Methodology for Adaptive Treatment Strategies R21 DA019800 S.A. Murphy For MCATS Oct. 8, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Piloting and Sizing Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials in Dynamic Treatment Regime Development 2012 Atlantic Causal Inference Conference.
Advertisements

Treatment Effect Heterogeneity & Dynamic Treatment Regime Development S.A. Murphy.
11 Confidence Intervals, Q-Learning and Dynamic Treatment Regimes S.A. Murphy Time for Causality – Bristol April, 2012 TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read.
Experimental Trials. Oslin ExTENd Late Trigger for Nonresponse 8 wks Response TDM + Naltrexone CBI Random assignment: CBI +Naltrexone Nonresponse Early.
Using Clinical Trial Data to Construct Policies for Guiding Clinical Decision Making S. Murphy & J. Pineau American Control Conference Special Session.
Adaptive Treatment Strategies in the Addictions: Current Examples and Future Directions James R. McKay, Ph.D. Professor of Psychology in Psychiatry University.
Experimenting to Improve Clinical Practice S.A. Murphy AAAS, 02/15/13 TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.:
1 Developing Dynamic Treatment Regimes for Chronic Disorders S.A. Murphy Univ. of Michigan RAND: August, 2005.
1 Dynamic Treatment Regimes Advances and Open Problems S.A. Murphy ICSPRAR-2008.
1 Developing Adaptive Treatment Strategies using MOST Experimental Designs S.A. Murphy Univ. of Michigan Dallas: December, 2005.
Methodology for Adaptive Treatment Strategies for Chronic Disorders: Focus on Pain S.A. Murphy NIH Pain Consortium 5 th Annual Symposium on Advances in.
Experiments and Dynamic Treatment Regimes S.A. Murphy Univ. of Michigan JSM: August, 2005.
SMART Designs for Constructing Adaptive Treatment Strategies S.A. Murphy 15th Annual Duke Nicotine Research Conference September, 2009.
Substance Abuse, Multi-Stage Decisions, Generalization Error How are they connected?! S.A. Murphy Univ. of Michigan CMU, Nov., 2004.
An Experimental Paradigm for Developing Dynamic Treatment Regimes S.A. Murphy Univ. of Michigan March, 2004.
Constructing Dynamic Treatment Regimes & STAR*D S.A. Murphy ICSA June 2008.
1 Dynamic Treatment Regimens S.A. Murphy PolMeth XXV July 10, 2008.
SMART Designs for Developing Adaptive Treatment Strategies S.A. Murphy K. Lynch, J. McKay, D. Oslin & T.Ten Have CPDD June, 2005.
Dynamic Treatment Regimes: Challenges in Data Analysis S.A. Murphy Survey Research Center January, 2009.
Sizing a Trial for the Development of Adaptive Treatment Strategies Alena I. Oetting The Society for Clinical Trials, 29th Annual Meeting St. Louis, MO.
SMART Experimental Designs for Developing Adaptive Treatment Strategies S.A. Murphy NIDA DESPR February, 2007.
Hypothesis Testing and Dynamic Treatment Regimes S.A. Murphy Schering-Plough Workshop May 2007 TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before.
Michigan Team February, Amy Wagaman Bibhas Chakraborty Herle McGowan Susan Murphy Lacey Gunter Danny Almirall Anne Buu.
An Experimental Paradigm for Developing Adaptive Treatment Strategies S.A. Murphy Univ. of Michigan UNC: November, 2003.
Experiments and Dynamic Treatment Regimes S.A. Murphy Univ. of Michigan PSU, October, 2005 In Honor of Clifford C. Clogg.
Planning Survival Analysis Studies of Dynamic Treatment Regimes Z. Li & S.A. Murphy UNC October, 2009.
Statistical Issues in Developing Adaptive Treatment Strategies for Chronic Disorders S.A. Murphy Univ. of Michigan CDC/ATSDR: March, 2005.
SMART Experimental Designs for Developing Adaptive Treatment Strategies S.A. Murphy RWJ Clinical Scholars Program, UMich April, 2007.
Hypothesis Testing and Dynamic Treatment Regimes S.A. Murphy, L. Gunter & B. Chakraborty ENAR March 2007.
1 Meeting the Future in Managing Chronic Disorders: Individually Tailored Strategies S.A. Murphy Herbert E. Robbins Collegiate Professorship in Statistics.
1 SMART Designs for Developing Adaptive Treatment Strategies S.A. Murphy K. Lynch, J. McKay, D. Oslin & T.Ten Have UMichSpline February, 2006.
Dynamic Treatment Regimes, STAR*D & Voting D. Lizotte, E. Laber & S. Murphy ENAR March 2009.
SMART Designs for Advancing mHealth Adaptive Interventions S.A. Murphy mHealth Evidence Workshop August, 2011.
An Experimental Paradigm for Developing Adaptive Treatment Strategies S.A. Murphy Univ. of Michigan ACSIR, July, 2003.
An Experimental Paradigm for Developing Adaptive Treatment Strategies S.A. Murphy Univ. of Michigan February, 2004.
Methods for Estimating the Decision Rules in Dynamic Treatment Regimes S.A. Murphy Univ. of Michigan IBC/ASC: July, 2004.
1 Possible Roles for Reinforcement Learning in Clinical Research S.A. Murphy November 14, 2007.
SMART Designs for Developing Dynamic Treatment Regimes S.A. Murphy MD Anderson December 2006.
Exploratory Analyses Aimed at Generating Proposals for Individualizing and Adapting Treatment S.A. Murphy BPRU, Hopkins September 22, 2009.
SMART Experimental Designs for Developing Adaptive Treatment Strategies S.A. Murphy ISCTM, 2007.
1 Section IV Study Designs for Investigating Adaptive Treatment Strategies Murphy.
Experiments and Adaptive Treatment Strategies S.A. Murphy Univ. of Michigan Chicago: May, 2005.
Susan Murphy, PI University of Michigan Acknowledgements: MCAT network and NIH The Goal To facilitate methodological collaborations necessary for producing.
1 Dynamic Treatment Regimes: Interventions for Chronic Conditions (such as Poverty or Criminality?) S.A. Murphy Univ. of Michigan In Honor of Clifford.
SMART Designs for Developing Dynamic Treatment Regimes S.A. Murphy Symposium on Causal Inference Johns Hopkins, January, 2006.
Experiments and Dynamic Treatment Regimes S.A. Murphy At NIAID, BRB December, 2007.
1 Machine/Reinforcement Learning in Clinical Research S.A. Murphy May 19, 2008.
Adaptive Treatment Strategies S.A. Murphy CCNIA Proposal Meeting 2008.
Adaptive Treatment Strategies S.A. Murphy Workshop on Adaptive Treatment Strategies Convergence, 2008.
Practical Application of Adaptive Treatment Strategies in Trial Design and Analysis S.A. Murphy Center for Clinical Trials Network Classroom Series April.
Hypothesis Testing and Adaptive Treatment Strategies S.A. Murphy SCT May 2007.
Adaptive Treatment Design and Analysis S.A. Murphy TRC, UPenn April, 2007.
Adaptive Treatment Strategies: Challenges in Data Analysis S.A. Murphy NY State Psychiatric Institute February, 2009.
1 Meeting the Future in Managing Chronic Disorders: Individually Tailored Strategies S.A. Murphy Univ. of Michigan In Honor of Clifford C. Clogg.
Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trials and Treatment Policies S.A. Murphy UAlberta, 09/28/12 TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint.
The Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness Trial
Overview of Adaptive Treatment Regimes Sachiko Miyahara Dr. Abdus Wahed.
Stat Club 327 Thomas February 18, 2015 Bethany C. Bray Outreach Director, The Methodology Center Research Assistant Professor, College of HHD.
SMART Case Studies Module 3—Day 1 Getting SMART About Developing Individualized Adaptive Health Interventions Methods Work, Chicago, Illinois, June
Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trials and Treatment Policies S.A. Murphy MUCMD, 08/10/12 TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual.
Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trials Module 2—Day 1 Getting SMART About Developing Individualized Adaptive Health Interventions Methods Work,
Raymond F. Anton, MD for The COMBINE Study Research Group
Adaptive Treatment Strategies Module 1—Day 1 Getting SMART About Developing Individualized Adaptive Health Interventions Methods Work, Chicago, Illinois,
CJ411-Seminar 8 What are the major treatment strategies currently used for drug and alcohol abuse?
1 SMART Designs for Developing Adaptive Treatment Strategies S.A. Murphy K. Lynch, J. McKay, D. Oslin & T.Ten Have NDRI April, 2006.
Motivation Using SMART research designs to improve individualized treatments Alena Scott 1, Janet Levy 3, and Susan Murphy 1,2 Institute for Social Research.
An Experimental Paradigm for Developing Adaptive Treatment Strategies S.A. Murphy NIDA Meeting on Treatment and Recovery Processes January, 2004.
Designing An Adaptive Treatment Susan A. Murphy Univ. of Michigan Joint with Linda Collins & Karen Bierman Pennsylvania State Univ.
SMART Trials for Developing Adaptive Treatment Strategies S.A. Murphy Workshop on Adaptive Treatment Designs NCDEU, 2006.
University of Michigan, Biostatistics
Presentation transcript:

Methodology for Adaptive Treatment Strategies R21 DA S.A. Murphy For MCATS Oct. 8, 2009

2 Overview Network involving computer scientists, engineers, physicians (mental health, infectious disease, substance abuse ), psychologists and statisticians. Goal: Identify major challenges & kick-start collaborations leading to longer term research initiatives Two workshops; white paper; special issue of Drug and Alcohol Dependence in 2007 September August 2006

3 Some Consequences A number of funded grants: R01s and a P01 Many papers + book by J. McKay : Treating Substance Use Disorders With Adaptive Continuing Care. Summer program (2007) for computer scientists, engineers and statisticians at the Statistical and Applied Mathematical Sciences Institute. Clinical trials designed to inform adaptive treatment strategies

4 Adaptive Treatment Strategies operationalize multi- stage decision making. These are individually tailored sequences of treatments, with treatment type and dosage adapted to the individual. Generalization from a one-time decision to a sequence of decisions concerning treatments Operationalize clinical practice. Each decision corresponds to a stage of treatment

Adaptive Drug Court Program

Critical Questions What is the best sequencing of treatments? Which treatment to provide first, second? What is the best timings of alterations in treatments? What information do we use to make these decisions? (how do we individualize the sequence of treatments?)

7 Methodological Innovations New experimental designs for comparing and constructing adaptive treatment strategies: SMART Transfer/generalization of data analysis methods for multi-stage decision making from the fields of computer science and engineering: Q-Learning

SMART Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial These are multi-stage trials; individuals move through multiple stages of treatment and are initially randomized and then re-randomized at each stage. Each stage corresponds to a critical decision.

SMART Precursors of the SMART design: CATIE (2001), STAR*D (2003), many in cancer SMART designs: Treatment of Alcohol Dependence (Oslin, data analysis; NIAAA) Treatment of ADHD (Pelham, data analysis ; IES) Treatment of Drug Abusing Pregnant Women (Jones, in field; NIDA) Treatment of Autism (Kasari, in field; Foundation) Treatment of Alcoholism (McKay, in field; NIAAA) Treatment of Prostate Cancer (Millikan, 2007)

Alcohol Dependence (Oslin; NIAAA) Late Trigger for Nonresponse 8 wks Response TDM + Naltrexone CBI Random assignment: CBI +Naltrexone Nonresponse Early Trigger for Nonresponse Random assignment: Naltrexone 8 wks Response Random assignment: CBI +Naltrexone CBI TDM + Naltrexone Naltrexone Nonresponse

Does improving adherence help? Late Trigger for Nonresponse 8 wks Response TDM + Naltrexone CBI Random assignment: CBI +Naltrexone Nonresponse Early Trigger for Nonresponse Random assignment: Naltrexone 8 wks Response Random assignment: CBI +Naltrexone CBI TDM + Naltrexone Naltrexone Nonresponse

Least Intensive vs Most Intensive Late Trigger for Nonresponse 8 wks Response TDM + Naltrexone CBI Random assignment: CBI +Naltrexone Nonresponse Early Trigger for Nonresponse Random assignment: Naltrexone 8 wks Response Random assignment: CBI +Naltrexone CBI TDM + Naltrexone Naltrexone Nonresponse

Drug-Addicted Pregnant Women (Jones; NIDA) rRBT 2 wks Response rRBT tRBT Random assignment: rRBT Nonresponse tRBT Random assignment: aRBT 2 wks Response Random assignment: eRBT tRBT rRBT Nonresponse

ADHD (Pelham, IES) B. Begin low dose medication 8 weeks Assess- Adequate response? B1. Continue, reassess monthly; randomize if deteriorate B2. Increase dose of medication with monthly changes as needed Random assignment: B3. Add BEMOD treatment with adaptive Modifications based on impairment; medication dose remains stable No A. Begin low-intensity behavior modification 8 weeks Assess- Adequate response? A1. Continue, reassess monthly; randomize if deteriorate A2. Add medication; BEMOD remains stable but medication dose may vary Random assignment: A3. Increase intensity of BEMOD with adaptive modifi- cations based on impairment Yes No Random assignment:

15 Q-Learning is used to constructing proposals for more deeply tailored adaptive treatment strategies Q stands for “Quality of Treatment” Q-Learning is a generalization of regression to multistage treatment

16 Example of Q-Learning output (CATIE) Begin with Olanzapine If non-responder then If preference is to try for efficacy improvement then If PANSS > 94 then switch to Clozapine Else switch to either Quetiapine or Risperidone If preference is to try for tolerable med. then If Olanzapine was not tolerable then switch to Risperidone If Olanzapine was not efficacious then switch to Quetiapine PANSS: Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale

17 Acknowledgements: This presentation is based on work with MCAT members as well as many individuals including Linda Collins, Dave Oslin, Joelle Pineau, John Rush and Scott Stroup. address: Slides with notes at: Click on seminars > health science seminars

18 Why use an Adaptive Treatment Strategy? –High heterogeneity in response to any one intervention What works for one person may not work for another What works now for a person may not work later –Improvement often marred by relapse Remitted or few current symptoms is not the same as cured. –Co-occurring disorders/adherence problems are common