With new systematics: Horn 1 shift 1mm Horn 1 angle 0.2mr Horn current ±1%

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Important Thing About By. The Important Thing About ******** The important thing about ***** is *****. It is true s/he can *****, *****, and *****.
Advertisements

CC Background Systematic 3 Philip Rodrigues Oxford Group Meeting 30/10/07.
Significance Testing.  A statistical method that uses sample data to evaluate a hypothesis about a population  1. State a hypothesis  2. Use the hypothesis.
Beam direction and flux measured by MUMON K. Matsuoka (Kyoto) for the MUMON group Contents: 1.Beam stability (direction/flux) 2.Absolute  beam flux.
6.5 & 6.7 Notes Determining the transformations to trigonometric functions.
1 Ratio mu+/mu- & muon reco studies on CRAFT data Status update, 6 Nov 2008 A.Calderon, INFN Padova & Ministerio de Educacion Y Ciencia, Spain F. Cavallo,
A long-baseline experiment with the IHEP neutrino beam Y. Efremenko detector Presented by.
Perpendicular Lines a) Work out the gradient of the line AB b) Draw a line which is perpendicular to the line AB. c) Hence work out the gradient of the.
Beam e background with antineutrinos Lots of discussion recently; does not look like getting needed amount of pME running will happen (or not easily at.
1 Using the pHE data to measure the beam e ’s from  + decay David Jaffe and Pedro Ochoa March 13 th 2007  Introduction  Antineutrino selection  Feasibility.
Selection: i) Used “basic cuts” described in my NuBarPID talk (slide 3). 74.4% of CC events pass this cut. ii) Used David’s PID cut at -0.2 to remove NC.
1 Using the pHE data to measure the beam e ’s from  + decay David Jaffe and Pedro Ochoa April 12 th 2007  Reminder  Systematic from background  Horn.
UNDERSTANDING RESEARCH RESULTS: STATISTICAL INFERENCE.
MINOS 1 Beam e ’s from antineutrinos David Jaffe and Pedro Ochoa September 27 th 2007  Preliminaries  Data & MC  Expected sensitivities  Preliminary.
2015/6/23 1 How to Extrapolate a Neutrino Spectrum to a Far Detector Alfons Weber (Oxford/RAL) NF International Scoping Study, RAL 27 th April 2006.
Counting And all That WALTA Meeting Toby Burnett, UW.
le010z185i le100z200i from  -,K - : from  + from  -,K - : from  + qe res dis coh qe res dis coh qe res dis coh qe res dis coh Different components.
1 Beam e ’s from antineutrinos using the pME and LE beams David Jaffe, Pedro Ochoa December 8 th 2006  Part 1: Reminder and update  Part 2: Change in.
Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Feb 21, 2007.
1 Latest CC analysis developments New selection efficiencies: –Based on C++ reco + PDFs rather than old (Fortran+reco_minos) cuts –Attempt to optimise.
April 1, Beam measurement with -Update - David Jaffe & Pedro Ochoa 1)Reminder of proposed technique 2)Use of horn-off data 3)Use of horn2-off data?
1 Using the pHE data to measure the beam e ’s from  + decay David Jaffe and Pedro Ochoa June 14 th 2007  Reminder  Updated Statistical error  Horn.
MINOS 1  and e Physics in MINOS  and e Physics in MINOS  Antineutrinos  Overview  Oscillations  Systematics  e Analysis  Nearest neighbors selection.
 Expand feasibility study to include background: Beam e measurement from antineutrinos Background in pHE and LE samples obtained with the nubar-PID cut.
1 Beam e ’s from antineutrinos – Update – David Jaffe, Pedro Ochoa November 13 th 2006  Part 1: from  + reweighing  Part 2: New ideas.
P. Vahle, Fermilab Oct An Alternate Approach to the CC Measurement— Predicting the FD Spectrum Patricia Vahle University College London Fermilab.
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
Luminosity Monitoring For PrimEx Dan Dale PrimEx Collaboration Meeting December 16, 2006.
Lepton/Photon 2003, Batavia, IL, USA August 11 th – 16 th Measurement of  b Branching Ratios in Modes Containing a  c Why are the  b branching fractions.
Debbie Harris Sacha Kopp, Commissioning Workshop 1    Beam Monitoring Hadmon will see remnant protons Muon Monitors see whatever escapes beam.
Chapter 1 Quiz.  A study of 254 patients with sleep disorders was conducted to find a link between obesity and sleep disorders.
Chapter 10 – Sampling Distributions Math 22 Introductory Statistics.
Response of AMANDA-II to Cosmic Ray Muons and study of Systematics Newt,Paolo and Teresa.
Updates on the P0D reconstruction
Mass production (Super-K) Setup of jnubeam – 3 horn 250 kA – 30-GeV proton beam of Gaussian distribution (  x,y = cm) – On center, parallel beam.
MM207 Statistics Welcome to the Unit 2 Seminar name.
Reflection and Refraction. Regular Reflection Light travels in straight lines through a uniform medium. This is called rectilinear propogation. Light.
Mass Hierarchy Study with MINOS Far Detector Atmospheric Neutrinos Xinjie Qiu 1, Andy Blake 2, Luke A. Corwin 3, Alec Habig 4, Stuart Mufso 3, Stan Wojcicki.
First Look at Data and MC Comparisons for Cedar and Birch ● Comparisons of physics quantities for CC events with permutations of Cedar, Birch, Data and.
N. Saoulidou, Fermilab, MINOS Collaboration Meeting N. Saoulidou, Fermilab, ND/CC Parallel Session, MINOS Collaboration Meeting R1.18.
Notes Over Trigonometric Ratios SOHCAHTOA A B C.
Cedar and pre-Daikon Validation ● CC PID parameter based CC sample selections with Birch, Cedar, Carrot and pre-Daikon. ● Cedar validation for use with.
1 of 14 NuMI Beam Flux Sacha E. Kopp University of Texas at AustinUniversity of Texas at Austin – 41 University of Southern California – 38.
Muon absolute flux measurement in anti-neutrino mode A.Ariga 1, C. Pistillo 1, S. Aoki 2 1 University of Bern, 2 Kobe University.
Results of the Dark Matter Sun analysis with data (Official Plots) Guillaume Lambard IFIC (Valencia, Spain) 06/06/2012.
Reliability: Introduction. Reliability Session Definitions & Basic Concepts of Reliability Theoretical Approaches Empirical Assessments of Reliability.
A bin-free Extended Maximum Likelihood Fit + Feldman-Cousins error analysis Peter Litchfield  A bin free Extended Maximum Likelihood method of fitting.
GOOD VERSUS BAD WEBSITES Everybody assumes that their website is great. But that’s not always true. When one has a website that is bad they often wonder.
Alternative Code to Calculate NMH Sensitivity J. Brunner 16/10/
T2K muon measurement 2014 Momentum module A.Ariga, C. Pistillo University of Bern S. Aoki Kobe University 1.
Cornell ERL-FFAG Lattice Using Dejan’s doublet arc cell September 2014Stephen Brooks, FFAG’141.
1 A study to clarify important systematic errors A.K.Ichikawa, Kyoto univ. We have just started not to be in a time blind with construction works. Activity.
P. Ochoa, September Using Muon Removed files to assess the purity of the nubar-PID selection Pedro Ochoa MINOS Collaboration Meeting September 2006.
Alternative Code to Calculate NMH Sensitivity J. Brunner 16/10/
Paolo Massarotti Charged Kaon Meeting 4 may 2006 Charged kaon lifetime P. Massarotti.
NEAR DETECTOR SPECTRA AND FAR NEAR RATIOS Amit Bashyal August 4, 2015 University of Texas at Arlington 1.
The reading is 7.38 mm. The reading is 7.72 mm.
Measuring Nuclear Effects with MINERnA APS April Meeting 2011 G. Arturo Fiorentini Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas On behalf of the MINERnA collaboration.
NuMI Flux, Leonidas Aliaga William & Mary July 25, 2012 Current Uncertainties And Future Plans International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super Beams.
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
Date: Topic: Similar Polygons (7.4)
Response of AMANDA-II to Cosmic Ray Muons and study of Systematics
בטיחות בתעשייה בהיבט חברות הביטוח
True or False: Suppose the graph of f is given
mr-mathematics.com Recapping: Writing a ratio
the value of the variable that makes an equation true
Determining the Function Obtained from a Series of Transformations.
Contribution of PKD1 to the physiology of mesenteric arteries
MR images of a 52-year-old man obtained 1 year and 3 months after surgery.A, A 3-mm-thick FSE T2-weighted image obtained at the level of the middle cerebellar.
Presentation transcript:

With new systematics: Horn 1 shift 1mm Horn 1 angle 0.2mr Horn current ±1%

 Ratios versus E true

 Ratios versus E reco

 Ratios versus E true

 Ratios versus E reco

With old systematics: Horn 1 shift 4mm Horn 1 angle 0.4mr Horn current ±2%

 Ratios versus E true

 The obtained ratios for the antineutrinos with hadron parents are:  The ratios are smoothed due to lack of statistics. LE-10 pHE

 Ratios versus E true

LE-10 pHE  But also have to consider effect on antineutrinos with muon parents:  Large effect !  + ’s depend directly on focusing.