How to Translate Knowledge in Three States: Discovery, Invention, Innovation Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
KT for TT – Ensuring Technology- based R&D matters to Stakeholders
Advertisements

Acknowledgements Funding Partners:University at Buffalo (UB) & National Disability Authority (NDA Project Mentors:Prof. Joe Lane (UB), Dr. Ger Craddock(CEUD/NDA)
Begin with Knowledge Translation; Have the End – Technology Transfer – in Mind Begin with Knowledge Translation; Have the End – Technology Transfer – in.
Contextualized Knowledge Translation Packages for Technology Transfer and Product Development ATIA Orlando, Florida January 2012 James A. Leahy Center.
Overview of Technology Transfer Process RERC on Technology Transfer University at Buffalo.
Achieving Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer: Implications for Evaluation Presenter: Vathsala I. Stone University at Buffalo/
TTO Role in University / Corporate Partnership
Getting from Knowledge to Action: Effectively communicating Research & Development value to multiple Stakeholder Groups. Joseph Lane & John Westbrook RESNA.
Innovation in Universal Design “Universal integration of research, education, innovation and enterprise at DIT GrangeGorman” Joseph P. Lane, University.
Need to Knowledge Model: A framework for achieving market Innovations through sponsored R&D Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology.
KT for TT – Ensuring Use and Impact from Technology R&D Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University at Buffalo.
Industry – The missing link between S&T Policy and Societal Benefit. Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University.
From Theory to Practice: Operationalizing Knowledge Translation for Successful AT Commercialization Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for.
Technology Transfer for KT Practitioners
Winning your next proposal: “Buzz Tactics” to increase the chances of success Joseph Lane, Jennifer Flagg, James Leahy Center on Knowledge Translation.
Best Practices in Technology Transfer Jennifer L Flagg Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University at Buffalo.
KT for AT: Knowledge Translation Tools for R&D Projects Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
Expanding Product Accessibility with Primary Market Research Techniques Jennifer L Flagg Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer, University.
Product Development & Planning. After we have: Come up with a conceptual product idea Profiled our target market (“customer”) It is time to move on to.
Microsoft Office Project 2003: Selling EPM in your Organization Matt Wilson Business Solutions Specialist LMR Solutions.
Tools for Technical, Business & Consumer Analysis in AT Product Development: Expanding the Need to Knowledge Model Joseph P. Lane, Center on KT4TT University.
Managing & Communicating Knowledge in Three States Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer School.
Stages of Development (SoD) National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) Copyright National Institute on.
Analytic Tools: Ensuring industry relevance for university-based R&D projects intending transfer. Joseph P. Lane & James Condron Center on Knowledge Translation.
Bridging the Evidence Gap: Level Of Knowledge Use Survey - LOKUS as a Validated Instrument Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology.
Bridging the Deliverable Gap: Improving Government’s approach to innovation intending social benefit. Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for.
The Case for Industry Leadership in STI Policy Implementation. Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
Knowledge Translation Conference KT Solutions for Overcoming Barriers to Research Use Hosted by SEDL’s Center on Knowledge Translation for Disability and.
The KT4TT Knowledge Base: Steps and Supporting Evidence to Improve Your Process! Webcast sponsored by SEDL September 29, 2010, 2:00 pm (Central) / 3:00.
Technology Transfer Principles: Methods, Knowledge States and Value Systems Underlying Successful Technological Innovation Joseph P. Lane, Director Center.
Is One Minute Madness?? Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University at Buffalo.
Evidence-based Management of R&D Projects Intending Market Deployment Joseph P. Lane, Director Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer.
Stages of Research and Development
Lecture 1. Basic definitions
Technological Design VS Engineering Design
Knowledge Translation Outcome Measurement
Four Models to Guide AT Projects Intending Innovative Technology Development Outcomes Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer.
A prospective study of the translational process in the technology development and transfer projects of NIDILRR’s technology grantees: a qualitative study.
Where do Market Innovations come from? Not the Stork!
Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
From Theory to Practice: Operationalizing Knowledge Translation for Successful AT Commercialization Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation.
KT for AT: Knowledge Translation Tools for R&D Projects
Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
The Social Model for A/T Technology Transfer – AAATE 2010 “From Problem Identification to Social Validation: An Operational Model” Joseph P. Lane,
Bridging the Deliverable Gap: Improving Government’s approach to innovation intending social benefit. Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation.
Need to Knowledge Model: A framework for achieving market Innovations through sponsored R&D Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology.
Translating New Knowledge from Technology Based Research Projects: an End-of-Grant Intervention Evaluation Study. Rationale and Methods Vathsala I. Stone.
Managing & Communicating Knowledge in Three States
Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
Joseph P. Lane, University at Buffalo
A prospective study of the translational process in the technology development and transfer projects of NIDILRR’s technology grantees: a qualitative study.
Expanding Product Accessibility with Primary Market Research Techniques Jennifer L Flagg Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer, University.
Four Models to Guide AT Projects Intending Innovative Technology Development Outcomes Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer.
Tools for Technical, Business & Consumer Analysis in AT Product Development: Expanding the Need to Knowledge Model Joseph P. Lane, Center on KT4TT.
Joseph P. Lane & James Condron
Joseph Lane & John Westbrook
Industry – The missing link between S&T Policy and Societal Benefit.
Best Practices in Technology Transfer
Three States of Knowledge in Technological Innovation
The Case for Industry Leadership in STI Policy Implementation.
AEA Annual Meeting , Nov , 2009 Achieving Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer: Implications for Evaluation Presenter: Vathsala I. Stone.
Is One Minute Madness?? Joseph P. Lane
RESNA 2018 Annual Conference
Knowledge Translation Across RERC Activities
Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
Reconciling Government Policies and Programs with Public Expectations: The Case of Innovation in AT Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation.
Knowledge Utility results from Rigor in Methods & Relevance in Content
The Need to Knowledge (NtK) Model: Orienting Scholar “Technology Grantees” to Best Practices in Transfer & Commercialization Joseph P. Lane, Director.
Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
Presentation transcript:

How to Translate Knowledge in Three States: Discovery, Invention, Innovation Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University at Buffalo

“Translating Three States of Knowledge: Discovery, Invention & Innovation” Lane & Flagg (2010) Implementation Science

Need to Knowledge (NtK) Model Based on CIHR KTA Model. Technology-based efforts intending impact MUST begin with a validated problem (need) and a feasible solution. Actors “need to know” stakeholders and context prior to initiating any project. Solution integrate Discovery, Invention and Innovation outputs.

Need to Knowledge (NtK) Model Model shows Phases, Stages, Steps, Tasks and Tips. Supported by primary/secondary findings from a scoping review of 250+ research and practice articles. model.phphttp://kt4tt.buffalo.edu/knowledgebase/ model.php

Three States of Knowledge Knowledge in each state requires a different approach to Knowledge Translation. Translating knowledge in all three states increases stakeholder opportunities for knowledge awareness, interest and use. Use may occur in short or long term.

Phases Stages and Gates Discovery (Research) Stage 1: Define Problem & Solution Stage 2: Scoping Stage 3: Conduct Research and Generate Discoveries – Discovery Output Prototype (Development) KTA – Knowledge in Discovery State Stage 4: Build Business Case and Plan for Development Stage 5: Implement Development Plan Stage 6: Testing and Validation – Invention Output Innovation (Production) KTA – Knowledge in Invention State (Proprietary & Non-Proprietary) Stage 7: Plan and for Production Stage 8: Launch Device or Service – Innovation Output KTA – Knowledge in Innovation State (Sales & Marketing) Stage 9: Life-Cycle Review / Terminate?

Discovery State of Knowledge Research = Knowledge Creation. Process - New knowledge discovery results from empirical exploration. Value – Novelty in first articulation and contribution to knowledge base. Output – Discovery State – conceptual idea embodied as publication.

Invention State of Knowledge Development = Knowledge Application. Process - Invention results from trial and error experimentation. Value – Novelty + Feasibility embodied proof of concept. Output – Invention State - embodied as tangible proof-of concept prototype.

Innovation State of Knowledge Production = Knowledge Codification. Process – Innovation results from systematic specification of attributes. Value – Novelty and Feasibility + Utility to producers and consumers. Output – Innovation State - embodied as functional device or service.

Takeaway Points: *There is now an operational model for the Innovation Process validated by research and practice literature. * Considering knowledge in three states has implications for practice, policy and communication.

Acknowledgement This is a presentation of the Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer, which is funded by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, U.S. Department of Education under grant #H133A The opinions contained in this presentation are those of the grantee, and do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Department of Education.