Probabilistic Robotics Introduction Probabilities Bayes rule Bayes filters.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
State Estimation and Kalman Filtering CS B659 Spring 2013 Kris Hauser.
Advertisements

SA-1 Probabilistic Robotics Planning and Control: Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes.
Hidden Markov Models Reading: Russell and Norvig, Chapter 15, Sections
Markov Localization & Bayes Filtering 1 with Kalman Filters Discrete Filters Particle Filters Slides adapted from Thrun et al., Probabilistic Robotics.
1 Slides for the book: Probabilistic Robotics Authors: Sebastian Thrun Wolfram Burgard Dieter Fox Publisher: MIT Press, Web site for the book & more.
Bayesian Robot Programming & Probabilistic Robotics Pavel Petrovič Department of Applied Informatics, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics
Recursive Bayes Filtering Advanced AI Wolfram Burgard.
Bayes Filters Pieter Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS Many slides adapted from Thrun, Burgard and Fox, Probabilistic Robotics TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the.
Recursive Bayes Filtering Advanced AI
CS 547: Sensing and Planning in Robotics Gaurav S. Sukhatme Computer Science Robotic Embedded Systems Laboratory University of Southern California
1.Examples of using probabilistic ideas in robotics 2.Reverend Bayes and review of probabilistic ideas 3.Introduction to Bayesian AI 4.Simple example.
Autonomous Robot Navigation Panos Trahanias ΗΥ475 Fall 2007.
Particle Filters Pieter Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS Many slides adapted from Thrun, Burgard and Fox, Probabilistic Robotics TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read.
Probabilistic Methods in Mobile Robotics. Stereo cameras Infra-red Sonar Laser range-finder Sonar Tactiles.
CS 547: Sensing and Planning in Robotics Gaurav S. Sukhatme Computer Science Robotic Embedded Systems Laboratory University of Southern California
Part 3 of 3: Beliefs in Probabilistic Robotics. References and Sources of Figures Part 1: Stuart Russell and Peter Norvig, Artificial Intelligence, 2.
CS 547: Sensing and Planning in Robotics Gaurav S. Sukhatme Computer Science Robotic Embedded Systems Laboratory University of Southern California
City College of New York 1 Dr. John (Jizhong) Xiao Department of Electrical Engineering City College of New York A Taste of Localization.
Probability: Review TexPoint fonts used in EMF.
Part 2 of 3: Bayesian Network and Dynamic Bayesian Network.
CS 547: Sensing and Planning in Robotics Gaurav S. Sukhatme Computer Science Robotics Research Laboratory University of Southern California
Particle Filtering. Sensors and Uncertainty Real world sensors are noisy and suffer from missing data (e.g., occlusions, GPS blackouts) Use sensor models.
Bayesian Filtering for Robot Localization
Probability in Robotics
Markov Localization & Bayes Filtering
Lab 4 1.Get an image into a ROS node 2.Find all the orange pixels (suggest HSV) 3.Identify the midpoint of all the orange pixels 4.Explore the findContours.
From Bayesian Filtering to Particle Filters Dieter Fox University of Washington Joint work with W. Burgard, F. Dellaert, C. Kwok, S. Thrun.
1 Robot Motion and Perception (ch. 5, 6) These two chapters discuss how one obtains the motion model and measurement model mentioned before. They are needed.
Visibility Graph. Voronoi Diagram Control is easy: stay equidistant away from closest obstacles.
1 Robot Environment Interaction Environment perception provides information about the environment’s state, and it tends to increase the robot’s knowledge.
Computer Science, Software Engineering & Robotics Workshop, FGCU, April 27-28, 2012 Fault Prediction with Particle Filters by David Hatfield mentors: Dr.
Computer Vision Group Prof. Daniel Cremers Autonomous Navigation for Flying Robots Lecture 6.1: Bayes Filter Jürgen Sturm Technische Universität München.
Computer Vision Group Prof. Daniel Cremers Autonomous Navigation for Flying Robots Lecture 5.2: Recap on Probability Theory Jürgen Sturm Technische Universität.
City College of New York 1 Dr. Jizhong Xiao Department of Electrical Engineering City College of New York Advanced Mobile Robotics.
The famous “sprinkler” example (J. Pearl, Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems, 1988)
Computer Vision Group Prof. Daniel Cremers Autonomous Navigation for Flying Robots Lecture 5.3: Reasoning with Bayes Law Jürgen Sturm Technische Universität.
4 Proposed Research Projects SmartHome – Encouraging patients with mild cognitive disabilities to use digital memory notebook for activities of daily living.
State Estimation and Kalman Filtering
Probability in Robotics Trends in Robotics Research Reactive Paradigm (mid-80’s) no models relies heavily on good sensing Probabilistic Robotics (since.
Probabilistic Robotics Introduction.  Robotics is the science of perceiving and manipulating the physical world through computer-controlled devices.
Probability in Robotics Trends in Robotics Research Reactive Paradigm (mid-80’s) no models relies heavily on good sensing Probabilistic Robotics (since.
Probabilistic Robotics
OBJECT TRACKING USING PARTICLE FILTERS. Table of Contents Tracking Tracking Tracking as a probabilistic inference problem Tracking as a probabilistic.
State Estimation and Kalman Filtering Zeeshan Ali Sayyed.
CS 547: Sensing and Planning in Robotics Gaurav S. Sukhatme Computer Science Robotic Embedded Systems Laboratory University of Southern California
1 CMSC 671 Fall 2001 Class #20 – Thursday, November 8.
Particle Filtering. Sensors and Uncertainty Real world sensors are noisy and suffer from missing data (e.g., occlusions, GPS blackouts) Use sensor models.
Probabilistic Robotics Introduction Probabilities Bayes rule Bayes filters.
CSE 473 Uncertainty. © UW CSE AI Faculty 2 Many Techniques Developed Fuzzy Logic Certainty Factors Non-monotonic logic Probability Only one has stood.
Probabilistic Robotics Introduction. SA-1 2 Introduction  Robotics is the science of perceiving and manipulating the physical world through computer-controlled.
Probabilistic Robotics Probability Theory Basics Error Propagation Slides from Autonomous Robots (Siegwart and Nourbaksh), Chapter 5 Probabilistic Robotics.
General approach: A: action S: pose O: observation Position at time t depends on position previous position and action, and current observation.
Matching ® ® ® Global Map Local Map … … … obstacle Where am I on the global map?                                   
Probabilistic Robotics Bayes Filter Implementations Gaussian filters.
CSE 468/568 Deadlines Lab1 grades out tomorrow (5/1) HW2 grades out by weekend Lab 3 grades out next weekend HW3 – Probability homework out Due 5/7 FINALS:
Review of Probability.
Today.
Reasoning Under Uncertainty: Conditioning, Bayes Rule & Chain Rule
Probabilistic Robotics
Probabilistic Robotics
Markov ó Kalman Filter Localization
Course: Autonomous Machine Learning
State Estimation Probability, Bayes Filtering
Probabilistic Reasoning over Time
Probability Review 11/22/2018.
CSE-490DF Robotics Capstone
EE-565: Mobile Robotics Non-Parametric Filters Module 2, Lecture 5
Probability Review 2/24/2019.
Chapter14-cont..
Probability in Robotics
Presentation transcript:

Probabilistic Robotics Introduction Probabilities Bayes rule Bayes filters

2 Probabilistic Robotics Key idea: Explicit representation of uncertainty using the calculus of probability theory Perception= state estimation Action = utility optimization

3 Pr(A) denotes probability that proposition A is true. Axioms of Probability Theory

4 A Closer Look at Axiom 3 B

5 Using the Axioms

6 Discrete Random Variables X denotes a random variable. X can take on a countable number of values in {x 1, x 2, …, x n }. P(X=x i ), or P(x i ), is the probability that the random variable X takes on value x i. P( ) is called probability mass function..

7 Continuous Random Variables X takes on values in the continuum. p(X=x), or p(x), is a probability density function. E.g. x p(x)

8 Joint and Conditional Probability P(X=x and Y=y) = P(x,y) If X and Y are independent then P(x,y) = P(x) P(y) P(x | y) is the probability of x given y P(x | y) = P(x,y) / P(y) P(x,y) = P(x | y) P(y) If X and Y are independent then P(x | y) = P(x)

9 Law of Total Probability, Marginals Discrete caseContinuous case

10 Bayes Formula

11 Normalization Algorithm:

12 Conditioning Law of total probability:

13 Bayes Rule with Background Knowledge

14 Conditioning Total probability:

15 Conditional Independence equivalent to and

16 Simple Example of State Estimation Suppose a robot obtains measurement z What is P(open|z)?

17 Causal vs. Diagnostic Reasoning P(open|z) is diagnostic. P(z|open) is causal. Often causal knowledge is easier to obtain. Bayes rule allows us to use causal knowledge: count frequencies!

18 Example P(z|open) = 0.6P(z|  open) = 0.3 P(open) = P(  open) = 0.5 z raises the probability that the door is open.

19 Combining Evidence Suppose our robot obtains another observation z 2. How can we integrate this new information? More generally, how can we estimate P(x| z 1...z n ) ?

20 Recursive Bayesian Updating Markov assumption: z n is independent of z 1,...,z n-1 if we know x.

21 Example: Second Measurement P(z 2 |open) = 0.5P(z 2 |  open) = 0.6 P(open|z 1 )=2/3 z 2 lowers the probability that the door is open.

22 A Typical Pitfall Two possible locations x 1 and x 2 P(x 1 )=0.99 P(z|x 2 )=0.09 P(z|x 1 )=0.07

23 Actions Often the world is dynamic since actions carried out by the robot, actions carried out by other agents, or just the time passing by change the world. How can we incorporate such actions?

24 Typical Actions The robot turns its wheels to move The robot uses its manipulator to grasp an object Plants grow over time… Actions are never carried out with absolute certainty. In contrast to measurements, actions generally increase the uncertainty.

25 Modeling Actions To incorporate the outcome of an action u into the current “belief”, we use the conditional pdf P(x|u,x’) This term specifies the pdf that executing u changes the state from x’ to x.

26 Example: Closing the door

27 State Transitions P(x|u,x’) for u = “close door”: If the door is open, the action “close door” succeeds in 90% of all cases.

28 Integrating the Outcome of Actions Continuous case: Discrete case:

29 Example: The Resulting Belief

30 Bayes Filters: Framework Given: Stream of observations z and action data u: Sensor model P(z|x). Action model P(x|u,x’). Prior probability of the system state P(x). Wanted: Estimate of the state X of a dynamical system. The posterior of the state is also called Belief:

31 Markov Assumption Underlying Assumptions Static world Independent noise Perfect model, no approximation errors

32 Bayes Filters Bayes z = observation u = action x = state Markov Total prob. Markov

33 Bayes Filter Algorithm 1. Algorithm Bayes_filter( Bel(x),d ): 2. 0 3. If d is a perceptual data item z then 4. For all x do For all x do Else if d is an action data item u then 10. For all x do Return Bel’(x)

34 Bayes Filters are Familiar! Kalman filters Particle filters Hidden Markov models Dynamic Bayesian networks Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs)

35 Example: State Representations for Robot Localization Grid Based approaches (Markov localization) Particle Filters (Monte Carlo localization) Kalman Tracking Discrete RepresentationsContinuous Representations

36 Summary Bayes rule allows us to compute probabilities that are hard to assess otherwise. Under the Markov assumption, recursive Bayesian updating can be used to efficiently combine evidence. Bayes filters are a probabilistic tool for estimating the state of dynamic systems.