Monopolistic Competition: Outline What is monopolistic competition? Characteristics of monopolistic competition Equilibrium in SR and the LR Implications.
Market Structures and Current Changes
BEllwork 1. Which of the following is NOT a condition for perfect competition? (1) many buyers and sellers participate (2) identical products are offered.
Understanding Monopoly 10. Natural Barriers to Entry Economies of scale –“Bigger is better” (more cost-efficient) –This is due to the ATC being downward-
Introduction A monopoly is a firm that is the sole seller of a product without close substitutes. In this chapter, we study monopoly and contrast it with.
Discussion Section February 9, 2007 Brian Chen
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Mergers. Other Issues Predatory Pricing Refusal to Deal Tie-in Mergers Cartels.
7.1 Perfect Competition After studying this section, you will be able to: Describe the four conditions that are in place in a perfectly competitive market.
LESSON 7.3 Antitrust, Economic Regulation, and Competition
CHAPTER 16 Monopolistic Competition and Product Differentiation.
Economics: Principles in Action
Chapter 24: Monopoly Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 13e.
CHAPTER 8: SECTION 1 A Perfectly Competitive Market
Price Discrimination. Price Discrimination Defined ▫Single-price monopolist  A monopolist who charges everyone the same price.  Not all monopolists.
Background Boeing Airbus
The Four Market Models How do businesses decide what price to charge and how much to produce? It depends on the character of its industry.
Copyright © 2004 South-Western Monopoly vs. Competition While a competitive firm is a price taker, a monopoly firm is a price maker. A firm is considered.
Economics Chapter 7 Market Structures
Explorations in Economics
The Four Conditions for Perfect Competition
More Economics of Competition and Competitive Strategies
Chapter 5 Global Management. Learning Outcomes 1.Define global management 2.Compare and contrast importing and exporting 3.Explain the advantages and.
Chapter 5 Presentation 3 Exchange Rates. Exchange Rate The rate at which the currency of one country can be exchanged for the currency of another
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly 1 PUBLIC POLICY AND COMPETITION  Government Anti-Trust Policy Schizophrenic government policy toward monopolistic.
Copyright©2004 South-Western Monopoly. Copyright © 2004 South-Western While a competitive firm is a price taker, a monopoly firm is a price maker.
Ch 3 Business Organizations. Sec 1 Businesses may be organized as individual proprietorships, partnerships, or corporations.
Monopoly CHAPTER 11 © 2016 CENGAGE LEARNING. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. MAY NOT BE COPIED, SCANNED, OR DUPLICATED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, EXCEPT FOR USE AS PERMITTED.
Harcourt Brace & Company MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION Chapter 17.
Evaluating Monopoly Comparison with Perfect Competition.
The Four Conditions for Perfect Competition
Chapter Six Profit Maximization: Seeking Competitive Advantage.
Develop A Foundational Knowledge Of Pricing To Understand Its Role In Marketing 3.04.
COMPETITION IN THE MARKETPLACE. BUYERS & SELLERS  BUYERS = CONSUMERS  SELLERS = PRODUCERS BUYERS & SELLERS COME TOGETHER TO EXCHANGE THINGS OF VALUE.
Types of Economic Competition. Determining the Type of Economic Competition The number of firms competing in the market The amount of similarity between.
Monopolistic Competition CHAPTER 13A. After studying this chapter you will be able to Define and identify monopolistic competition Explain how output.
2 The Global Economy. Learning Objectives Distinguish among the basic theories of world trade: absolute advantage, comparative advantage, and competitive.
The dominance concept: new wine in old bottles Miguel de la Mano * Member of the Chief Economist’s Office DG COMP, European Commission FTC/DOJ Hearings.
By: Serenity Hughes ECONOMICS 101.  The markets for many important products are dominated by a small number of very large firms. IMPERFECT COMPETITION.
MONOPOLIES.  Single seller (pure monopoly) – industry with only one dominant company  Cartel agreement – group of producers who enter a collusive agreement.
ETHICS IN THE MARKETPLACE Competition is part of the free enterprise system. Competition tends to produce efficiency in the market and benefits the general.
And Unit 3 – Theory of the Firm. 1. single seller in the market. 2. a price searcher -- ability to set price 3. significant barriers to entry 4. possibility.
EU Competition Law. Introduction Competition law protects competition in a free market economy, that is, an economic system in which the allocation of.
Chapter 15 Monopoly!!. Monopoly the monopoly is the price maker, and the competitive firm is the price taker. A monopoly is when it’s product does not.
Chapter 25 Monopoly Economics, 7th Edition Boyes/Melvin Y_dNg&feature=related.
The Case against Microsoft. © 2004 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved12-2.
Market Structures Chapter 7. PERFECT COMPETITION Section One.
The Economic Environment of Business – Lecture 5 Competition Policy.
Market Structures Regulation & Deregulation Chapter 7 Section 4.
Oligopolistic competition and Ethics… Manish Das Dept. of Business Management Tripura University.
Price-Searcher Markets with Low Entry Barriers
Competitors and Competition
Strategic Positioning
Regulation & Deregulation Chapter 7 Section 4
Jaime Cuervo Kaushik Kumar Priyanshi Patel Sotonye Ogan Thais Gaspar
2.02 Barriers to International Trade
Market Structure & Competition
Bellwork What is the difference between a perfectly competitive firm, monopoly and oligopoly? Give examples of each.
Market Structures I: Monopoly
Economics: Principles in Action
Market Structure.
Perfect Competition What conditions must exist for perfect competition? What are barriers to entry and how do they affect the marketplace? What are prices.
Warm Up: What is the message of the cartoon?
Strategic Positioning
Perfect Competition What conditions must exist for perfect competition? What are barriers to entry and how do they affect the marketplace? What are prices.
Presentation transcript:

Boeing vs. Airbus Jaime Cuervo Kaushik Kumar Priyanshi Patel Sotonye Ogan Thais Gaspar

The creation of Airbus Airbus was founded in 1970 as a consortium of four European aircraft manufacturers British (20%), France (37.9%), Germany (37.9%), Spain (4.2%) It was originally a marginal competitor and unlikely to challenge US dominance Team 5 - Airbus Prespective2

The creation of Airbus Since 1981, however, Airbus has confounded its critics by gaining market share In 2000, Airbus made the transition from a consortium to a fully functioning private entity Team 5 - Airbus Prespective3

The Dispute In the 80’s and 90’s Airbus, was obtaining subsidies from the euro goverments. Then, the U.S.Goverment supported Boeing and McDonnell Douglas agreement: US and EU, limited subsidies to 33% of total costs of developing a new aircraft. Team 5 - Airbus Prespective4

In the year 1993, Bill Clinton wanted to renegotiate the 1992 agreement because he thought that this was creating job losses in the US. In 2005, USA and EU appealed to the WTO. EU argued that Boeing broke the deal of 1992 and USA argued that Airbus had received aid and loans from the European Union Team 5 - Airbus Prespective5 The Dispute

Why Airbus is healthy competition for Boeing Boeing spent a reported $5 billion developing and tooling up the 777 wide-bodied jetliner that it introduced in The development cost of the Airbus A380 “super-jumbo” cost between a reported $10 billion and $15 billion. A direct competitor to boeing’s profitable 747. Team 5 - Airbus Prespective6

Why Airbus is healthy competition for Boeing In terms of pricing, the A380’s list price is significantly higher than the 747’s list price, $220 million vs. $185 million, yet Airbus claims the combination of increased capacity and reduced operating costs provides superior economics. According to company documents, the operating cost per flight will be 12% more than the 747’s cost, but given the plane’s 35% greater capacity, it will provide almost 25% more volume for free. The greater competition leads to more efficiency in the production of planes and more innovative ideas in relation to the speed of travel, capacity of planes and also ways of reducing pollution. The greater capacity of the Airbus will inevitably lead to less flights per day as planes are able to carry more travelers therefore reducing the amount of flights to preferred destinations each day. Until the 1980’s the U.S manufacturing firm had a virtual monopoly accounting for two-thirds of the world market share after the buyout of McDonnel Douglas. Team 5 - Airbus Prespective7

Why Airbus is healthy competition for Boeing Boeing with their supreme world market share were able to sell a lower quantity of goods at a higher price than would firms under healthy competition. Improved price discrimination allows a monopolist to gain more profit by charging more to those who want or need the product more or who have a higher ability to pay. The healthy competition now faced by Boeing has reduced the possibility of them becoming ‘complacent giants’. Boeing has dominated the market for so long with no worthy competitors that it creates the uncertainty of whether they will continue to be innovative and progressive, however, Airbus’s entry into the market ensures that Boeing faces stern competition. Team 5 - Airbus Prespective8

The Anti-Competitive Merger In 1997 Boeing announced that it would merge with his longtime rival McDonnell Douglas The merger would allow Boeing to increase its presence in the defense and space business Approved by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (potential personal interests involved) Team 5 - Airbus Prespective9

The Anti-Competitive Merger Restrict competition in the market Increase of US government funding to the new company Supplier’s agreements with important airlines would also restrict competition Team 5 - Airbus Prespective10

Conclusion Different strategies for the future The WTO report will make changes in the way that Airbus is supported by European Governments, and will potentially make adjustments on Airbus´s business The EU was disappointment with certain parts of the WTO report, and is considering an appeal on certain elements Team 5 - Airbus Prespective 11

Conclusion The reaction on stock exchanges was relatively muted If Boeing thinks it has a case, then round three of the funding dispute may be just around the corner. Team 5 - Airbus Prespective 12

Sources is-in-airbus-and-boeing-both-claim-victory/page1 is-in-airbus-and-boeing-both-claim-victory/page ers1.png ers1.png content/uploads/2009/11/airbus_logo1.jpg content/uploads/2009/11/airbus_logo1.jpg Team 5 - Airbus Prespective13