Ethical Guidelines for Research with Human Participants

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Human Subjects Research at the University of Michigan
Advertisements

Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
University Research Ethics Committee Workshop on procedure and data protection issues 30th May 2008.
Making Sense of the Social World 4th Edition
Ethical Considerations when Developing Human Research Protocols A discipline “born in scandal and reared in protectionism” Carol Levine, 1988.
Behavioral Research Chapter Three Ethical Research.
TODAY’S TOPIC: Ethics – deconstructing consent and participation with “vulnerable” populations.
Evaluating Risk 1 IRB CELT Presentation Colleen Donaldson – IRB Administrator Julie Wilkens – IRB Coordinator.
Human Subjects & Research Understanding the protection of human subjects, HSRC, and the nature of the process.
THE ETHICS OF HUMAN PARTICIPANT RESEARCH Office for Research Protections The Pennsylvania State University.
Pediatric Ethics Subcommittee of Pediatric Advisory Committee, September 10, 2004 Analysis of Research Protocols Involving Children: Combining Subparts.
Ethical Principles and Guidelines for Research Involving Human Subjects Based on guidelines from the University of North Carolina Institutional Review.
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.
Scientific Data Management for the Protection of Human Subjects Robert R. Downs NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC) Center for International.
Ethical Issues in Research
Human Subject Research Ethics
Human Subject Research by Students at William Paterson University May 2011.
1 Wheaton College INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB)
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Ethics and Informed Consent
Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
Regulatory criteria for approval Bob Craig, July 2007.
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HISTORY AND ETHICS. 2 Ethical History : Holocaust : Nuremburg Trials 1964: Declaration of Helsinki :
Risk by Richard R. Riker MD Vice-Chair, IRB Maine Medical Center.
Human Research Protection Program 101 July 19-20, 2007 Milwaukee, WI.
Teaching Research Methods (Classroom Protocols) Boston University Charles River Campus Boston University Medical Center Mary A. Banks BS, BSN IRB Director.
1 Protection of Vulnerable Subjects in Research Melody Lin, Ph.D. December 2012.
University of North Carolina at Greensboro Protecting Research Participants.
Chapter 18 Ethical Precautions in Music Therapy Research.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) What is our Purpose and Role for Ethical Research.
Making Sense of the Social World 4th Edition
Ethics Ethics Applied to Research. Ethics in Nursing Research Scientific Misconduct – a fabrication, falsification, plagiarism or other practice that.
Research Ethics. Ethics From the Greek word, “Ethos” meaning character From the Greek word, “Ethos” meaning character Implies a judgment of character.
Theoretical and Conceptual Framework. THEORY Theory is: a generalized abstraction about the relationship between two or more concepts a systematic abstract.
Dustin Yocum, MA Institutional Review Board University of Illinois HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
Ethics Ethics Applied to Research Back to Class 2.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
Donna B. Konradi, DNS, RN, CNE GERO 586 Understanding the Ethics of Research.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Ann Billetz, Ph.D. 11/6/09. Excerpt from MCLA’s IRB policy.
Copyright © 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 7 Generating Research Evidence Ethically.
 What is an IRB and why do we need one at Western?  Who needs to submit proposals to the IRB?  If approved, how long is your proposal good for?  Is.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 7 Ethics in Nursing Research.
Chapter 2: Ethical Issues in Program Evaluation. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) Federal mandate for IRBs –Concern during 1970s about unethical research.
Copyright c 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.1 Chapter 5 Research Ethics All researchers, even students, have a responsibility to conduct ethical research.
 The purpose of IRB is to ensure the rights of research subjects are protected  In accordance with the ethical standards of the U.S. Department of Health.
Research Ethics Dr Nichola Seare Aston Health Research & Innovation Cluster.
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
Chapter 3: Ethical guidelines for psychological research.
The Protection of Human Participants in Research
Protection of Human Subjects In Research
Chapter 5 Research Ethics
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
© 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
IRB BASICS: Ethics and Human Subject Protections
IRB The purpose of IRB is to ensure the rights of research subjects are protected In accordance with the ethical standards of the U.S. Department of Health.
Today’s Agenda: Ethics Cont. HW: Read & 1.6 (1.5 optional…)
Ethical Considerations
Intro to Projects – Research with Human Subjects
Greg Nezat CRNA, PhD CDR/NC/USN Chairman, IRB II
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP)
Ethics Review Morals: Rules that define what is right and wrong Ethics: process of examining moral standards and looking at how we should interpret and.
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations on Expedited Review
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Interviewer Research Ethics
Presentation transcript:

Ethical Guidelines for Research with Human Participants July 2003

Guiding Principles Autonomy: respect individual’s right to decide freely whether to participate Beneficence: maximize benefits and minimize harm to participants Justice: access to participation in research studies must be equitable (e.g., risks should not be borne disproportionately by the disadvantaged)

Autonomy Informed Consent Protect participants’ privacy and confidentiality

Informed Consent Defined: voluntary choice of an individual to participate in research based on an accurate understanding of it’s purposes, procedures, risks, benefits, and any other factors that may affect a person’s decision to participate.

Informed Consent Participants must read and sign an informed consent form prior to their participation in any type of data collection activity. Minor children (under the age of 18) must give assent to participate and a parent/guardian must sign a consent form.

Informed Consent Form Describes the research to be conducted Describes the reasonably foreseeable risks Describes the expected benefits (if any) Explains how participant’s confidentiality will be protected Provides name and phone number of person to contact if there are questions/concerns Explains the VOLUNTARY nature of the project and the participant’s right to withdraw at any time without penalty.

Protect participants’ privacy and confidentiality Is there risk of criminal prosecution or loss of employment if the individual participates in the research project? Is the participant willing to have his/her identity associated with the data provided to the researcher?

How to protect privacy and confidentiality of participants Do not ask for the participant’s name or any other identifying information (i.e., keep your data collection anonymous) Remove participant’s name from data after it is collected and assign a number or pseudonym Store data in locked file cabinet and/or encrypted in an electronic data file

Beneficence Maximize benefits: does the research have scientific merit? Minimize harm to participants: does the research involve risk? What is the risk/benefit ratio?

Minimal Risk Defined: the probability and magnitude of harm or discomfort anticipated in the research are not greater than those ordinarily encountered in daily life or during the performance of routine physical or psychological examinations or tests

Examples of Potential Risks Physical: bodily injury or death Psychological: emotional disturbance, impairment of cognitive functioning Social: exposure to criminal penalties/litigation, loss of job or social standing

Examples of Potential Benefits Improved physical/mental health of participants and other people Increased scientific understanding of topic under study Participant exposed to state of the art technology

Justice Access to participation in research studies must be equitable Historically the risks have been borne disproportionately by the disadvantaged and the benefits realized by the privileged Researchers must give serious consideration to their subject selection process Who is included? Why? Who is excluded? Why?

Recruiting participants Participation must be truly voluntary—avoid coercion or undue influence Selection must be equitable--is there a scientific reason for excluding non-English speaking participants or is it just more convenient for the researcher? Recruiting from special populations (children, pregnant women, prisoners, mentally handicapped) requires extra safeguards

Institution Review Board (IRB) Established at each organization that conducts research with human participants Composed of faculty members with different backgrounds (some scientific, some not) Reviews applications from researchers who plan to collect data from humans

The IRB evaluates proposed research projects by considering: The potential risks to participants and whether the researcher has taken the necessary steps to minimize these risks The potential benefits to participants and society—do they outweigh the risks? The participant selection process—is it equitable? The completeness and readability of the informed consent form

The IRB monitors ongoing research projects Have any undesirable and/or unintended experiences (adverse events) resulted from a subject’s participation in a research study? Is the researcher in compliance with IRB regulations? These regulations are based on Federal laws governing the treatment of human participants in research projects.

Review of principles guiding the treatment of research participants Autonomy Informed consent Privacy and confidentiality Beneficence: Risk/benefit analysis Scientific merit Justice: Subject selection process