Keystroke Biometric Studies Keystroke Biometric Identification and Authentication on Long-Text Input Book chapter in Behavioral Biometrics for Human Identification.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Touch-Screen Mobile- Device Data Collection for Biometrics Studies W. Ciaurro, B. Major, D. Martinez, D. Panchal, G. Perez, M. Rana, R. Rana, R. Reyes,
Advertisements

A Comprehensive Study of the Usability of multiple Graphical Passwords SoumChowdhury (Presenter) Ron Poet Lewis Mackenzie 1 School of Computing Science.
Biometric Data Mining “A Data Mining Study of Mouse Movement, Stylometry, and Keystroke Biometric Data” Clara Eusebi, Cosmin Gilga, Deepa John, Andre Maisonave.
Fingerprint Minutiae Matching Algorithm using Distance Histogram of Neighborhood Presented By: Neeraj Sharma M.S. student, Dongseo University, Pusan South.
Behavior-based Authentication Systems
Designing a Multi-Biometric System to Fuse Classification Output of Several Pace University Biometric Systems Leigh Anne Clevenger, Laura Davis, Paola.
Detecting Computer Intrusions Using Behavioral Biometrics Ahmed Awad E. A, and Issa Traore University of Victoria PST’05 Oct 13,2005.
Service Discrimination and Audit File Reduction for Effective Intrusion Detection by Fernando Godínez (ITESM) In collaboration with Dieter Hutter (DFKI)
Research Experiment Design Sprint: Keystroke Biometric Intrusion Detection Ned Bakelman Advisor: Dr. Charles Tappert.
Team Members: Ana Caicedo Escobar Sandeep Indukuri Deepthi Tulasi Kevin Chan Under Esteemed Guidance of: Prof. Charles C Tappert Robert Zack.
Robert S. Zack May 8, 2010 METHODS OF DERIVING BIOMETRIC ROC CURVES FROM THE k-NN CLASSIFIER.
Research Experiment Design Sprint: Keystroke Biometric Intrusion Detection Ned Bakelman Advisor: Dr. Charles Tappert.
Keystroke Biometrics Study Software Engineering Project Team + DPS Student.
Mouse Movement Biometrics, Pace University, Fall'20071 Mouse Movement Biometrics Fall 2007 Capstone -Team Members Rafael Diaz Michael Lampe Nkem Ajufor.
Long Text Keystroke Biometrics Study Gary Bartolacci, Mary Curtin, Marc Katzenberg, Ngozi Nwana Sung-Hyuk Cha, Charles Tappert (Software Engineering Project.
Keystroke Biometric : ROC Experiments Team Abhishek Kanchan Priyanka Ranadive Sagar Desai Pooja Malhotra Ning Wang.
CS Team 5 Alex Wong Raheel Khan Rumeiz Hasseem Swati Bharati Biometric Authentication System.
Keystroke Biometric Studies Security Research at Pace Keystroke Biometric Drs. Charles Tappert and Allen Stix Seidenberg School of CSIS.
Keystroke Biometric Studies Assignment 2 – Review of the Literature Case Study – Keystroke Biometric Describe problem investigated (intro + abstract) Developed.
SOWK 6003 Social Work Research Week 10 Quantitative Data Analysis
Mouse Movement Project Customer: Larry Immohr Professor: Dr. Charles Tappert Team: Shinese Noble Anil Ramapanicker Pranav Shah Adam Weiss.
Ned Bakelman Advisor: Dr. Charles Tappert Research Experiment Design Sprint: Keystroke Biometric Intrusion Detection.
Robert S. Zack, Charles C. Tappert, and Sung-Hyuk Cha Pace University, New York Performance of a Long-Text-Input Keystroke Biometric Authentication System.
Biometric ROC Curves Methods of Deriving Biometric Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves from the Nearest Neighbor Classifier Robert Zack dissertation.
A User Verification System: Spring, 2002 Timely Problems, Novel Solutions Project Team Members: William Baker, Arthur Evans, Lisa Jordan, Saurabh Pethe.
Keystroke Biometric Studies Assignment 2 – Review of the Literature Case Study – Keystroke Biometric Describe the problem being investigated Build a case.
Keystroke Biometric Identification and Authentication on Long-Text Input Summary of eight years of research in this area Charles Tappert Seidenberg School.
Biometrics: Ear Recognition
Computer Vision Lecture 8 Performance Evaluation.
Handwriting Copybook Style Analysis Of Pseudo-Online Data Student and Faculty Research Day Mary L. Manfredi, Dr. Sung-Hyuk Cha, Dr. Charles Tappert, Dr.
© URENIO Research Unit 2004 URENIO Online Benchmarking Application Thessaloniki 7 th of October 2004 Isidoros Passas BEng Computer System Engineering.
Topics Covered: Data preparation Data preparation Data capturing Data capturing Data verification and validation Data verification and validation Data.
DARPA-BAA Proposal 2012 Active Authentication Technical POC: Dr. Charles Tappert Principal Investigators: Drs. Tappert, Cha, Chen, Grossman.
Computer Based Information Systems Control UAA – ACCT 316 – Fall 2003 Accounting Information Systems Dr. Fred Barbee.
Speaker Recognition By Afshan Hina.
Pattern Recognition: Baysian Decision Theory Charles Tappert Seidenberg School of CSIS, Pace University.
Introduction to Biometrics Charles Tappert Seidenberg School of CSIS, Pace University.
Keystroke Dynamics Etem DENİZ, Buğra KOCATÜRK, Gülşah YILDIZOĞLU, Ömer UZUN Boğaziçi University, CMPE, May 2010.
Understanding and Predicting Graded Search Satisfaction Tang Yuk Yu 1.
Evaluating a Research Report
Keystroke Biometric System Client: Dr. Mary Villani Instructor: Dr. Charles Tappert Team 4 Members: Michael Wuench ; Mingfei Bi ; Evelin Urbaez ; Shaji.
Keystroke Biometrics Studies on a Variety of Short and Long Text and Numeric Input Ned Bakelman, DPS Candidate Charles C. Tappert, PhD, Advisor Seidenberg.
User Authentication Using Keystroke Dynamics Jeff Hieb & Kunal Pharas ECE 614 Spring 2005 University of Louisville.
Selim Akyokus AIA /2/ AIA 2007 ENHANCED PASSWORD AUTENTICATION THROUGH KEYSTROKE TYPING CHARACTERISTICS Ozlem Guven(1), Selim Akyokus(1),
Keystroke Biometrics Studies on a Variety of Short and Long Text and Numeric Input Ned Bakelman, DPS Candidate Charles C. Tappert, PhD, Advisor Seidenberg.
1 Pattern Recognition Pattern recognition is: 1. A research area in which patterns in data are found, recognized, discovered, …whatever. 2. A catchall.
Second Line Intrusion Detection Using Personalization DISA Sponsored GWU-CS.
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
1st NRC Meeting, October 2006, Amsterdam 1 Data Management Procedures Preview of software used in ICCS Michael Jung, IEA Data Processing Center.
I can be You: Questioning the use of Keystroke Dynamics as Biometrics —Paper by Tey Chee Meng, Payas Gupta, Debin Gao Presented by: Kai Li Department of.
Login session using mouse biometrics A static authentication proposal using mouse biometrics Christopher Johnsrud Fullu 2008.
1 Iris Recognition Ying Sun AICIP Group Meeting November 3, 2006.
Objectives: Terminology Components The Design Cycle Resources: DHS Slides – Chapter 1 Glossary Java Applet URL:.../publications/courses/ece_8443/lectures/current/lecture_02.ppt.../publications/courses/ece_8443/lectures/current/lecture_02.ppt.
Typing Pattern Authentication Techniques 3 rd Quarter Luke Knepper.
I can be You: Questioning the use of Keystroke Dynamics as Biometrics Tey Chee Meng, Payas Gupta, Debin Gao Ke Chen.
Machine Learning in Practice Lecture 9 Carolyn Penstein Rosé Language Technologies Institute/ Human-Computer Interaction Institute.
Machine Learning in Practice Lecture 9 Carolyn Penstein Rosé Language Technologies Institute/ Human-Computer Interaction Institute.
Elizabeth Wood, Julio Zelaya, Eric Saari, Kenneth King, Mike Gupta, Nicola Howard, Sadia Ismat, Mary Angela Kane, Mark Naumowicz, Daniel Varela, and Mary.
Opinion spam and Analysis 소프트웨어공학 연구실 G 최효린 1 / 35.
Long-Text Keystroke Biometric Applications over the Internet Gary Bartolacci, Mary Curtin, Marc Katzenberg, Ngozi Nwana, Sung-Hyuk Cha, and Charles Tappert.
Using Hand Gestures for Alternative User Verification
Learning to Detect and Classify Malicious Executables in the Wild by J
Computer-User-Input Behavioral Biometrics Dr. Charles C
Keystroke Biometric Studies
Computer-User-Input Behavioral Biometrics The Biometrics we focus on at Pace University Dr. Charles C. Tappert Seidenberg School of CSIS, Pace University.
Keystroke Biometric System
Evaluation of a Stylometry System on Various Length Portions of Books
Multi-Biometrics: Fusing At The Classification Output Level Using Keystroke and Mouse Motion Features Todd Breuer, Paola Garcia Cardenas, Anu George, Hung.
Dynamic Authentication of Typing Patterns
Keystroke Recognition using Wi-Fi Signals
Presentation transcript:

Keystroke Biometric Studies Keystroke Biometric Identification and Authentication on Long-Text Input Book chapter in Behavioral Biometrics for Human Identification (2009), edited by Liang Wang and Xin Geng Authors Charles C. Tappert, Mary Villani, and Sung-Hyuk Cha Summarizes keystroke biometric work DPS dissertations 2 on identification, 1 on missing/incomplete data About 6 masters-level projects New material – authentication, longitudinal, touch-type model

Keystroke Biometric Studies Major Chapter Sections Introduction Keystroke Biometric System Experimental Design and Data Collection Experimental Results Conclusions and Future Work

Keystroke Biometric Studies Introduction Build a Case for Usefulness of Study Validate importance of study – applications Define keystroke biometric Appeal of keystroke over other biometrics Previous work on the keystroke biometric No direct study comparisons on same data Feature measurements Make case for using: data over the internet, long text input, free (arbitrary) text input Extends previous work by authors Summary of scope and methodology Summary of paper organization

Keystroke Biometric Studies Introduction Validate importance of study – applications Internet authentication application Authenticate (verify) student test-takers Internet identification application Identify perpetrators of inappropriate Internet security for other applications Important as more businesses move toward e-commerce

Keystroke Biometric Studies Introduction Define Keystroke Biometric The keystroke biometric is one of the less-studied behavioral biometrics Based on the idea that typing patterns are unique to individuals and difficult to duplicate

Keystroke Biometric Studies Introduction Appeal of Keystroke Biometric Not intrusive – data captured as users type Users type frequently for business/pleasure Inexpensive – keyboards are common No special equipment necessary Can continue to check ID with keystrokes after initial authentication As users continue to type

Keystroke Biometric Studies Introduction Previous Work on Keystroke Biometric One early study goes back to typewriter input Identification versus authentication Most studies were on authentication Two commercial products on hardening passwords Few on identification (more difficult problem) Short versus long text input Most studies used short input – passwords, names Few used long text input –copy or free text Other keystroke problems studies One study detected fatigue, stress, etc. Another detected ID change via monitoring

Keystroke Biometric Studies Introduction No Direct Study Comparisons on Same Data No comparisons on a standard data set (desirable, available for many biometric and pattern recognition problems) Rather, researchers collect their own data Nevertheless, literature optimistic of keystroke biometric potential for security

Keystroke Biometric Studies Introduction Feature Measurements Features derived from raw data Key press times and key release times Each keystroke provides small amount of data Data varies from different keyboards, different conditions, and different entered texts Using long text input allows Use of good (statistical) feature measurements Generalization over keyboards, conditions, etc.

Keystroke Biometric Studies Introduction Make Case for Using Data over the internet Required by applications Long text input More and better features Higher accuracy Free text input Required by applications Predefined copy texts unacceptable

Keystroke Biometric Studies Introduction Extends Previous Work by Authors Previous keystroke identification study Ideal conditions Fixed text and Same keyboard for enrollment and testing Less ideal conditions Free text input Different keyboards for enrollment and testing

Keystroke Biometric Studies Introduction Summary of Scope and Methodology Determine distinctiveness of keystroke patterns Two application types Identification (1-of-n problem) Authentication (yes/no problem) Two indep. variables (4 data quadrants) Keyboard type – desktop versus laptop Entry mode – copy versus free text

Keystroke Biometric Studies Keystroke Biometric System Raw keystroke data capture Feature extraction Classification for identification Classification for authentication

Keystroke Biometric Studies Keystroke Biometric System Raw Keystroke Data Capture

Keystroke Biometric Studies Keystroke Biometric System Raw Keystroke Data Capture

Keystroke Biometric Studies Keystroke Biometric System Feature Extraction Mostly statistical features Averages and standard deviations Key press times Transition times between keystroke pairs Individual keys and groups of keys – hierarchy Percentage features Percentage use of non-letter keys Percentage use of mouse clicks Input rates – average time/keystroke

Keystroke Biometric Studies Keystroke Biometric System Feature Extraction A two-key sequence (th) showing the two transition measures

Keystroke Biometric Studies Keystroke Biometric System Feature Extraction Hierarchy tree for the 39 duration categories

Keystroke Biometric Studies Keystroke Biometric System Feature Extraction Hierarchy tree for the 35 transition categories

Keystroke Biometric Studies Keystroke Biometric System Feature Extraction Fallback procedure for few/missing samples When the number of samples is less than a fallback threshold, take the weighted average of the key’s mean and the fallback mean

Keystroke Biometric Studies Keystroke Biometric System Feature Extraction Two preprocessing steps Outlier removal Remove duration and transition times > threshold Feature standardization Convert features into the range 0-1

Keystroke Biometric Studies Keystroke Biometric System Classification for Identification Nearest neighbor using Euclidean distance Compare a test sample against the training samples, and the author of the nearest training sample is identified as the author of the test sample

Keystroke Biometric Studies Keystroke Biometric System Classification for Authentication Cha’s vector-distance (dichotomy) model

Keystroke Biometric Studies Experimental Design and Data Collection Design Two independent variables Keyboard type Desktop – all Dell Laptop – 90% Dell + IBM, Compaq, Apple, HP, Toshiba Input mode Copy task – predefined text Free text input – e.g., arbitrary

Keystroke Biometric Studies Experimental Design and Data Collection Design

Keystroke Biometric Studies Experimental Design and Data Collection Data Collection Subjects provided samples in at least two quadrants Five samples per quadrant per subject Summary of subject demographics AgeFemaleMaleTotal Under All

Keystroke Biometric Studies Experimental Results Identification experimental results Authentication experimental results Longitudinal study results System hierarchical model and parameters Hierarchical fallback model Outlier parameters Number of enrollment samples Input text length Probability distributions of statistical features

Keystroke Biometric Studies Experimental Results Identification Experimental Results Identification performance under ideal conditions (same keyboard type and input mode, leave-one-out procedure)

Keystroke Biometric Studies Experimental Results Identification Experimental Results Identification performance under non-ideal conditions (train on one file, test on another)

Keystroke Biometric Studies Experimental Design and Data Collection Design

Keystroke Biometric Studies Experimental Results Authentication Experimental Results Authentication performance under ideal conditions (weak enrollment: train on 18 subjects and test on 18 different subjects)

Keystroke Biometric Studies Experimental Results Longitudinal Study Results Identification – 13 subjects at 2-week intervals Average 6 arrow groups: 90% -> 85% -> 83% Authentication – 13 subjects at 2-week intervals Average 6 arrow groups: 90% -> 87% -> 85% Identification – 8 subjects at 2-year interval Average 6 arrow groups: 84% -> 67% Authentication – 8 subjects at 2-year interval Average 6 arrow groups: 94% -> 92% (all above results under non-ideal conditions)

Keystroke Biometric Studies Experimental Results System hierarchical model and parameters Touch-type hierarchy tree for durations

Keystroke Biometric Studies Experimental Results System hierarchical model and parameters Identification accuracy versus outlier removal passes

Keystroke Biometric Studies Experimental Results System hierarchical model and parameters Identification accuracy versus outlier removal distance (sigma)

Keystroke Biometric Studies Experimental Results System hierarchical model and parameters Identification accuracy versus enrollment samples

Keystroke Biometric Studies Experimental Results System hierarchical model and parameters Identification accuracy versus input text length

Keystroke Biometric Studies Experimental Results System hierarchical model and parameters Distributions of “u” duration times for each entry mode

Keystroke Biometric Studies Conclusions Results are important and timely as more people become involved in the applications of interest Authenticating online test-takers Identifying senders of inappropriate High performance (accuracy) results if 2 or more enrollment samples/user Users use same keyboard type

Keystroke Biometric Studies Future Work Focus on user authentication Focus on Cha’s dichotomy model Develop strong/weak enrollment concepts Strong – system trained on actual users Weak – system trained on other (non-test) users Develop strategies to obtain ROC curves Run actual test-taker experiments