AFOSR MURI. Salem, MA. June 4, 2002. 1/10 Coordinated UAV Operations: Perspectives and New Results Vishwesh Kulkarni Joint Work with Jan De Mot, Sommer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Coverage in Wireless Sensor Network Phani Teja Kuruganti AICIP lab.
Advertisements

Markov Decision Process
1 University of Southern California Keep the Adversary Guessing: Agent Security by Policy Randomization Praveen Paruchuri University of Southern California.
Modeling Maze Navigation Consider the case of a stationary robot and a mobile robot moving towards a goal in a maze. We can model the utility of sharing.
Kick-off Meeting, July 28, 2008 ONR MURI: NexGeNetSci Distributed Coordination, Consensus, and Coverage in Networked Dynamic Systems Ali Jadbabaie Electrical.
U NIVERSITY OF M ASSACHUSETTS, A MHERST Department of Computer Science Solving POMDPs Using Quadratically Constrained Linear Programs Christopher Amato.
Markov Game Analysis for Attack and Defense of Power Networks Chris Y. T. Ma, David K. Y. Yau, Xin Lou, and Nageswara S. V. Rao.
SARSOP Successive Approximations of the Reachable Space under Optimal Policies Devin Grady 4 April 2013.
Optimal Policies for POMDP Presented by Alp Sardağ.
CompLACS Composing Learning for Artificial Cognitive Systems Year 2: Specification of scenarios.
Probabilistic Robotics
Topology Generation Suat Mercan. 2 Outline Motivation Topology Characterization Levels of Topology Modeling Techniques Types of Topology Generators.
Distributed Association Control in Shared Wireless Networks Krishna C. Garikipati and Kang G. Shin University of Michigan-Ann Arbor.
Markov Decision Processes
Mobile Assisted Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks N.B. Priyantha, H. Balakrishnan, E.D. Demaine, S. Teller MIT Computer Science Presenters: Puneet.
Game-Theoretic Approaches to Multi-Agent Systems Bernhard Nebel.
The Cat and The Mouse -- The Case of Mobile Sensors and Targets David K. Y. Yau Lab for Advanced Network Systems Dept of Computer Science Purdue University.
June 4, 2015 On the Capacity of a Class of Cognitive Radios Sriram Sridharan in collaboration with Dr. Sriram Vishwanath Wireless Networking and Communications.
In practice, we run into three common issues faced by concurrent optimization algorithms. We alter our model-shaping to mitigate these by reasoning about.
Data Transmission and Base Station Placement for Optimizing Network Lifetime. E. Arkin, V. Polishchuk, A. Efrat, S. Ramasubramanian,V. PolishchukA. EfratS.
Jie Gao Joint work with Amitabh Basu*, Joseph Mitchell, Girishkumar Stony Brook Distributed Localization using Noisy Distance and Angle Information.
Location Estimation in Sensor Networks Moshe Mishali.
1 University of Southern California Security in Multiagent Systems by Policy Randomization Praveen Paruchuri, Milind Tambe, Fernando Ordonez University.
8/22/20061 Maintaining a Linked Network Chain Utilizing Decentralized Mobility Control AIAA GNC Conference & Exhibit Aug. 21, 2006 Cory Dixon and Eric.
© 2005, it - instituto de telecomunicações. Todos os direitos reservados. Gerhard Maierbacher Scalable Coding Solutions for Wireless Sensor Networks IT.
1 Autonomous Controller Design for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles using Multi-objective Genetic Programming Gregory J. Barlow North Carolina State University.
Dr. Shankar Sastry, Chair Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences University of California, Berkeley.
Model-Driven Data Acquisition in Sensor Networks - Amol Deshpande et al., VLDB ‘04 Jisu Oh March 20, 2006 CS 580S Paper Presentation.
U NIVERSITY OF M ASSACHUSETTS, A MHERST Department of Computer Science Optimal Fixed-Size Controllers for Decentralized POMDPs Christopher Amato Daniel.
Multiagent Planning with Factored MDPs Carlos Guestrin Daphne Koller Stanford University Ronald Parr Duke University.
A Multi-Agent Learning Approach to Online Distributed Resource Allocation Chongjie Zhang Victor Lesser Prashant Shenoy Computer Science Department University.
Model-driven Data Acquisition in Sensor Networks Amol Deshpande 1,4 Carlos Guestrin 4,2 Sam Madden 4,3 Joe Hellerstein 1,4 Wei Hong 4 1 UC Berkeley 2 Carnegie.
A Decentralised Coordination Algorithm for Mobile Sensors School of Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton {rs06r2, fmdf08r, acr,
2002 MURI Minisymposium Cooperative Control of Distributed Autonomous Vehicles in Adversarial Environments 2002 MURI Minisymposium Ameesh Pandya Prof.
Decentralised Coordination through Local Message Passing Alex Rogers School of Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton
Aeronautics & Astronautics Autonomous Flight Systems Laboratory All slides and material copyright of University of Washington Autonomous Flight Systems.
CS Reinforcement Learning1 Reinforcement Learning Variation on Supervised Learning Exact target outputs are not given Some variation of reward is.
01/16/2002 Reliable Query Reporting Project Participants: Rajgopal Kannan S. S. Iyengar Sudipta Sarangi Y. Rachakonda (Graduate Student) Sensor Networking.
Decentralised Coordination of Mobile Sensors School of Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Ruben Stranders,
Conference Paper by: Bikramjit Banerjee University of Southern Mississippi From the Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
An algorithm for dynamic spectrum allocation in shadowing environment and with communication constraints Konstantinos Koufos Helsinki University of Technology.
The Coverage Problem in Wireless Ad Hoc Sensor Networks Supervisor: Prof. Sanjay Srivastava By, Rucha Kulkarni
Stochastic Routing Routing Area Meeting IETF 82 (Taipei) Nov.15, 2011.
Generalized and Bounded Policy Iteration for Finitely Nested Interactive POMDPs: Scaling Up Ekhlas Sonu, Prashant Doshi Dept. of Computer Science University.
De-Nian Young Ming-Syan Chen IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing Slide content thanks in part to Yu-Hsun Chen, University of Taiwan.
Software Multiagent Systems: Lecture 13 Milind Tambe University of Southern California
Dynamic Programming for Partially Observable Stochastic Games Daniel S. Bernstein University of Massachusetts Amherst in collaboration with Christopher.
MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation 1 Dynamic Sensor Resource Management for ATE MURI.
Approximate Dynamic Programming Methods for Resource Constrained Sensor Management John W. Fisher III, Jason L. Williams and Alan S. Willsky MIT CSAIL.
A Study of Central Auction Based Wholesale Electricity Markets S. Ceppi and N. Gatti.
Mobile Agent Migration Problem Yingyue Xu. Energy efficiency requirement of sensor networks Mobile agent computing paradigm Data fusion, distributed processing.
Minimal Spanning Tree Problems in What is a minimal spanning tree An MST is a tree (set of edges) that connects all nodes in a graph, using.
Information Theory for Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks (ITMANET): The FLoWS Project Competitive Scheduling in Wireless Networks with Correlated Channel State Ozan.
Optimal Placement of Energy Storage in Power Networks Christos Thrampoulidis Subhonmesh Bose and Babak Hassibi Joint work with 52 nd IEEE CDC December.
MDPs (cont) & Reinforcement Learning
© 2009 Ilya O. Ryzhov 1 © 2008 Warren B. Powell 1. Optimal Learning On A Graph INFORMS Annual Meeting October 11, 2009 Ilya O. Ryzhov Warren Powell Princeton.
The set of SE models include s those that are BE. It further includes models that include identical distributions over the subject agent’s action observation.
We aim to exploit cognition to maximize network performance What is the side information at a cognitive node? What is the best encoding scheme given this.
1 Chapter 17 2 nd Part Making Complex Decisions --- Decision-theoretic Agent Design Xin Lu 11/04/2002.
Distributed Optimization Yen-Ling Kuo Der-Yeuan Yu May 27, 2010.
- A Maximum Likelihood Approach Vinod Kumar Ramachandran ID:
1 Markov Decision Processes Finite Horizon Problems Alan Fern * * Based in part on slides by Craig Boutilier and Daniel Weld.
Keep the Adversary Guessing: Agent Security by Policy Randomization
Near-optimal Observation Selection using Submodular Functions
Traveling Salesman Problems Motivated by Robot Navigation
Analytics and OR DP- summary.
Wireless Sensor Network Architectures
Towards Next Generation Panel at SAINT 2002
MURI Kickoff Meeting Randolph L. Moses November, 2008
Introduction of new service, Part II Summary
Presentation transcript:

AFOSR MURI. Salem, MA. June 4, /10 Coordinated UAV Operations: Perspectives and New Results Vishwesh Kulkarni Joint Work with Jan De Mot, Sommer Gentry, Tom Schouwenaars, Vladislav Gavrilets, and Prof. Eric Feron at the Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems, MIT. AFOSR MURI ONR YIA

AFOSR MURI. Salem, MA. June 4, /10 Efficient multi-agent operations require robust, optimal coordination policies. UAV specifications constrain deployable coordination policies. How may we improve our understanding of these constraints? How may we use it to synthesize more efficient coordination policies? Overview We view spatial distribution of the UAVs as a key factor and present original results concerning the UAV separations and the UAV placements. Coordinated Path Planning Surveillance Number of UAVs Efficiency = ??

AFOSR MURI. Salem, MA. June 4, /10 Coordinated Path Planning (CPP) Questions What is the spatial distribution under an optimal policy? We have characterized the separation bounds. How many UAVs are needed?  We do not know the full answer yet! CPP Problem Setting UAVs need to go from a point s to a point t. Environment is dynamic and uncertain. UAVs cooperate by sharing the acquired local information. UAVs have limited resources. GOAL: Optimize the traversal efficiency.

AFOSR MURI. Salem, MA. June 4, /10 Related Past Works We present new results in a coordinated target acquisition setting using DP. Multi-Agent Exploration of Unknown Environments Probabilistic map building of Burgard et al [2002] uses deterministic value iteration to determine the next optimal observation point. The market architecture of Zlot et al [2002] auctions off the next optimal observation points obtained by solving a TSP. The end goal is spanning rather than CPP. CPP as Multi-Agent MDPs Boutilier et al [2000]. We consider partially observable MDPs. Greedy policy pursuit-evasion games of Hespanha et al [2002]. known region new region agent unknown region

AFOSR MURI. Salem, MA. June 4, /10 Our CPP Problem Terrain is mapped into regions having payoffs. Terrain traversal becomes graph traversal. UAVs share local information. Partially known, uncertain environment On-board sensors reduce uncertainty in a direction dependent manner. Lookahead link costs are deterministic, others i.i.d. Goal: Find a path for each agent that minimizes the expected aggregate cost.

AFOSR MURI. Salem, MA. June 4, /10 The CPP Separation Results G 7, infinite horizon, discount factor  = 0.8 Conjecture 1: The UAV separation is bounded in Extra nodes should not affect the separation adversely. Conjecture 2: The UAV separation is bounded in in a pair-wise sense. Conjecture 1 should hold pair-wise in the n-agent setting. Cluster Separation Lemma Using optimal paths for two agents in, configurations,, and do not evolve into configurations with l > 2. The UAV separation is bounded in Communication power, hierarchy tier sizes

AFOSR MURI. Salem, MA. June 4, /10 Surveillance as CPP Surveillance Problem Setting Terrain as regions with dynamic, uncertain payoffs. UAVs face dynamic, uncertain threats. Limited communication capacity and efficiency. Efficiency decreases with distance. UAVs cooperate by repositioning and handoffs. Goal: Maximize the net minimal spare UAV capacity. Questions What is the spatial distribution under an optimal policy? Characterized by the separation results. How many UAVs are needed?  We do not know the full answer yet! efficiency SNR

AFOSR MURI. Salem, MA. June 4, /10 Related Efficiency Results capacity … Gupta-Kumar [2000] capacity … Grossglauser-Tse [2000] Dumb Antennas … Viswanath et al [2002] Space-Time Codes … Tarokh et al [2000] Commonalities with Cellular Network Concepts i.i.d. uniformly distributed payoffs path loss decrease in efficiency How many Network Capacity Cellular network understanding has promise in the UAV setting. Techniques to exploit the UAV mobility

AFOSR MURI. Salem, MA. June 4, /10 Future Directions probability link cost 1 Extensions for larger and heterogeneous clusters  Dynamic program modifications More incremental on-board information gathering  Gradual link cost change from i.i.d. to deterministic  Sets of possible link cost distributions Separation and efficiency properties for large scale systems  Curse of dimensionality  Neuro-Dynamic programming for approximate solutions To add or not to add (a UAV) …  Brute force iterative DP-based solution  Binary search for an optimum number efficiency per UAV number of UAVs ??

AFOSR MURI. Salem, MA. June 4, /10 Questions ?? Joint work being done at MIT with Prof. Eric Feron’s group, supported by his AFOSR MURI and ONR Young Investigator Award grants. Thank You !