9/29/08 ESPP-781 Where does risk come from? A story from a small state in upstate New York.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regulatory Toxicology James Swenberg, D.V.M., Ph.D.
Advertisements

Risk Assessment.
Carcinogen Classification Criteria Patricia Richter Ph.D., DABT Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee June 8, 2010.
Chapter 5 Chemicals and Cancer.
CONFERENCE ON “ FOOD ADDITIVES : SAFETY IN USE AND CONSUMER CONCERNS“ JOMO KENYATTA UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY NAIROBI, 24 JUNE 2014.
DrugEpi 3-6 Study Design Exercises Module 3 Introduction Content Area: Analytical Epidemiology Essential Question (Generic): Is there an association between.
Module 8: Risk Assessment. 2 Module Objectives  Define the purpose of Superfund risk assessment  Define the four components of the human health risk.
Sources of Uncertainty and Current Practice for Addressing Them: Toxicological Perspective David A. Bussard U.S. Environmental Protection Agency The views.
Environmental Health III. Epidemiology Shu-Chi Chang, Ph.D., P.E., P.A. Assistant Professor 1 and Division Chief 2 1 Department of Environmental Engineering.
10/1/08 ESPP-781 Risk Definition, Typology, Examples Probability of harm X magnitude of harm Types of risk –low-probability, high-consequence risks nuclear.
Detectives in the Classroom - Investigation 2-3: What's Wrong with This Picture? What's Wrong with This Picture?
What Do Toxicologists Do?
1 Issues in Harmonizing Methods for Risk Assessment Kenny S. Crump Louisiana Tech University
Risk Assessment II Dec 9, Is there a “safe” dose ? For effects other than cancer:
Michael H. Dong MPH, DrPA, PhD  readings Toxicology and Risk Assessment (3rd of 10 Lectures on Toxicologic Epidemiology)
Neonatal/Juvenile Animal Safety Studies Kenneth L. Hastings, Dr.P.H., D.A.B.T. Office of New Drugs, CDER.
Risk Assessment: A Conceptual Introduction
Risk Assessment Bruce Case. Risk Assessment: Lecture Outline 1. Definitions: Risk Analysis, Risk Assessment (Evaluation) and their components 2. A detailed.
An Overview of Risk Assessment Bernard D. Goldstein, MD University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health.
June 16-19, USEPA Cancer Guidelines: Mode of Carcinogenic Action 1 ICABR – Impacts of the Bioeconomy on Agricultural Sustainability, the Environment.
ILSI Risk Science Institute Acrylamide Toxicity: Research to Address Key Data Gaps Presented by Dr. Stephen S. Olin ILSI Risk Science Institute.
APES Get out Ecological Footprint Assignment. Chapter 17 Environmental Hazards & Human Health.
Environmental Risk Analysis
1 Chapter 8: Environmental Health and Toxicology Hong Kong residents concerned about SARS Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required.
Chapter 8: Environmental Health and Toxicology
Lecture 8 Objective 20. Describe the elements of design of observational studies: case reports/series.
Committee on Carcinogenicity (COC) Approach to Risk Assessment of Genotoxic Carcinogens David H. Phillips* COC Chairman Descriptive vs. Quantitative.
CE Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science Readings for This Class: Chapter 4 O hio N orthern U niversity Introduction Chemistry,
TRAINING FOR THE HEALTH SECTOR
Dr. Manfred Wentz Director, Hohenstein Institutes (USA) Head, Oeko-Tex Certification Body (USA) AAFA – Environmental Committee Meeting November 10, 2008.
Exposure Definition and Measurement in Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
 Drinking-Water Standards  History  Key Definitions  How Standards are Developed  Current Issues Confronting Developers of Standards.
INTRODUCTION TO TOXICOLOGY SIDNEY GREEN, PH.D. DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACOLOGY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE HOWARD UNIVERISTY.
Biomedical Research.
Chapter 15 & 16 Lecture Risks and Pests. Hazard vs. Risk Hazard Anything that causes: 1.Injury, disease, or death to humans 2.Damage to property 3.Destruction.
Environmental Hazards and Human Health Environment: combination of physical, chemical, and biological factors. Hazard: anything that can cause injury,
Environmental Hazards & Human Health
Copyright © 2002 University of Maryland School of Nursing. All rights reserved. Comparison of Pharmacology and Toxicology This material was developed at.
Environmental Science: Toward a Sustainable Future Richard T. Wright
Risk Assessment Nov 7, 2008 Timbrell 3 rd Edn pp Casarett & Doull 7 th Edn Chapter 7 (pp )
Juan Alguacil, MD Huelva University Brussels, 26 June 2012 Limits on Occupational Exposure Limits for Carcinogens 8th Seminar on workers’ protection &
Module 3 Risk Analysis and its Components. Risk Analysis ● WTO SPS agreement puts emphasis on sound science ● Risk analysis = integrated mechanism to.
MAIN TOXICITY TESTING. TESTING STRATEGIES A number of different types of data are used in order to establish the safety of chemical substances for use.
Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Dekant Department of Toxicology University of Würzburg Germany Risk, Hazard, and Innovation.
Risk Assessment & Risk Reduction in Environmental Policy.
Determining Risks to Background Arsenic Using a Margin – of – Exposure Approach Presentation at Society of Risk Analysis, New England Chapter Barbara D.
Pollution and Human Health
Unit 2 – Public Health Epidemiology Chapter 4 – Epidemiology: The Basic Science of Public Health.
“A thing is safe if its risks are judged to be acceptable” Wm. Lowrance, 1976.
Assessing Risks and Benefits. Risk vs. Benefit: Tipping the Scales.
Chapter 15.3 Risk Assessment 2002 WHO report: “Focusing on risks to health is the key to preventing disease and injury.” risk assessment—process of evaluating.
Environmental Risk Analysis Chapter 6 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management, 4e.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
 Advantages  Context-independent, hence applicable regardless of source, medium, location, affected interests (“risk science”)  Calculable, hence comparable.
Chapter 17 Environmental Hazards & Human Health
RISK DUE TO AIR POLLUTANTS
Environmental Risk Analysis Chapter 6 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
‘DOSE’-‘OUTCOME’ IN GENERAL Relationship between a measured outcome associated with a measured dose –‘outcome’ = level of biological response or prevalence.
Perspective on the current state-of-knowledge of mode of action as it relates to the dose response assessment of cancer and noncancer toxicity Jennifer.
Foundations for Evaluating Clinical Literature. Outline Definitions Study Design Sampling Bias Reliability and validity.
Acute Toxicity Studies Single dose - rat, mouse (5/sex/dose), dog, monkey (1/sex/dose) 14 day observation In-life observations (body wt., food consumption,
1 Risk Assessment for Air Toxics: The 4 Basic Steps NESCAUM Health Effects Workshop Bordentown, NJ July 30, 2008.
DOSE-RESPONSE ASSESSMENT
CHAPTER 5 Occupational Exposure Limits and Assessment of Workplace Chemical Risks.
Risk Assessment Dec 4 -6, 2006.
THE DOSE MAKES THE POISON
Risk Assessment Dec 7, 2009 Timbrell 3rd Edn pp 16-21
Pollution and Human Health
Paul Y Hamey Chemicals Regulation Division
Introduction to Risk Assessment
Presentation transcript:

9/29/08 ESPP-781 Where does risk come from? A story from a small state in upstate New York

9/29/08 ESPP-782 National Research Council, “Red Book” Model of Risk Analysis (1983)

9/29/08 ESPP-783 Steps in Formal Risk Analysis Research Hazard identification Exposure assessment Risk characterization Risk communication Risk management

9/29/08 ESPP-784 Analytic Methods for Toxic Chemicals and Their Limitations Short-term tests (problem: reductionism) Bioassays (problem: interspecies extrapolation) –choice of test animals –routes of exposure –dose-response issues Epidemiology (problem: confounding factors)

9/29/08 ESPP-785 Social Construction of Risk Models What causal understandings are built into the risk assessment model? –E.g., Cancer begins with a single mutation. Which parameters are important? –E.g., For cancer causation, what matters is level of exposure, chemical structure, DNA repair. What measures and methods are used to characterize those parameters? –E.g., structure-activity studies, animal studies, biological uptake from environment

9/29/08 ESPP-786 Model: From Mouse to Man

9/29/08 ESPP-787 Biases that may overstate risk Conservative assumptions in QRA –use of most sensitive species –considering all routes of exposure –use of high-dose testing Low-dose extrapolation (ignoring possible mechanisms and thresholds) Tilt toward human-made hazards (e.g., pesticides vs. “natural carcinogens”)

9/29/08 ESPP-788 Biases that may understate risk Synergistic effects (multiple exposures) Vulnerable or non-standard populations Tilt toward “natural” rather than social or behavioral causes –ignoring behavior as an element of risk Bias toward “known” scenarios and available evidence

9/29/08 ESPP-789 Risk Management Strategies Zero risk (no animal carcinogens in food) De minimis risk (<10 -6 lifetime cancer risk) Safety (no observable effect level or NOEL) Acceptable risk (regulatory standard) Risk tradeoffs –risks vs. benefits (disease vs. income, speed, connectivity, choice) –risks vs. risks (epidemic vs. drug reaction)

9/29/08 ESPP-7810 Ethical Issues in Risk Analysis Preventive policy: no “body counts” No human experimentation –But is it permissible to test low-level exposures on consenting subjects? Ethical treatment of animals How conservative should the analyst be?

9/29/08 ESPP-7811 The Analytic-Deliberative model of Risk Analysis