Effect of silvicultural and prescribed fire treatments on coarse woody debris dynamics in a sierran old growth mixed-conifer forest. Jim Innes and Malcolm.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Central Washington Landscape Assessment (CWLA) project update and discussion.
Advertisements

Dry-conifer Ecology and Silviculture in Western Oregon John D. Bailey Oregon State University.
Habitat Use and Ecology of the Northern Flying Squirrel Todd M. Wilson USFS, PNW Research Station.
Brief Overview & Summary THE TEAKETTLE EXPERIMENT:
RISK ASSESSMENT & SPOTTED OWL RESPONSE TO SILVICULTURE In MIXED-CONIFER FORESTS LARRY L. IRWIN DENNIS F. ROCK SUZANNE L. ROCK NCASI.
1st of 3 Part Training Series Christopher Woodall INTRODUCTION TO THE P2+ DOWN WOODY MATERIALS INDICATOR.
Fuels Reduction and Wildlife Habitat Restoration in a Late Successional Reserve Klamath National Forest, Goosenest Ranger District.
Introduction Methods Results and Conclusions References Acknowledgements Figures and Tables Table 1. Habitat suitability index for forests with different.
Tree Regeneration Responses to Prescribed Fire and Thinning in a Sierran Mixed Conifer Forest Harold S.J. Zald 1, Andrew N. Gray 2, Malcolm North 3, and.
SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY SUB-GROUP UPDATE THURSDAY 23 RD JANUARY 2014 YVETTE DICKINSON.
Silvicultural experiments exploring linkages between stand structural diversity and ecological variables in California Carl Skinner, Martin Ritchie, Eric.
Fuel Management Objectives within Dry Forest Landscapes on the Okanogan-Wenatchee NF Dr. Richy J. Harrod Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest.
Revising Southern Sierran Forest Management: The Implications for Plants Malcolm North, USFS Sierra Nevada Research Center, and Dept of Plant Sciences,
Harold S.J. Zald and Andrew N. Gray USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR Tree Regeneration.
Timber Products Company Bioforestry: Measurement of forest structures within intensively managed forestlands. Stuart Farber & Geoff Kaberle Timber Products.
Physical Evidence used to Establish Reference Conditions for the Southwest Jemez CFLR Project In order to set goals that underlie restoration treatments,
Key Recommendations and Products From a Series of Dry-Forest Workshops in Oregon and Washington Redmond, OR October 14, 2009.
Tree Regeneration in Response to Prescribed Fire, Thinning, and Microsite Conditions in a Sierran Mixed Conifer Forest Harold Zald ( ,
Thinning Impacts on Even-aged Stands of Eucalyptus in Brazil Thinning Impacts on Even-aged Stands of Eucalyptus in Brazil June 21, 2010 Missoula, MT Western.
Why Woody Biomass? Forest Management Perspective Malcolm North, USFS Pacific Southwest Research Station, and Dept of Plant Sciences, U.C. Davis Fire suppressed.
Delleker North Hazardous Fuel Reduction Fuels & Fire Behavior Assessment Project Funded by the Plumas NF with USDA Forest Service’s “Community Protection”
Stand Structure and Ecological Restoration Charles W. Denton Ecological Restoration Institute John D. Bailey, Associate Professor of Forestry, Associate.
Forests, fungi, and small mammals: the impact of fire and forest thinning on truffle production and consumption Marc Meyer and Malcolm North USFS PSW Research.
Growth and yield Harvesting Regeneration Thinning Fire and fuels.
Debris Management in Alberta Fuel Management Workshop October 2003 Greg Baxter Researcher, WFORG FERIC Western Division.
VARIABLE RETENTION HARVESTING ON POTLATCH FORESTS.
Western Juniper- Steens Mountain Alturas Juniper.
“Near term response of surface soil nitrogen cycling and pools to forest clearing and burning” Heather E. Erickson Recent soils research from the Teakettle.
Different effects of thinning and burning on Sierran mixed-conifer ecosystems Malcolm North, USFS, Sierra Nevada Research Center, Davis, CA.
Fuel treatment effects on forest carbon and wildfire Malcolm North, Sierra Nevada Research Center,
 Discuss silvicultural principles related to restoration/fuels treatments  Compare conditions from the 1900 Cheesman Lake reconstruction to current.
What The Northwest Forest Plan says about 80+ year old trees.
Restoration of Compartment 46 to promote oak-hickory regeneration, shortleaf pine and native grasses in Sewanee, TN Johnson Jeffers and colleagues in FORS.
Bringing stand level fire risk to the landscape level: Fire risk assessment using FFE-FVS with the Landscape Management System. Kevin Ceder And James McCarter.
Using Birds to Guide Post-fire Management in the Plumas & Lassen National Forests Ryan D. Burnett, Nathaniel Seavy, and Diana Humple 4/21/2011.
Colorado Front Range Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Project : Initial Pre and Post-Treatment Stand Structure Analysis for the Pike and San.
UPPER MONUMENT CREEK LANDSCAPE RESTORATION Allan Hahn – District Ranger Mike Picard – ID Team Leader.
The Vegetation Module Seth Bigelow, Malcolm North Sierra Nevada Research Center, USDA-FS Pacific SW Research Stn, UC Davis Dept of Plant Sciences.
Tree distribution patterns in the southwest Jemez Mountains Kamal Humagain 1, Robert Cox 1, and James Cain 2 1 Texas Tech University 2 New Mexico State.
Tree Data National Manual Version 1.61 Section 5.0.
Truckee Ecological Restoration the evolution of project design Tahoe National Forest, Truckee Ranger District PSW Sagehen Experimental Forest UC Berkeley.
Effects of Forest Management Practices on Carbon Storage Coeli M. Hoover USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station Forest PLUS, Washington DC December.
Effect of retained trees on growth and structure of young Scots pine stands Juha Ruuska, Sauli Valkonen and Jouni Siipilehto Finnish Forest Research Institute,
Thinning as a tool of close to nature forestry Igor Štefančík Forest Research Institute, Zvolen Slovakia.
Coarse Woody Debris Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project Randy G. Jensen Stephen R. Shifley Brian L. Brookshire.
Effects of Experimental Burning and Thinning on Soil Respiration and Belowground Characteristics Soung-Ryoul Ryu 1, Amy Concilio 1, Jiquan Chen 1, Deborah.
Sharon Stanton & FIA National Indicator Leads RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENHANCED FOREST INDICATORS.
Site Description This research is being conducted as a part of the Detritus Input and Removal Treatments Project (DIRT), a cross-continental experiment.
Forest floor invasion results, 2002 Questions we asked: 1. Last year we found woody stem density was 65% lower in Vinca areas than on the natural forest.
Carbon Sequestration and Fire Risk in a East-Side Pine Forest Martin Ritchie Research Forester Pacific Southwest Research Station.
Forest Ecological Relationships: Teakettle and Plumas Lassen Administrative Study Malcolm North, Sierra Nevada Research Center, Davis, CA
Harold S.J. Zald and Andrew N. Gray USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR Tree Regeneration.
What Drives Fire Frequency, Intensity, and Spread (focused on the Rocky Mountains) Aka: Fuels vs. Climate Bottom up or Top down Local vs Regional.
Stand Development. Site Capability The ability of a forest to grow is related directly to physical site factors. Favourable physical factors create better.
The Effect of Fuel Treatments on the Invasion of Nonnative Plants Kyle E. Merriam 1, Jon E. Keeley 1, and Jan L. Beyers 2. [1] USGS Western Ecological.
Carbon Dynamics in Coarse Woody Debris Pools at the Tapajos National Forest in Brazil Hudson Silva Patrick Crill Michael Keller.
Response of Understory Vegetation following Western Juniper (Juniperus occidentalis) Cutting on Two Sites Breanna S Sabin FS 533.
Research design for hydrologic response to watershed treatments in the mixed conifer zone of California’s Sierra Nevada John Battles 1, Roger Bales 2,
FOR 350 Silviculture. What is silviculture? The art and science of controlling the establishment, composition, structure, and growth of a forest stand.
Presentation Outline What is an irregular shelterwood system?
FOR 350 Silvicultural Terminology Review
Temporal and spatial variability in stand structure and individual-tree growth for 10 years following commercial thinning in spruce-fir forests of northern.
Evolution and Population Genetics
Fuels reduction effectiveness: Case studies review of the evidence
Shelterwood and clearcut
Jing Hu University of Queensland
50 Essential Forestry Terms Afforestation All-aged (uneven-aged) Artificial Regeneration Basal Area Biomass Broadleaf Clear-cut Harvest Climax Forest.
Single Tree Selection.
Managing Forest Resources
Angela Gee, US Forest Service July 22, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Effect of silvicultural and prescribed fire treatments on coarse woody debris dynamics in a sierran old growth mixed-conifer forest. Jim Innes and Malcolm North USDA-PSW Sierra Nevada Research Center Davis, California

Coarse Woody Debris (CWD) in the Sierra Nevada Important habitat for small to mid-sized mammals particularly during snow cover. Long duration fire fuels. Knowledge gap concerning management/restoration guidelines for CWD in Sierra Nevada. –Guidelines are based on fire suppressed forest structures (for example, The CASPO Report).

Study Site – Teakettle Experimental Forest 18, 4 hectare plots Patterson Mountain, California Old growth mixed- conifer forest m elevation.

Methods Full Factorial Experiment with 3 replicates: –Prescribed fire and 2 levels of cutting: Shelterwood (Low thinning) > 25 cm leaving 22 trees per hectare. California spotted owl cut (CASPO) harvest from 25 cm to 76 cm. Here we are using a plot from each treatment and 3 controls. Mapped all logs > 30 cm small-end-diameter within each 4 ha plot. Decay classes 1 – 4. Analysis: t-test and Ripley’s K function, alpha =.05

Hypotheses Thin no burn treatment: –Increase the per hectare plot density, volume and mass of CWD. –Decrease mean piece large-end-diameter and volume. Burning in combination with thinning: –Decrease per hectare plot density, volume and mass of CWD. –Decrease mean piece-volume and mean piece large-end- diameter. Burning alone. –Increase mean piece-volume and mean piece large-end- diameter.

Results - Thin no burn treatment 1. Will increase the per hectare plot density, –Yes, density 39% in the CASPO and 48 % in the shelterwood. volume (m 3 ha -1 ) and mass (Mt ha -1 ) of CWD. –No, CASPO volume 10% and Mass 4%. –Shelterwood volume 25% and mass 9 %.

Results - Thin no burn treatment 2. Thinning alone will decrease mean piece large-end- diameter (cm) and volume (m 3 ). –CASPO mean piece large- end-diameter 21% (16 cm, (p=0.0001). –Mean piece volume 44% (2.1 m 3, p=0.004). –Shelterwood mean piece large-end-diameter 19% (13.4 cm, p=0.0001). – Mean piece volume 60% (2.9 m 3, p=0.0001).

Results - Thin and burn treatment 1. Decrease in per hectare plot density, volume (m 3 ha -1 ) and mass (Mt ha -1 ). –CASPO Density 38%, volume 70% and mass 69%. –Shelterwood by 26%, volume 39% and mass 19%.

Results - Thin and burn treatment 2. Decrease mean piece-volume (m 3 ) and mean piece large-end-diameter (cm). CASPO 60% mean piece- volume (2.2 m 3, P=.0001). 29% mean piece large-end- diameter (22.4 cm, p=.0001). Shelterwood 56% mean piece- volume (3.2 m 3, P=.007). 24% Mean piece large-end- diameter (20.5 cm, p=.0001).

Results – Burn only treatment Increase mean piece volume (m 3 ) and mean piece large-end- diameter (cm). –Mean piece volume by 50% (2.5 m 3, p=0.003) and mean piece large- end-diameter 12% (8 cm, p=.03).

Decay Dynamics Cut only in lower decay classes due to logging slash. Cut and burn in lower decay classes from slash and in higher decay class due to removal by fire. Burn plots - higher decay classes due to removal by fire.

Spatial Patterns – Control plots Variability among plots. Control plot 2 random clustering possibly due to a spot fire in Suggests past fires may produce long lasting legacy patterns. Control 1 Control 3 Control 2 Clustered Random Regular

Spatial Patterns – Treated plots Shelterwood Unburned shelterwood Burn only pretreatmentBurn only post-treatment Pretreatment Burned shelterwoodPretreatment CASPO PretreatmentUnburned CASPO Burned CASPOPretreatment Clustered Random Regular No trend in spatial patterns with treatments. or in significance of clustering with treatment.

Summary Cut and cut and burn treatments – 1.Change in quality of CWD from fewer larger pieces to a greater number of smaller pieces. 2.Average diameter 16 cm in cut only. 3.Average diameter 21 cm in cut and burn plots. 4.Shift in decay to the lower decay classes. Burn only – 1. Less of a diameter reduction relative to the cut, cut and burn plots (8 cm) due to no inputs of smaller diameter logs. Variation in topography, aspect and past fire history likely plays a large role in CWD dynamics. Spatial patterns do not show a trend with cutting and or burning treatments and fall within pretreatment spatial variability.

Recommendations for Managers Contact –Jim Innes – – Cutting and cutting and burning alter the structure of CWD more so than fire alone. Reductions in log diameters may impact habitat availability for some species. Leaving some larger logs may mitigate diameter decreases after cutting and burning. Spatial patterns do not appear to be altered by the treatments beyond the pretreatment range of variability at the studied scale.