Overview of Navy Operational and Research SST Activities James Cummings Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA Doug May and Bruce McKenzie Naval Oceanographic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Crown copyright Met Office Implementing a diurnal model at the Met Office James While, Matthew Martin.
Advertisements

Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting
OSTIA : Transition to an Operational System John Stark, Craig Donlon. GlobColour / Medspiration Workshop, 4-6 Dec
Improvements to the NOAA Geostationary Sea Surface Temperature Product Suite Eileen Maturi, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR Andy Harris, Jonathan Mittaz, Prabhat Koner.
ROMS User Workshop, October 2, 2007, Los Angeles
15 May 2009ACSPO v1.10 GAC1 ACSPO upgrade to v1.10 Effective Date: 04 March 2009 Sasha Ignatov, XingMing Liang, Yury Kihai, Boris Petrenko, John Stroup.
© The Aerospace Corporation 2014 Observation Impact on WRF Model Forecast Accuracy over Southwest Asia Michael D. McAtee Environmental Satellite Systems.
Data Assimilation Andrew Collard. Overview Introduction to Atmospheric Data Assimilation Control Variables Observations Background Error Covariance Summary.
2. Description of MIIDAPS 1. Introduction A Generalized Approach to Microwave Satellite Data Assimilation Quality Control and Preprocessing Here, we present.
A thermodynamic model for estimating sea and lake ice thickness with optical satellite data Student presentation for GGS656 Sanmei Li April 17, 2012.
1 Evaluation of two global HYCOM 1/12º hindcasts in the Mediterranean Sea Cedric Sommen 1 In collaboration with Alexandra Bozec 2 and Eric Chassignet 2.
TRMM Tropical Rainfall Measurement (Mission). Why TRMM? n Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) is a joint US-Japan study initiated in 1997 to study.
Satellite SST Radiance Assimilation and SST Data Impacts James Cummings Naval Research Laboratory Monterey, CA Sea Surface Temperature Science.
ECMWF CO 2 Data Assimilation at ECMWF Richard Engelen European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Reading, United Kingdom Many thanks to Phil Watts,
NRL modeling during ONR Monterey Bay 2006 experiment. Igor Shulman, Clark Rowley, Stephanie Anderson, John Kindle Naval Research Laboratory, SSC Sergio.
Surface Skin Temperatures Observed from IR and Microwave Satellite Measurements Catherine Prigent, CNRS, LERMA, Observatoire de Paris, France Filipe Aires,
Improved NCEP SST Analysis
Data assimilation of polar orbiting satellites at ECMWF
Recent activities on utilization of microwave imager data in the JMA NWP system - Preparation for AMSR2 data assimilation - Masahiro Kazumori Japan Meteorological.
MISST FY1 team meeting April 5-6, Miami, FL NOAA: Gary Wick, Eric Bayler, Ken Casey, Andy Harris, Tim Mavor Navy: Bruce Mckenzie, Charlie Barron NASA:
Ensemble-variational sea ice data assimilation Anna Shlyaeva, Mark Buehner, Alain Caya, Data Assimilation and Satellite Meteorology Research Jean-Francois.
Applications and Limitations of Satellite Data Professor Ming-Dah Chou January 3, 2005 Department of Atmospheric Sciences National Taiwan University.
Modeling study of the coastal upwelling system of the Monterey Bay area during 1999 and I. Shulman (1), J.D. Paduan (2), L. K. Rosenfeld (2), S.
MODIS Sea-Surface Temperatures for GHRSST-PP Robert H. Evans & Peter J. Minnett Otis Brown, Erica Key, Goshka Szczodrak, Kay Kilpatrick, Warner Baringer,
Status and Progress of NCODA Assimilation in HYCOM James A. Cummings Naval Research Laboratory 11 th HYCOM Consortium Meeting Stennis Space Center, Mississippi.
© Crown copyright Met Office Plans for Met Office contribution to SMOS+STORM Evolution James Cotton & Pete Francis, Satellite Applications, Met Office,
Assimilating Retrievals of Sea Surface Temperature from VIIRS and AMSR2 Bruce Brasnett and Dorina Surcel Colan CMDE November 21, 2014 Brasnett, B. and.
Satellite-derived Sea Surface Temperatures Corey Farley Remote Sensing May 8, 2002.
NCODA Variational Ocean Data Assimilation System (NCODA v3.5) James Cummings Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA GODAE Ocean View / CLIVAR GSOP Workshop.
Potential impact of HF radar and gliders on ocean forecast system Peter Oke June 2009 CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research.
The I nverse R egional O cean M odeling S ystem Development and Application to Variational Data Assimilation of Coastal Mesoscale Eddies. Di Lorenzo, E.
USE OF AIRS/AMSU DATA FOR WEATHER AND CLIMATE RESEARCH Joel Susskind University of Maryland May 12, 2005.
Overview of the NRL Coupled Ocean Data Assimilation System James Cummings and Rich Hodur Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA HYCOM Ocean Model Workshop.
AIRS Radiance and Geophysical Products: Methodology and Validation Mitch Goldberg, Larry McMillin NOAA/NESDIS Walter Wolf, Lihang Zhou, Yanni Qu and M.
The Application of Observation Adjoint Sensitivity to Satellite Assimilation Problems Nancy L. Baker Naval Research Laboratory Monterey, CA.
A Generalized Approach to Microwave Satellite Data Assimilation Quality Control and Preprocessing Kevin Garrett 1 and Sid Boukabara 2 11 th JCSDA Science.
Investigations of Artifacts in the ISCCP Datasets William B. Rossow July 2006.
Chelle L. Gentemann & Peter J. Minnett Introduction to the upper ocean thermal structure Diurnal models M-AERI data Examples of diurnal warming Conclusions.
The Hyperspectral Environmental Suite (HES) and Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) will be flown on the next generation of NOAA Geostationary Operational Environmental.
MIIDAPS Application to GSI for QC and Dynamic Emissivity in Passive Microwave Data Assimilation.
AQUA AMSR-E MODIS POES AVHRR TRMM TMI ENVISAT AATSR GOES Imager Multi-sensor Improved SST (MISST) for GODAE Part I: Chelle Gentemann, Gary Wick Part II:
Considerations for the Physical Inversion of Cloudy Radiometric Satellite Observations.
Visible optical depth,  Optically thicker clouds correlate with colder tops Ship tracks Note, retrievals done on cloudy pixels which are spatially uniform.
Satellites Storm “Since the early 1960s, virtually all areas of the atmospheric sciences have been revolutionized by the development and application of.
© Crown copyright Met Office Assimilating cloud affected infrared radiances at the Met Office Ed Pavelin and Roger Saunders, Met Office, Exeter.
Application of HYCOM in Eddy- Resolving Global Ocean Prediction Community Effort: Community Effort: NRL, Florida State, U. of Miami, GISS, NOAA/NCEP, NOAA/AOML,
A step toward operational use of AMSR-E horizontal polarized radiance in JMA global data assimilation system Masahiro Kazumori Numerical Prediction Division.
Impact of Blended MW-IR SST Analyses on NAVY Numerical Weather Prediction and Atmospheric Data Assimilation James Cummings, James Goerss, Nancy Baker Naval.
Infrared and Microwave Remote Sensing of Sea Surface Temperature Gary A. Wick NOAA Environmental Technology Laboratory January 14, 2004.
HYCOM/NCODA Variational Ocean Data Assimilation System James Cummings Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA GODAE Ocean View III Meeting November.
Demonstration and Comparison of Sequential Approaches for Altimeter Data Assimilation in HYCOM A. Srinivasan, E. P. Chassignet, O. M. Smedstad, C. Thacker,
TS 15 The Great Salt Lake System ASLO 2005 Aquatic Sciences Meeting Climatology and Variability of Satellite-derived Temperature of the Great Salt Lake.
HYCOM data assimilation Short term: ▪ Improve current OI based technique Assimilate satellite data (tracks) directly Improve vertical projection technique.
GHRSST HL_TAG meeting Copenhagen, March 2010 Validation of L2P products in the Arctic Motivation: Consistent inter-satellite validation of L2p SST observations.
The MODIS SST hypercube is a multi-dimensional look up table of SST retrieval uncertainty, bias and standard deviation, determined from comprehensive analysis.
AQUA AMSR-E MODIS POES AVHRR TRMM TMI ENVISAT AATSR GOES Imager Multi-sensor Improved SST (MISST) for GODAE Part I: Chelle Gentemann, Gary Wick Part II:
NASA, CGMS-44, 7 June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS LIMB CORRECTION OF POLAR- ORBITING IMAGERY FOR THE IMPROVED INTERPRETATION.
A comparison of AMSR-E and AATSR SST time-series A preliminary investigation into the effects of using cloud-cleared SST data as opposed to all-sky SST.
Use of high resolution global SST data in operational analysis and assimilation systems at the UK Met Office. Matt Martin, John Stark,
Mesoscale Assimilation of Rain-Affected Observations Clark Amerault National Research Council Postdoctoral Associate - Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey,
HYCOM and GODAE in Relation to Navy Ocean Prediction An Overview Presented by Harley Hurlburt Naval Research Laboratory Stennis Space Center, MS
2 Jun 09 UNCLASSIFIED 10th GHRSST Science Team Meeting Santa Rosa, CA 1 – 5 June Presented by Bruce McKenzie Charlie N. Barron, A.B. Kara, C. Rowley.
Radiance Simulation System for OSSE  Objectives  To evaluate the impact of observing system data under the context of numerical weather analysis and.
Roger A. Stocker 1 Jason E. Nachamkin 2 An overview of operational FNMOC mesoscale cloud forecast support 1 FNMOC: Fleet Numerical Meteorology & Oceanography.
© Crown copyright Met Office Assimilating infra-red sounder data over land John Eyre for Ed Pavelin Met Office, UK Acknowledgements: Brett Candy DAOS-WG,
The development of the NSST within the NCEP GFS/CFS
The impact of Argo data on ocean and climate forecasting
Rory Gray Development of a Dynamic Infrared Land Surface Emissivity Atlas based on IASI Retrievals Rory Gray
Intraseasonal latent heat flux based on satellite observations
NRL Coupled Model Activities
Presentation transcript:

Overview of Navy Operational and Research SST Activities James Cummings Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA Doug May and Bruce McKenzie Naval Oceanographic Office, Stennis Space Center, MS Sea Surface Temperature Science Team Meeting 8-10 November 2010 Seattle, WA

Talk Outline: 1.NAVOCEANO SST Activities SST retrievals SST uncertainty estimates 2.SST Analysis Capabilities and Products 3.NRL SST Activities aerosol contamination detection and correction physical SST retrievals diurnal skin SST model

MetOp-A AVHRR FRAC 15 million obs GOES-West 3.2 million obs N-19 AVHRR LAC 4.5 million obs GOES-East 2.1 million obs MetOp-A, N-18, N-19 AVHRR GAC 1.3 million obs NAVOCEANO Operational SST Daily Data Counts Total: 26.1 million retrievals/day

ENVISAT AATSR 18 million obsAQUA AMSRE 5 million obs MSG SEVIRI 2 million obs GHRSST SST Data Daily Data Counts Total: 25.0 million retrievals/day

Data latency is determined from start time of AVHRR GAC orbit to delivery time of processed SST retrievals NAVOCEANO AVHRR GAC SST Data Latency

Improved Daytime Equation Bias and RMSD Errors Relative to Drifting Buoys: NAVOCEANO METOP-A FRAC DayNight

NAVOCEANO Satellite SST Retrieval Errors Common Set of Drifting Buoy Match-ups used to Compute SST Retrieval Errors Across all Satellites

3DVAR – simultaneous analysis of 5 ocean variables: temperature, salinity, geopotential, u,v velocity components Ocean Model Ocean Data QC 3DVAR Raw Obs SST: NOAA (GAC, LAC), METOP (GAC, LAC), GOES, MSG, AATSR, AMSR-E, Ship/Buoy Profile Temp/Salt: XBT, CTD, Argo Float, Fixed/Drifting Buoy Altimeter SSH: Jason-1, Jason-2 Sea Ice: SSM/I, SSMIS, AMSR-E Ocean Gliders: T/S profiles Velocity: HF Radar, ADCP, Argo Trajectories, Surface Drifters, Gliders Innovations Increments Forecast Fields Prediction Errors First Guess Adaptive Sampling Guidance SensorsNCODA: QC + 3DVAR HYCOM or NCOM Navy Coupled Ocean Data Assimilation: operational at Navy centers (NAVO, FNMOC) Automated QC w/condition flags Data Flow through NCODA System

Variational Analysis System Components 3DVAR Analysis Error Ensemble Transform Assimilation Adjoint

Sea Ice SST Global 2DVAR Assimilation: 9 km grid, 6 hr cycle Analysis Increments Updated Field Navy Contribution to GHRSST Sea Ice and SST analysis fields and analysis errors since 2005

Variational Assimilation: Adaptive Data Thinning high density SST data averaged within spatially varying bins bins defined by background covariances – more (less) data thinning where length scales are long (short) takes into account observation error and SST water mass of origin Satellite & In Situ SSTThinned SST 10 km 200 km 10 km Scales Global 2DVAR GHRSST Analysis 6 hr update cycle

SST Covariance Options: flow dependence: correlations stretched and rotated along SST gradients distance from land: correlations spread along, not across, land boundaries Flow Dependent Land Distance Variational Assimilation: Covariances

Aerosol Plumes Obscure the Ocean Yellow Sea, Sea of Japan West Pacific Ocean Atlantic Ocean Tropical Atlantic Ocean Dust is optically active in the IR: elevated plumes appear cold Need to first detect and then correct aerosol contamination of SST retrievals

Navy Aerosol Analysis Prediction System (NAAPS) NAAPS February 2007 Optical Depth Sulfate Dust Smoke global semi-lagrangian aerosol transport model driven by global NWP model variational assimilation MODIS and MISR AOD multiple aerosol types: dust, smoke, sulfate, sea spray physical processes: a) emission from the surface b) boundary layer mixing and diffusion c) wind dispersion and advection d) atmospheric removal by wet and dry deposition Aerosol plume events are episodic, varying in strength, frequency, composition, altitude NAAPS provides time-dependent, spatially varying analyses to track aerosol plumes

discriminate among groups of SST retrievals contaminated by aerosols and SST retrievals free from aerosols B = between group and W = within group covariance matrices. Eigenvalues of W -1 B and eigenvectors ( ) are the canonical variates. predictors are AVHRR channel BTs and wavelength dependent NAAPS AOD components (x) projected onto r canonical variates SST is classified as contaminated if the Euclidean distance is closest to the contaminated group mean (μ j ) group assignment (k) is probabilistic (  2 ) – allows for uncertainties in NAAPS model predictions and satellite IR BTs Detection Aerosol Contamination: Canonical Variate Analysis

GroupDust Contamination SST Anomaly N 1None Weak Moderate Strong Canonical Variate Analysis applied to NAVO match-up data base for 1-10 July 2010 in tropical Atlantic four groups defined with different levels of dust loading first two canonical variates explain 98% of the variance strong contamination group shows cold SST anomalies relative to buoys

NAAPS Dust AOT at 500 nm (0.56 g/m 2 extinction) CRTM top-of-atmosphere BTs with and without NAAPS dust Correction Aerosol Contamination: CRTM Aerosol Module AVHRR/METOP-A Ch5 dust minus clear sky TOA BTs. Nadir view using Navy global NWP model (idealized case). Forward modeling results only, correction algorithm work in progress

Physical Satellite Skin SST Retrievals Two Step Process CRTM forward modeling: innovations of AVHRR BTs wrt NWP model BTs CRTM inverse modeling: sensitivities of SST BTs to model state vector and SST BT response to state perturbations incorporates impact of real atmosphere above the SST field removes atmospheric signals in the data assumes observed changes in SST BTs are due to 3 atmospheric model state variables: atmospheric water vapor content atmospheric temperature sea surface temperature

3 4 5 Forward Modeling with CRTM AVHRR Infrared Channels converts NOGAPS state vector to top of the atmosphere brightness temperatures (TOA BTs ) predicted AVHRR channels 3-5 TOA BTs from NOGAPS (left) METOP-A observed channel 5 BTs minus NOGAPS predicted TOA BTs (below)

Given BT innovations and sensitivities, solve 3x3 matrix problem: Inverse Modeling with CRTM Returns: (1) SST increment -  T sst (2) atmospheric temperature increment -  T atm (3) atmospheric moisture increment -  Q atm

Navy NWP Requirements for Physical Skin SST Skin vs. Bulk empirical SST algorithms compute bulk SST from drifting buoys skill limited to latitude / longitude range of buoy observations unknown sampling depth of drifting buoys (cm to m) daily averaged bulk SST analysis inadequate for NWP Navy atmospheric 4D-VAR rejects data from satellite sounding channels that peak at or near the surface Diurnal SST Cycle need to resolve ocean diurnal cycle essential weather variation required for physical SST assimilation (6-hr update cycle) diurnal SST influences NWP convection and mixing affects clouds, low level humidity, visibility, EM/EO propagation NWP model improvements lead directly to improvements in ocean circulation and wave models

*Zeng, X. and A. Beljaars (2005). Geophys. Res. Lett. 32. *Takaya, Y., J. Bidlot, A. Beljaars, and P. Janssen (2010). J. Geophys. Res forced by NOGAPS heat fluxes, solar radiation, surface stress called every model time step integrating NWP forcing over time compared skin SST with bulk SST control large regional differences found: 4  K instantaneous, 1  K on average skin-bulk SST differences persist in warm layers in some locations Skin SST Model* Embedded in NOGAPS Link to movie

Summary and Conclusions Navy Operations: NOAA/METOP/GOES SST data provider consistent SSES for all satellite SST observing systems range of SST assimilation activities: global, regional, coastal analysis-only, model based forecasting systems Navy Research and Development: physical SST retrieval algorithms aerosol contamination detection and (eventually) correction diurnal SST modeling, direct SST radiance assimilation Navy activities encompass many Science Team tasks

END

NAVOCEANO AVHRR Retrieval Process Overview AVHRR and HIRS 1b Input Day/Night Test Solar Zenith Angle Day/Night Test Solar Zenith Angle Satellite Zenith Angle Test Gross Cloud Test Land Test Create Unit Array Visible Cloud Threshold Test (daytime only) Uniformity Tests Thin Cirrus Test Low Stratus Test CH4 – CH5 Test SST Intercomparison Test Unreasonable SST Test Climatology Test HIRS/Field Test (nighttime only) Aerosol Test (nighttime only) Create SST