1 CCLI Proposal Writing Strategies Tim Fossum Program Director Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation Vermont.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Confirming Student Learning: Using Assessment Techniques in the Classroom Douglas R. Davenport Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Truman State University.
Advertisements

Funding for Education Scholarship Russ Pimmel NSF ASEE Annual Conference June 20, 2006.
Bridging Research, Information and Culture An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Your Name Your Institution.
Session 5 Intellectual Merit and Broader Significance FISH 521.
Counting Down the Top Ten List for Proposal Writing Royal Roads University Office of Research February 26, 2010.
INSTITUTE OF BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES WRITING GRANT PROPOSALS Thursday, April 10, 2014 Randy Draper, Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research Room 125, IBS.
Helpful Hints and Fatal Flaws. Helpful Hint Number 1: Read the Program Announcement NSF has no hidden agendas. It’s all there in the program announcement.
Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research RII Track-3: Building Diverse Communities May 21, 2013 Jeanne Small & Uma Venkateswaran 1.
NSF Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney, Ph.D Adjunct, Department of Biology New Mexico State University 24 September 2008.
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals: Fellowship Track Washington, DC January 9, 2014.
The IGERT Program Preliminary Proposals June 2008 Carol Van Hartesveldt IGERT Program Director IGERT Program Director.
1 Exploring NSF Funding Opportunities in DUE Tim Fossum Division of Undergraduate Education Vermont EPSCoR NSF Research Day May 6, 2008.
Funding Opportunities NSF Division of Undergraduate Education North Dakota State University June 6, 2005.
1 Jill Singer Division of Undergraduate Education Directorate for Education & Human Resources National Science Foundation Sustainability.
1 Jill Singer Division of Undergraduate Education Directorate for Education & Human Resources National Science Foundation SCCUR.
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
Applying for ADVANCE Grants: It’s All About Expertise & Teamwork.
CAREER WORKSHOP APRIL 9, 2014 Required Elements of the Proposal Beth Hodges Director, Office of Proposal Development FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY.
WRITING PROPOSALS WITH STRONG METHODOLOGY AND IMPLEMENTATION Kusum Singh, Virginia Tech Gavin W. Fulmer, National Science Foundation 1.
Proposal Strengths and Weakness as Identified by Reviewers Russ Pimmel & Sheryl Sorby FIE Conference Oct 13, 2007.
Carol Brodie Research & Graduate Studies
Top Ten Ways To Write a Good Proposal… That Won’t Get Funded.
1 Classroom-Based Research: How to Be a Researcher in Your Classroom Basic Skills Initiative Teaching and Learning Workshop October 2009 Darla M. Cooper.
March 20, 2012 Susan Finger & Sue Fitzgerald Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation March 21, 2012 Sue Fitzgerald & Maura Borrego.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
1 The NSF Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Program Jill Singer Program Director, Division of Undergraduate Education Directorate for.
Dealing with Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts Criteria
Funding Opportunities for Chemists at the National Science Foundation Division of Undergraduate Education Pamela Brown, NSF Program Director Division of.
Writing More Effective Proposals Russ Pimmel Abe Nisanci U of Alabama NSF. Share The Future IV March 17, 2003.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Integrating Diversity into.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Project Evaluation Don Millard John Yu March 27, 2012 Guy-Alain Amoussou Lou Everett
Proposal Enhancement Strategies Russell Pimmel AASCU Workshop March 4, 2006.
Nuts & Bolts Session National Science Foundation CCLI Grant Writing Linnea Fletcher ASMCUE Program 7 – 9 pm (2 hours) May 28, 2009.
Grant Research Basics. Asking the Question  Before you start, you must have both clearly stated research question and primary outcome measure.  What.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended.
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION working together to improve education with technology Using Evidence for Educational Technology Success.
Writing More Effective NSF Proposals Jeanne R. Small Oklahoma City, Oklahoma March 2, 2006 Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE) National Science Foundation.
Proposal Writing Strategies Barb Anderegg and Susan Burkett National Science Foundation Annual ASEE Conference June 18, 2006.
Funding your Dreams Cathy Manduca Director, Science Education Resource Center Iowa State University, 2005.
Integrating Broader Impacts into your Research Proposal
 Read through problems  Identify problems you think your team has the capacity and interest to solve  Prioritize the problems and indicate the.
1. Most of the information presented in this workshop represents the presenter’s opinion and not an official NSF position 2.
Writing a More Effective Proposal Susan Burkett and Stephanie Adams February 9, 2006.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Broadening Participation.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
CAREER WORKSHOP APRIL 6, 2015 Required Elements of the NSF Proposal Beth Hodges Director, Office of Proposal Development FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
1 Developing a Competitive Proposal ( An Interactive, Web-Based Workshop) Russell Pimmel Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation.
Part 1 1. March 20, 2012 Susan Finger & Sue Fitzgerald Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation March 21, 2012 Sue Fitzgerald &
1Mobile Computing Systems © 2001 Carnegie Mellon University Writing a Successful NSF Proposal November 4, 2003 Website: nsf.gov.
NSF’s Broader Impacts Criteria Bev Watford, Sue Kemnitzer, Russ Pimmel Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation Session T4B, Thursday.
Documenting Completion of your PDP
Principals of Research Writing. What is Research Writing? Process of communicating your research  Before the fact  Research proposal  After the fact.
Workshop for Faculty from Minority Serving Intuitions ---- Overview ---- Russ Pimmel Workshop for Faculty from Minority Serving Intuitions Feb. 8 –10,
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
1. October 25, 2011 Louis Everett & John Yu Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation October 26, 2011 Don Millard & John Yu Division.
Project Evaluation for MSP Targeted Partnerships Eric R. Banilower Horizon Research, Inc.
Carpe Diem Phase II Making the Case. Jot down 3 questions that you have related to Phase II (the one’s that you carried into the room today)
Local HWTS Monitoring Eva Manzano, CAWST Technical Advisor Laos Vientiane, Lao PDR November 11, 2014.
Writing a More Effective Proposal Susan Burkett and Russell Pimmel CASEE Symposium and Annual Meeting October 19, 2005.
Writing More Effective IUSE-EHR Proposals Jeff Ryan, University of South Florida Jill Singer, SUNY Buffalo State Earth Educators’ Rendezvous July 14, 2015.
Developing a Competitive Proposal (An Interactive, Web-Based Workshop) Russell Pimmel Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation.
“CareerGuide for Schools”
Writing More Effective NSF Proposals
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Presentation transcript:

1 CCLI Proposal Writing Strategies Tim Fossum Program Director Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation Vermont EPSCoR NSF Research Day June 7, 2008

2 Caution The information presented in this workshop represents my opinion and is not an official NSF position.

3 Overview of Workshop Goal: Prepare you to write more competitive CCLI proposals

4 EHR/DUE’s CCLI Program Vision: Excellent STEM education for all undergraduate students. Goal: Stimulate, disseminate, and institutionalize innovative developments in STEM education through the production of knowledge and the improvement of practice. Components:  Material & pedagogy development  Faculty development  Implementation  Assessment  Research

5 Audience participation Identify the single most important piece of advice you would give to a colleague writing a CCLI proposal...

6 Initial Proposal Sketch Goal: Enhance student learning in Goal: Enhance student learning in at U of Y at U of Y Rationale: Observed shortcomings in educational experience of the students at U of Y and felt that new stuff would improve the situation Rationale: Observed shortcomings in educational experience of the students at U of Y and felt that new stuff would improve the situation Project Description: Details of new stuff Project Description: Details of new stuff Evaluation: Use U of Y’s course evaluation forms to show improvements in learning Evaluation: Use U of Y’s course evaluation forms to show improvements in learning Dissemination: Describe new stuff using conference papers, journal articles, and web site Dissemination: Describe new stuff using conference papers, journal articles, and web site

7 Proposal Strategies Read the program solicitation Read the program solicitation  Determine how your ideas match the solicitation and how you can improve the match Articulate your goals, objectives, & outcomes Articulate your goals, objectives, & outcomes  Outcomes should include improved student learning Build on existing knowledge base Build on existing knowledge base  Review the literature  Present evidence that the new stuff is doable; will enhance learning; is the best approach Explore potential collaborations Explore potential collaborations

8 Proposal Strategies Use data to document existing shortcomings in student learning Use data to document existing shortcomings in student learning Describe management plan Describe management plan  Provide tasks, team responsibilities, timeline Provide clear examples of the approach Provide clear examples of the approach Integrate the evaluation effort early Integrate the evaluation effort early  Build assessment tools around defined objectives and expected outcomes  Connect with independent evaluation experts

9 Proposal Strategies Identify strategies for dissemination Identify strategies for dissemination  Define a plan to contribute to knowledge base  Address broader impacts  Collaborate, form partnerships, build community

10 Write Proposal to Answer Reviewers’ Questions What are you trying to accomplish? What will be the outcomes? Why do you believe that you have a good idea? Why is the problem important? Why is your approach promising? How will you manage the project to ensure success? How will you know if you succeed? How will others find out about your work? How will you interest them? How will you excite them?

11 Developing Goals & Outcomes Start with one or more overarching statements of project intention Start with one or more overarching statements of project intention  Each statement is a goal Convert each goal into one or more expected measurable results Convert each goal into one or more expected measurable results  Each result is an outcome

12 Goals –> Objectives –> Outcomes Converting goals to outcomes may involve intermediate steps Converting goals to outcomes may involve intermediate steps  Intermediate steps frequently called objectives:  More specific, more measurable than goals  Less specific, less measurable than outcomes

13 Goals Goals may focus on Goals may focus on  Cognitive behavior  Affective behavior  Success rates  Diversity  Cognitive, affective, or success in targeted subgroups

14 Goals Goals may focus on... Goals may focus on...  Cognitive behavior  Affective behavior  Success rates  Diversity  Cognitive, affective, or success in targeted subgroups

15 Outcomes Must be measurable Must be related closely to goals Outcomes are the basis for evaluation

16 Example Outcomes Conceptual understanding Students will be better able to solve simple conceptual problems Students will be better able to solve simple conceptual problems Students will be better able to solve out-of-context problems. Students will be better able to solve out-of-context problems.Attitude Students will be more likely to describe as an exciting career Students will be more likely to describe as an exciting career The percentage of students who transfer out of after taking will decrease. The percentage of students who transfer out of after taking will decrease.

17 Project Rationale Rationale is the narrative that provides the context for the project Rationale is the narrative that provides the context for the project  It’s the section that connects the “Statement of Goals and Outcomes” to the “Project Plan”

18 An Effective Rationale answers the following questions: What does the knowledge base say about your approach? What does the knowledge base say about your approach? Why is this problem important? Why is this problem important? What is the evidence that your proposed approach will solve the problem? What is the evidence that your proposed approach will solve the problem? What are the potential problems & limitations? What are the potential problems & limitations? Have you done prior work? If so, was it successful? Have you done prior work? If so, was it successful?

19 Project Evaluation Plan All projects require evaluation All projects require evaluation  All proposal require an evaluation plan During the project, formative evaluation: During the project, formative evaluation:  Monitors progress toward goals  Identifies problems At the end of the project, summative evaluation: At the end of the project, summative evaluation:  Tells you what you accomplished  Provides data for you to use in telling others

20 Evaluation Plan Get help at the beginning – in the proposal writing phase Get help at the beginning – in the proposal writing phase  Involve an expert evaluator  Consider an outside (independent) evaluator  Size of budget  Importance of objectivity

21 Evaluation Plan Provide details on tools & experimental design Provide details on tools & experimental design  Describe how  Students will be “surveyed”,  Faculty will be “asked”,  Grades will be “compared”  Indicate who will do these tasks  Indicate who will analyze and interpret the data  Consider confounding factors  Try to measure deeper learning  Collect demographic data on student populations

22 Dissemination Plan CCLI projects need to contribute to: CCLI projects need to contribute to:  The STEM education knowledge base  Building the STEM education community

23 Dissemination Plan Target and involve a specific sub- population – e.g., Those who teach similar courses at other locations Target and involve a specific sub- population – e.g., Those who teach similar courses at other locations  Ask them to review various products, data, and approaches  Work with them to organize  exchanges and listserves  Informal meeting at a conference or on-campus  Faculty development workshops (on- campus and at conferences) Explore beta test sites Explore beta test sites

24 Dissemination Plan Be specific in publication efforts Be specific in publication efforts Explore commercialization Explore commercialization Put material in a form suitable for the National Science Digital Library (NSDL) Put material in a form suitable for the National Science Digital Library (NSDL)

25 General Advice Use good style (clarity, organization, etc.) Use good style (clarity, organization, etc.) Reinforce your ideas Reinforce your ideas Give examples Give examples Provide appropriate level of detail Provide appropriate level of detail

26 General Advice Pay special attention to your Project Summary Pay special attention to your Project Summary  Summarize goals, rationale, methods, and evaluation and dissemination plans  Address intellectual merit and broader impacts  Explicitly and independently  Three paragraphs with headings: “Summary”“Summary” “Intellectual Merit”“Intellectual Merit” “Broader Impacts”“Broader Impacts”

27 General Advice Follow the solicitation and GPG Follow the solicitation and GPG Seek advice (PO, colleagues) Seek advice (PO, colleagues) Prepare credible budget Prepare credible budget Address prior funding when appropriate Address prior funding when appropriate Sell your ideas but don’t over promote Sell your ideas but don’t over promote Proofread the proposal Proofread the proposal “Tell a story” and turn a good idea into a competitive proposal “Tell a story” and turn a good idea into a competitive proposal

28 Conclusion Full presentation at: Read the solicitation! Read the GPG!