N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes Accommodation Decisions: Policy, Training, and Monitoring as Critical Aspects of an Objective Approach.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects General Advisory Committee December 8, 2006 Overview of.
Advertisements

What’s New with PARCC for ELA? January 30, 2014 Vincent Segalini.
Testing Accommodations for Students with Disabilities.
Special Test Accommodations Virginia Association of Test Directors 2008 Assessment Conference October 2008.
PARCC Read Aloud Decision Making
Guidelines for Using Supplemental Aids on State Assessments (Appendix D Exemplified) Training presented at Special Education Assessments TETN #9005 October.
Grade 3 Portfolio Implementation Guide Training for School Test Coordinators and Instructional Coaches NHCS Implementation Support Discussion Group Edmodo.
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
Where do we look for accommodation information for TAKS, TAKS Accommodated, & TAKS-M? Accommodation information for students who are assessed with TAKS.
PARCC Accommodation: Text-to-Speech, Screen Reader Version, ASL Video, Human Reader/Human Signer For the ELA/Literacy Assessment December 2014.
Introduction & Background Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO)
Connecticut Comprehensive System of Monitoring the use of Accommodations in Testing Connecticut Comprehensive System of Monitoring the use of Accommodations.
N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes Accommodation Policies and Score Comparability Issues Martha L. Thurlow University of Minnesota.
During state assessments, certain test administration procedures and materials may be provided to students based on their needs. In general, these procedures.
Clarification on determining if a student meets the criteria to receive a read aloud accommodation in one of the following formats: Human Reader Text-to-Speech.
National Center on Educational Outcomes N C E O How IEP Teams Make Assessment Accommodation Decisions: Rhode Island’s Research Findings.
N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes Helping Students Select and Use Test Accommodations Martha L. Thurlow Sandy Thompson University of Minnesota.
TEST ACCOMMODATIONS 2013 English Language Learners (ELLs) 1 Presented by: Leyda Sotolongo Title III Coordinator ESOL Department.
ACCOMMODATIONS STAAR STAAR Spanish STAAR Modified STAAR L or TELPAS
ACCOMMODATIONS for Students with Disabilities Taking STAAR, STAAR Spanish, STAAR Modified, STAAR L, or TELPAS TETN Event #10416 October 13, 2011 TEA Student.
2010 LAT (Linguistically Adapted Testing) 2010 Campus Test Coordinator Training LAT (Linguistically Adapted Testing) April 20, 2010 Trainer – John Thornell.
Program Overview: Focus- Assessment Bilingual Module 3 Presented by Marcee Camarillo Silvia Saldaña.
D E C E M B E R  S T U D E N T A S S E S S M E N T D I V I S I O N  T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Training on the LPAC Decision-Making.
Smarter Balanced Accommodations – Knowing and Using Allowed Resources Presenters: Donna Gearns Alicia Skelly 8/20/2014.
Martha Thurlow and Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes CEC Preconvention Workshop #4 April 21, 2010.
Challenges of Administering MI-Access To Students with Visual and Hearing Impairments Presenters: COLLETTE BAUMAN Supervisor, Michigan Department of Education-Low.
KEDC Special Education Regional Training Sheila Anderson, Psy.S
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Test Security and Special Populations. Test Security.
Alabama Alternate Assessment
Reading Grades 3 – 8 TAKS and TAKS Accommodated. Eligibility A test administrator may provide the dyslexia bundled accommodations to a student:  Not.
UPDATE ON ACCOMMODATIONS Lisa Mullins And Sonya Burnett Copyright 2010 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
A Principled Approach to Accountability Assessments for Students with Disabilities CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment Detroit, Michigan June.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
In the State-Required Assessment and Accountability Programs 703 KAR 5:070 1.
Killeen Independent School District Assessment & Accountability 1.
Region 4 ESC December 3,  Purpose ◦ provide guidance about the use of accommodations on TAKS, TAKS(Accommodated), TAKS-M, TELPAS, and LAT 
1 National Center on Educational Outcomes What’s so Difficult About Including Special Education Teachers and Their Students in Growth Models Used to Evaluate.
Slide 1 National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) High School Exit Exams: Performance, Validity and Use Martha L. Thurlow National Center on Educational.
Test Accommodations Students with Disabilities 2012 Presented by Janice Koblick, Curriculum Supervisor Exceptional Student Education 1.
Oklahoma School Testing Program (OSTP) Accommodation Overview.
PARCC Accessibility Features and Accommodations Manual Training for Parents Presented on November 20, 2014 Presented by the: Office of Special Education.
Suggested training for region, district, and campus professionals 9/24/2014Texas Education Agency – Student Assessment Division 1.
Testing Accommodations. Allowable Test Administration Procedures and Materials  Available to any student who regularly benefits from the use of these.
STAAR Decision Making Process for LPAC for Teachers.
STAAR 2012 Jamie Hicks and Christina Trotter Coordinators of Student Assessment Accommodations Training.
1 National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) Martha L. Thurlow Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Decision Making Considerations for Validity.
Special Ed. New Direction - Kathy Airhart and Joey Hassel  focus on embedded PD model combining sped and general PD  shifting towards performance based.
Update Accommodations SEPTEMBER 17, 2015 ASSMNT. FOR STUDENTS W/ DISABILITIES TETN #36603.
Colorado Accommodation Manual Part I Section I Guidance Section II Five-Step Process Welcome! Colorado Department of Education Exceptional Student Services.
Accommodations: Decide, Document, Monitor Carrie Perkis NCDPI Division of Accountability Services Conference on Exceptional Children November 2010.
2012 Testing Accommodations for Students with Disabilities "To give anything less than your best is the sacrifice the gift." -Steve Prefonataine.
STAAR Alternate is the state assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities.
Cindy Blair Director of Testing
Oral Administration Training
Claudia Alanis Director, Assessment & Accountability
American Institutes for Research
Ashlee Lara & Janet Tracy
Accessibility Features and Accommodations
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Laurene Christensen, Ph.D. Linda Goldstone, M.S.
STAAR Alternate is the state assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities.
Oral/Signed Administration Guidelines
Accommodations for Instruction & Assessment
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Accessibility Supports Training
Oral Administration Training
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Presentation transcript:

N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes Accommodation Decisions: Policy, Training, and Monitoring as Critical Aspects of an Objective Approach Martha L. Thurlow National Center on Educational Outcomes CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment Orlando, FL June 17, 2008

N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes The challenges in selecting assessment accommodations are many – they include: Use of evidence to judge the effectiveness and validity of accommodations Appropriate policy setting, with strong rationales about the validity of accommodations – when experimental studies have not been conducted or cannot be conducted Training of decision makers Monitoring of what actually happens to ensure that there is validity

N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes Summaries of Published Evidence Summaries available since 1999 (with spotty reviews before that) Tindal & Fuchs summary in 1999 NCEO summaries of ; ; Sireci, Scarpati, & Li summary of 2005 ( in Review of Educational Research ) The evidence basis for accommodations is very important – yet, does not answer all the policy questions.

N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes YearsNumber of Studies Average Per Year 1990 through through through through through through Number of Accommodations Studies

N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes Research Methods Number of Studies Method * ** Experimental or Quasi- experimental 21 (43%) 18 (56%) Review of extant data 17 (35%)6 (19%) Survey/Interview 7 (14%)5 (16%) Meta-analysis 2 (4%)0 (0%) IEP intervention 1 (2%)0 (0%) Product evaluation 1 (2%)0 (0%) Other (i.e., case studies, observation) 0 (0%)3 (9%) * From Johnstone, Altman, Thurlow, & Thompson (2006). ** From Zenisky & Sireci (2007).

N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes What is Studied? Extended time, oral administration are most often studies (followed by computer administration) Studying multiple accommodations at one time has fallen dramatically The most frequently allowed accommodations (large print, individual, small group, magnification, braille) are studied less often; accommodations used by small numbers of students are rarely studied

N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes Policy Setting Requires More Than Research Evidence Research evidence may focus on different standards from those of the state, or be based on different selection criteria for students using the accommodation States may find that conducting research is very difficult to do – given all the complexities that arise when doing this research

N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes Steps States Need to Take Examine data on use of accommodations Develop good policies, documenting the rationale for each accommodation Provide guidance for human suppliers of accommodations Provide training of teachers and decision makers Monitor on test days, and examine relation to decisions and instruction

N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes Examine Data Multiple Ways By category of disability By grade or school level By type of accommodation or specific accommodations of interest By other factors that may be important  Ethnicity  Socioeconomic status

N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes From NCEO analysis of APR data – Thurlow et al., 2008

N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes From NCEO analysis of APR data – Thurlow et al., 2008

N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes Policy Setting Think about the need for changes each year. States with Read Aloud Question Changes in Policy – comparing 2003 to 2005 and 2007 Number of States No changes since One change since Two changes since From NCEO Data Viewer at

N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes Constrain the Number of Students Using Certain Accommodations Massachusetts Texas Examples from States

N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes Test Administrator Reads Aloud ELA Comprehension Test: The test administrator reads the ELA Reading Comprehension test to a student. Note: Reading aloud the ELA Composition writing prompt, or the Mathematics, Science and Technology/Engineering, and/or History and Social Science tests is standard accommodation 16. The decision to use nonstandard accommodation 26 must be made separately from the decision to use standard accommodation The student has a specific disability that severely limits or prevents him or her from decoding text, or from comprehending decoded text, even after varied and repeated attempts to teach the student to do so. The student must be a virtual non-reader, not simply reading below grade level. 2.The student has access to printed materials only through a reader, and/or is provided with spoken text on audiotape, CD, video, or other electronic format during routine instruction, except while the student is actually being taught to decode. 3.The accommodation is documented in the student’s IEP or 504 plan, after the team has considered the conditions listed above and in Section C of this Chapter in determining whether the student is eligible for this accommodation. Special Instructions: a)All passages and test items must be read word-for-word, exactly as written. The test administrator may not provide assistance to the student regarding the meanings of words, intent of any test item, or responses to test items. The test administrator must read in a neutral tone, without emphasis on any terms, passages, or response options, and with no detectable changes in inflection. The test can be read aloud in one of the following ways, which must be specified in the IEP or 504 plan:  Test administrator reads entire test session (passages and test items) word-for-word exactly as written. OR  Test administrator reads selected words, phrases, or sentences as directed by the student. The student points to the word, phrase, or sentence that he or she needs read aloud. a)If the test is read aloud, it must be administered in a separate setting, either individually or to a small group (2-5 students). When reading aloud to a small group of students, follow the procedures outlined in the appendix. b)Reading aloud the ELA Reading Comprehension test to a student is nonstandard accommodation 26. Reading aloud other MCAS tests to a student is standard accommodation 16. Massachusetts – Read Aloud

N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes Eligibility for Dyslexia Bundled Accommodations A student who meets the following criteria is eligible to receive the three bundled accommodations on English or Spanish TAKS, including TAKS (Accommodated), reading tests at grades 3–6, or English TAKS, including TAKS (Accommodated), reading tests at grades 7 and 8. A student not receiving special education services must be identified with dyslexia. A student receiving special education services must either be identified with dyslexia or have a severe reading disability that exhibits the characteristics of dyslexia, causing the student to lack word- identification skills and to have difficulty reading words in isolation. The student must routinely receive accommodations in classroom instruction and testing that address the difficulties he or she has reading words in isolation. Authority for Decision For a student with dyslexia not receiving special education services who meets both criteria above, the decision to provide the bundled accommodations must be made either by the student’s placement committee as required by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 or by the committee of knowledgeable persons as outlined in The Dyslexia Handbook. In both of these cases, the committee’s decision must be documented in writing in accordance with district policies and procedures. Texas – Bundled Accommodations

N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes Number of States Figure 2. States with Written Guidelines for Access Assistants in 2003 and 2005

N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes Monitoring Accommodations Do decisions made by the IEP team get carried out on the day of testing? Do accommodations used during testing reflect – to the extent appropriate – accommodations that are used during instruction? Do accommodations get recorded properly on assessment forms? Etc!