Center for Space Environment Modeling Ward Manchester University of Michigan Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory SHINE July.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Observational evidence of a magnetic flux rope eruption associated with the X3 flare on 2002 July 15 Liu Yu Solar Seminar, 2003 June 16.
Advertisements

Lecture 9 Prominences and Filaments Filaments are formed in magnetic loops that hold relatively cool, dense gas suspended above the surface of the Sun,"
1 A New Model of Solar Flare Trigger Mechanism Kanya Kusano (Hiroshima University) Collaboration with T.Maeshiro (Hiroshima Univ.) T.Yokoyama (Univ. of.
Observations on Current Sheet and Magnetic Reconnection in Solar Flares Haimin Wang and Jiong Qiu BBSO/NJIT.
Phillip Chamberlin University of Colorado Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics (LASP) (303)
The magnetic nature of solar flares Paper by E.R. Priest & T.G. Forbes Review presented by Hui Song.
The Relationship Between CMEs and Post-eruption Arcades Peter T. Gallagher, Chia-Hsien Lin, Claire Raftery, Ryan O. Milligan.
TRACE and RHESSI observations of the failed eruption of the magnetic flux rope Tomasz Mrozek Astronomical Institute University of Wrocław.
Lecture 4 The Formation and Evolution of CMEs. Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) Appear as loop like features that breakup helmet streamers in the corona.
CME/Flare Mechanisms Solar “minimum” event this January For use to VSE must be able to predict CME/flare Spiro K. Antiochos Naval Research Laboratory.
A flare compilation Lots of people including Louise Harra, Lidia van Driel Gesztelyi, Chris Goff, Sarah Matthews, Len Culhane, Cristina Mandrini, Pascal.
Magnetic Reconnection Across the HCS Mark Moldwin UM and Megan Cartwright UC-Berkeley Isradynamics April 2010 With thanks to Mark Linton at NRL Linton.
Hard X-ray Production in a Failed Filament Eruption David, Alexander, Rui Liu and Holly R., Gilbert 2006 ApJ 653, L719 Related Paper: Ji. H. et al., 2003.
A full view of EIT waves Chen, P.F., Fang, C. & Shibata, K. ApJ, 2005, 622, Solar seminar Shiota.
General Properties Absolute visual magnitude M V = 4.83 Central temperature = 15 million 0 K X = 0.73, Y = 0.25, Z = 0.02 Initial abundances: Age: ~ 4.52.
Nanoflares and MHD turbulence in Coronal Loop: a Hybrid Shell Model Giuseppina Nigro, F.Malara, V.Carbone, P.Veltri Dipartimento di Fisica Università della.
STEREO AND SPACE WEATHER Variable conditions in space that can have adverse effects on human life and society Space Weather: Variable conditions in space.
Chip Manchester, Fang Fang, Bill Abbett, Bart van der Holst Patterns of Large- Scale Flux Emegence Patterns of Large- Scale Flux Emegence.
Modeling the Magnetic Field Evolution of the December Eruptive Flare Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Simulation of Flux Emergence from the Convection Zone Fang Fang 1, Ward Manchester IV 1, William Abbett 2 and Bart van der Holst 1 1 Department of Atmospheric,
Chip Manchester 1, Fang Fang 1, Bart van der Holst 1, Bill Abbett 2 (1)University of Michigan (2)University of California Berkeley Study of Flux Emergence:
Two energy release processes for CMEs: MHD catastrophe and magnetic reconnection Yao CHEN Department of Space Science and Applied Physics Shandong University.
Vincent Surges Advisors: Yingna Su Aad van Ballegooijen Observations and Magnetic Field Modeling of a flare/CME event on 2010 April 8.
Understanding Magnetic Eruptions on the Sun and their Interplanetary Consequences A Solar and Heliospheric Research grant funded by the DoD MURI program.
Rapid Changes in the Longitudinal Magnetic Field Associated with the July gamma -ray Flare Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Haimin Wang, Valentyna Abramenko,
Chapter 7 The Sun. Solar Prominence – photo by SOHO spacecraft from the Astronomy Picture of the Day site link.
Ward Manchester University of Michigan Coupling of the Coronal and Subphotospheric Magnetic Field in Active Regions by Shear Flows Driven by The Lorentz.
Kathy Reeves Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Terry Forbes University of New Hampshire Partitioning of energy in a loss-of-equilibrium CME model.
High Altitude Observatory (HAO) – National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) The National Center for Atmospheric Research is operated by the University.
Center for Space Environment Modeling W. Manchester 1, I. Roussev, I.V. Sokolov 1, 1 University of Michigan AGU Berkeley March.
The Effect of Sub-surface Fields on the Dynamic Evolution of a Model Corona Goals :  To predict the onset of a CME based upon reliable measurements of.
Photospheric Sources of Very Fast (>1100km/s) Coronal Mass Ejections Recent studies show that only very fast CMEs (> 1100 km/s) are capable of producing.
Twist & writhe of kink-unstable magnetic flux ropes I flux rope: helicity sum of twist and writhe: kink instability: twist  and writhe  (sum is constant)
Physical analogies between solar chromosphere and earth’s ionosphere Hiroaki Isobe (Kyoto University) Acknowledgements: Y. Miyoshi, Y. Ogawa and participants.
The Sun and the Heliosphere: some basic concepts…
Living in a Star Sarah Gibson High Altitude Observatory / NCAR.
Beijing UniversityTuesday 18-May-2010 Quiescent Prominence Instabilities Hinode/SOT and AIA Explorations Thomas Berger Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics.
Chromospheric Magnetic Reconnection from an Observer’s Point of View Jongchul Chae Seoul National University, Korea.
Three-dimensional MHD simulation of a flux rope driven CME Manchester IV, W.B., Gombosi, T.I., Roussev, I., De Zeeuw, D.L., Sokolov, I.V., Powell, K.G.,
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Long-term development of solar corona in build-up to the SEP events of 21 April 2002 and 24 August 2002 A. J. Coyner, D. Alexander,
Space Science MO&DA Programs - September Page 1 SS It is known that the aurora is created by intense electron beams which impact the upper atmosphere.
Evolution of Emerging Flux and Associated Active Phenomena Takehiro Miyagoshi (GUAS, Japan) Takaaki Yokoyama (NRO, Japan)
Partially Ionized Plasma Effect in Dynamic Solar Atmosphere Naoki Nakamura 2015/07/05 Solar Seminar.
3D simulations of solar emerging flux ISOBE Hiroaki Plasma seminar 2004/04/28.
Current Sheets from WL and UV data: open questions Alessandro Bemporad INAF – Arcetri Astrophysical Observatory 1° ISSI Group Meeting October 23-27, 2006,
A comparison of CME-associated atmospheric waves observed in coronal (Fe XII 195A) and chromospheric ( He I 10830A) lines Holly R. Gilbert, Thomas E. Holzer,
II. MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS (Space Climate School, Lapland, March, 2009) Eric Priest (St Andrews)
Simulation Study of Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetotail and Solar Corona Zhi-Wei Ma Zhejiang University & Institute of Plasma Physics Beijing,
Observations and nonlinear force-free field modeling of active region Y. Su, A. van Ballegooijen, B. W. Lites, E. E. DeLuca, L. Golub, P. C. Grigis,
III. APPLICATIONS of RECONNECTION Yohkoh Bright Pts Loops Holes A magnetic world T=few MK 1. Coronal Heating.
SHINE Formation and Eruption of Filament Flux Ropes A. A. van Ballegooijen 1 & D. H. Mackay 2 1 Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge,
A Numerical Study of the Breakout Model for Coronal Mass Ejection Initiation P. MacNeice, S.K. Antiochos, A. Phillips, D.S. Spicer, C.R. DeVore, and K.
Shock heating by Fast/Slow MHD waves along plasma loops
WG1-1: Sub-surface Structure and Evolution Motivation: A research program on space weather that ignores the sub-photospheric evolution of magnetic fields.
Observations –Morphology –Quantitative properties Underlying Physics –Aly-Sturrock limit Present Theories/Models Coronal Mass Ejections (CME) S. K. Antiochos,
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Spring, 2012 Copyright © The Sun: Magnetic Structure Feb. 16, 2012.
On Coronal Mass Ejections and Configurations of the Ambient Magnetic Field Yang Liu Stanford University 3/17/ COSPAR 2008.
What we can learn from active region flux emergence David Alexander Rice University Collaborators: Lirong Tian (Rice) Yuhong Fan (HAO)
Axel Brandenburg & Jörn Warnecke NorditaStockholm  loop emergence –Buoyant rise –Many scale heights –Twist needed Dynamo –bi-helical field Emergence.
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
Coronal Mass Ejection: Initiation, Magnetic Helicity, and Flux Ropes. L. Boundary Motion-Driven Evolution Amari, T., Luciani, J. F., Aly, J. J., Mikic,
Helicity Thinkshop 2009, Beijing Asymmetry of helicity injection in emerging active regions L. Tian, D. Alexander Rice University, USA Y. Liu Yunnan Astronomical.
Ward Manchester University of Michigan
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
Wave heating of the partially-ionised solar atmosphere
From the Convection Zone to the Heliosphere
Phillip Chamberlin Solar Flares (303) University of Colorado
Abstract We simulate the twisting of an initially potential coronal flux tube by photospheric vortex motions. The flux tube starts to evolve slowly(quasi-statically)
Preflare State Rust et al. (1994) 太陽雑誌会.
Ron Moore and Alphonse Sterling
Presentation transcript:

Center for Space Environment Modeling Ward Manchester University of Michigan Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory SHINE July 11, 2005 Kona, Hawaii The Source of Magnetic Shear That Drives CMEs

Center for Space Environment Modeling Velocity and Magnetic Shear in AR Source of the Halloween Events  Velocity Shear Yang et al. 2004, ApJ 617 L151, Magnetic Shear Liu et al ApJ 622, 722

Center for Space Environment Modeling Magnetic Shear Indicated by Ha Filaments  AR 9236

Center for Space Environment Modeling Magnetic Shear in the Corona seen by TRACE  AR 9026 before and after a CME  Liu et al. 2005, ApJ 622, 722

Center for Space Environment Modeling Magnetic Shear in the Corona: X-Ray Sigmoids  Moore et al. 2001, ApJ 552, 833

Center for Space Environment Modeling CME Models Including Photospheric Shear Magnetic Arcade Models  Imposed shearing of foot points with magnetic reconnect at the base of the arcade (Mikic 1988, Mikic and Linker 1994, Choe and Lee 1996, Amari 2003)  Break-out model: Imposed shearing motions and reconnection above the arcade in a quadruple system

Center for Space Environment Modeling Emergence of a 3D flux rope  Manchester et al. 2004, ApJ 610, 588 Initial state from Fan 2001, ApJ 554 L111

Center for Space Environment Modeling Flux Rope Emerging From the Convection Zone into the Corona  Initial state from Fan (2001)  Buoyant section of the flux rope reduced by a factor of two

Center for Space Environment Modeling Spontaneous Shearing Motions  Opposite sides of the flux rope move in opposite directions as the flux rope expands.  Motions are driven by the Lorentz force!

Center for Space Environment Modeling Tension component of the Lorentz Force Drives the Shearing!!  Shearing motions transport Bx flux into the expanding portion of the flux rope and tends to return Bx to constant values along field lines to restore force balance  Loss of equilibrium occurs from a shearing catastrophe when the field traverses many pressure scale heights and Bx can not be equilibrated

Center for Space Environment Modeling

Center for Space Environment Modeling Eruption of a Magnetic Field Line The field line locally eruption where the field line is being sheared and propagates as a shear Alfven wave along the field line.

Center for Space Environment Modeling Shearing motions are a transport process! Axial Flux Transport Energy Transport (Poynting Flux)

Center for Space Environment Modeling Comparison of Shear Velocity The image on the left, the shear velocity at the mid-plane of the simulation is shown. On the right, Doppler velocity maps of active regions at the limb made with SUMER Chae et al. 2000, ApJ 533, 535,

Center for Space Environment Modeling Formation of a Sigmoid Current Sheet To the left, an iso-surface of current density and field lines are shown over the photosphere colored to show Bz. To the right, observations of X-ray sigmoids by Moore et al. (2001)

Center for Space Environment Modeling Conclusions  Shearing motions are an inevitable consequence of the Lorentz force that arises as the magnetic field expands in a highly stratified atmosphere which naturally explains:  Coincidence of the magnetic neutral line and the velocity neutral line  Impulsive nature of shearing in newly emerged flux  Magnitude of the shear velocity in the photosphere, chromosphere and corona that occur at a characteristic fraction of the local Alfven speed.  The large scale pattern of shear in active regions which increases with proximity to the neutral line  Shearing motions transport axial flux into expanding portion of the flux rope and strongly couple the low  corona to the high  photosphere and below  The eruption of the flux rope and arcade occur with shearing motions and reconnection explains CMEs and flares  Multiple (homologous) eruptions from arcades that occur as a slow build up and expansion followed by eruption  Formation of a sigmoid shaped current-sheet  The force-free paradigm is incorrect. With a more complete model of magnetic field traversing a large range of plasma beta, the ad hoc application of shearing motions can be put to rest

Center for Space Environment Modeling Fundamental Assumptions  The Sun possesses a gravitational field that results in large pressure stratification of the atmosphere  Non-force-free magnetic structures pass that through the photosphere into the corona to form active regions are larger than pressure scale height at the photosphere (140 km)  Magnetic field possess a horizontal axial component in addition to an azimuthal component  The Lorentz force can be represented by (curl B) X B  Applies to arcades and flux ropes

Center for Space Environment Modeling

Center for Space Environment Modeling

Center for Space Environment Modeling Shear-Driven Arcade Eruption