1 High Time-Resolution Size- Resolved Aerosol Predictions: Learning about CCN from Aerosol Field Campaigns Win Trivitayanurak GEOS-CHEM Meeting Harvard.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SOLAS Dust workshop (Reading) Overview of dust modelling from Leeds global aerosol group Graham Mann, Ken Carslaw, Dominick Spracklen,
Advertisements

Some recent studies using Models-3 Ian Rodgers Presentation to APRIL meeting London 4 th March 2003.
Aerosol Lifetimes at High Latitudes Betty Croft 1, Jeff Pierce 1,2 and Randall Martin 1,3 1 Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada 2 Colorado State University,
VIII. Aerosols Size distribution Formation and Processing Composition Aerosol phase chemistry.
Proposed Aerosol Treatment for CAM4 Steve Ghan, Richard Easter, Xiaohong Liu, Rahul Zaveri Pacific Northwest National Laboratory precursor emissions coagulation.
INDIRECT AEROSOL EFFECTS
Incorporation of the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization and Dissolution (MADRID) into CMAQ Yang Zhang, Betty K. Pun, Krish Vijayaraghavan,
Global Climatology of Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations Estimated from Remote-Sensed Aerosol Optical Depth Aaron van Donkelaar 1, Randall Martin 1,2,
Title Performance of the EMEP aerosol model: current results and further needs Presented by Svetlana Tsyro (EMEP/MSC-W) EMEP workshop on Particulate Matter.
Aerosols By Elizabeth Dahl (2005) Edited by Ted Dibble (2008)
Global Aerosol Microphysics With TOMAS Peter J. Adams Acknowledgments: Win Trivitayanurak GEOS-CHEM User’s Meeting April 7, 2009 Center for Atmospheric.
Two-Moment Aerosol Microphysics (TOMAS) Development GEOS-CHEM User’s Meeting 4-6 April 2005 Funding: NSF / NASA Peter Adams Kaiping Chen Jeffrey Pierce.
Transpacific transport of pollution as seen from space Funding: NASA, EPA, EPRI Daniel J. Jacob, Rokjin J. Park, Becky Alexander, T. Duncan Fairlie, Arlene.
Investigating the Sources of Organic Carbon Aerosol in the Atmosphere Colette L. Heald NOAA Climate and Global Change Postdoctoral Fellow University of.
Organic Carbon Aerosol Colette L. Heald University of California, Berkeley NOAA Summer Institute, Steamboat Springs, CO July 12, 2006.
A. CLARKE 1, C. McNAUGHTON 1, S. HOWELL 1, V. KAPUSTIN 1, K. MOORE, B. BLOMQUIST, R. WEBER and F. EISELE 2 1 School Of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology,
Ultrafine Particles and Climate Change Peter J. Adams HDGC Seminar November 5, 2003.
Implementation of Sulfate and Sea-Salt Aerosol Microphysics in GEOS-Chem Hi everyone. My name is Win Trivitayanurak… I’m a PhD student working with Peter.
Satellite-based Global Estimate of Ground-level Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations Aaron van Donkelaar1, Randall Martin1,2, Lok Lamsal1, Chulkyu Lee1.
Colette Heald Fangqun Yu Aerosol Processes Working Group.
Assimilation of Aerosol Optical Depth Gé Verver 1, Bas Henzing 1, Peter van Velthoven 1 Cristina Robles-Gonzalez 2, Gerrit de Leeuw 2 1 KNMI, De Bilt,
New Particle Formation in the Global Atmosphere Fangqun Yu Atmospheric Sciences Research Center, State University of New York at Albany Zifa Wang Institute.
Aerosols. Atmospheric Aerosols Bibliography Seinfeld & Pandis, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Chapt Finlayson-Pitts & Pitts, Chemistry of the.
1 Mass Flux in a Horizontally Homogeneous Atmosphere A useful tool for emissions and lifetimes. Assume an atmosphere well- mixed in latitude and longitude;
Modeling BC Sources and Sinks - research plan Charles Q. Jia and Sunling Gong University of Toronto and Environment 1 st annual NETCARE workshop.
1 1 Model studies of some atmospheric aerosols and comparisons with measurements K. G e o r g i e v I P P – B A S, S o f i a, B u l g a r i a.
Aerosol Working Group The 7 th International GEOS-Chem User’s Meeting May 4, 2015 Aerosol WG Co-Chairs Colette Heald: Jeff Pierce (outgoing):
INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORT OF AIR POLLUTION WITH GMI AND PLANS FOR THE NEW HEMISPHERIC TRANSPORT OF AIR POLLUTANTS (HTAP) MODEL INTERCOMPARISON STUDY ROKJIN.
Processes Controlling the Seasonal Cycle of Arctic Aerosol Number and Size B. Croft 1, J. R. Pierce 2, R. V. Martin 1,3, R. Leaitch 4, T. Breider 5, A.
Aerosol Microphysics: Plans for GEOS-CHEM
Proposal for a Research Infrastructure for Advanced Aerosol Observations and Capacity Building in China Alfred WIEDENSOHLER Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric.
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER 1 Lecture 2: Aerosol sources and sinks Ken Carslaw.
Improving Black Carbon (BC) Aging in GEOS-Chem Based on Aerosol Microphysics: Constraints from HIPPO Observations Cenlin He Advisers: Qinbin Li, Kuo-Nan.
EVALUATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF GAS/PARTICLE MASS TRANSFER TREATMENTS FOR 3-D AEROSOL SIMULATION AND FORECAST Xiaoming Hu and Yang Zhang North Carolina State.
DYNAMO Webinar Series Dynamics of the Madden-Julian Oscillation Field Campaign Climate Variability & Predictability.
Progress on Application of Modal Aerosol Dynamics to CAM Xiaohong Liu, Steve Ghan, Richard Easter, Rahul Zaveri, Yun Qian (Pacific Northwest National.
GEM/AQ Simulations on Intercontinental Transports Science and Technology Branch Environment Canada.
EANET activities and the applicability to model development Kazuhide Matsuda ADORC.
Gas and Aerosol Partitioning Over the Equatorial Pacific Wenxian Zhang April 21, 2009.
Coupling between the aerosols and hydrologic cycles Xiaoyan Jiang Climatology course, 387H Dec 5, 2006.
Representation of Sea Salt Aerosol in CAM coupled with a Sectional Aerosol Microphysical Model CARMA Tianyi Fan, Owen Brian Toon LASP/ATOC, University.
Aerosols: What are we missing? What should we do in the future? Peter J. Adams Carnegie Mellon University Chemistry-Climate Interactions Workshop February.
Overview of the tracer code in RegCM Tracers Aerosols ( droplets, smoke particles, dust, pollens, flying cats …) Gazeous phase, chemical species Evolution.
1 The roles of H 2 SO 4 and organic species in the growth of newly formed particles in the rural environment Wu Zhijun Leibniz-Institute for Tropospheric.
Image D. Anderson, NASA, from Seinfeld et al., BAMS, in press, 2003 Intercontinental Transport of Pollutants Out & Into Asia (emphasis on particles)
NATURAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY POLLUTION INFLUENCES ON AEROSOL CONCENTRATIONS AND VISIBILITY DEGRADATION IN THE UNITED STATES Rokjin J. Park, Daniel J. Jacob,
An Interactive Aerosol-Climate Model based on CAM/CCSM: Progress and challenging issues Chien Wang and Dongchul Kim (MIT) Annica Ekman (U. Stockholm) Mary.
Extending Size-Dependent Composition to the Modal Approach: A Case Study with Sea Salt Aerosol Uma Shankar and Rohit Mathur The University of North Carolina.
Estimating background ozone in surface air over the United States with global 3-D models of tropospheric chemistry Description, Evaluation, and Results.
Estimating PM 2.5 from MODIS and MISR AOD Aaron van Donkelaar and Randall Martin March 2009.
A ir Quality Research Branch Meteorological Service of Canada Environment Environnement Canada Performance Evaluation of AURAMS for Multiple Cases Michael.
Georgia Institute of Technology SAMI Aerosol Modeling: Performance Evaluation & Future Year Simulations Talat Odman Georgia Institute of Technology SAMI.
Using WRF-Chem to understand interactions between synoptic and microphysical variability during VOCALS Rhea George, Robert Wood University of Washington.
GEOS-CHEM Activities at NIA Hongyu Liu National Institute of Aerospace (NIA) at NASA LaRC June 2, 2003.
Modeling. How Do we Address Aerosol-Cloud Interactions? The Scale Problem Process Models ~ 10s km Mesoscale Models Cloud resolving Models Regional Models.
Understanding The Effect Of Anthropogenic Aerosol Weekly Cycles Upon The Climate Using A Global Model Of Aerosol Processes (GLOMAP) Introduction GLOMAP.
Chien Wang Massachusetts Institute of Technology A Close Look at the Aerosol-Cloud Interaction in Tropical Deep Convection.
Transpacific transport of anthropogenic aerosols and implications for North American air quality EGU, Vienna April 27, 2005 Colette Heald, Daniel Jacob,
Modeling the emission, transport, and optical properties of Asian dust storms using coupled CAM/CARMA model Lin Su and Owen B. Toon Laboratory for Atmospheric.
BACKGROUND AEROSOL IN THE UNITED STATES: NATURAL SOURCES AND TRANSBOUNDARY POLLUTION Daniel J. Jacob and Rokjin J. Park with support from EPRI, EPA/OAQPS.
Aerosol 1 st indirect forcing in the coupled CAM-IMPACT model: effects from primary-emitted particulate sulfate and boundary layer nucleation Minghuai.
Modal Aerosol Treatment in CAM: Evaluation and Indirect Effect X. Liu, S. J. Ghan, R. Easter (PNNL) J.-F. Lamarque, P. Hess, N. Mahowald, F. Vitt, H. Morrison,
B. Croft1, R. V. Martin1,2, G. R. Wentworth3, W. R. Leaitch4, J. G
Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University
A model of sea salt aerosol for Cape Grim Preliminary investigations
TOWARDS AN AEROSOL CLIMATOLOGY
EXPORT EFFICIENCY OF BLACK CARBON IN CONTINENTAL OUTFLOW: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE GLOBAL BUDGET AND FOR ARCTIC DEPOSITION Rokjin, J. Park, Daniel J. Jacob,
Does anyone believe that this feedback loop works as advertised?
Particle formation and growth
Presentation transcript:

1 High Time-Resolution Size- Resolved Aerosol Predictions: Learning about CCN from Aerosol Field Campaigns Win Trivitayanurak GEOS-CHEM Meeting Harvard University April 4, 2005

2 Outline Objective Model Development Status Sample results Future work Conclusion

3 Objectives To implement TOMAS aerosol microphysics in GEOS-CHEM. To evaluate the microphysics model by comparing aerosol model predictions against ACE Asia field campaign. Look for potential improvement to the microphysics model:  Nucleation model  Primary aerosol emission size-distributions  Vertical distribution

4 TOMAS Microphysics TOMAS (TwO-Moment Aerosol Sectional microphysics algorithm) [Adams and Seinfeld, 2002]  Conserve BOTH number and mass concentrations by tracking them for each size bin.  30 Bins – dry mass boundary  Processes include coagulation, condensation/ evaporation, dry deposition, wet deposition and nucleation m o 2m o … Mass M1N1M1N1 M2N2M2N2...

5 Model Development Status 30 size-bin sulfate aerosol tracers added to STT array  30 tracers for aerosol number of each size bin: Nk1, Nk2, Nk3, …., Nk30  30 tracers for aerosol mass of each size bin: SF1, SF2, SF3, …., SF30 Important : aerosol m ass and number must go together !  Transport & convection

6 Model Development Status … TOMAS microphysics integrated  Condensation + coagulation + nucleation – ON GEOS-CHEM processes  Transport – OFF  Convection – OFF  Convective precip. – OFF  LS precip. – ON  Aqueous oxidation – ON but not physical yet.  Dry deposition – ON but not size-dependent yet.

7 Sample results – SO4 mass (L = 1) Original GEOS-CHEM bulk SO4 Sum of 30 bins mass of sulfate [  g/m 3 ]

8 Sample results – SO4 mass ( L = 10) Original GEOS-CHEM bulk SO4 Sum of 30 bins mass of sulfate [  g/m 3 ]

9 Sample results – Number Concentration ( L=1 ) [no./cm 3 ] [  g/m 3 ] Sum of 30 bins mass of sulfate Sum of 30 bins number of sulfate

10 Sample results – Number Concentration ( L= 10) Sum of 30 bins mass of sulfate [  g/m 3 ] [no./cm 3 ] Sum of 30 bins number of sulfate

11 Sample results – Size distribution Sulfate number size distribution dN/dlogD p (cm -3 ) D p (  m) dM/dlogD p (  g cm -3 ) A snapshot at 7/31/2001 taken from grid box (61,31,1) ~ Shanghai, East China Sulfate mass size distribution

12 Model run time on Linux platform Original GEOS-CHEM GEOS-CHEM w/ TOMAS Transport  Convection  Convective Precip  TOMAS  Run time13 hours18 hours 1 month of GEOS-CHEM full chemistry run with 4x5 resolution and GEOS 3 meteorology

13 Future work Turning on transport & convection Introduce aqueous phase chemistry wrt each size bin Introduce size-resolved dry deposition Adding more aerosol types (sea salt, dust, OC, EC) Comparison to ACE-Asia

14 Conclusion Keeping the aerosol mass and number tracers consistent is crucial for TOMAS Early stage of TOMAS microphysics in GEOS-CHEM shows a promising future for high time-resolution size-resolved aerosol prediction.

15 QUESTIONS?

16 Sulfate size distribution Snapshot at 7/1/ HRS Sulfate number size distribution Sulfate mass size distribution

17 Sulfate size distribution Snapshot at 7/1/ HRS Sulfate number size distribution Sulfate mass size distribution

18 Sulfate size distribution Snapshot at 7/17/2001 Sulfate number size distribution Sulfate mass size distribution

19

20 Binary nucleation model, H 2 SO 4 -H 2 O system [Jaecker-Voirol and Mirabel, 1989] In each time step (1hr), first let gas-phase H 2 SO 4 condense onto existing aerosol. At end of time step, if remaining H 2 SO 4 concentration exceeds critical concentration, then nucleation occurs. [Wexler et al., 1994] C crit = 0.16exp(0.1T - 3.5RH ) Nucleated particles are introduced to the smallest size bin Aerosol Microphysics : Nucleation

21 Aerosol Microphysics : Nucleation Nucleation events observed at H 2 SO 4 concentrations below those required by binary nucleation model Suggest other mechanisms are at work  Ternary nucleation (H 2 SO 4 -NH 3 -H 2 O)  Ion induced nucleation. Shall test and see in GEOS-CHEM

22 Aerosol Microphysics : Primary Aerosol Importance of primary ultrafine emissions  Particulate emissions are more efficient than gas- phase emissions at increasing CCN  indirect effects.  Need accurate size-distributions of primary aerosols. Ratio of CCN(0.2%) particulate emission scenario over gas-phase emission scenario [Adams and Seinfeld, GRL 2003]

23 Aerosol Microphysics : Primary Aerosol Current Primary Aerosol Size-Distributions  EC/OC: main source of ultrafine particles and aerosol number  Sulfate: also ultrafine  Dust: mostly coarse, some fine  Sea-salt: mostly coarse, some fine Dp (  m) Mass Size Distribution Probability OC/EC Sulfate Dust Sea-salt Dp (  m) Number Size Distribution Probability

24 Aerosol Microphysics : Vertical Distribution Vertical distribution of aerosols affects lifetime because lower aerosols are removed by rain more efficiently. How good is the vertical profile prediction? Examine how each process influences vertical distributions  sources vs. sinks  Gravitational settling = sink for large particles Enough settling?  Vertical mixing; how good?

25 Field Campaign TRACE-P  Feb - Apr 2001  NW Pacific  Asian Chemical outflow and evolution  Aircraft ACE-Asia  Late Mar - May 2001  Ground network:  Yellow Sea, Sea of Japan, Pacific and ground-based in China and Japan  Asian Aerosol, radiative effect, aerosol processes  Aircraft, R/V (ships), ground stations network [Huebert et al., 2003]

26 Comparison Parameters? How to evaluate model? Nucleation:  SO 2, H 2 SO 4, surface area, and number concentrations. Temp, RH.  Do observations agree with theory? [McNaughton et al., JGR 2004 in press] Observations during flight 7 of ACE-Asia. MBL Diameter (  m) dA/d log Dp (  m 2 cm -3 ) C-130 Altitude (m) Temp (°C) Particle (# cm -3 ) SO 2 (ppbv)

27 Comparison Primary Aerosol:  Size distribution measured on aircraft. Different volatility suggest aerosol types.  Do the input size distributions of primary aerosols produce accurate total number concentration and size distribution? Dp (um) dN/d log Dp (cm -3 ) [McNaughton et al., JGR 2004 in press] Sulfuric acid or organic compound Formed earlier w/ partial neutralization by NH3 Sulfuric acid with near complete neutralization Or ammoniated species

28 Comparison Vertical distribution:  Number profile, mass profile, size-resolved profile.  Compare model vs. observations  examine what is too high/low, e.g. production or loss.  Potential improvement? Is it in the aerosol model? Diameter (um) C-130 Altitude (m) Sulfate mass conc. (ug/m3) Twin Otter Altitude (m) [BAHREINI ET AL., 2003] [McNaughton et al., 2004 in press]