IMPROVE data meeting, Seattle, WA, 13 July 2005 Recent NWP results from IMPROVE Greg Thompson, Roy Rasmussen, Bill Hall, Kyoko Ikeda (NCAR-RAL), Axel Seifert.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R. Forbes, 17 Nov 09 ECMWF Clouds and Radiation University of Reading ECMWF Cloud and Radiation Parametrization: Recent Activities Richard Forbes, Maike.
Advertisements

WMO International Cloud Modeling Workshop, July 2004 A two-moment microphysical scheme for mesoscale and microscale cloud resolving models Axel Seifert.
Jaekwan Shim, Yoon-Jeong Hwang, Yeon-Hee Kim, Kwan-Young Chung Forecast Research Division, National Institute of Meteorological Research, KMA The Experiments.
15th Annual WRF Users’ Workshop
Daily runs and real time assimilation during the COPS campaign with AROME Pierre Brousseau, Y. Seity, G. Hello, S. Malardel, C. Fisher, L. Berre, T. Montemerle,
The Impacts of Positive Definite Moisture Advection and Microphysical Advances in Orography Robert Hahn & Cliff Mass University of Washington.
The Impacts of Positive Definite Moisture Advection and Microphysical Advances in Orography Robert Hahn & Cliff Mass University of Washington.
Preparing for the OLYMPEX Field Campaign: Challenges of observing heavy rain and snow in remote regions of the Olympic Mountains Joe Zagrodnik.
      Brian A. Colle*, Yanluan Lin*, Justin B. Wolfe*, W. James David E. Kingsmill +, Mark Stoelinga, and Chris Woods # *Stony Brook.
Univ of Washington 03 Apr 2006 A New Bulk Microphysical Parameterization in MM5 & WRF Greg Thompson, Paul Field, Roy Rasmussen, Bill Hall and what’s so.
Predicting lightning density in Mediterranean storms based on the WRF model dynamic and microphysical fields Yoav Yair 1, Barry Lynn 1, Colin Price 2,
Three Dimensional SBM in MM5 Two Case Studies: Florida Simulation of Sea Breeze (7/27/91): Comparison with FTMS, TMIS California: Orographic Precipitation.
Hector simulation We found simulation largely depending on: Model initialization scheme Lateral boundary conditions Physical processes represented in the.
Motivation Sensitivity of Precipitation to Aerosol Concentration. (Based partly on 2 d results). Theory: Precipitation occurring in a “maritime” airmass.
Orographic triggering and mesoscale organization of extreme storms in subtropical South America Kristen Lani Rasmussen Robert A. Houze, Jr. ICAM 2013,
Microphysics Parameterizations 1 Nov 2010 (“Sub” for next 2 lectures) Wendi Kaufeld.
The National Environmental Agency of Georgia L. Megrelidze, N. Kutaladze, Kh. Kokosadze NWP Local Area Models’ Failure in Simulation of Eastern Invasion.
Microphysics complexity in squall line simulations. As high-resolution climate models increasingly turn towards an explicit representation of convection,
In this work we present results of cloud electrification obtained with the RAMS model that includes the process of charge separation between ice particles.
Thompson Runs Precipitation Comparison John D. McMillen.
Simulations with the MesoNH model from 27 August 2005 to 29 August 2005 (6UTC) performed by Meteo-France CNRM Nicole Asencio See powerpoint comments associated.
Ground Deicing Update Scott Landolt, Roy Rasmussen and Jenny Black.
The IOP6 (24 September 2012) heavy precipitation event over Southern France: observational and model analysis Lagouvardos, K. (1), Kotroni, V. (1), Bousquet.
Dynamical downscaling of historical and projected winter precipitation in the Wasatch Range (for the CI-WATER project) Court Strong, Jim Steenburgh, Trevor.
WMO workshop, Hamburg, July, 2004 Some aspects of the STERAO case study simulated by Méso-NH by Jean-Pierre PINTY, Céline MARI Christelle BARTHE and Jean-Pierre.
GOES-R ABI Synthetic Imagery at 3.9 and 2.25 µm 24Feb2015 Poster 2 Louie Grasso, Yoo-Jeong Noh CIRA/Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
Update on model development Meteo-France Meteo-France CLOUDNET workshop - Exeter 5-6/04/2004 François Bouyssel.
Experiences with 0-36 h Explicit Convective Forecasting with the WRF-ARW Model Morris Weisman (Wei Wang, Chris Davis) NCAR/MMM WSN05 September 8, 2005.
1 Model Representation of Freezing and Melting: Anticipation of Model- Dependent Thermal Biases or Why Melting Snow Made Me Happy as a Child (without me.
CCN effects on numerically simulated mixed-phase convective storms with Klaus D. Beheng, University Karlsruhe, Germany Alexander Khain, Hebrew University.
Ed Maurer Partitioning precipitation into rain and snow for event-based hydrologic modeling in the Pacific Northwest U.S. Edwin Maurer Civil Engineering.
A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional Climate and Weather. Zhang, D.-L., W.-Z. Zheng, and Y.-K. Xue, 2003: A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional.
Edward Mansell National Severe Storms Laboratory Donald MacGorman and Conrad Ziegler National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, OK Funding sources in the.
Three real case simulations by Meso-NH validated against satellite observations J.-P. Chaboureau and J.-P. Pinty Laboratoire d’Aérologie, Toulouse 1.Elbe.
WRF Version 2: Physics Update Jimy Dudhia NCAR/MMM.
Hurricane Karl’s landfall as seen by high-resolution radar data and WRF Jennifer DeHart and Robert Houze Cyclone Workshop NASA grants: NNX13AG71G.
Progress Update of Numerical Simulation for OSSE Project Yongzuo Li 11/18/2008.
An Investigation of the Mesoscale Predictability over the Northeast U.S.        Brian A. Colle, Matthew Jones, and Joseph Olson Institute for Terrestrial.
Meteorologisches Institut der Universitat Munchen A shallow convection case from BBC: Results from the WMO international cloud modelling workshop Nicole.
Module 17 MM5: Climate Simulation BREAK. Regional Climate Simulation for the Pan-Arctic using MM5 William J. Gutowski, Jr., Helin Wei, Charles Vörösmarty,
 Federal Aviation Administration’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on certification of aircraft for operation in supercooled large drop (SLD) icing conditions.
August 6, 2001Presented to MIT/LL The LAPS “hot start” Initializing mesoscale forecast models with active cloud and precipitation processes Paul Schultz.
COSMO General Meeting 2008, Krakow Modifications to the COSMO-Model Cumulus Parameterisation Scheme (Tiedtke 1989): Implementation and Testing Dimitrii.
Control Run Precipitation Comparison John D. McMillen.
Impact of Cloud Microphysics on the Development of Trailing Stratiform Precipitation in a Simulated Squall Line: Comparison of One- and Two-Moment Schemes.
1 Detailed Microphysical Model Simulations of Freezing Drizzle Formation Istvan Geresdi Roy Rasmussen University of Pecs, Hungary NCAR Research funded.
Part II: Implementation of a New Snow Parameterization EXPLICIT FORECASTS OF WINTER PRECIPITATION USING AN IMPROVED BULK MICROPHYSICS SCHEME Thompson G.,
QUEST-Meeting, 14. Dez. 2007, Offenbach Das neue COSMO-EU Mikrophysikschema: Validierung von Eisgehalten Axel Seifert Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach.
B3. Microphysical Processes
Sensitivity to the Representation of Microphysical Processes in Numerical Simulations during Tropical Storm Formation Penny, A. B., P. A. Harr, and J.
Parameterization of Cloud Microphysics Based on the Prediction of Bulk Ice Particle Properties. Part II: Case Study Comparisons with Observations and Other.
Daniel M. Alrick 14th Cyclone Workshop Monday, September 22, 2008
WRF model runs of 2 and 3 August
Relevant publications
QPF sensitivity to Runge-Kutta and Leapfrog core
Evaluating Cloud Microphysical Schemes in Simulating Orographic Precipitation Events Using OLYMPEX Field Experiment Observations Brian A. Colle1 and Aaron.
Simulation of the Arctic Mixed-Phase Clouds
Verification of dynamically downscaled results around Japan Islands
TAIWIN model verification task
Water Budget of Typhoon Nari(2001)
University of Washington Modeling Infrastructure Available for Olympex
Three-category ice scheme
Robert Conrick, Qi Zhong, and Cliff Mass
452 Precipitation.
Seong Soo Yum1, Wonheung Kim1, Jae-In Song1 and Chang Ki Kim2
Daniel M. Alrick 14th Cyclone Workshop Monday, September 22, 2008
Concurrent Sensitivities of an Idealized Deep Convective Storm to Parameterization of Microphysics, Horizontal Grid Resolution, and Environmental Static.
Rita Roberts and Jim Wilson National Center for Atmospheric Research
Cliff Mass and David Ovens University of Washington
A Multiscale Numerical Study of Hurricane Andrew (1992)
Presentation transcript:

IMPROVE data meeting, Seattle, WA, 13 July 2005 Recent NWP results from IMPROVE Greg Thompson, Roy Rasmussen, Bill Hall, Kyoko Ikeda (NCAR-RAL), Axel Seifert (Germany), Istvan Geresdi (Pecs, Hungary), Efforts to improve the bulk microphysical parameterization in MM5, RUC, and WRF models (plus excursions into PBL parameterizations)

IMPROVE data meeting, Seattle, WA, 13 July 2005 List of MM5 case studies used as a baseline 14 Feb 1990 (WISP) shallow, post-frontal, upslope cloud w/widespread FZDZ. 30 Jan 1998 (NASA-SLDRP) shallow stratoCu, primarily CLW w/slight FZDZ. 04 Feb 1998 (NASA-SLDRP) deep and dynamic snowstorm w/classic FZRA. 01 Feb 2001 (IMPROVE-1) deep PacNW wide cold-frontal rainband system. 28 Nov 2001 (IMPROVE-2) deep PacNW frontal system plus orographics. 13 Dec 2001 (IMPROVE-2) deep PacNW frontal system plus orographics. Thompson, G. and B. C. Bernstein, 2005: Explicit forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved bulk microphysics scheme. Part II: Case studies. Mon. Wea. Rev., in preparation.

IMPROVE data meeting, Seattle, WA, 13 July 2005 IMPROVE-1 case: 1-2 Feb 2001 major simulation flaw in timing of the front: MM5 is nearly 3 hours too fast with landfall (0z)

IMPROVE data meeting, Seattle, WA, 13 July Feb 2001 moderate simulation flaw in stength of LLJ: MM5 is 5-10 m s -1 too weak around mb

IMPROVE data meeting, Seattle, WA, 13 July 2005 Thermodynamics: 1-2 Feb 2001

IMPROVE data meeting, Seattle, WA, 13 July 2005 Microphysics: 1-2 Feb 2001 KHQM Cloud ice (purple) Snow (blue) Rain (green) Graupel (red) Cloud water (green) g/kg melting Cloud water (shaded) sample microphysical variables plot

IMPROVE data meeting, Seattle, WA, 13 July 2005 IMPROVE-2 case: Dec 2001

IMPROVE data meeting, Seattle, WA, 13 July 2005 Thermodynamics: Dec 2001

IMPROVE data meeting, Seattle, WA, 13 July z 13 Dec 12z 14 Dec 13z 14z 15z 16z 17z 18z 19z 20z 21z 22z 23z 00z 01z 02z 03z 04z 05z 06z 07z 08z 09z 10z 11z Potential corruption by snow Santiam Pass bad data after 1500 local time PARSL site (Sisters, OR) KOTH - North Bend KEUG - Eugene KSLE - Salem KCVO - Corvallis Falls Creek Jump-off Joe Corbett and S.P. minimum 60 mm Dec 2001: Observed precipitation PARSL site (Sisters, OR) KSLE - Salem

IMPROVE data meeting, Seattle, WA, 13 July 2005 Grid 3/4 (4/1.3 km spacing) precip accum

IMPROVE data meeting, Seattle, WA, 13 July 2005 Microphysics: Dec 2001

IMPROVE data meeting, Seattle, WA, 13 July 2005 Pre, inter, post-frontal

IMPROVE data meeting, Seattle, WA, 13 July 2005 WMO Cloud Modeling Workshop Istvan Geresdi bin microphys Bill Hall R-T; 2-moment snow; S&B autoconv. Jean-Pierre Chaboureau 2-moment MesoNH Axel Seifert 2-moment WRF Winfried Straub 2-moment Seifert in KAMM2 WMO International Cloud Modeling Workshop Every 4 years July 2004 in Hamburg, Germany “Case #3” Dec 2001 IMPROVE-2 case study All modelers use provided datasets Intercompare model results Variety of bulk micro param and one bin model Effect of changing autoconversion only (6-hr precip)

IMPROVE data meeting, Seattle, WA, 13 July 2005 Summary and future work 2D simulations bulk scheme tuned to Geresdi’s bin/explicit model comparisons to other bulk models (Seifert, Hall, …) 3D case studies numerous cases from variety of field projects different precip formation mechanisms different geographic regions (continental/maritime) Future work verification data especially other IMPROVE cases other bulk species (aggregates) or 2-moments? WRF model simulations AIRS-2 cases other field projects?

IMPROVE data meeting, Seattle, WA, 13 July 2005empty