1 High Resolution Daily Sea Surface Temperature Analysis Errors Richard W. Reynolds (NOAA, CICS) Dudley B. Chelton (Oregon State University)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OSTIA : Transition to an Operational System John Stark, Craig Donlon. GlobColour / Medspiration Workshop, 4-6 Dec
Advertisements

Improvements to the NOAA Geostationary Sea Surface Temperature Product Suite Eileen Maturi, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR Andy Harris, Jonathan Mittaz, Prabhat Koner.
Pathfinder –> MODIS -> VIIRS Evolution of a CDR Robert Evans, Peter Minnett, Guillermo Podesta Kay Kilpatrick (retired), Sue Walsh, Vicki Halliwell, Liz.
GHRSST XI Science Team Meeting, ST-VAL, June 2010, Lima, Peru Recent developments to the SST Quality Monitor (SQUAM) and SST validation with In situ.
1 Met Office, UK 2 Japan Meteorological Agency 3 Bureau of Meteorology, Australia Assimilation of data from AIRS for improved numerical weather prediction.
Assimilating SST and Ocean Colour into ocean forecasting models Rosa Barciela, NCOF, Met Office
1 High resolution SST products for 2001 Satellite SST products and coverage In situ observations, coverage Quality control procedures Satellite error statistics.
Assimilation of sea surface temperature and sea ice in HIRLAM Mariken Homleid HIRLAM/AAA workshop on surface assimilation Budapest 13 November 2007.
Medspiration user meeting, dec 4-6 Use of Medspiration and GHRSST data in the Northern Seas Jacob L. Høyer & Søren Andersen Center for Ocean and Ice, Danish.
Sandra Castro, Gary Wick, Peter Minnett, Andrew Jessup & Bill Emery.
Characterizing and comparison of uncertainty in the AVHRR Pathfinder SST field, Versions 5 & 6 Robert Evans Guilllermo Podesta’ RSMAS Nov 8, 2010 with.
1 A High Resolution Daily SST Analysis Richard W. Reynolds (NOAA, CICS) Dudley B. Chelton (Oregon State University) Thomas M. Smith (NOAA, STAR)
Progress in Data Merging/Gridding & CDR and Differences Between Global SST Averages in Gridded Data Sets Alexey Kaplan Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory.
NOAA Climate Obs 4th Annual Review Silver Spring, MD May 10-12, NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center 1.SSTs for Daily SST OI NOAA’s National.
1 Improved Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Analyses for Climate NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC Thomas M. Smith Richard W. Reynolds Kenneth.
1 NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center April 2005 Climate Observation Program Blended SST Analysis Changes and Implications for the Buoy Network 1.Plans.
1 Sea Surface Temperature Analyses NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC Richard W. Reynolds.
Improved NCEP SST Analysis
1 Comparisons of Daily SST Analyses for NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC Richard W. Reynolds (NOAA, NCDC) Dudley B. Chelton.
Ongoing calibration and extension of SST 4 and 11 μm waveband algorithms for AQUA and TERRA MODIS using the in situ buoy, radiometer matchup database Robert.
SST Diurnal Cycle over the Western Hemisphere: Preliminary Results from the New High-Resolution MPM Analysis Wanqiu Wang, Pingping Xie, and Chenjie Huang.
4 June 2009GHRSST-X STM - SQUAM1 The SST Quality Monitor (SQUAM) 10 th GHRSST Science Team Meeting 1-5 June 2009, Santa Rosa, CA Alexander “Sasha” Ignatov*,
MISST FY1 team meeting April 5-6, Miami, FL NOAA: Gary Wick, Eric Bayler, Ken Casey, Andy Harris, Tim Mavor Navy: Bruce Mckenzie, Charlie Barron NASA:
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 POES-GOES Blended SST Analysis.
CPC Unified Gauge – Satellite Merged Precipitation Analysis for Improved Monitoring and Assessments of Global Climate Pingping Xie, Soo-Hyun Yoo,
MODIS Sea-Surface Temperatures for GHRSST-PP Robert H. Evans & Peter J. Minnett Otis Brown, Erica Key, Goshka Szczodrak, Kay Kilpatrick, Warner Baringer,
Dataset Development within the Surface Processes Group David I. Berry and Elizabeth C. Kent.
Assimilating Retrievals of Sea Surface Temperature from VIIRS and AMSR2 Bruce Brasnett and Dorina Surcel Colan CMDE November 21, 2014 Brasnett, B. and.
AN ENHANCED SST COMPOSITE FOR WEATHER FORECASTING AND REGIONAL CLIMATE STUDIES Gary Jedlovec 1, Jorge Vazquez 2, and Ed Armstrong 2 1NASA/MSFC Earth Science.
Page 1© Crown copyright HadISST2: progress and plans Nick Rayner, 14 th March 2007.
Initial Trends in Cloud Amount from the AVHRR Pathfinder Atmospheres Extended (PATMOS-x) Data Set Andrew K Heidinger, Michael J Pavolonis**, Aleksandar.
DMI-OI analysis in the Arctic DMI-OI processing scheme or Arctic Arctic bias correction method Arctic L4 Reanalysis Biases (AATSR – Pathfinder) Validation.
Hurricane Intensity Estimation from GOES-R Hyperspectral Environmental Suite Eye Sounding Fourth GOES-R Users’ Conference Mark DeMaria NESDIS/ORA-STAR,
1 Agenda Review Issues Melbourne, May 2007 Kenneth S. Casey NOAA National Oceanographic Data Center May 2007 Gary Wick, Rapporteur GHRSST-8 Session-8 Reanalysis.
1 Motivation Motivation SST analysis products at NCDC SST analysis products at NCDC  Extended Reconstruction SST (ERSST) v.3b  Daily Optimum Interpolation.
Sea surface temperature gradient comparisons from MODIS and AVHRR sensors Ed Armstrong 1, Grant Wagner, Jorge Vazquez, Mike Chin, Gregg Foti, Ben Holt,
USE OF AIRS/AMSU DATA FOR WEATHER AND CLIMATE RESEARCH Joel Susskind University of Maryland May 12, 2005.
Wind Stress Data Products for Model Comparison 2012 ECCO Meeting California Institute of Technology David Moroni 10/31/12.
MARACOOS - International Constellation of Satellites – Since 1992 X-Band (installed 2003) L-Band (installed 1992) Sea Surface Temperature - SST Ocean.
Evaluation of the Real-Time Ocean Forecast System in Florida Atlantic Coastal Waters June 3 to 8, 2007 Matthew D. Grossi Department of Marine & Environmental.
Results Time mean SSTs display regions of large fronts but also thermostats associated with mode waters (Fig. 2, upper panel). Large fronts are typically.
Eileen Maturi 1, Jo Murray 2, Andy Harris 3, Paul Fieguth 4, John Sapper 1 1 NOAA/NESDIS, U.S.A., 2 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, U.K., 3 University.
1 Daily OI Analysis for Sea Surface Temperature NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC Richard W. Reynolds (NOAA, NCDC) Thomas M. Smith (NOAA,
Yi Chao Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
Infrared and Microwave Remote Sensing of Sea Surface Temperature Gary A. Wick NOAA Environmental Technology Laboratory January 14, 2004.
NOAA Environmental Technology Laboratory Gary A. Wick Observed Differences Between Infrared and Microwave Products Detailed comparisons between infrared.
General Objective: Conduct R&D activities to improve the quality of SST products used by MERSEA modeling and assimilation centers and produce global, Atlantic.
A new high resolution satellite derived precipitation data set for climate studies Renu Joseph, T. Smith, M. R. P. Sapiano, and R. R. Ferraro Cooperative.
November 28, 2006 Derivation and Evaluation of Multi- Sensor SST Error Characteristics Gary Wick 1 and Sandra Castro 2 1 NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory.
NOAA Climate Observation Annual Review Silver, Spring, MD Sept. 3-5, Intercomparisons Among Global Daily SST Analyses NOAA’s National Climatic Data.
BLUElink> Regional High-Resolution SST Analysis System – Verification and Inter-Comparison Helen Beggs Ocean & Marine Forecasting Group, BMRC, Bureau of.
GHRSST HL_TAG meeting Copenhagen, March 2010 Validation of L2P products in the Arctic Motivation: Consistent inter-satellite validation of L2p SST observations.
AQUA AMSR-E MODIS POES AVHRR TRMM TMI ENVISAT AATSR Multi-satellite, multi-sensor data fusion: global daily 9 km SSTs from MODIS, AMSR-E, and TMI
1 Two- Stage High Resolution Daily SST Analysis Richard W. Reynolds (NOAA’s CICS) Dudley B. Chelton (Oregon State University) Thomas M. Smith (NOAA, STAR)
A comparison of AMSR-E and AATSR SST time-series A preliminary investigation into the effects of using cloud-cleared SST data as opposed to all-sky SST.
Use of high resolution global SST data in operational analysis and assimilation systems at the UK Met Office. Matt Martin, John Stark,
Martin Rutherford Technical Director Oceanography and Meteorology Royal Australian Navy 02 Jun 2009 Towards a Bias Corrected L4 Median.
International GHRSST User Symposium Santa Rosa, California, USA 28-29th May 2009 MODIS Sea-Surface Temperatures Peter J Minnett & Robert H. Evans With.
2 Jun 09 UNCLASSIFIED 10th GHRSST Science Team Meeting Santa Rosa, CA 1 – 5 June Presented by Bruce McKenzie Charlie N. Barron, A.B. Kara, C. Rowley.
1 March 2011iQuam GHRSST DV-WG, HL-TAG and ST-VAL Meeting 28 February – 2 March 2011, Boulder, CO In situ Quality Monitor (iQuam) Near-real time.
Characterizing and comparison of uncertainty in the AVHRR Pathfinder Versions 5 & 6 SST field to various reference fields Robert Evans Guilllermo Podesta’
Uncertainty estimation from first principles: The future of SSES? Gary Corlett (University of Leicester) Chris Merchant (University of Edinburgh)
Edward Armstrong Jorge Vazquez Mike Chin Mike Davis James Pogue JPL PO.DAAC California Institute of Technology 28 May 2009 GHRSST Symposium, Santa Rosa,
SST and SIC in HIRLAM and HARMONIE Mariken Homleid ALADIN/HIRLAM Workshop/ASM, 14 May 2009.
GHRSST-9 Perros-Guirec, France 9-13 June Intercomparisons Among Global Daily SST Analyses NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC, USA.
29 May 2009GHRSST User's Symp - SQUAM1 The SST Quality Monitor (SQUAM) 1 st GHRSST Int’l User’s Symposium May 2009, Santa Rosa, CA Alexander “Sasha”
1 Objective Determination of Feature Resolution in an SST Analysis Dudley B. Chelton (Oregon State University) Richard W. Reynolds (NOAA, CICS) Dimitris.
Aquarius SSS space/time biases with respect to Argo data
NOAA Objective Sea Surface Salinity Analysis P. Xie, Y. Xue, and A
Thomas Smith1 Phillip A. Arkin2 George J. Huffman3 John J. Bates1
Presentation transcript:

1 High Resolution Daily Sea Surface Temperature Analysis Errors Richard W. Reynolds (NOAA, CICS) Dudley B. Chelton (Oregon State University)

2 GHRSST & High Resolution SST Analysis: Must be a balance between Signal and Noise GHRSST Reynolds & Chelton

3 Background GHRSST (The Group for High Resolution SST) includes many high resolution SST analyses –There are differences in input data, grid resolution, analysis procedures –There are important differences in analyzed SSTs and analysis resolution Reynolds and Chelton compared 6 SST analyses for to try to identify analysis problems and determine whether any of the analyses are superior

4 SST Analyses, 1 January 2007 RSS OI –(~1/11)° grid NCEP RTG-HR –(1/12)° grid UK OSTIA –(1/20)° grid NCDC Daily OI: (AMSR + AVHRR) – (1/4)° grid Spatial scales differ Differences can exceed 5°C off coast

5 Random + Sampling Error OI Derived –Top panel: –Top panel: AVHRR-only –Bottom panel: AMSR+AVHRR Sampling errors are larger than random errors Sampling and random error reduced by observations –Lower for AMSR+AVHRR

6 SST Analyses, 1 January 2007 RSS OI –(~1/11)° grid NCEP RTG-HR –(1/12)° grid UK OSTIA –(1/20)° grid NCDC Daily OI: (AMSR + AVHRR) – (1/4)° grid This is a daily average –What spatial scales are justified?

7 Results There is no clear correlation between resolution and spatial grid size If the analysis resolution is pushed beyond the spatial and temporal resolution of the data: the apparent SST signal is simply just noise Is there a better way to do analyses?

8 Two Stage Analysis 1.Low Resolution (25 km) analysis using microwave and infrared satellite data plus in situ data 2.High Resolution (4.4 km) analysis using infrared satellite data only

9 Why Two Stages? Both microwave (MW) and infrared (IR) satellite data are now available –Microwave has better coverage than infrared –Infrared has higher resolution than microwave “2-Stage Analysis” allows processing to take advantage of both types of data

10 Analysis Differences High – Low Top panel:Top panel: No filter of Pathfinder AVHRR –Note bull’s eyes: especially along 145°E Bottom panel:Bottom panel: Median filter of Pathfinder AVHRR –Data extremes tossed by eliminating data where the |median – observation| > 0.8°C –Fewer bull’s eyes

11 RMS monthly differences: High – Low Top panel:Top panel: January 2003 Bottom panel:Bottom panel: July 2003 Note regions with little difference (no AVHRR hi-res signal) –Gulf Stream in January –Off Peru/Columbia coast in July

12 130W 125W 120W 115W 130W 125W 120W 115W SST Gradient Magnitudes Castelao, et al. (2006), hourly averages:

13 11 Sep. ‘03 SST Gradient: (°C/100 km) Top panel:Top panel: Hi-Res Middle panel:Middle panel: Low-Res Bottom panelBottom panel: OI Hi- Res Normalized Error –Norm. Error ~1.0 if no Hi-Res Data –Norm. Error < 0.8 with Hi-Res Data

14 11 Sep. ‘03 SST Gradient: (°C/100 km) Top panel:Top panel: Hi-Res Middle panel:Middle panel: Low-Res Bottom panelBottom panel: Difference (Hi-Res – Low-Res) –With Hi-Res Normalized Error 0.8 Contour –Indicator of data edge: e.g., cloud cover, swath edge –Note correlation between contour and high gradients

15 Input Data Pathfinder AVHRR Data with respect to AMSR+AVHRR –Data for 10 Sept analysis shown –Data for 11 Sept Analysis uses Sept data no data for 12 Sept. The only useful field for 10 and 11 Sept. analysis is AVHRR day data for 10 Sept. 2003

16 Day Pathfinder 10 Sept TopTop: Median filtered observations BottomBottom: Additional gradient filtering using climatology if missing box in 3x3 –Large 1°C data to AMSR+AVHRR difference near data edge –Gradient filtering reduces but can’t eliminate it –Gradient filtering does reduce other gradients at date edge

17 Analysis 11 Sept TopTop: Median filtered analysis BottomBottom: Median + gradient filtering near data edge: 3x3 box with at least 1 missing ob –Some improvement –Gradients are unrealistic showing where analysis resolution changes –May need to reduce analysis resolution at data edge 3x3 edge with large gradient

18

19 Why are there Data Edge Biases? Retrievals are from NOAA-17, a morning satellite: bias is unlikely to be a diurnal signal; also same positive bias seen at night on another several other days Median and gradient filtering not adequate Are the biases due to cloud detection problems? How should these biases be corrected? Can the Pathfinder team help?

20 Low-Res Analysis 11 Sept Top:Top: AVHRR-only Middle:Middle: AMSR+AVHRR Bottom:Bottom: Difference: AVHRR-only warmer than AMSR+AVHRR by more than 1°C AMSR dominates AVHRR due to better sampling

21 Filtering for High-Res Data Large-scale bias correction (15 day, ~1000 km): to correct satellite data with respect to in situ data Median Filtering: To eliminate 1 pixel extremes Gradient Filtering: To eliminate errors near data (or cloud) edges ADD ?? Small-scale bias correction (3 day, ~100 km): to correct AVHRR data with respect to AMSR data

22 Is it Real or is it Memorex? Advertisement from the 1990s implying that a live and a Memorex taped performance were the same

23 Is it SST signal or SST noise?

24 Suggestions for Improving SST Analyses - 1 Intercompare the input data –Look for and reduce isolated extremes Consider median filtering –Be careful at boundaries between regions with and without data Computing an analysis is a bit like making sausage –The input impacts the output

25 Suggestions for Improving SST Analyses - 2 Compute several versions –Do intercomparsions among these versions and with other analysis products to uncover problems Compute gradients –Look for large gradients at the boundaries between regions with and without data Share results with others

26 Goldilocks & the 3 Bears Can users find the SST analysis that “is just right” for them??

27 One page summary-1 “Truth in Advertising” SST Stats: Grid resolution, data used, temporal resolution, and period of analysis, provider, ….. This is easily available We need to also provide “more difficult” information

28 One page summary-2 “Truth in Advertising” AnalysisSST Analysis Resolution: Explain that the resolution changes in time and space with data changes –Example: For 2 stage analysis With AVHRR data: 10 km Without AVHRR: 100 km Flag regions with/without AVHRR data

29 One page summary-3 “Truth in Advertising” SST Bias Correction: Explain why corrections needed –For 2 stage analysis Ship SSTs reduced by 0.14°C to better match buoys Satellite data adjusted with respect to buoy and corrected ship data: 15 day, ~1000 km AVHRR data adjusted with respect to AMSR data: 3 day, ~100 km ??

30 One page summary-4 “Truth in Advertising” Error Estimates: Verification needed by analysis and by data intercomparions –For 2 stage analysis Bias, random & sampling error estimated Relative values useful Absolute values may be too small especially near the coast

31 One page summary-5 “Truth in Advertising” Additional Data Processing –For 2 stage analysis Satellite data median filtered to eliminate grid scale bull’s eyes Satellite data near data edges eliminated when gradients large Other information –For 2 stage analysis Two stages allow useful separation of IR and MW resolution and sampling

32 One page summary-6 “Truth in Advertising” usersThree most important things about documentation and users –Users don’t know that there is any –If they know that, they don’t read it –If they read it, they don’t understand it That is why a one page summary would be useful