Lecture 21 - 1 ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) TMDL Assessment ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PCBs Total Maximum Daily Loads San Francisco Bay Fred Hetzel SFB-RWQCB May 13, 2003.
Advertisements

Water Pollution. Definitions Impaired Waters Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act requires states to develop lists of impaired waters, those that do.
Ann D Hirekatur Project Manager State of Lake Wisconsin Meeting July 13, 2013 Wisconsin River Basin Water Quality Improvement Project.
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Clean Water Act SAFE 210. History/Amendments Recent major amendments were enacted in 1972, 1977, and – Established the National Pollutant Discharge.
Water Quality Standards and MS4 Storm Water Permitting.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality TMDLs 101 An Explanation of the Federal Clean Water Act’s TMDL Requirements and How they Impact Carter Lake.
TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.
Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development,
Bureau of Water Program Overview Local Government Interest.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas.
9.Monitoring Plan + 10.Implementation Plan + 4. LAs* 5. WLAs* 6. MOS* 7.Seasonal Variation* 8.Reasonable Assurance + TMDL Process 1 Problem Understanding.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Water Policy in the US and the EU K H Reckhow and C Pahl-Wostl Part I: US Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
Trends in Stormwater Permitting Joyce Brenner, P.E. Chief of Stormwater Policy, Planning, and Permitting Division of Environmental Analysis Caltrans Headquarters.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) Why watersheds? ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
Water Quality Monitoring The Role of the Clean Water Act.
Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality A TMDL Training Program for Local Government Leaders and Other Water Resource.
Approaches to Addressing Bacteria Impairments Kevin Wagner Texas Water Resources Institute.
United States Department of Agriculture Cooperative State, Research, Education and Extension Service Impacts of Agriculture on Water Quality: The role.
Environmental flows in Europe Mike Acreman. Green and pleasant land? Thames basin 10,000 km mm rainfall 15 million people significant water stress.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality A TMDL Training Program for Local Government Leaders and Other Water Resource.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Lake Erie HABs Workshop Bill Fischbein Supervising Attorney Water Programs March 16, 2012 – Toledo March 30, Columbus.
Water Quality Associated with Urban Runoff: Sources, Emerging Issues and Management Approaches Martha Sutula and Eric Stein Biogeochemistry and Biology.
 Why are we here?  Without regulations, rivers used to catch fire. Rules and Regulation.
Nutrient Management in the Urban Landscape Rebecca Kluckhohn, P.E. Watershed Engineer West Metro Water Alliance Forum, May 18 th 2011 W W e n c k Engineers.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
1 ATTAINS: A Gateway to State-Reported Water Quality Information Webcast Sponsored by EPA’s Watershed Academy June 18, 2008, 11:30am-1:30pm EST Shera Bender,
Module 1: Stormwater Permit Program Robert Pitt Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, AL.
Watershed Assessment and Diagnosis of Condition for August 20, 2007 Joe Magner and Greg Johnson MPCA.
Teresa Marks Director 1. o The Clean Water Act of 1972 requires states to establish water quality standards (WQS) for all waterbodies within the state.
MJ Paul Tetra Tech Inc. Center for Ecological Sciences RTP, NC USING BIOLOGICAL RESPONSES IN NUTRIENT CRITERIA DEVELOPMENT: APPLICATIONS, OPPORTUNITIES,
CoastalZone.com The Use of Ecological Risk Assessments in a Watershed Level Context Thorne E. Abbott CoastalZone.com.
How do humans affect watersheds and the hydrologic cycle ?
Pine and Mill Creek E. coli Stakeholder Meeting Pine and Mill Creek E. coli Stakeholder Meeting Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Water Bureau.
Freshwater and Society Module 1, part C. Developed by: Updated: U?-m1c-s2 Water quality degradation
MWCOG Water Resource Workshop “Preparing for Regulatory Change” February 20, 2004 Track 2: Panel #4 - Storm Water MS4 Regulation Paula Estornell, USEPA,
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Nutrient Effects on Springs Biota Synthesis: Springs Management and Research Needs Mark Brown & Richard Hamann.
How do humans affect watersheds and the hydrologic cycle ?
West Metro Water Alliance A Path to Clean Water – Understanding TMDLs and Watershed Planning September 21, 2011 Diane Spector Wenck Associates, Inc.
Ch. 1: “Watersheds and Wetlands” Lesson 1.5: “Factors That Affect Wetlands and Watersheds” Part 2.
A quantification of groundwater seepage during drought and its importance for water quality modeling in the St. Vrain watershed Hannah Chapin Thomas Gerber.
Case Study Development of an Index of Biotic Integrity for the Mid-Atlantic Highland Region McCormick et al
Water Sources & Pollutants FS Unit 5 FCS-FS-5: Students will discuss why water and pH are important factors in food preparation and preservation. C. List.
Pollutants in a Watershed
Urban Runoff Greg Gearheart Christine Sotelo Eric Berntsen State Water Resources Control Board.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans016-1 Unit 17 Point Source Control Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act of 1972)
Aquatic Resource Monitoring Overview Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division Corvallis, Oregon (541)
Canal Restoration Regulatory Background The Clean Water Act, an introduction: Basic structure for regulating discharges of pollutants into U.S. waters,
CHRIS ZADAK AND RACHEL OLMANSON, METR0-ST. CROIX WATERSHED UNIT WATERSHED RESTORATION AND PROTECTION STRATEGY.
Water Pollution: Pollutant Transport Mechanisms
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Use Attainability Analyses & Criteria Development
Use Attainability Analyses & Criteria Development
Water Pollution.
Water Pollution.
Des Plaines River Watershed Workgroup Midwest Biodiversity Institute
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
Lake Erie HABs Workshop
Water Pollution.
Implementation of Water Quality Standards and the WQ Based Approach
EPA’S ROLE IN APPROVING BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS
Presentation transcript:

Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) TMDL Assessment ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology

Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) Definitions TMDL: total maximum daily load of a pollutant that achieves compliance with a water quality standard TMDL process: plan to develop and implement a TMDL pollutant: substance added by humans or human activities; also habitat destruction, hydrologic modification, etc. pollution: man-made or man-induced alteration of chemical, physical, biological, and radiological integrity of water

Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) TMDL program Originates from Section 303d of the Clean Water Act: –Makes it the responsibility of the states to assess whether or not ambient water quality standards are being met for individual waterbodies –If the ambient water quality standards are not being met, a water quality management program must be implemented to achieve the standards water quality in the waterbody

Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) ambient water quality effluent water quality Point source controls Point and nonpoint source controls EASY NOT SO EASY

Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) Nonpoint sources Examples: –Runoff from urban areas, construction sites, golf courses, etc. –Atmospheric deposition –Groundwater seepage –Snowmelt We need to know about watershed hydrology!

Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) TMDL program States must identify waters not meeting ambient water quality standards –Define pollutants –Define sources –Establish TMDLs necessary to secure the standards –Allocate responsibility for reducing pollutant releases 1992 amendment to TMDL regulations –States must submit lists of impaired water bodies every two years

Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) TMDL program Reports are at: Nevada’s TMDL report is at

Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) TMDL process All waters Determine designated use/ standard Listing PlanningImplementation NRC (2002) Figure 1-1 Every two years

Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) Ambient water quality standards Designated use: Describes the goal of the water quality standard –Examples: Swimming Boating Drinking water Wildlife Criterion: represents the condition of the waterbody that supports the designated use

Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) Types of water quality criteria Pollutant load(s) from source(s) Ambient pollutant concentration in waterbody Human health and biological condition Controls on sources of pollution other than pollutants: –Land use –Characteristics of the channel/riparian zone –Flow regime –Species harvest condition NPDES permits (effluent stds) TMDL standard Instream flows; TMDL plans

Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) Desirable criteria Measurable –Specify duration, frequency, and magnitude for chemical criteria Derived from the designated use –Biocriteria such as numeric measures of fish, benthic invertebrates, algae, etc.

Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) Some problems with standards Standards that are not measurable –Problem: What do you do if you can’t measure as specified? Non-exceedence standard –Problem: Under what circumstances do you define exceedence? Flow restriction standards –Problem: Wet weather flows (storm runoff)

Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) Integrity standards Integrity: biological condition of waterbodies that have not been altered by human activity BUT… No integrity does not necessarily mean the waterbody is impaired!!!

Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) Biological integrity Figure 3: Karr and Chu (1999)

Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) Integrity standards Indices (Box 3-5) –Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) Multimetric approach to assess biological condition Combines measures of condition in –Individuals –Populations –Assemblages –Landscapes Sites are scored according to metrics Overall score indicates the biological condition of the waterbody

Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) Common pitfalls Expectation of simple correlations Inappropriate application of reference condition Inadequate sampling design Inappropriate consideration of sources of variability Incompatible data sets Inappropriate tests of metrics Etc. Karr and Chu (1999)

Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) TMDL process Identify designated uses NRC (1999) Identify impaired water bodies Establish priority Allocate maximum total loadings of contaminants among sources

Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) Allocation of maximum loads Determine relative contributions of different stressors Assess possible management options –Changes in hydrology –Changes in biology –Pollutant load limits MODELS CAN BE USEFUL HERE

Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) Model selection Focus on standard/criteria Based on scientific theory Prediction uncertainty is reported Appropriately complex Appropriate for available data Credible to stakeholders Cost is feasible and sustainable Flexibility

Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) TMDL process Identify designated uses NRC (1999) Identify impaired water bodies Establish priority Allocate maximum total loadings of contaminants among sources Implement controls Assess results Adaptive implementation

Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) Figure 5-2: NRC (2001)

Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) NRC (2001)