G030513-00-D Calibration of the LIGO Interferometer Using the Recoil of Photons Justice Bruursema Mentor: Daniel Sigg.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beyond The Standard Quantum Limit B. W. Barr Institute for Gravitational Research University of Glasgow.
Advertisements

Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
Measuring film thickness using Opti-Probe
Laser Speckle Extensometer ME 53
USE OF GEANT4 FOR LHCB RICH SIMULATION S. Easo, RAL, LHCB AND ITS RICH DETECTORS. TESTBEAM DATA FOR LHCB-RICH. OVERVIEW OF GEANT4 SIMULATION.
One Arm Cavity M0 L1 L2 TM M0 L1 L2 TRIPLE QUAD 16m R = 20m, T=1% R = ∞, T=1%  Optimally coupled cavity (no mode matched light reflected back)  Finesse.
Measuring the Speed of Light! Photonic partners: David Orenstein Anuta Bezryadina Nathan Burd.
Chapter2: Light and EM Spectrum 18.1 The Electromagnetic Spectrum 18.2 Interference, Diffraction, and Polarization 18.3 Special Relativity Professor Mohammad.
G v1Squeezed Light Interferometry1 Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection July 6, 2012 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory.
1. What is Lighting? 2 Example 1. Find the cubic polynomial or that passes through the four points and satisfies 1.As a photon Metal Insulator.
SURVEYING II UNIT IV PRESENTATION II.
Transportation of Ultra-Stable Light via Optical Fiber Emily Conant Bard College, California Institute of Technology Mentors: Evan Hall, Rana Adhikari,
LiCAS Project: FSI Overview Richard Bingham, Edward Botcherby, Paul Coe, John Green, Grzegorz Grzelak, Ankush Mitra, John Nixon, Armin Reichold University.
G D 1 LIGO-????????? Photon Calibration System (PhotonCal)
LIGO-G E LIGO Laboratory1 Simulating the LIGO Laser Phase Change Resulting from Gravitational Waves Simulate GW generation and detection Make.
LIGO-G W Proposed LHO Commissioning Activities in May 02 Fred Raab 29 Apr 02.
Marcus Benna, University of Cambridge Wavefront Sensing in Dual-Recycled Interferometers LIGO What is Wavefront Sensing? How does it work? –Detection of.
Investigation of Variations in the Absolute Calibration of the Laser Power Sensors for the LIGO Photon Calibrators Stephanie Erickson (Smith College) Mentor:
Measurement of the laser beam profile at PSL to Mode Cleaner interface for the 40 Meter Prototype Interferometer A table of contents 1. Introduction 1.1.
Marcus Benna, University of Cambridge Wavefront Sensing in Dual-Recycled Interferometers LIGO What is Wavefront Sensing? How does it work? –Detection of.
Modulation and Demodulation
Chapter One Characteristics of Instrumentation بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
Eric Perry.  Since speeding in auto mobiles is so common in everyday life, people decided to use technology to help the drivers get away with it.  Detectors.
GWADW 2010 in Kyoto, May 19, Development for Observation and Reduction of Radiation Pressure Noise T. Mori, S. Ballmer, K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata,
G R DC Readout for Advanced LIGO P Fritschel LSC meeting Hannover, 21 August 2003.
Thermal noise issues Chinyere Ifeoma Nwabugwu Louisiana State University August 05, 2005 Eric Black, Akira Villar, Kenneth G. Libbrecht, Kate Dooley, Royal.
Optical readout for a resonant gw bar. Old setup.
Test mass dynamics with optical springs proposed experiments at Gingin Chunnong Zhao (University of Western Australia) Thanks to ACIGA members Stefan Danilishin.
GEO‘s experience with Signal Recycling Harald Lück Perugia,
Mikael Siltanen,1 Markus Metsälä,1
Toby Shoobridge David Benham NERC Space Geodesy Facility Herstmonceux, UK
LIGO-G D Enhanced LIGO Kate Dooley University of Florida On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SESAPS Nov. 1, 2008.
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
04. November 2004 A. Freise A. Freise, M. Loupias Collaboration Meeting November 04, 2004 Alignment Status.
Displacement calibration techniques for the LIGO detectors Evan Goetz (University of Michigan)‏ for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration April 2008 APS meeting.
LIGO-G D “First Lock” for the LIGO Detectors 20 October 2000 LIGO Hanford Observatory Stan Whitcomb.
1 Wan Wu, Volker Quetschke, Ira Thorpe, Rodrigo Delgadillo, Guido Mueller, David Reitze, and David Tanner Noise associated with the EOM in Advanced LIGO.
Photo-thermal Deflection Spectroscopy George Noid LIGO SURF Student.
1 Thermal noise and high order Laguerre-Gauss modes J-Y. Vinet, B. Mours, E. Tournefier GWADW meeting, Isola d’Elba May 27 th – Jun 2 nd, 2006.
Status of the Advanced LIGO PSL development LSC meeting, Baton Rouge March 2007 G Z Benno Willke for the PSL team.
CALIBRATION Erwin Pilch Prevessin Site, F CERN CEDEX, FrancUniversity of Technology Graz, Austria 9 th August
LIGO-G09xxxxx-v1 Form F v1 Development of a Low Noise External Cavity Diode Laser in the Littrow Configuration Chloe Ling LIGO SURF 2013 Mentors:
Calibration in the Front End Controls Craig Cahillane LIGO Caltech SURF 2013 Mentors: Alan Weinstein, Jamie Rollins Presentation to Calibration Group 8/21/2013.
Opto-mechanics with a 50 ng membrane Henning Kaufer, A. Sawadsky, R. Moghadas Nia, D.Friedrich, T. Westphal, K. Yamamoto and R. Schnabel GWADW 2012,
AOS: Photon Calibrator Technical Status
First DR FFT Results on Advanced LIGO Using Perfect and Imperfect Optics By Ken Ganezer, George Jennings, and Sam Wiley CSUDH LIGO-G Z by Ken.
Hartmann Sensor for advanced gravitational wave interferometers
Charles University Prague Charles University Prague Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics Absolute charge measurements using laser setup Pavel Bažant,
By Dr. Hong Zhang For Freshman Engineering Clinic.
Development of a Readout Scheme for High Frequency Gravitational Waves Jared Markowitz Mentors: Rick Savage Paul Schwinberg Paul Schwinberg.
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
Advanced LIGO UK 1 LIGO-G K OSEM Development UK Advanced LIGO project Stuart Aston University of Birmingham for the UK Advanced LIGO Team LSC.
Hartmann Wavefront Sensing for the Gingin Experiment Aidan Brooks, Peter Veitch, Jesper Munch Department of Physics, University of Adelaide LSC, LLO Mar.
10-meter Interferometer Results M. Woods (special thanks to Steve Myers and Tim Slaton) Jan. 31, 2000 Commissioning Setup System Noise Monte Carlo simulation.
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment Rainer Weiss, MIT On behalf of the proposing group Fermi Lab Proposal Review November 3, 2009.
Development of a Readout Scheme for High Frequency Gravitational Waves Jared Markowitz Mentors: Rick Savage Paul Schwinberg.
H1 Squeezing Experiment: the path to an Advanced Squeezer
Advanced-LIGO optical lever progress
UNIT-3 ADVANCES IN METROLOGY
Peter Beyersdorf TAMA300 Results from the Stanford 10m all-reflective polarization Sagnac interferometer Peter Beyersdorf TAMA300.
Progress toward squeeze injection in Enhanced LIGO
Photon Calibrator Investigations During S6
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
Measuring the Speed of Light!
Developing Remote Controls for the Motorized Polarization Controller in LHO’s Arm Length Stabilization System Caroline Martin Mentor: Daniel Sigg SURF.
“Traditional” treatment of quantum noise
Paige Thielen, ME535 Spring 2018
LIGO Interferometry CLEO/QELS Joint Symposium on Gravitational Wave Detection, Baltimore, May 24, 2005 Daniel Sigg.
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
LIGO Photon Calibrators
Presentation transcript:

G D Calibration of the LIGO Interferometer Using the Recoil of Photons Justice Bruursema Mentor: Daniel Sigg

G D Motivation The Photon Calibrator has been developed to provide a physically independent means of evaluating systematic errors in order to analyze the interferometer’s strain signal correctly. Using it, we can apply a known force at a specified time to one of the end mirrors and see how the gravitational- wave readout channel responds. My job involves analyzing, installing and implementing this device into the interferometer system here at LIGO.

G D How Photon Calibration Works 1.Bounce am amplitude-modulated beam off one of the end mirrors 2.Measure the displacement introduced by radiation pressure 3.Compare the measured displacement to the expected reaction: 4.The precision of the “expected reaction” depends only on the incident angle and the photoreceiver calibration 5.This process gives both timing and amplitude calibrations

G D Laser 500mW Nd:YLF at 1047nm Pumped by a laser diode at 808nm Polarizer Ensures an accurate photoreceiver calibration AOM Modulates the beam power Photoreceiver Indicates the power of the beam Key Components The new design:

G D Beam Profiling The first beam splitter effectively dumps excess pump diode light A lens was necessary in order to shoot the laser through the AOM A lens is also used to clean up the beam that strikes the end mirror (at a distance of 228 inches) Beam Splitter Reflectance (courtesy cvilaser.com) : Beam behind the first BS Beam that strikes the end mirror – approximately 6-7mm in diameter

G D Modulation The original method of modulation was to vary the laser diode current This was found to be not working and an AOM is now used instead The old design: An AOM (Acousto-Optic Modulator) deflects a portion of a beam that passes through it. The intensity of the deflected beam depends on the amplitude of an applied RF signal. Currently, we achieve between 50% to 60% modulation

G D Calibrations The photoreceiver calibration is essential to retrieving meaningful data from the photon calibrator There should be a linear relationship between the photoreceiver voltage signal and the power of the beam exiting the box. The exact slope of this relationship depends slightly on the alignment of all the components

G D Installation and Implementation The photon calibrator was installed at the X arm end station The laser was aligned to strike the end mirror A DAQ channel was connected in order to retrieve the internal photoreceiver signal A function generator was set up temporarily for an input signal Only interferometer lock is necessary for capturing data

G D Results We have observed that the mirror is definitely being driven by the photon calibrator, currently at 113 Hz for 100mW rms beam power Calculations estimate the mirror’s displacement to be about meters Calculations from the photon calibrator data estimate the background noise of the interferometer to be about 2· meters

G D Future Work Different AOM’s should be investigated in order to achieve deeper modulation and cause less beam distortion An AWG channel needs to be setup at and connected to the photon calibrator Measurements of the mirror response should be taken as the laser is aligned at different points on the mirror Comparisons should be made between the photon calibrator’s excitation of the mirror and an excitation through the LSC system

G D The End Thanks to: Rick Savage, Richard McCarthy and Josh Myers for their help Special thanks to: Daniel Sigg & Doug Cook for their work with me