SMC Fall Policy Mtg. 2003 NWTIC / SMC Genetic Gains / Type IV Joint Trial Progress Report (GGTIV) David G. Briggs Robert B. Harrison Keith Jayawickrama.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Acorn Strategies How Acorn Size Influences Seedling Size and Possible Choices.
Advertisements

USA Raspberry Industry: Trends
Types of Checks in Variety Trials One could be a long term check that is unchanged from year to year –serves to monitor experimental conditions from year.
Design and Analysis of Augmented Designs in Screening Trials
 Sycamore Tree Health, Dispersal, and Soil Composition in Quarry Bottom Flood Zones Zachary R. Young, Sarah Minor, Hunter Schouweiler.
Management of cheatgrass fuel loading in the shrub-steppe Steven O. Link, PhD (Botany) Native Plant Landscaping and Restoration LLC 4604 E. Robin Ct. West.
Mark DMAs & Collect Data  Identify Plants on the DMA  Take photos  Determine sample interval (2.75 m = 40 plots each side for a 110 m DMA)  Use random.
An Envirothon Primer Glenn “Dode” Gladders
EVALUATION OF GREENSEEKER FOR NITROGEN FETILIZATION IN COTTON ALABAMA REPORT 1 Evaluation of Green Seeker for Nitrogen Fertilization in Cotton – Preliminary.
Integrated Crop Pest Management Montana Small Grain Guide.
Sponsored by the Cooperative Monitoring, Evaluation, and Research Committee (CMER) of the Timber, Fish, and Wildlife (TFW) Agreement Forested Wetlands.
Growth and yield Harvesting Regeneration Thinning Fire and fuels.
Modeling Effects of Genetic Improvement in Loblolly Pine Plantations Barry D. Shiver Stephen Logan.
Impact of plot size on the effect of competition in individual-tree models and their applications Jari Hynynen & Risto Ojansuu Finnish Forest Research.
Abstract The goal of the Conifer Translational Genomics Network (CTGN) project is to provide tree breeders across the United States with new tools to enhance.
VARIABLE RETENTION HARVESTING ON POTLATCH FORESTS.
Summary of results from the Regional Forest Nutrition Research Project and Stand Management Cooperative Rob Harrison, Dave Briggs, Eric Turnblom, Bob Gonyea,
Juniper Control Aspen Restoration. Aspen, Northern Great Basin.
Agronomy Trials Usually interested in the factors of production: –When to plant? –What seeding rate? –Fertilizer? What kind? –Irrigation? When? How much?
First Measurements of 2005 GGTIV* Installations Eric C. Turnblom, SMC Keith Jayawickrama, NWTIC SMC Spring Policy Meeting, 25 – 26 Apr 2007 Vancouver,
INTEGRATED FARMING SYSTEMS November, COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL.
Most Common Conservation Practices Forestry Illinois.
Overview of System of Rice Intensification in Cambodia Chou Cheythyrith National FAO-IPM Project Coordinator, Ministry of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries,
Control of Experimental Error Accuracy = without bias  average is on the bull’s-eye  achieved through randomization Precision = repeatability  measurements.
Field Plots & Agricultural Research Dr. Bob Kemerait & Dr. Eric Prostko University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service April 2001.
Stem form responses to differing areas of weed control around planted Douglas-fir trees Robin Rose, Douglas A. Maguire, and Scott Ketchum Department of.
Conducting Experimental Trials Gary Palmer. Scientific Method  Formulation of Hypothesis  Planning an experiment to objectively test the hypothesis.
Preliminary Development Plan – Continuation of August 28, 2012 BoCC Hearing Board of County Commissioners September 18, 2012.
Experimental design. Experiments vs. observational studies Manipulative experiments: The only way to prove the causal relationships BUT Spatial and temporal.
A New Effort to Study Intensively Managed Pine Plantations CAPPS - Consortium for Accelerated Pine Production Studies.
Nick Smith, Kim Iles and Kurt Raynor Partly funded by BC Forest Science Program and Western Forest Products Sector sampling – some statistical properties.
Evaluation of the System of Rice Intensification in Bhutan Karma Lhendup Faculty of Agriculture College of Natural Resources Royal University of Bhutan.
Critical Period Threshold Study Effects of up to Five Years of Consecutive Weed Control Relative to Growth Losses from Delaying Weed Control for Douglas-
Precision Agriculture What terraces have to do with variability of improved grazed pastures? Jesús Santillano-Cázares, Spring 2006.
A Brief Look at Federal Wildland Fire Policy & WFDSS One Approach to Successful Implementation Dan O’Brien NWCC Fire Analyst March 31, 2008.
Positive products for control of rice blast disease Mwangi J.K, - UOK Wanjogu R.K,Owilla B.P.O, -MIAD.
Development of Vegetation Indices as Economic Thresholds for Control of Defoliating Insects of Soybean James BoardVijay MakaRandy PriceDina KnightMatthew.
By Klaus Puettmann & Mike Saunders Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota A New Tool for White Spruce Management: Density Management Guides.
CCLONES - ADEPT ( Comparing Clonal Lines On Experimental Sites) Forest Biology Research Cooperative University of Florida.
CCLONES - ADEPT ( Comparing Clonal Lines On Experimental Sites) Forest Biology Research Cooperative University of Florida.
SMC Silviculture Project Report Eric C. Turnblom Silviculture Project Leader, SMC SMC Spring Policy Meeting, 25 – 26 Apr 2007 Vancouver, WA.
Fairy Lake Rx Burn Monitoring Stated objectives:  Mimic light to moderate ground fire  To minimize the mortality of mature whitebark pine (
Establishing Plots to Monitor Growth and Treatment Response Some do’s and don’ts A discussion.
Incorporating Genetics into Growth Models: Results from Block-Plot Trials of Douglas-Fir Peter Gould and Brad St Clair PNW Research Station Keith Jayawickrama.
The Effect of Fuel Treatments on the Invasion of Nonnative Plants Kyle E. Merriam 1, Jon E. Keeley 1, and Jan L. Beyers 2. [1] USGS Western Ecological.
Growth of remaining branches in pruned Douglas-fir trees E.C. Turnblom and R.L. Collier.
LAND Subdivie a 4.27 acres into 18 lots 17 detached single family homes One duplex Base density allows for unit Affordable housing bonus.
Soil Sampling for Fertilizer and Lime Recommendations.
Whitebark Pine Planting Prescriptions Glenda Scott and Ward McCaughey.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Agricultural Census Sampling Frames and Sampling Section B 1.
Pine Productivity Increases from Seedling Genetic Improvements
Nick Smith, Kim Iles and Kurt Raynor
Learning to Read Scientific Methods #1
A Brief Introduction to Forest Practices Regulations
Management of cheatgrass fuel loading in the shrub-steppe
Developing Edition 3.0 of CIPSANON
Preliminary Performance of Hedelfingen Cherry on Ten Rootstocks in the 1998 NC-140 Sweet Cherry Rootstock Trial R.L.Perry, R. Andersen, R. Crassweller,
Preliminary Performance of Montmorency on Eleven Rootstocks in the 1998 NC-140 Tart Cherry Rootstock Trial R. Perry, L. Anderson, R. Andersen, G. Greene,
(RE)FORESTATION DEDUCTION AND AMORTIZATION
Tree List Generator (TLG) v1.0
Water and nutrient limitations to tree establishment on slate waste
Tree Harvesting By Mr. Kennedy.
Our Family’s Tree Farm Math Lesson
FFA Forestry CDE – Elba High School – Mr. Davis
Experimental design.
Conservation Activity Plans (CAP)
Evaluating “Ultra-Early” Corn Hybrids
VARIABILITY IN TRIALS Adapted fr M Gunther.
Big Creek Plantation Establishment and Management
North Carolina's Selective Vegetation Removal.
Presentation transcript:

SMC Fall Policy Mtg NWTIC / SMC Genetic Gains / Type IV Joint Trial Progress Report (GGTIV) David G. Briggs Robert B. Harrison Keith Jayawickrama Brad St. Clair Eric C. Turnblom

SMC Fall Policy Mtg GGTIV Objectives Provide information to guide managers currently applying combinations of genetics, spacing and vegetation control Provide linkages with other studies (such as Genetic Gains Trials, intensive ‘veg’ mgt. trials, spacing trials (like SMC Type III), that will assist modeling

SMC Fall Policy Mtg GGTIV Study Design Factorial Treatment Design –Spacing, three levels: S1, S2, S3 –Genetic Gain, three levels: G1, G2, G3 –Vegetation control, two levels: V1, V2 Randomized Block Experimental Design –Six blocks for each breeding zone –First set of six in Grays Harbor breeding zone

SMC Fall Policy Mtg GGTIV Treatment Design Spacing Factor levels –(S1) 15 x 15’, nominally 200 SPA –(S2) 10 x 10’, nominally 440 SPA Genetic Gain Trial portion uses this density only –(S3) 7 x 7’, nominally 900 SPA

SMC Fall Policy Mtg GGTIV Treatment Design Genetic Quality Factor levels –(G1) Unimproved –(G2) Moderate gain Type IV Trial portion does not use this level –(G3) High gain

SMC Fall Policy Mtg GGTIV Treatment Design Vegetation Control Factor levels –(V1) Current Practice Defined as single site prep; used only in Type IV –(V2) Complete Defined as 80% or greater bare ground until crown closure; standard on all GGT plots and on Type IV

SMC Fall Policy Mtg GGTIV Experimental Design Genetic Gain Trial –Uses all three gain levels (G1, G2, G3) –Uses middle spacing level (S2) –Uses complete vegetation control level (V2) Type IV Trial –Uses two gain levels (G1, G3) –Uses all three spacing levels (S1, S2, S3) –Uses two ‘veg’ control levels (V1, V2)

SMC Fall Policy Mtg GGTIV Experimental Design Genetic Gain Trial –Uses all three gain levels (G1, G2, G3) –Uses middle spacing level (S2) –Uses complete vegetation control level (V2) Type IV Trial –Uses two gain levels (G1, G3) –Uses all three spacing levels (S1, S2, S3) –Uses two ‘veg’ control levels (V1, V2)

SMC Fall Policy Mtg GGTIV Experimental Design Genetic Gain Trial –Uses all three gain levels (G1, G2, G3) –Uses middle spacing level (S2) –Uses complete vegetation control level (V2) Type IV Trial –Uses two gain levels (G1, G3) –Uses all three spacing levels (S1, S2, S3) –Uses two ‘veg’ control levels (V1, V2)

SMC Fall Policy Mtg GGTIV Experimental Design Genetic Gain Trial –Holds spacing & ‘veg’ control constant, resulting in three ‘G’ treatments –Replicated 5 times for total of 15 plots –S2 level requires ~0.6 acre plot size including buffer –Total area is ~9 acres

SMC Fall Policy Mtg GGTIV Experimental Design Type IV Trial –Spacing x Genetics x ‘Veg’ = 3 x 2 x 2 = 12 treatments, but not every V1 level appears –“Complete” block at V2 level, “incomplete” at V1 level –Nine plots in each block, two shared with GGT –Total area is ~6 acres

SMC Fall Policy Mtg G2 G1 (S2 V2) G1 G2 G3G1 G3 (S2 V2) G2 G1 G3 G2 G1G3 G3 S1 V1 G3 S3 V2 G1 S2 V1 G1 S3 V2 G3 S3 V1 G1 S1 V2 G3 S1 V2 GGTIV Block (or Site) Layout

SMC Fall Policy Mtg GGTIV Site Layout Grid will be overlaid on photos to identify largest possible number of 0.75 acre ‘cells’ All plot boundaries laid in; “rough” or otherwise highly variable plots discarded Remaining plots (min. 22) randomized to treatments Planting rows will be carefully laid out, planting spots pinned Protection: Seedling tubes or fencing

SMC Fall Policy Mtg Fencing vs Tubing Type IV’s

SMC Fall Policy Mtg Assumptions Length of Side of 3/4 Ac plot, ft181 # plots per side5 minimum length of side905 side $0.50acres enclosed 1000 $ 8,000 $ 12,000 $ 28, $ 12,000 $ 18,000 $ 28, $ 16,000 $ 24,000 $ 28, $ 20,000 $ 30,000 $ 28, Tubing includes initial cost + $4000 annual cost to re-set tubes

SMC Fall Policy Mtg Break-even

SMC Fall Policy Mtg GGTIV Site Selection Grays Harbor breeding zone Need sample of sites to which seed is deployed Extendable 1 zone N/S or E/W – mind Elev. Minimum area 15 ac, probably ~30 acres Ready to plant by 2005 (3 units), or 2006 (3 units) Tour (9 Sep 2003) identified 1 unit for 2005, and one unit for 2006 (out of four visited) Candidate Area Selection Forms (CASF) Fill out prior to harvest (permits better SI est., etc.) On-site evaluation follows CASF screening

SMC Fall Policy Mtg GGTIV Site Parameters Clearcut (no dispersed leave trees, may be clumped at edges) Undetectable disease Avoid pulling stumps Avoid piling slash; piles at edges OK(?) Avoid slash burning in favor of mechanical disposal; spray to control re-sprouts to achieve 80% bare ground

SMC Fall Policy Mtg GGTIV Seedling Parameters NWTIC verifies crosses w/ BLUP rankings Container 15’s with fertilizer All seedlings clearly tagged to identify gain level (RFID from PFC?) Grown at same nursery facility Appropriately randomize nursery blocks (averages out edge effects, etc.)

SMC Fall Policy Mtg GGTIV Conclusion NWTIC has special project funding to go ahead with their next GGT Brief series of conversations will define responsibilities for further operational aspects between co-ops Sites needed; Landowners with holdings in or immediately surrounding Grays Harbor breeding zone – send in a CASF (or two)

SMC Fall Policy Mtg NWTIC / SMC Genetic Gains / Type IV Joint Trial Progress Report (GGTIV) Thank you for your attention! Questions? David G. Briggs Robert B. Harrison Keith Jayawickrama Brad St. Clair Eric C. Turnblom