Progress on jet trigger response functions FTK Physics Case Meeting 06/16/05 Erik Brubaker University of Chicago.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
Advertisements

Jet Slice Status Report Ricardo Gonçalo (LIP) and David Miller (Chicago) For the Jet Trigger Group Trigger General Meeting – 9 July 2014.
H/Abb -> 4b’s process & Multi-Et-Threshold Study for 4jet Trigger Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK Meeting on July 13 th, 2006.
Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Skeleton outline for the physics case document M. Shochet December 15, 2005.
1  trigger optimization in CMS Tracker Giuseppe Bagliesi On behalf of  tracking group Workshop on B/tau Physics at LHC Helsinki, May 30 - June 1, 2002.
Status Analysis pp -> D s D s0 (2317) Overview Reconstruction Some QA plots Figure of merit First approach/strategy.
FTK Studies: H  hh  bbbb FTK Physics Case Meeting 11/03/05 Erik Brubaker University of Chicago.
Simulation Work at Nevis Jovan Mitrevski Columbia University DØ Workshop July 10, 2002.
Update on Tools FTK Meeting 06/06/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.
Progress on jet trigger response functions FTK Physics Case Meeting 04/21/05 Erik Brubaker University of Chicago.
Update on H/Abb -> 4b’s process (4jet Trigger) Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK Meeting on Sep. 7 th, 2006.
Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 High-level Trigger Algorithm Development Ignacio Aracena for the SLAC ATLAS group.
Saclay, 04 / 11 / 2002 E. Perez 1 Simulation of the performances of the upgraded L1Cal  Short reminder  Performances (jets) (see Jovan’s talk for electron.
Top Trigger Strategy in ATLASWorkshop on Top Physics, 18 Oct Patrick Ryan, MSU Top Trigger Strategy in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics Grenoble.
Progress on FTK Studies FTK Physics Case Meeting 07/20/05 Erik Brubaker University of Chicago.
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
Developments with the Cone Algorithm in Run II John Krane Iowa State University MC Workshop Oct , Fermilab Part I: Data vs MC, interpreted as physics.
Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)
Update FTK Meeting 07/13/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.
Physics Studies Update FTK Meeting 02/23/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.
Progress on B-tagging Efficiency Monica Dunford May 22 nd, 2007.
STAR J/  Simulations for RUN III Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Analysis Meeting at BNL October 23, 2002.
H  FTK update Catalin, Tony FTK meeting, 9/7/2006.
Update on H  studies Catalin and Tony FTK meeting, July 13, 2006.
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
FTK update H→  Tony, Catalin By speeding up/adding rejection at LVL2, we can have a higher rate coming in from LVL1. Therefore some of the LVL1 threshold.
Update Apr 24, 2007 Erik Brubaker FTK meeting. April 24, 2007FTK Meeting2 LVL1/LVL2 jet triggers Set trigger thresholds according to TDR scheme. E.g.,
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
Status: WW,ZZ->H->  Catalin, Kevin, Tony, Dovid.
Update FTK Meeting 05/02/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.
Jet Reconstruction and Calibration in Athena US ATLAS Software Workshop BNL, 27/08/03 Ambreesh Gupta, for the JetRec Group University of Chicago Outline:
LHCC Review, CERN, 19/10/99Paul Bright-Thomas, for Alan Watson 1 LVL1 Calorimeter Algorithm Updates Changes since the TDR: Greater “integration” of e/
2004 Xmas MeetingSarah Allwood WW Scattering at ATLAS.
Progress on H/Abb -> 4b’s channel for the FTK physics case ~ 4jets Trigger w/ and w/o FTK ~ Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK.
A statistical test for point source searches - Aart Heijboer - AWG - Cern june 2002 A statistical test for point source searches Aart Heijboer contents:
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
PULSAR Specifications for RECES and ISOLIST ● Zeroth order start on “exploring” how a PULSAR scheme might look for isolation trigger and RECES ● Philosophy.
CaloTopoCluster Based Energy Flow and the Local Hadron Calibration Mark Hodgkinson June 2009 Hadronic Calibration Workshop.
Simone Gennai SNS, INFN-Pisa1 Radion searches in CMS A first look to  hh G. Dewhirst, L. Fano, S. Gennai, S. Nikitenko.
1 Silke Duensing DØ Analysis Status NIKHEF Annual Scientific Meeting Analysing first D0 data  Real Data with:  Jets  Missing Et  Electrons 
PESAsim – the e/  analysis framework Validation of the framework First look at a trigger menu combining several signatures Short-term plans Mark Sutton.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Missing Et Before and After Shutdown Yuri Gershtein.
Study on search of a SM Higgs (120GeV) produced via VBF and decaying in two hadronic taus V.Cavasinni, F.Sarri, I.Vivarelli.
Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of photon reconstruction efficiency in H  events Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
QCD Background Estimation From Data Rob Duxfield, Dan Tovey University of Sheffield.
Hardeep Bansil (University of Birmingham) on behalf of L1Calo collaboration ATLAS UK Meeting, Royal Holloway January 2011 Argonne Birmingham Cambridge.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
Dijet Mass and Calibration1 H C A L Z(700) Data and Calibration Dan Green Fermilab June, 2001.
10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.
Background Shape Study for the ttH, H  bb Channel Catrin Bernius First year talk 15th June 2007 Background Shape Study for the ttH 0, H 0  bb Channel.
Bc → J/   Lifetime measurement Use 6.7 fb -1 and try two independent approaches Selection 1: no dependence of selection on decay time Fit fixes bkgd.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
Photon Reconstruction Efficiencies in Higgs → γγ Events Neil Cooper-Smith RHUL ATLAS UK Higgs Meeting - Durham 11/01/07.
Photon purity measurement on JF17 Di jet sample using Direct photon working Group ntuple Z.Liang (Academia Sinica,TaiWan) 6/24/20161.
Upsilon production and μ-tagged jets in DØ Horst D. Wahl Florida State University (DØ collaboration) 29 April 2005 DIS April to 1 May 2005 Madison.
More technical description:
Performance of jets algorithms in ATLAS
2vtx tagged dijets mass resolution study
SLOPE: A MATLAB Revival
Physics Studies Update
J/Y Simulations for Trigger
Semileptonic ttH(Hbb) studies at UCL
Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of Chicago
Higgs  update Catalin and Tony May 22, 2007
Presentation transcript:

Progress on jet trigger response functions FTK Physics Case Meeting 06/16/05 Erik Brubaker University of Chicago

June 16, 2005FTK Physics Case Meeting2 Reminder: Purpose Making the physics case for FTK means studying signal and background trigger rates for several processes. ATLAS full simulation is very slow. Solution: use fully simulated events to parameterize the L1 jet trigger response vs ATLFAST jet p T. Then all the various processes for physics studies can be studied using ATLFAST.

June 16, 2005FTK Physics Case Meeting3 Some definitions Dijet samples: –J1: 17 < p T < 35. –J2: 35 < p T < 70. –J3: 70 < p T < 140. –J4: 140 < p T < 280. –J5: 280 < p T < 560. –J6: 560 < p T < –J7: 1120 < p T < –J8: 2240 < p T. Cone jets –R=0.4 –Seed > 2 GeV ATLFAST jets –Cone 0.4 –Seed > 1.5 GeV? L1 jets –8 x 8 trigger towers –|  | < 2.6 L1 taus –1 x 2 towers (EM), 2 x 2 towers (HAD) –Isolation EM < 2 GeV, HAD < 2 GeV.

June 16, 2005FTK Physics Case Meeting4 Response plot: change 4x4 to 8x8 Better resolution

June 16, 2005FTK Physics Case Meeting5 Zoom out Saturation effects: any saturated trigger element  pinned cluster energy. Some code missing… Second band of response not understood. Under investigation.

June 16, 2005FTK Physics Case Meeting6 Parameterize the response L1 E T for slices of ATLFAST p T

June 16, 2005FTK Physics Case Meeting7 Functional Form Use Landau function for low-p T jets, Gaussian for high-p T jets. Quadratic dependence of Gaussian mean, width on jet p T. Fixed parameters for Landau, slowly varying with jet p T. See function sent via More technical details available upon request.

June 16, 2005FTK Physics Case Meeting8 Quality of Fit Not quantitative yet. A few trouble spots. Concentrate on regions of most importance— feedback!

June 16, 2005FTK Physics Case Meeting9 How to use it—not so simple! For a 2-jet trigger, with thresholds c 1 and c 2. Then what? How to get probability for event to pass a set of triggers? –I’ll think about this and try to supply a prescription. float probJetPasses[MAXATLJET][2]; for (int i = 0 ; i < nAtlJet ; i++) { probJetPasses[i][0] = TrigProb(ptAtlJet[i],c1); probJetPasses[i][1] = TrigProb(ptAtlJet[i],c2); }

June 16, 2005FTK Physics Case Meeting10 Tau trigger response Parallel question: how do ATLFAST jets fire tau triggers. Tau trigger has isolation cuts: –EM 12-tower ring. –Had 12-tower ring. Need to rerun trigger simulation with looser energy and iso requirements to form an RoI. Parameterize energy response, isolation separately? Correlated? Need input from those working on taus.

June 16, 2005FTK Physics Case Meeting11 Plan before next time Parameterize tau trigger energy response to jets, and efficiency of isolation requirements. Improve jet trigger energy parameterization as necessary. Understand how to go from P(jet triggers | ATLpt, L1threshold) to P(event triggers | [list of jets],[list of thresholds]). Start work on H  hh  bbbb process study.