L. Brillet (CEA) – ANR meeting – META08 Hammamet 1/18 validation ANR meeting - 28/10/2008 CEA Grenoble - DSV/iRTSV/CMBA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide 1 CheVi Tutorial Aniko Simon, Darryl Reid, Sing Yoong Khew, and Zsolt Zsoldos SimBioSys presents.
Advertisements

– A Web Portal for Massively Parallel Flexible Docking, using the ChemAxon toolkit. Dragos Horvath*, Kun Attila, Benjamin Parent*, Cyrielle.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
0 - 0.
ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSIONS
Addition Facts
Amino Acids, Proteins, and Enzymes
The world leader in serving science TQ ANALYST SOFTWARE Putting your applications on target.
Lets play bingo!!. Calculate: MEAN Calculate: MEDIAN
Christopher Reynolds Supervisor: Prof. Michael Sternberg Bioinformatics Department Division of Molecular Biosciences Imperial College London.
Past Tense Probe. Past Tense Probe Past Tense Probe – Practice 1.
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
Inhibitors of Pantothenate Synthetase: Initiating a Quest for New TB Drugs Reaz Uddin, Michael Brunsteiner, Pavel A. Petukhov* Department of Medicinal.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
11 = This is the fact family. You say: 8+3=11 and 3+8=11
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
Miroslav Brumovský28th July 2011 Miroslav Brumovský 28 th July 2011 Methods using polarization for in silico fragment-based drug design.
PSSA Preparation.
Improving enrichment rates A practical solution to an impractical problem Noel O’Boyle Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre
Molecular dynamics refinement and rescoring in WISDOM virtual screenings Gianluca Degliesposti University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Molecular Modelling.
Establishing a Successful Virtual Screening Process Stephen Pickett Roche Discovery Welwyn.
An Integrated Approach to Protein-Protein Docking
BL5203: Molecular Recognition & Interaction Lecture 5: Drug Design Methods Ligand-Protein Docking (Part I) Prof. Chen Yu Zong Tel:
Molecular Docking Using GOLD Tommi Suvitaival Seppo Virtanen S Basics for Biosystems of the Cell Fall 2006.
Computational Techniques in Support of Drug Discovery October 2, 2002 Jeffrey Wolbach, Ph. D.
Topological Summaries: Using Graphs for Chemical Searching and Mining Graphs are a flexible & unifying model Scalable similarity searches through novel.
A genetic algorithm for structure based de-novo design Scott C.-H. Pegg, Jose J. Haresco & Irwin D. Kuntz February 21, 2006.
Introduction to Chemoinformatics Irene Kouskoumvekaki Associate Professor December 12th, 2012 Biological Sequence Analysis course.
Faculté de Chimie, ULP, Strasbourg, FRANCE
CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE Virtual Screening at the post-genomic era Dr. Didier ROGNAN Bioinformatic Group UMR CNRS 7081 Illkirch, France.
Protein Molecule Simulation on the Grid G-USE in ProSim Project Tamas Kiss Joint EGGE and EDGeS Summer School.
Développement "IN SILICO" de nouveaux extractants et complexants de métaux Alexandre Varnek Laboratoire d’Infochimie, Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg,
Function first: a powerful approach to post-genomic drug discovery Stephen F. Betz, Susan M. Baxter and Jacquelyn S. Fetrow GeneFormatics Presented by.
In silico discovery of inhibitors using structure-based approaches Jasmita Gill Structural and Computational Biology Group, ICGEB, New Delhi Nov 2005.
SimBioSys Inc.© Slide #1 Enrichment and cross-validation studies of the eHiTS high throughput screening software package.
Altman et al. JACS 2008, Presented By Swati Jain.
Virtual Screening C371 Fall INTRODUCTION Virtual screening – Computational or in silico analog of biological screening –Score, rank, and/or filter.
Bioinformatics MEDC601 Lecture by Brad Windle Ph# Office: Massey Cancer Center, Goodwin Labs Room 319 Web site for lecture:
Hierarchical Database Screenings for HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Using a Pharmacophore Model, Rigid Docking, Solvation Docking, and MM-PB/SA Junmei Wang,
Développement "IN SILICO" de nouveaux extractants et complexants de métaux Alexandre Varnek Laboratoire d’Infochimie, Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg,
Surflex: Fully Automatic Flexible Molecular Docking Using a Molecular Similarity-Based Search Engine Ajay N. Jain UCSF Cancer Research Institute and Comprehensive.
Identification of structurally diverse Growth Hormone Secretagogue (GHS) agonists by virtual screening and structure-activity relationship analysis of.
Mean Field Theory and Mutually Orthogonal Latin Squares in Peptide Structure Prediction N. Gautham Department of Crystallography and Biophysics University.
Molecular mechanics Classical physics, treats atoms as spheres Calculations are rapid, even for large molecules Useful for studying conformations Cannot.
Force-field-based conformational sampling & docking: status, results, issues of the project Dragos Horvath ANR (Agence Nationale de la Recherche)
Elon Yariv Graduate student in Prof. Nir Ben-Tal’s lab Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tel Aviv University.
Docking and Virtual Screening Using the BMI cluster
Molecular Modeling in Drug Discovery: an Overview
HP-SEE In the search of the HDAC-1 inhibitors. The preliminary results of ligand based virtual screening Ilija N. Cvijetić, Ivan O. Juranić,
A new protein-protein docking scoring function based on interface residue properties Reporter: Yu Lun Kuo (D )
Structure-based inhibitor design and validation: Application to Plasmodium falciparum glutathione S-transferase Marli Botha MSc. Bioinformatics.
Screening for bioactive chemicals at the CMBA facility
DATA MINING FOR SMALL MOLECULE ALLOSTERIC INHIBITORS
Ligand-Based Structural Hypotheses for Virtual Screening
Molecular Docking Profacgen. The interactions between proteins and other molecules play important roles in various biological processes, including gene.
Virtual Screening.
An Integrated Approach to Protein-Protein Docking
William J. Zuercher, Jonathan M. Elkins, Stefan Knapp 
Mr.Halavath Ramesh 16-MCH-001 Dept. of Chemistry Loyola College University of Madras-Chennai.
Mr.Halavath Ramesh 16-MCH-001 Dept. of Chemistry Loyola College University of Madras-Chennai.
Mr.Halavath Ramesh 16-MCH-001 Dept. of Chemistry Loyola College University of Madras-Chennai.
Mr.Halavath Ramesh 16-MCH-001 Dept. of Chemistry Loyola College University of Madras-Chennai.
Docking validation of Dud778-dUTPase cocrystal structure.
Julia Salas Case Study, CS379a
Presentation transcript:

L. Brillet (CEA) – ANR meeting – META08 Hammamet 1/18 validation ANR meeting - 28/10/2008 CEA Grenoble - DSV/iRTSV/CMBA (C. Barette, L. Lafanechère) et LTS (R. Prudent, C. Cochet) Laboratoire dinfochimie, ULP, Strasbourg (S. Conilleau, D. Horvath) LIFL, Lille (team of E.-G. Talbi) L. Brillet, S. Roy (CEA Grenoble - DSV/iRTSV/CMBA)

L. Brillet (CEA) – ANR meeting – META08 Hammamet 2/18 Introduction folding redocking of PDB complexes comparison with classical docking programs activity prediction EVALUATION 1. Preparation of the PDB complexes 2. Evaluation with the protein kinase CK2 – comparison with Gold

L. Brillet (CEA) – ANR meeting – META08 Hammamet 3/18 Thrombin CK2 HIV-RT reference coordinates for ligands superimposition of the complexes structures preparation of the target H, charges, atomic types, file format, active site preparation of the ligands corrections, H, charges, atomic types, file format PREPARATION OF THE COMPLEXES 3 families of PDB complexes redocking : 3BQC.pdb (human) 23 ligands (human + maize) 1RT1.pdb 11 ligands 1XM1.pdb 10 ligands Tools : Chimera, MOE, VegaZZ, ChemAxon

L. Brillet (CEA) – ANR meeting – META08 Hammamet 4/18 Evaluation with the protein kinase CK2 ATP or GTP Protein – substrate phosphate substrates CK2 abnormal expression: inflammation (viral) infection cancer PROTEIN KINASE CK2

L. Brillet (CEA) – ANR meeting – META08 Hammamet 5/18 in vitro activity in vivo activity selectivity SAR Database JChemBase (ChemAxon) CK2 BIOLOGICAL DATA CEA Grenoble, DSV/iRTSV/LTS: R. Prudent, C. Cochet Expanding the chemical diversity of CK2 inhibitors, Prudent et al., 2008, Mol. Cell. Biochem. Salicylaldehyde derivatives as new protein kinase CK2 inhibitors, Prudent et al., 2008, Bioch. Biophys. Acta Evaluation with the protein kinase CK2 CEA Grenoble, DSV/iRTSV/CMBA: C. Barette, L. Lafanechère HTS screening: ~ compounds post HTS studies: 5 groups of actives / inactives structural analogues (~ 100 compounds)

L. Brillet (CEA) – ANR meeting – META08 Hammamet 6/18 EVALUATION WITH CK2 – COMPARISON - GOLD EVALUATION WITH CK2 – COMPARISON - GOLD Gold (CCDC) co-cristallised ligands set of analogues (known activity) CMBA library (CEA): comp. co-cristallised ligands others ? docking results Comparison ? 1 protein conformation Hits selection in vitro tests

L. Brillet (CEA) – ANR meeting – META08 Hammamet 7/18 GoldGlideFlexX PRELIMINARY STUDIES Comparison - Gold Revue of the litterature (docking, evaluation of the docking programs) Training in D. Rognans laboratory (Strasbourg) Choice of a docking program

L. Brillet (CEA) – ANR meeting – META08 Hammamet 8/18 1.Bibliography 2.Preparation of the target 3.Preparation of the library 4.Design of the screening parameters 5.Screening of the library 6.Post-processing / results analysis VIRTUAL SCREENING ON CK2 WITH GOLD Developed strategy: Comparison - Gold

L. Brillet (CEA) – ANR meeting – META08 Hammamet 9/18 33 publications 25 cristallised inhibitors-CK2 complexes (PDB) - structure - flexibility - water molecules ? - binding modes / interactions BIBLIOGRAPHY Comparison - Gold information about the active site:

L. Brillet (CEA) – ANR meeting – META08 Hammamet 10/18 emodin, 3BQC.pdb Lys68 green = hydrophobic pink = polar

L. Brillet (CEA) – ANR meeting – META08 Hammamet 11/18 PREPARATION OF THE TARGET Comparison - Gold Preparation Choice of the conformation

L. Brillet (CEA) – ANR meeting – META08 Hammamet 12/18 Unique ID Protonation pH 7.4 Tautomers Standardisation 2D 3D PREPARATION OF THE LIBRARY x x x x x Comparison - Gold automated procedure:

L. Brillet (CEA) – ANR meeting – META08 Hammamet 13/18 DESIGN OF THE SCREENING PARAMETERS 1 - Docking of PDB complexes check the pose (RMSD < 2A ?) Comparison - Gold Docking protocole variations with Gold : - water molecule n°2 - flexibility of the lateral chains - number of genetic operations for each genetic algorithm run - number of genetic algorithm runs per ligand failures : no flexibility of the hinge region good success rate

L. Brillet (CEA) – ANR meeting – META08 Hammamet 14/ Docking of a small set of actives / inactives check the enrichment in actives actives inactives % of actives % of compounds ranked by score 100% random enrichment Comparison - Gold DESIGN OF THE SCREENING PARAMETERS

L. Brillet (CEA) – ANR meeting – META08 Hammamet 15/18 POST-PROCESSING / RANKING OF THE MOLECULES Strategies: based on interaction fingerprints + diversity analysis Comparison - Gold based on a consensus of scoring functions Optimizing Fragment and Scaffold Docking by Use of Molecular Interaction Fingerprints, G. Marcou & D. Rognan, 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model.

L. Brillet (CEA) – ANR meeting – META08 Hammamet 16/18 EVALUATION WITH CK2 – COMPARISON - GOLD EVALUATION WITH CK2 – COMPARISON - GOLD Gold (CCDC) co-cristallised ligands set of analogues (known activity) CMBA library (CEA): comp. co-cristallised ligands others ? docking results Comparison ? 1 protein conformation Hits selection in vitro tests

L. Brillet (CEA) – ANR meeting – META08 Hammamet 17/18 CEA: CMBA (C. Barette, L. Lafanechère), LTS (R. Prudent, C. Cochet, V. Moucadel), Laboratoire dInfochimie (ULP, Strasbourg): S. Conilleau, D. Horvath, G. Marcou Bioinformatique du Médicament, Laboratoire de Pharmacochimie et de la Communication Cellulaire (ULP, Illkirch): D. Rognan and his team CEA: GIPSE (C. Charavay, V. Dorffer, J.-P. Eynar), IBS (A. Thomas) M. Lopez-Ramos (Institut Curie, Paris), J.-N. Denis (UJF), D. Giganti (Institut Pasteur, Paris) Laboratoire dInformatique Fondamentale de Lille: team of E.-G. Talbi Conclusion THANKS

L. Brillet (CEA) – ANR meeting – META08 Hammamet 18/18 validation ANR meeting - 28/10/2008 CEA Grenoble - DSV/iRTSV/CMBA (C. Barette, L. Lafanechère) et LTS (R. Prudent, C. Cochet) Laboratoire dinfochimie, ULP, Strasbourg (D. Horvath, S. Conilleau) LIFL, Lille (team of E.-G. Talbi) L. Brillet, S. Roy (CEA Grenoble - DSV/iRTSV/CMBA)