Asymmetry Analysis A. Schälicke, 23 May 2006 Status: independent analyses give similar asymmetries but (significant) different errors.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2010 PREx Run – Dithering & Compton Polarimetry Chun-Min Jen on behalf of the Hall-A JLab. Institution: Syracuse University, NY, 13244,
Advertisements

Claude Beigel, PhD. Exposure Assessment Senior Scientist Research Triangle Park, USA Practical session metabolites Part II: goodness of fit and decision.
 (1385) ANALYSIS STATUS Enrico Fragiacomo, Massimo Venaruzzo INFN and University Trieste Resonances meeting – CERN – 04/03/2011.
Low x workshop Helsinki 2007 Joël Feltesse 1 Inclusive F 2 at low x and F L measurement at HERA Joël Feltesse Desy/Hamburg/Saclay On behalf of the H1 and.
14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.
July 2001 Snowmass A New Measurement of  from KTeV Introduction The KTeV Detector  Analysis of 1997 Data Update of Previous Result Conclusions.
Photon Polarization Analysis Bill Bugg Data selection: 1)PCALE Max cut 2)Visual Inspection. For every cycle of every run we plot and examine a series of.
NuMI Offaxis Near Detector and Backgrounds Stanley Wojcicki Stanford University Cambridge Offaxis workshop January 12, 2004.
1 Beam e ’s from antineutrinos using the pME and LE beams David Jaffe, Pedro Ochoa December 8 th 2006  Part 1: Reminder and update  Part 2: Change in.
R. Dollan, Princeton 22/05/06 Analysis of the September data H. Kolanoski, K. Laihem, S. Riemann, A. Schälicke, DESY R. Dollan,T. Lohse, HU - Berlin.
Data Handling l Classification of Errors v Systematic v Random.
Statistical Treatment of Data Significant Figures : number of digits know with certainty + the first in doubt. Rounding off: use the same number of significant.
Radiative Leptonic B Decays Edward Chen, Gregory Dubois-Felsmann, David Hitlin Caltech BaBar DOE Presentation Aug 10, 2005.
Significant Figures.  All measurements are inaccurate  Precision of measuring device  Human error  Faulty technique.
Two and a half problems in homogenization of climate series concluding remarks to Daily Stew Ralf Lindau.
Quantify prediction uncertainty (Book, p ) Prediction standard deviations (Book, p. 180): A measure of prediction uncertainty Calculated by translating.
Xiaoyan LinQuark Matter 2006, Shanghai, Nov , Study B and D Contributions to Non- photonic Electrons via Azimuthal Correlations between Non-
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
Presentation Ling Zhang Date: Framework of the method 1 Using Distribution Fitting for Assumptions 2 monte – carlo simulation 3 compare different.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Outline Highlight in background rates estimation (Liangjian and Chao) Impact of fine structures in reactor spectrum (Xin) Requirement in Energy resolution.
Objectives To learn how uncertainty in a measurement arises
Uncertainty in Measurement Accuracy, Precision, Error and Significant Figures.
Objectives To learn how uncertainty in a measurement arises
W + /W - and l + /l - A Means to investigate PDFs T. Schörner-Sadenius, G. Steinbrück Hamburg University HERA-LHC Workshop, CERN, October 2004.
Photon Polarization Analysis Bill Bugg Data selection: 1)PCALE Max cut
Sensitivity Prospects for Light Charged Higgs at 7 TeV J.L. Lane, P.S. Miyagawa, U.K. Yang (Manchester) M. Klemetti, C.T. Potter (McGill) P. Mal (Arizona)
Victor Ryabov (PNPI) for the PHENIX Collaboration QM2005 Budapest Aug,06, First measurement of the  - meson production with PHENIX experiment at.
LIGO-G D Status of Stochastic Search with LIGO Vuk Mandic on behalf of LIGO Scientific Collaboration Caltech GWDAW-10, 12/15/05.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Tracking & Ecal Positional/Angular Resolution Hakan Yilmaz.
Ciro Bigongiari, Salvatore Mangano Results of the optical properties of sea water with the OB system.
A Luminosity Detector for the Future Linear Collider Ronen Ingbir Prague Workshop HEP Tel Aviv University.
HEP Tel Aviv University LumiCal (pads design) Simulation Ronen Ingbir FCAL Simulation meeting, Zeuthen Tel Aviv University HEP experimental Group Collaboration.
1 Mean Analysis. 2 Introduction l If we use sample mean (the mean of the sample) to approximate the population mean (the mean of the population), errors.
Study of pair-produced doubly charged Higgs bosons with a four muon final state at the CMS detector (CMS NOTE 2006/081, Authors : T.Rommerskirchen and.
Jin Huang, Xin Qian For Transversity Analysis Meeting May 3, 2010.
1 Koji Hara (KEK) For the Belle Collaboration Time Dependent CP Violation in B 0 →  +  - Decays [hep-ex/ ]
1 Occupancy, Rate Effects & Combinatorial Background By Rusty Towell January 8, 2009.
K* photoproduction from g11 K. Hicks Ohio University HSG meeting, 12 June 2009.
Jin Huang M.I.T. For Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jan 29, JLab.
Gluon Polarization Errors at PHENIX Spin Discussion Mar. 24 & Apr. 14, 1998 Yuji Goto, RIKEN.
Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology Spokespeople: J.-P. Chen, A. Deur, F. Garibaldi Hall A Collaboration Meeting June 13 th, 2013 E97-110:
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
Ciro Bigongiari, Salvatore Mangano, Results of the optical properties of sea water with the OB system.
Tau31 Tracking Efficiency at BaBar Ian Nugent UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Sept 2005 Outline Introduction  Decays Efficiency Charge Asymmetry Pt Dependence.
FEE studies of Carbon and CH2 using Ecal only Sebouh Paul 10/27/15.
I'm concerned that the OS requirement for the signal is inefficient as the charge of the TeV scale leptons can be easily mis-assigned. As a result we do.
LNF 12/12/06 1 F.Ambrosino-T. Capussela-F.Perfetto Update on        Dalitz plot slope Where we started from A big surprise Systematic checks.
Investigation on CDF Top Physics Group Ye Li Graduate Student UW - Madison.
Referee Report on Open charm production results for summer conferences, 2010 Peter Clarke Marcel Merk “Observations” and “Comments” The referees thank.
Slide 1 Status Report. Slide 2 QCD and W+jets Background Estimation Using Fake Rate Method Norbert Neumeister, Hwidong Yoo Purdue University EXO non-hadronic.
Comparison between Aasim and Calibob
1.4 Significant Figures in Calculations
Status of AIF analysis Daisuke Kaneko.
Sílvia Bravo i Gallart IFAE, Barcelona Moriond-QCD, 18 March 2002
Monte Carlo Simulation Managing uncertainty in complex environments.
Summary of FMS/Jet Meetings
RAA predictions show enhancement highly sensitive to jet quenching
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
FFT analysis Goal : Energy calibration ( systematic error estimation)
G0 Beam Polarization T. Horn, D. Gaskell Jefferson Lab
Carrying out Practical Tasks
Studies of EPR-type flavor entangled states in Y(4s)->B0B0
Study of e+e- pp process using initial state radiation with BaBar
The “Other” STAR-PHENIX Discrepancy Differences in the f analyses
COMPTON SCATTERING IN FORWARD DIRECTION
Study of coherent c.s. dependence on Energy, what was done
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Presentation transcript:

Asymmetry Analysis A. Schälicke, 23 May 2006 Status: independent analyses give similar asymmetries but (significant) different errors

Asymmetry analysis Open questions: final asymmetry and final error Analysis steps: background subtraction combination of runs systematic studies

Tel Aviv Method A (s i - b i+1 ) all plus cycle in one histo all minus cycle in one histogram calculate one single asymmetry Zeuthen + HUB Method D (s i -b j ) normalization to agsic calculate asymmetry for each cycle pair combine all asymmetries mean, statistical error, Chi2 obtain result for all crystals background subtraction asymmetry calculation Bill’s analysis somewhere in between

further suggestions combine low sensitivity and high sensitivity (avoid saturation, but use higher resolution if available) combine asymmetries of all * crystal (independent result to check simulation, and systematic, but also improvement of final uncertainty)

systematic studies possi - check eta - correction flyer suppression do not change mean, but estimate systematic uncertainties

remaining tasks understand error calculations (of each other) state number of used points (after cuts)