Conceptual Design Review Senior Design University of Idaho College of Engineering
Overview 1.Functional requirements and constraints 2.Material Flow –Remove cartridges from tray –Presentation of cartridges in front of camera –Gage wheel –Put cartridges into 50ct tray 3.Cartridge Inspection –Lighting –Inspection Software 4.Future focus 5.Budget 6.Schedule
1. Functional Requirements and Constraints
Minimal change in height desired from 500ct to 50ct tray Minimize risk of incurring incidental and other defects while processing product Cost of x-y positioning systems 2. Material flow considerations
2.1 Remove cartridges from tray Gravity feed from 500ct tray –Freefall acceleration velocities are sufficient for 600parts/min requirement –How do we get them back up higher in elevation? Vertical ascent out of 500ct tray –Vacuum and air blast alternatives considered –Air is readily available –Experimental results
Vertical ascent: Air jet and tube array Remove cartridges from 500ct tray –20 tube array, 1-D positioning system –500ct tray gets positioned, tubes are stationary –Varied length tubes, cartridges arrive at different times –Ten cartridges pulsed every 1 second with an air jet array below the tubes
Where the tubes end Cartridge queue –Accepts cartridges from feed tube –Advances cartridges to inspection area –Provides better advancement control than gravity feed tube
2.2 Presentation of cartridges in front of camera Dropping Contact Rolling –Single Roller –Multiple Roller
Dropping Image: 3 images within one picture Pros –Gravity is consistent and does work for us –Gravity produces proper orientation Cons –Scaling issues, consistency in falling distance –Mirrors in place to give 360 degree view
Image: 3 images taken 120 o apart Pros –Consistent image in front of camera –Multiple parts within picture window Cons –3 images taken 120 o apart cause long process time –High transfer rates, rotational and linear Single Roller
Multiple Roller Image: 1 unrolled image of entire cartridge Pros –Consistent image in front of camera –Multiple parts within picture window Cons –High transfer rates, rotational and linear –Complex apparatus
Multiple Roller
2.3 Gage Wheel Pros –Gages parts for proper diameter –Outputs bad parts to separate bin –Produces timing interval between parts Cons –Limited to one type of defect –Allows minor defective parts to pass
ct Tray Package Machine Existing Prototype to be utilized for project Electromechanical device that can be controlled by camera processor Built for existing tray configuration
3. Cartridge Inspection 3.1 Lighting 1.Front lighting 2.Back lighting 3.Structured lighting
Things to Consider Metallic reflective surface Curved shape of case Surface defects on case Measurements of dimensions of entire bullet
Applications
Front lighting Brightfield illumination Darkfield illumination
Front lighting Diffused Front light Omni-directional illumination Shiny Object Reflective surface
Back lighting Optical Diffuser
Structured lighting
Lighting options for material flow
3.2 Inspection Software Three ways to use software to inspect bullets –Intensity –Edges –Shapes
Inspection Software Intensity - Use multiple polygons to look for dark areas (flaws) on the cartridge surface. This sensor is looking for the amount of “white space” inside the red box
Inspection Software Intensity –Pros Easily detect major defects Checks areas Easily manipulate intensity values –Cons Smaller sensors are better, but more work to make them Hairline fractures can cause problems if intensity settings aren’t sensitive enough
Inspection Software Intensity Pass
Inspection Software Intensity Fail
Inspection Software Edges - Use multiple sensors to look for edges (flaws) inside areas that are white on the cartridge surface. These sensors are looking for edges on the red lines
Inspection Software Edges –Pros Easily detect major defects Checks for all edges Easy to make multiple sensors in different places –Cons Smaller sensors are better, but more work to make them Hairline fractures can cause problems if edges are too far apart
Inspection Software Edge Pass
Inspection Software Edge Fail
Inspection Software Shapes - Use a single or multiple sensors to look for “perfect” cartridges or parts of the cartridge. This sensor is looking for the “white” shapes on the cartridge
Inspection Software Shapes –Pros Easily detect major defects Checks for all white “blobs” larger than a specified size. –Cons Smaller sensors are better, but more work and more processing time Smaller defects including hairline fractures and small dents are difficult to see
Inspection Software Shape Pass
Inspection Software Shape Fail
4. Future Focus Based on recent discussion with ATK, focus will be on the inspection process Further testing –Material handling –Lighting Combination of front and back lighting –Software inspection Combination of intensity and edge sensors
4.2 Lighting Combination of front lighting and back lighting –Pro Cheaper Works well with dropping –Cons Hard to adjust Reflection
4.3 Software Combination of intensity and edge sensors –Pros Both sensors work well on different sections of the cartridge Inspects entire cartridge –Cons Multiple sensors Increased processing time
5. Phase 1 Budget Expected expenses –Materials –Controls Motors Microcontroller –Lighting Expected date for budget approximation –December 6, 2004
6. Short Term Schedule Experiment (to be completed by December 3 rd ) –Take pictures Different lighting Different transfer methods –Detect defects Implement different sensors Minimize processing time Deliverables (December 17 th ) –Preliminary design of phase 1
Questions