Progress on Determining Heat Loads on Divertors and First Walls T.K. Mau UC-San Diego ARIES Pathways Project Meeting December 12-13, 2007 Atlanta, Georgia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Joint SEWGs-TFE meeting S. Brezinsek22/07/2008 TF E Impact of N 2 on carbon chemistry in JET S. Brezinsek, Y. Corre and TFE.
Advertisements

Introduction to Plasma-Surface Interactions Lecture 6 Divertors.
ASIPP HT-7 belt limiter Houyang Guo, Sizhen Zhu and Jiangang Li Investigation of EAST Divertor Asymmetry in Plasma Detachment & Target Power Loading Using.
Conference on Computational Physics 30 August 2006 Transport Simulation for the Scrape-Off Layer and Divertor Plasmas in KSTAR Tokamak S. S. Kim and S.
Exploring Capability to Calculate Heat Loads on Divertors and Walls T.K. Mau UC-San Diego ARIES Pathways Project Meeting September 6-7, 2007 Idaho Falls,
April 27-28, 2006/ARR 1 Finalizing ARIES-CS Power Core Engineering Presented by A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego ARIES Meeting UW, Madison.
Systems Code Status J. F. Lyon, ORNL ARIES Meeting June 14, 2006.
Physics Analysis for Equilibrium, Stability, and Divertors ARIES Power Plant Studies Charles Kessel, PPPL DOE Peer Review, UCSD August 17, 2000.
Comparison of drift simulation with D,Chi different in div.legs.
Physics of fusion power
Poloidal Distribution of ARIES-ACT Neutron Wall Loading L. El-Guebaly, A. Jaber, D. Henderson Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Power Loads and Divertor Design Hayden McGuinness Don Steiner Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute In collaboration with T.K. Mau and A. Grossman.
AN UPDATE ON DIVERTOR HEAT LOAD ANALYSIS T.K. Mau, A. Grossman, A.R. Raffray UC-San Diego H. McGuinness RPI ARIES-CS Project Meeting June 14-15, 2005 University.
AN UPDATE on DIVERTOR DESIGN and HEAT LOAD ANALYSIS T.K. Mau (UCSD) H. McGuinness (RPI), D. Steiner (RPI) A.R. Raffray (UCSD), X. Wang (UCSD), A. Grossman.
Scoping Study of He-cooled Porous Media for ARIES-CS Divertor Presented by John Pulsifer Major contributor: René Raffray University of California, San.
MICE absorber and Window / flow Design Wing Lau, Giles Barr & Stephanie Yang Oxford University MICE Meeting Berkeley, Oct 2002.
10/04/ D Source, Neutron Wall Loading & Radiative Heating for ARIES-CS Paul Wilson Brian Kiedrowski Laila El-Guebaly.
CHE/ME 109 Heat Transfer in Electronics LECTURE 8 – SPECIFIC CONDUCTION MODELS.
Nov 13-14, 2001 A. R. Raffray, et al., Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Effort 1 Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Development Effort A.
Highlights of ARIES-AT Study Farrokh Najmabadi For the ARIES Team VLT Conference call July 12, 2000 ARIES Web Site:
June19-21, 2000Finalizing the ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Designs, ARIES Project Meeting/ARR ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design (The Final Stretch)
ARIES Systems Studies: ARIES-I and ARIES-AT type operating points C. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES Project Meeting, San Diego, December.
March 20-21, 2000ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design, ARIES Project Meeting/ARR Status ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design The ARIES Team Presented.
Introduction to Plasma- Surface Interactions G M McCracken Hefei, October 2007.
Advanced Tokamak Plasmas and the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Spring APS, Philadelphia, 4/5/2003.
ITPA, DivSOL, May 2007: Coster et al Coster, Bonnin, Corrigan, Wiesen, Chankin, Zagorski, Owen, Rognlien, Kukushkin, Fundamenski, … With contributions.
1 Calorimeter Thermal Analysis with Increased Heat Loads September 28, 2009.
Nam-Sik Yoon (Chungbuk National University of Korea) A Dust Charging Model under Tokamak Discharge Conditions 6 th Japan-Korea Workshop on Theory and Simulation.
Simulation Study on behaviors of a detachment front in a divertor plasma: roles of the cross-field transport Makoto Nakamura Prof. Y. Ogawa, S. Togo, M.
PIC simulations of the propagation of type-1 ELM-produced energetic particles on the SOL of JET D. Tskhakaya 1, *, A. Loarte 2, S. Kuhn 1, and W. Fundamenski.
1 Modeling of EAST Divertor S. Zhu Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Calorimeter Analysis Tasks, July 2014 Revision B January 22, 2015.
Systems Analysis Development for ARIES Next Step C. E. Kessel 1, Z. Dragojlovic 2, and R. Raffrey 2 1 Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory 2 University.
1 Development of integrated SOL/Divertor code and simulation study in JT-60U/JT-60SA tokamaks H. Kawashima, K. Shimizu, T. Takizuka Japan Atomic Energy.
V. A. Soukhanovskii NSTX Team XP Review 31 January 2006 Princeton, NJ Supported by Office of Science Divertor heat flux reduction and detachment in lower.
V. A. Soukhanovskii 1 Acknowledgement s: R. Maingi 2, D. A. Gates 3, J. Menard 3, R. Raman 4, R. E. Bell 3, C. E. Bush 2, R. Kaita 3, H. W. Kugel 3, B.
第16回 若手科学者によるプラズマ研究会 JAEA
Introduction to Plasma- Surface Interactions Lecture 3 Atomic and Molecular Processes.
Transport of deuterium - tritium neutrals in ITER divertor M. Z. Tokar and V.Kotov Plasma and neutral gas in ITER divertor will be mixed of deuterium and.
Systems Code – Hardwired Numbers for Review C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project Meeting, July 29-30, 2010.
14 Oct. 2009, S. Masuzaki 1/18 Edge Heat Transport in the Helical Divertor Configuration in LHD S. Masuzaki, M. Kobayashi, T. Murase, T. Morisaki, N. Ohyabu,
1 Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik 10th ITPA meeting on SOL/Divertor Physics, 8/1/08, Avila ELM resolved measurements of W sputtering MPI für Plasmaphysik.
EAST Data processing of divertor probes on EAST Jun Wang, Jiafeng Chang, Guosheng Xu, Wei Zhang, Tingfeng Ming, Siye Ding Institute of Plasma Physics,
D. Tskhakaya et al. 1 (13) PSI 18, Toledo July 2008 Kinetic simulations of the parallel transport in the JET Scrape-off Layer D. Tskhakaya, R.
Edge-SOL Plasma Transport Simulation for the KSTAR
Edge characterization experiments in the National Spherical Torus Experiment V. A. Soukhanovskii and NSTX Research Team Session CO1 - NSTX ORAL session,
EFDA EUROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Task Force S1 J.Ongena 19th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Lyon Towards the realization on JET of an.
O-36, p 1(10) G. Arnoux 18 th PSI, Toledo, 26-30/05/2008 Divertor heat load in ITER-like advanced tokamak scenarios on JET G.Arnoux 1,(3), P.Andrew 1,
Radial Electric Field Formation by Charge Exchange Reaction at Boundary of Fusion Device* K.C. Lee U.C. Davis *submitted to Physics of Plasmas.
Systems Analysis Development for ARIES Next Step C. E. Kessel 1, Z. Dragojlovic 2, and R. Raffrey 2 1 Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory 2 University.
Assessment of Fusion Development Path: Initial Results of the ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego ANS 18 th Topical Meeting on the.
1 EAST Recent Progress on Long Pulse Divertor Operation in EAST H.Y. Guo, J. Li, G.-N. Luo Z.W. Wu, X. Gao, S. Zhu and the EAST Team 19 th PSI Conference.
Integrated Simulation of ELM Energy Loss Determined by Pedestal MHD and SOL Transport N. Hayashi, T. Takizuka, T. Ozeki, N. Aiba, N. Oyama JAEA Naka TH/4-2.
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Taming The Physics For Commercial Fusion Power Plants ARIES Team Meeting.
Theory of dilute electrolyte solutions and ionized gases
Role of thermal instabilities and anomalous transport in the density limit M.Z.Tokar, F.A.Kelly, Y.Liang, X.Loozen Institut für Plasmaphysik, Forschungszentrum.
18th International Spherical Torus Workshop, Princeton, November 2015 Magnetic Configurations  Three comparative configurations:  Standard Divertor (+QF)
ZHENG Guo-yao, FENG Kai-ming, SHENG Guang-zhao 1) Southwestern Institute of Physics, Chengdu Simulation of plasma parameters for HCSB-DEMO by 1.5D plasma.
A.Yu. Chirkov1), S.V. Ryzhkov1), P.A. Bagryansky2), A.V. Anikeev2)
Neutron Wall Loading Update L. El-Guebaly, A. Jaber, A. Robinson, D. Henderson Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin-Madison
Page 1 of 9 ELM loading conditions and component responses C. Kessel and M. S. Tillack ARIES Project Meeting 4-5 April 2011.
Radiation divertor experiments in the HL-2A tokamak L.W. Yan, W.Y. Hong, M.X. Wang, J. Cheng, J. Qian, Y.D. Pan, Y. Zhou, W. Li, K.J. Zhao, Z. Cao, Q.W.
1 V.A. Soukhanovskii/IAEA-FEC/Oct Developing Physics Basis for the Radiative Snowflake Divertor at DIII-D by V.A. Soukhanovskii 1, with S.L. Allen.
2014/03/06 那珂核融合研究所 第 17 回若手科学者によるプラズマ研究会 SOL-divertor plasma simulations with virtual divertor model Satoshi Togo, Tomonori Takizuka a, Makoto Nakamura.
Member of the Helmholtz Association Meike Clever | Institute of Energy Research – Plasma Physics | Association EURATOM – FZJ Graduiertenkolleg 1203 Dynamics.
Engineering models in the ARIES system code, Part II M. S. Tillack, X. R. Wang, et al. ARIES Project Meeting January 2011.
Mechanisms for losses during Edge Localised modes (ELMs)
Temperature Measurements of Limiter Surfaces at High Heat Flux in the HT-7 Tokamak H. Lin, X.Z. Gong, J. Huang, J.Liu, B. Shi, X.D. Zhang, B.N. Wan,
Finite difference code for 3D edge modelling
Presentation transcript:

Progress on Determining Heat Loads on Divertors and First Walls T.K. Mau UC-San Diego ARIES Pathways Project Meeting December 12-13, 2007 Atlanta, Georgia

In the Last Project Meeting, We Concluded: It is important to self-consistently evaluate the distribution of heat loads on the divertor plates and first wall for the ARIES Pathway power management studies and for designing the TNS device. We will use the UEDGE code to calculate heat loads for power fluxes originating in the SOL and divertor region. Previous published results of calculated heat loads on target plates and surrounding walls were presented for ARIES-AT (w/o impurity), and FIRE (with impurity injection). In this talk, we report progress on: Work with Tom Rognlien (LLNL) to restore the UEDGE case runs for ARIES-AT. Setting up to run ARIES-AT cases with impurity injection, that may help lower peak heat load with a broadened profile.

Spent two days in LLNL in October to work with Tom Rognlien on UEDGE runs for ARIES-AT. Obtained the input files for ARIES-AT from Tom. Learned to truly run UEDGE, and used specific “knobs” and techniques to reach a convergent solution. Set up code to run with impurity (fixed-fraction model) for ARIES-AT. Tom wrote a BASIS script to facilitate displaying heat loads on plates and walls. Collaboration with LLNL on UEDGE

Tokamak Regions for UEDGE Divertor Analysis SOL X point Private Flux region Boundary conditions are set at core boundary, plates and wall. UEDGE solves set of fluid equations in all regions except the core.

ARIES-AT Example Study with Argon Impurity As a start, the impurity density is determined as a fraction of electron density, n e. In our case, n Z / n e = 0.05%. Impurity radiation is calculated using an emissivity table based on non- equilibrium coronal results from the MIST code. Emissivity depends on : electron temperature charge exchange recombination on neutral hydrogen impurity lifetime due to convection (  = 1 s) Other assumed parameters are: P core,net = 40 MW [ f rad = 0.88 ] Core ion density = 5x10 19 m -3 D i = 0.33 m 2 /s,  i =  e = 0.5 m 2 /s

For this case, Divertor Plates are Orthogonal to Field Lines R strike = 3.4 m (inner); 4.3 m (outer)  core boundary = 0.97  separatrix =  wall = 1.10

Distance along Outer Plate (m) Calculated Heat Flux to Outer Divertor Plate Peak heat flux = 17 MW/m 40 MW input power Labels: solid: total; bd : particle flux; e+i : plate recombination; ri : impurity radiation; rh ; hydrogen radiation

Corresponding ARIES-AT Case with No Impurity Net core power input = 80 MW f rad = 0.77 Peak heat flux = 47 MW/m 2 Comparison to Case with Impurity The case with impurity has peak heat load that is less than half that for the no-impurity case. The case with impurity appears to have a broader heat load profile.

Distance from OB side to Outer Divertor Plate (m) Calculated Heat Flux to Outer Wall Peak heat flux = 0.6 MW/m 2 Labels: Solid : total; ri : impurity radiation; rh ; hydrogen radiation

Calculated Heat Flux to Inner Divertor Plate Peak heat flux = 0.35 MW/m 2 The heat flux is much lower and much more broadened than at the outer plate. Distance along Inner Plate (m) Higher flux expansion? Impurity density model?

Calculated Heat Flux to Inner Wall Peak heat flux = 0.3 MW/m 2 Wall heat flux profile is much less peaked than on outer wall.

Summary We obtained the necessary input files for us to start looking at power loads at various divertor geometries and side walls, in the presence of impurities, using the UEDGE code. We calculated heat loads at the plates and walls for a fixed fraction impurity concentration with plates orthogonal to the field lines. Results are shown to trend in the right direction compared to case without impurity, and at different power input. Ability to obtain convergent solutions is sensitive to specific boundary conditions, e.g., core density, and finding a solution can be a time-consuming process. Clearly more practice and further guidance are in order.

Future Work Future runs with UEDGE/ARIES-AT will include: varying impurity concentration multi-charge-state impurity radiation impurity injection tilted plates Run VNC software to enable “in situ” interaction with Rognlien when searching for a convergent solution. More BASIS scripts for displaying n, T profiles, etc.