Detecting Gravitational Waves: How does LIGO work and how well does LIGO work? Barry C. Barish Caltech University of Kentucky 4-March-05 "Colliding.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A walk through some statistic details of LSC results.
Advertisements

1 Einstein's Legacy: General Relativity, our Best Description of the Universe Barry C. Barish Caltech AAAS 20-Feb-05 LIGO-xxx Crab Pulsar.
LIGO-G M First Generation Interferometers Barry Barish 30 Oct 2000 Workshop on Astrophysical Sources for Ground-Based Gravitational Wave Detectors.
- Gravitational Wave Detection of Astrophysical Sources Barry C. Barish Caltech Neutrino Telescope Venice 24-Feb-05 LIGO-xxx Crab Pulsar.
1 Science Opportunities for Australia Advanced LIGO Barry Barish Director, LIGO Canberra, Australia 16-Sept-03 LIGO-G M.
Probing the Universe for Gravitational Waves Barry C. Barish Caltech University of Illinois 16-Feb-06 Crab Pulsar.
Interferometric Gravitational Wave Detectors Barry C. Barish Caltech TAUP 9-Sept-03 "Colliding Black Holes" Credit: National Center for Supercomputing.
LIGO Status and Advanced LIGO Plans Barry C Barish OSTP 1-Dec-04.
Status and Prospects for LIGO Barry C. Barish Caltech 17-March-06 St Thomas, Virgin Islands Crab Pulsar.
The LIGO Project ( Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory) Rick Savage - LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Probing the Universe for Gravitational Waves Barry C. Barish Caltech Cornell University 3-April-06 Crab Pulsar.
1 Einstein's Legacy: General Relativity, our Best Description of the Universe Barry C. Barish Caltech LLNL Science Day 23-May-05.
1 What can gravitational waves do to probe early cosmology? Barry C. Barish Caltech “Kavli-CERCA Conference on the Future of Cosmology” Case Western Reserve.
Einstein’s Theory of Gravitation “instantaneous action at a distance”
1 Probing the Universe for Gravitational Waves Barry C. Barish Caltech Los Angeles Astronomical Society 8-Nov-04 "Colliding Black Holes" Credit: National.
LIGO Present and Future
The Search for Gravitational Waves Barry Barish Caltech University of Iowa 16-Sept-02.
G M LIGO “First Lock” Barry Barish 21 October 2000.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory LIGO
LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO: Progress and Prospects Barry Barish 18 July 2000 COSPAR 2000 Fundamental Physics in Space.
1 Observing the Most Violent Events in the Universe Virgo Barry Barish Director, LIGO Virgo Inauguration 23-July-03 Cascina 2003.
Listening to Gravitational Waves: Einstein’s Songlines from the Universe Barry C. Barish.
Catching the Waves with LIGO Barry Barish Los Alamos National Laboratory 27-March-03.
Overview Ground-based Interferometers Barry Barish Caltech Amaldi-6 20-June-05.
Gravitational-waves: Sources and detection
The LIGO Project ( Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory) Rick Savage - LIGO Hanford Observatory.
The LIGO Project ( Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory) Rick Savage – Scientist LIGO Hanford Observatory.
1 Probing the Universe for Gravitational Waves Barry C. Barish Caltech UC Davis 12-April-04 "Colliding Black Holes" Credit: National Center for Supercomputing.
1 LIGO and the Quest for Gravitational Waves Barry C. Barish Caltech UT Austin 24-Sept-03 "Colliding Black Holes" Credit: National Center for Supercomputing.
R. Frey Student Visit 1 Gravitational Waves, LIGO, and UO GW Physics LIGO
Probing the Universe for Gravitational Waves Barry C. Barish Caltech Georgia Tech 26-April-06 Crab Pulsar.
1 Probing the Universe for Gravitational Waves Barry C. Barish Caltech Argonne National Laboratory 16-Jan-04 "Colliding Black Holes" Credit: National Center.
LIGO -- Studying the Fabric of the Universe LIGO-GOxxxx Barry C. Barish National Science Board LIGO Livingston, LA 4-Feb-04.
Brennan Ireland Rochester Institute of Technology Astrophysical Sciences and Technology December 5, 2013 LIGO: Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave.
Gravitational Wave Detectors: new eyes for physics and astronomy Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University.
David Shoemaker 30 August 05
LIGO-G v1 The LIGO Vacuum System and plans for LIGO-Australia Stan Whitcomb IndIGO - ACIGA meeting on LIGO-Australia 9 February 2011.
Advanced LIGO: our future in gravitational astronomy K.A. Strain for the LIGO Science Collaboration NAM 2008 LIGO-G K.
The LIGO Project: a Status Report
LIGO- G M Status of LIGO David Shoemaker LISA Symposium 13 July 2004.
LIGO G M Introduction to LIGO Stan Whitcomb LIGO Hanford Observatory 24 August 2004.
14 July LNGSSearch for Gravitational Waves with Interferometers 1 The search for gravitational waves with the new generation of interferometers Peter.
Status of LIGO Data Analysis Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Dec.
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v1.
Advanced interferometers for astronomical observations Lee Samuel Finn Center for Gravitational Wave Physics, Penn State.
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS
LIGO-G Z LIGO Observational Results I Patrick Brady University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee on behalf of LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G D Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory) Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech National.
LIGO-G D LIGO Laboratory1 Stoyan Nikolov LIGO-G D The LIGO project’s quest for gravitational waves Presenting LIGO to the students of.
LIGO- G D Gravitational Wave Observations with Interferometers: Results and Prospects Stan Whitcomb for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 2 nd.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
LIGO-G M The Curtain Rises on LIGO: Listening to Einstein's Gravitational Symphony Gary Sanders Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory.
Gravitational wave astronomy: a facilities overview Barry C. Barish Caltech AAS San Diego 13-Jan-05 LISA.
LIGO-G v2 The Search For Continuous Gravitational Waves Gregory Mendell, LIGO Hanford Observatory on behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration The.
LIGO-G M Scientific Operation of LIGO Gary H Sanders LIGO Laboratory California Institute of Technology APS Meeting APR03, Philadelphia Gravitational-Wave.
LIGO G M Intro to LIGO Seismic Isolation Pre-bid meeting Gary Sanders LIGO/Caltech Stanford, April 29, 2003.
G Z The LIGO gravitational wave detector consists of two observatories »LIGO Hanford Observatory – 2 interferometers (4 km long arms and 2 km.
LIGO-G M Press Conference Scientific Operation of LIGO Gary H Sanders Caltech (on behalf of a large team) APS April Meeting Philadelphia 6-April-03.
LIGO- G D Results from the LIGO Science Runs Stan Whitcomb for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Aspen Winter Conference on Gravitational Waves.
GW – the first GW detection ! Is it a start of GW astronomy ? If “yes” then which ? «Счастлив, кто посетил сей мир в его минуты роковые !...» Ф.Тютчев.
APS Meeting April 2003 LIGO-G Z 1 Sources and Science with LIGO Data Jolien Creighton University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee On Behalf of the LIGO.
Searches for Gravitational Waves Barry Barish Caltech IPA London – Aug 2014 “Merging Neutron Stars“ (Price & Rosswog)
The search for those elusive gravitational waves
Gravitational Wave Detection of Astrophysical Sources Barry C
The Search for Gravitational Waves with Advanced LIGO
GW150914: The first direct detection of gravitational waves
Gravity -- Studying the Fabric of the Universe Barry C
Status of LIGO Patrick J. Sutton LIGO-Caltech
Detection of Gravitational Waves with Interferometers
Presentation transcript:

Detecting Gravitational Waves: How does LIGO work and how well does LIGO work? Barry C. Barish Caltech University of Kentucky 4-March-05 "Colliding Black Holes" Credit: National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA)

Einstein’s Theory of Gravitation gravitational radiation a necessary consequence of Special Relativity with its finite speed for information transfer gravitational waves come from the acceleration of masses and propagate away from their sources as a space-time warpage at the speed of light gravitational radiation binary inspiral of compact objects

General Relativity Einstein’s equations have form similar to the equations of elasticity. P = Eh (P = stress, h = strain, E = Young’s mod.) T = (c4/8πG)h T = stress tensor, G = Curvature tensor and c4/8πG ~ 1042N is a space-time “stiffness” (energy density/unit curvature) Space-time can carry waves. They have very small amplitude There is a large mismatch with ordinary matter, so very little energy is absorbed (very small cross-section)

Einstein’s Theory of Gravitation gravitational waves Using Minkowski metric, the information about space-time curvature is contained in the metric as an added term, hmn. In the weak field limit, the equation can be described with linear equations. If the choice of gauge is the transverse traceless gauge the formulation becomes a familiar wave equation The strain hmn takes the form of a plane wave propagating at the speed of light (c). Since gravity is spin 2, the waves have two components, but rotated by 450 instead of 900 from each other.

Detection of Gravitational Waves Gravitational Wave Astrophysical Source Terrestrial detectors Virgo, LIGO, TAMA, GEO AIGO Detectors in space LISA

International Network on Earth simultaneously detect signal LIGO Virgo GEO TAMA AIGO decompose the polarization of gravitational waves locate the sources detection confidence

Detecting a passing wave …. Free masses

Detecting a passing wave …. Interferometer

Interferometer Concept Laser used to measure relative lengths of two orthogonal arms Arms in LIGO are 4km Measure difference in length to one part in 1021 or 10-18 meters …causing the interference pattern to change at the photodiode As a wave passes, the arm lengths change in different ways…. Suspended Masses

Simultaneous Detection LIGO 3002 km (L/c = 10 ms) Hanford Observatory MIT Caltech Livingston Observatory

LIGO Livingston Observatory

LIGO Hanford Observatory

LIGO Facilities beam tube enclosure minimal enclosure reinforced concrete no services

LIGO beam tube LIGO beam tube under construction in January 1998 65 ft spiral welded sections girth welded in portable clean room in the field 1.2 m diameter - 3mm stainless 50 km of weld

Vacuum Chambers vibration isolation systems Reduce in-band seismic motion by 4 - 6 orders of magnitude Compensate for microseism at 0.15 Hz by a factor of ten Compensate (partially) for Earth tides

Seismic Isolation springs and masses Constrained Layer damped spring

LIGO vacuum equipment

Seismic Isolation suspension system suspension assembly for a core optic support structure is welded tubular stainless steel suspension wire is 0.31 mm diameter steel music wire fundamental violin mode frequency of 340 Hz

LIGO Optics fused silica Surface uniformity < 1 nm rms Scatter < 50 ppm Absorption < 2 ppm ROC matched < 3% Internal mode Q’s > 2 x 106 Caltech data CSIRO data

Core Optics installation and alignment

LIGO Commissioning and Science Timeline Now

Lock Acquisition

Tidal Compensation Data Tidal evaluation 21-hour locked section of S1 data Predicted tides Feedforward Feedback Residual signal on voice coils Residual signal on laser

Controlling angular degrees of freedom

Interferometer Noise Limits Seismic Noise test mass (mirror) Residual gas scattering Quantum Noise "Shot" noise Radiation pressure LASER Beam splitter Wavelength & amplitude fluctuations Thermal (Brownian) Noise photodiode

What Limits LIGO Sensitivity? Seismic noise limits low frequencies Thermal Noise limits middle frequencies Quantum nature of light (Shot Noise) limits high frequencies Technical issues - alignment, electronics, acoustics, etc limit us before we reach these design goals

Evolution of LIGO Sensitivity

Science Runs NN Binary Inspiral Range A Measure of Progress Virgo Cluster Andromeda Milky Way NN Binary Inspiral Range E8 ~ 5 kpc S1 ~ 100 kpc S2 ~ 0.9Mpc S3 ~ 3 Mpc Design~ 18 Mpc

Astrophysical Sources signatures Compact binary inspiral: “chirps” NS-NS waveforms are well described BH-BH need better waveforms search technique: matched templates Supernovae / GRBs: “bursts” burst signals in coincidence with signals in electromagnetic radiation prompt alarm (~ one hour) with neutrino detectors Pulsars in our galaxy: “periodic” search for observed neutron stars (frequency, doppler shift) all sky search (computing challenge) r-modes Cosmological Signal “stochastic background”

Compact binary collisions Neutron Star – Neutron Star waveforms are well described Black Hole – Black Hole need better waveforms Search: matched templates “chirps”

Template Bank 2110 templates Second-order post-Newtonian Covers desired region of mass param space Calculated based on L1 noise curve Templates placed for max mismatch of  = 0.03

Optimal Filtering frequency domain Transform data to frequency domain : Generate template in frequency domain : Correlate, weighting by power spectral density of noise: Then inverse Fourier transform gives you the filter output at all times: Find maxima of over arrival time and phase Characterize these by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and effective distance

Matched Filtering

Loudest Surviving Candidate Not NS/NS inspiral event 1 Sep 2002, 00:38:33 UTC S/N = 15.9, c2/dof = 2.2 (m1,m2) = (1.3, 1.1) Msun What caused this? Appears to be due to saturation of a photodiode

Results of Inspiral Search Upper limit binary neutron star coalescence rate LIGO S2 Data R < 50 / yr / MWEG Previous observational limits Japanese TAMA  R < 30,000 / yr / MWEG Caltech 40m  R < 4,000 / yr / MWEG Theoretical prediction R < 2 x 10-5 / yr / MWEG Detectable Range of S2 data reaches Andromeda!

Astrophysical Sources signatures Compact binary inspiral: “chirps” NS-NS waveforms are well described BH-BH need better waveforms search technique: matched templates Supernovae / GRBs: “bursts” burst signals in coincidence with signals in electromagnetic radiation prompt alarm (~ one hour) with neutrino detectors Pulsars in our galaxy: “periodic” search for observed neutron stars (frequency, doppler shift) all sky search (computing challenge) r-modes Cosmological Signal “stochastic background”

Detection of Burst Sources Known sources -- Supernovae & GRBs Coincidence with observed electromagnetic observations. No close supernovae occurred during the first science run Second science run – We analyzed the very bright and close GRB030329 Unknown phenomena Emission of short transients of gravitational radiation of unknown waveform (e.g. black hole mergers).

Time-domain high pass filter ‘Unmodeled’ Bursts search for waveforms from sources for which we cannot currently make an accurate prediction of the waveform shape. GOAL METHODS ‘Raw Data’ Time-domain high pass filter Time-Frequency Plane Search ‘TFCLUSTERS’ Pure Time-Domain Search ‘SLOPE’ frequency time 8Hz 0.125s

Coincidences and Efficiency

Directed Burst Sources

GRB030359

Astrophysical Sources signatures Compact binary inspiral: “chirps” NS-NS waveforms are well described BH-BH need better waveforms search technique: matched templates Supernovae / GRBs: “bursts” burst signals in coincidence with signals in electromagnetic radiation prompt alarm (~ one hour) with neutrino detectors Pulsars in our galaxy: “periodic” search for observed neutron stars (frequency, doppler shift) all sky search (computing challenge) r-modes Cosmological Signal “stochastic background”

Detection of Periodic Sources Pulsars in our galaxy: “periodic” search for observed neutron stars all sky search (computing challenge) r-modes Frequency modulation of signal due to Earth’s motion relative to the Solar System Barycenter, intrinsic frequency changes. Amplitude modulation due to the detector’s antenna pattern.

Two Search Methods Frequency domain Time domain Best suited for large parameter space searches Maximum likelihood detection method + Frequentist approach Time domain Best suited to target known objects, even if phase evolution is complicated Bayesian approach First science run --- use both pipelines for the same search for cross-checking and validation

at present sensitivities Directed Searches NO DETECTION EXPECTED at present sensitivities Crab Pulsar Limits of detectability for rotating NS with equatorial ellipticity e = dI/Izz: 10-3 , 10-4 , 10-5 @ 8.5 kpc. PSR J1939+2134 1283.86 Hz

The Data time behavior days days days days

The Data frequency behavior Hz Hz Hz Hz

Summary of S2 results limits on strain J1939+2134 S2 J1910 – 5959D: h0 = 1.7 x 10-24 Crab pulsar h95 1 PDF strain Marginalized Bayesian PDF for h Red dots: pulsars are in globular clusters - cluster dynamics hide intrinsic spin-down properties Blue dots: field pulsars for which spin-downs are known

Directed Pulsar Search 28 Radio Sources

Detection of Periodic Sources Known Pulsars in our galaxy Frequency modulation of signal due to Earth’s motion relative to the Solar System Barycenter, intrinsic frequency changes. NEW RESULT 28 known pulsars NO gravitational waves e < 10-5 – 10-6 (no mountains > 10 cm Amplitude modulation due to the detector’s antenna pattern. ALL SKY SEARCH enormous computing challenge

Summary S2 results - ellipticity limits Best upper-limits: J1910 – 5959D: h0 < 1.7 x 10-24 J2124 – 3358:  < 4.5 x 10-6 How far are S2 results from spin-down limit? Crab: ~ 30X EM spin-down upper-limits LIGO upper-limits from hmax J1939+2134 S1 S2 Red dots: pulsars are in globular clusters - cluster dynamics hide intrinsic spin-down properties Blue dots: field pulsars for which spin-downs are known

LIGO Pulsar Search using home pc’s Einstein@Home LIGO Pulsar Search using home pc’s BRUCE ALLEN Project Leader Univ of Wisconsin Milwaukee LIGO, UWM, AEI, APS http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu

Astrophysical Sources signatures Compact binary inspiral: “chirps” NS-NS waveforms are well described BH-BH need better waveforms search technique: matched templates Supernovae / GRBs: “bursts” burst signals in coincidence with signals in electromagnetic radiation prompt alarm (~ one hour) with neutrino detectors Pulsars in our galaxy: “periodic” search for observed neutron stars (frequency, doppler shift) all sky search (computing challenge) r-modes Cosmological Signal “stochastic background”

Signals from the Early Universe stochastic background Cosmic Microwave background WMAP 2003

Signals from the Early Universe Strength specified by ratio of energy density in GWs to total energy density needed to close the universe: Detect by cross-correlating output of two GW detectors: First LIGO Science Data Hanford - Livingston

Results – Stochastic Backgrounds

from the Early Universe Gravitational Waves from the Early Universe E7 results projected S1 S2 LIGO Adv LIGO

Advanced LIGO improved subsystems Multiple Suspensions Active Seismic Improved Optics Higher Power Laser

Advanced LIGO Cubic Law for “Window” on the Universe Improve amplitude sensitivity by a factor of 10x… …number of sources goes up 1000x! Virgo cluster Advanced LIGO Initial LIGO Today

optical configuration Advanced LIGO 2007 + Enhanced Systems laser suspension seismic isolation test mass Rate Improvement ~ 104 + narrow band optical configuration

LIGO Construction is complete & commissioning almost complete New upper limits for neutron binary inspirals, a fast pulsar and stochastic backgrounds have been achieved from the first short science runs Sensitivity improvements are rapid -- second data run was 10x more sensitive and 4x duration and results are beginning to be reported ----- (e.g. improved pulsar searches) Enhanced detectors will be installed in ~ 5 years, further increasing sensitivity Direct detection should be achieved and gravitational-wave astronomy begun within the next decade !

Gravitational Wave Astronomy LIGO will provide a new way to view the dynamics of the Universe