July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 High-level Trigger Algorithm Development Ignacio Aracena for the SLAC ATLAS group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mayukh Das 1Louisiana Tech University For the 2004 D0SAR Workshop Activities with L3 and the Higgs By : Mayukh Das.
Advertisements

Freiburg Seminar, Sept Sascha Caron Finding the Higgs or something else ideas to improve the discovery ideas to improve the discovery potential at.
B Tagging with CMS Fabrizio Palla INFN Pisa B  Workshop Helsinki 29 May – 1 June 2002.
1 The ATLAS Missing E T trigger Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University.
Alain Romeyer - January Light higgs decay in SUSY cascade - Status report Introduction Trigger efficiency B tagging Jet calibration Invariant mass.
1 B-tagging meeting overview Li bo Shandong University.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern SM Higgs Discovery Channels ATLAS High Level Trigger Trigger & Physics Selection Higgs Channels: Physics Performance.
CMS High Level Trigger Selection Giuseppe Bagliesi INFN-Pisa On behalf of the CMS collaboration EPS-HEP 2003 Aachen, Germany.
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ Beauty 2005 in Assisi, June 2005 Sascha Caron for the DØ collaboration Tag beauty fast …
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
1  trigger optimization in CMS Tracker Giuseppe Bagliesi On behalf of  tracking group Workshop on B/tau Physics at LHC Helsinki, May 30 - June 1, 2002.
L. Perera LPC physics meeting 11/17/ Search for H/A →  Lalith Perera Rutgers University for Rutgers CMS Group Amit Lath, Keith Rose, Sunil Somalvar,
FPCP 2002, 05/16-18/2002 p. 1 Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityCDF Run II Status Status of CDF and Prospects Flavor Physics and CP Violation.
September 27, 2005FAKT 2005, ViennaSlide 1 B-Tagging and ttH, H → bb Analysis on Fully Simulated Events in the ATLAS Experiment A.H. Wildauer Universität.
Progress on H/Abb -> 4b’s channel for the FTK physics case ~ 4jets trigger w/ and w/o FTK ~ Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK.
Daniele Benedetti CMS and University of Perugia Chicago 07/02/2004 High Level Trigger for the ttH channel in fully hadronic decay at LHC with the CMS detector.
Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.
On the Trail of the Higgs Boson Meenakshi Narain.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
L3 Filtering: status and plans D  Computing Review Meeting: 9 th May 2002 Terry Wyatt, on behalf of the L3 Algorithms group. For more details of current.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
Tracking at the ATLAS LVL2 Trigger Athens – HEP2003 Nikos Konstantinidis University College London.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
Simulation Calor 2002, March. 27, 2002M. Wielers, TRIUMF1 Performance of Jets and missing ET in ATLAS Monika Wielers TRIUMF, Vancouver on behalf.
The Region of Interest Strategy for the ATLAS Second Level Trigger
17 April. 2005,APS meeting, Tampa,FloridaS. Bhattacharya 1 Satyaki Bhattacharya Beyond Standard Model Higgs Search at LHC.
September 30, 2004FTK meeting1 Making the FTK Physics Case M. Shochet 9/30/04.
HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis Studies on the High.
August 30, 2006 CAT physics meeting Calibration of b-tagging at Tevatron 1. A Secondary Vertex Tagger 2. Primary and secondary vertex reconstruction 3.
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
Vertex finding and B-Tagging for the ATLAS Inner Detector A.H. Wildauer Universität Innsbruck CERN ATLAS Computing Group on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
Simone Gennai SNS, INFN-Pisa1 Radion searches in CMS A first look to  hh G. Dewhirst, L. Fano, S. Gennai, S. Nikitenko.
Higgs Searches at Tevatron Makoto Tomoto 戸本 誠 Fermilab/Nagoya University On behalf of the DØ & CDF Collaborations Tsukuba, April 21 st, 2006.
B-Tagging Algorithms for CMS Physics
FIMCMS, 26 May, 2008 S. Lehti HIP Charged Higgs Project Preparative Analysis for Background Measurements with Data R.Kinnunen, M. Kortelainen, S. Lehti,
DPF2000, 8/9-12/00 p. 1Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityHiggs Searches in Run II at CDF Prospects for Higgs Searches at CDF in Run II DPF2000.
Physics at LHC Prague, 6-12 July, 2003 R. Kinnunen Helsinki Institute of Physics A/H ->  and H + ->  in CMS R. Kinnunen Physics at LHC Prague July 6.
Higgs Reach Through VBF with ATLAS Bruce Mellado University of Wisconsin-Madison Recontres de Moriond 2004 QCD and High Energy Hadronic Interactions.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
G Watts/UW Seattle2 SM Hidden Sector Phenomenology as complex as you wish Decay back to SM particles Scalar.
Study on search of a SM Higgs (120GeV) produced via VBF and decaying in two hadronic taus V.Cavasinni, F.Sarri, I.Vivarelli.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Performance of the ATLAS Trigger with Proton Collisions at the LHC John Baines (RAL) for the ATLAS Collaboration 1.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
Alain Romeyer - Sept Light Higgs search in SUSY cascades Introduction (Previous studies) Plans for this analysis Simulation chain Reconstruction.
B-Tagging Algorithms at the CMS Experiment Gavril Giurgiu (for the CMS Collaboration) Johns Hopkins University DPF-APS Meeting, August 10, 2011 Brown University,
Feasibility study of Higgs pair creation in gamma-gamma collider Hiroshima University Nozomi Maeda 19.April 2009.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
EPS Manchester Daniela Bortoletto Associated Production for the Standard Model Higgs at CDF D. Bortoletto Purdue University Outline: Higgs at the.
Living Long At the LHC G. WATTS (UW/SEATTLE/MARSEILLE) WG3: EXOTIC HIGGS FERMILAB MAY 21, 2015.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.
SEARCH FOR DIRECT PRODUCTION OF SUPERSYMMETRIC PAIRS OF TOP QUARKS AT √ S = 8 TEV, WITH ONE LEPTON IN THE FINAL STATE. Juan Pablo Gómez Cardona PhD Candidate.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
Marcello Barisonzi First results of AOD analysis on t-channel Single Top DAD 30/05/2005 Page 1 AOD on Single Top Marcello Barisonzi.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
Low Mass Standard Model Higgs Boson Searches at the Tevatron Andrew Mehta Physics at LHC, Split, Croatia, September 29th 2008 On behalf of the CDF and.
The Level-2 calorimeter status SLAC ATLAS Forum May
Using IP Chi-Square Probability
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
High Level Trigger Studies for the Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis
Presentation transcript:

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 High-level Trigger Algorithm Development Ignacio Aracena for the SLAC ATLAS group

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 2 Physics selection in the HLT New physics High-mass objects at low rates Background: QCD, electroweak Trigger on new physics Need strong background rejection power High signal efficiency ATLAS trigger system 3 Level trigger system 3 Level trigger system Level-1 identifies Region of Interest (RoI) Level-1 identifies Region of Interest (RoI) High-Level Trigger High-Level Trigger Driven by the RoI conceptDriven by the RoI concept Allowed Level-2 time budget 40msAllowed Level-2 time budget 40ms Event Filter improves resolution, ~4s latencyEvent Filter improves resolution, ~4s latency EF 200Hz L2 1kHz L1 75kHz Bunch crossing 40MHz

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 3 SLAC ATLAS HLT algorithm activities *Jet slice –Level-2 algorithm improvements –Online integration *Missing ET slice –Event Filter MET improvements –Level-2 MET development –Online integration *b-jet slice –New Level-2 b-tag algorithms *Tau slice –Online integration

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 4 Physics with jets and MET trigger Generic Supersymmetry signals contain large number of jets and MET Need Jets+MET trigger to reject QCD background from SUSY signal p p Example jets + MET in the final state high p T jets MET

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 5 Jet slice L1 JETROI T2CaloJet TrigJetRec time TrigCaloCellMaker L2 EF TrigCaloTowerMaker TrigJetHypo TrigL2JetHypo Level-1 : Jet RoI candidate using sum of calorimeter trigger towers High-Level trigger: Jet algorithm: Use calorimeter information only Data preparation in a given ( ,  )-window around L1 jet RoI position Iterative cone algorithm Calibration Jet hypothesis algorithm: Cut on jet ET Small Level-2 time budget <40ms! SLAC : Optimize L2 jet parameters, reduce processing time

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 6 Jet slice Optimized Level-2 jet algorithm parameters Reduced ( ,  )-window from 1.4x1.4 to 1.0x1.0 Reduced number of iterations from 5 to 3 in the cone algorithm  Reduce processing time by 32%  No significant loss in energy resolution  Presented at CHEP07 ( ATL-DAQ-CONF ) No. of iterations  Processing time (2GHz CPU) time (ms)

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 7 The Missing ET slice L2 EF L1 MET T2MissingET EFMissingET TrigL2MissingETHypo TrigEFMissingETHypo Level-1 : MET from sum of calorimeter trigger towers High-Level TriggerLevel-2: Not sufficient time to transfer full calorimeter data and compute MET in < 40ms Forward L1 MET result to the Event Filter Event Filter: Full calorimeter data available MET computation based on energy sums from: (i) the calorimeter front end read-out boards (FEB) (ii) individual calorimeter cells SLAC : investigate L2 MET trigger strategies, primary author of FEB readout

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 8 Missing ET in the Event Filter Original Missing ET in the Event Filter Use sum over FEBs or cells Uses the “RegionSelector” tool: Fill list of detector channels around the RoI Fill list of calorimeter cells through the RegionSelector event-by-event Improve EF MET algorithm speed: MET global quantity, does not fit in RoI concept. Do not use RegionSelector Load full list of calorimeter cells at initialization 90% faster for the FEB loop 50% smaller execution time for cell loop No impact on physics performance with RegionSelector w/o RegionSelector cell MET timing (2GHz CPU) FEB MET timing (2GHz CPU) time (ms) with RegionSelector w/o RegionSelector

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 9 Physics with b-jet and  triggers Supersymmetry Large tan  the 3 rd generation squarks are lightest, enhanced b-jet production, bbA 0 /H 0,A 0 /H 0 → bb Higgs Standard Model M H < 135GeV use ttH, H→bb VBF H →  Beyond SM Charged Higgs tt → bH ± bW,H ± →  gg →tbH ±, H ± → tb large tan , bbA 0 /H 0, A 0 /H 0 →  p p b-jets MET hep-ph/

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 10 b-jet slice New L2 b-tagger : Signed Impact Parameter Chi-Square Probability (IPChi2Prob): tag b-quarks based on the Impact parameter of tracks pointing to jets Good angular resolution and good Impact Parameter resolution needed for determining sign of the impact parameter Developed track jets at Level-2 which improves angular resolution by factor 2 with respect to Level-1 jet 

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 11 b-jet slice Level-2 Fast Secondary Vertex b-tagger Tracks belonging to a secondary vertex, Impact Parameter and phi are correlated: dca = Lsin(  trk –  SV ) Identify secondary B vertices by fitting the dca-phi distribution Build Neural Network with variables: number of tracks with dca/  > 2.0, mass, p T - fraction, vertex decay length Requires HLT beam spot (see R. Bartoldus’ talk) : Level-2 b-tag performance depends on beam spot shift Significant rejection improvement for efficiency <50%

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 12 HLT online integration Initial development of HLT algorithms uses the ATLAS offline framework (athena) Series of tests before a new HLT algorithm can run in the real system at Point1 First pass compares offline result with online emulator (athenaMT/PT) Technical runs: stress test for the HLT at Point1 using simulated physics events Monitor HLT performance online: measure algorithm timing, data collection time, rates, memory leaks SLAC: responsible for online integration of Jet slice, MET slice,  slice Example from technical run April 2008 Using simulated QCD dijet events Level-2 data collection time + algorithm processing time

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 13 Conclusions *SLAC HLT participation is well established within ATLAS *Our group has improved various HLT algorithms –Level-2 jet parameter optimization reduces the processing time without loss of resolution –New Level-2 b-taggers with improved efficiency and rejection –Fast MET computation at the Event Filter *We are also strongly involved in the HLT online integration *The SLAC HLT involvement meets our physics interest *Our expertise will be a good asset for the definition of the Trigger Menu